Last modified by Artur K. on 2026/05/29 14:28

From version 1.13
edited by Helena K.
on 2026/01/15 15:17
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 1.8
edited by Helena K.
on 2026/01/15 15:12
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -127,40 +127,51 @@
127 127  The replacement of a reference with a different reference has the same impact for every artefact.
128 128  
129 129  |(% colspan="3" %)**ALL ARTEFACTS**
130 -|(% style="width:492px" %)**Type of change**|(% style="width:441px" %)**Impact**|**Comments**
131 -|(% style="width:492px" %)(((
132 -**Replacement of a child artefact having a different version, but same id and Agency**
133 -)))|(% style="width:441px" %)(((
134 -**The child artefact version change is replicated in the parent artefact**
130 +|**Type of change**|**Impact**|**Comments**
131 +|(((
132 +**Replacement of a child artefact having a different version, but same id and**
133 +
134 +**Agency**
135 135  )))|(((
136 +**The child artefact version change is replicated in the**
137 +
138 +**parent artefact**
139 +)))|(((
136 136  If a child artefact (e.g. a Code List) has a minor version change, then the parent artefact (e.g. a Concept Scheme) should also have a minor version change.
141 +
137 137  If there are several child artefact version changes, the most severe impact is replicated in the parent artefact. For example, if two Code Lists have minor changes, and one Code List has a major change at the same time, the parent Concept Scheme has a major version change
138 138  )))
139 -|(% style="width:492px" %)(((
140 -**Replacement of a referenced child artefact having a different id or Agency**
141 -)))|(% style="width:441px" %)**The parent artefact version impact depends on the backward/ forward compatibility as shown in the tables above**|Technically, the child artefact is not considered to be related to the previous child artefact. It needs to be checked whether exchange contracts can still be guaranteed (backward/forward compatibility principle)
144 +|(((
145 +**Replacement of a referenced child artefact having a**
142 142  
147 +**different id or Agency**
148 +)))|**The parent artefact version impact depends on the backward/ forward compatibility as shown in the tables above**|Technically, the child artefact is not considered to be related to the previous child artefact. It needs to be checked whether exchange contracts can still be guaranteed (backward/forward compatibility principle)
149 +
143 143  ==== b. Addition or removal of referenced artefacts ====
144 144  
145 -|(% colspan="3" style="width:876px" %)**CONCEPT SCHEME (CS)**
146 -|(% style="width:845px" %)**Type of change**|(% style="width:156px" %)**Impact**|(% style="width:1071px" %)**Comments**
147 -|(% style="width:845px" %)(((
148 -**Addition or removal of a child Code List**
149 -)))|(% style="width:156px" %)**Minor: N.+**|(% style="width:1071px" %)The child Code Lists in a Data Structure Definition have priority over those referenced in a Concept Scheme. Child Code Lists added to or removed from a Concept Scheme do not have a direct impact on the data exchange. Backward/forward compatibility depends on the way Code Lists are referenced in Data Structure Definitions referencing the concept scheme. This needs to be taken into account when creating a new version of a DSD accordingly
152 +| |(% colspan="2" %)**CONCEPT SCHEME (CS)**
153 +|**Type of change**|**Impact**|**Comments**
154 +|(((
155 +**Addition or removal of a child**
150 150  
157 +**Code List**
158 +)))|**Minor: N.+**|The child Code Lists in a Data Structure Definition have priority over those referenced in a Concept Scheme. Child Code Lists added to or removed from a Concept Scheme do not have a direct impact on the data exchange. Backward/forward compatibility depends on the way Code Lists are referenced in Data Structure Definitions referencing the concept scheme. This needs to be taken into account when creating a new version of a DSD accordingly
151 151  
152 152  
153 -|(% colspan="3" %)**DATA STRUCTURE DEFINITION (DSD)**
161 +
162 +| |(% colspan="2" %)**DATA STRUCTURE DEFINITION (DSD)**
154 154  |**Type of change**|**Impact**|**Comments**
155 155  |**Addition or removal of a child Code List**|(((
156 -**If same id and Agency, then the child artefact version change is replicated in the parent artefact.
157 -If different id or Agency, impact wil depend on the backward/forward compatibility as shown in the tables above**
165 +**If same id and Agency, then the child artefact version change is replicated in the parent artefact.**
166 +
167 +**If different id or Agency, impact wil depend on the backward/forward compatibility as shown in the tables above**
158 158  )))|(((
159 159  If a child Code List has a minor version change, then the DSD should also have a minor version change.
170 +
160 160  If there are several Code List version changes, the most severe impact is replicated in the DSD. For example, if two Code Lists have minor changes, and one Code List has a major change at the same time, the parent DSD has a major version change
161 161  )))
162 162  
163 -= 6. Appendix - Examples =
174 +=== 6. Appendix - Examples ===
164 164  
165 165  **Example 1 – Change to a Code List name, for clarification purposes**. **Patch Impact: N.M.+**
166 166  
... ... @@ -181,29 +181,36 @@
181 181  
182 182  |(% colspan="2" %)**AGGREGATION OF EXISTING CODES**
183 183  |**Old version**|**New version**
184 -|**2011** Heifers (female bovine that never calved), live
185 -**2012** Cows, live|**2010** Heifers and cows, live
186 -|(% colspan="2" %)Codes **2011** and **2012** are fully{{footnote}}i.e. without integration into or combination with another existing code.{{/footnote}} __**removed**__ and replaced with one __**brand new**__ code. In this case there is a many to 1 correspondence between the codes.
195 +|**2011** Heifers (female bovine that never calved), live **2012** Cows, live|**2010** Heifers and cows, live
196 +|(% colspan="2" %)Codes **2011** and **2012** are fully{{footnote}}i.e. without integration into or combination with another existing code.{{/footnote}} **removed** and replaced with one **brand new** code. In this case there is a many to 1 correspondence between the codes.
187 187  
198 +
199 +
188 188  |(% colspan="2" %)**DISAGGREGATION OF EXISTING CODES**
189 189  |**Old version**|**New version**
190 190  |**1010** Live horses|(((
191 -1011 Pure bred breeding horses, live
192 -1012 Other horses, live
203 +1. Pure bred breeding horses, live
204 +1. Other horses, live
193 193  )))
194 -|(% colspan="2" %)Code **1010** is fully __**removed**__ and replaced with two __**brand new**__ codes. In this case there is a 1 to m correspondence between the codes.
206 +|(% colspan="2" %)Code **1010** is fully **removed** and replaced with two **brand new** codes. In this case there is a 1 to m correspondence between the codes.
195 195  
208 +
209 +
196 196  |(% colspan="2" %)**REORGANISATION OF EXISTING CODES**
197 197  |**Old version**|**New version**
198 198  |(((
199 199  **3010** Fowls, weighing ≤ 185 g
214 +
200 200  **3020** Ducks, , weighing ≤ 185 g
216 +
201 201  **3030** Other poultry, weighing ≤ 185 g
218 +
202 202  **3040** Fowls, weighing > 185 g
220 +
203 203  **3050** Ducks, , weighing > 185 g
222 +
204 204  **3060** Other poultry, weighing > 185 g
205 -)))|**3025** Poultry, weighing ≤ 175 g
206 -**3045** Poultry, weighing > 175 g
224 +)))|**3025** Poultry, weighing ≤ 175 g **3045** Poultry, weighing > 175 g
207 207  |(% colspan="2" %)Codes **3010**, **3020**, **3030**, **3040**, **3050** and **3060** are fully removed and replaced with two brand new codes; furthermore the criterion for the classification used in the old version has been changed in the new version (185 g criterion versus 175 g criterion), so that it is not possible to exactly aggregate the codes from the old version to the codes of the new version (e.g. a part of **3010** goes to **3025**, another part to **3045**). In this case there is a m to n correspondence between the two sets of codes
208 208  
209 209  **Example 5 – Changes to hierarchies in a Code List. Major impact: +.0**
... ... @@ -210,8 +210,7 @@
210 210  
211 211  |(% colspan="2" %)**ADDING A NEW CODE IN AN EXISTING HIERARCHY – CODE LIST**
212 212  |**Old version**|**New version**
213 -|• 0213 - Beer o02131 - Lager beer o02132 - Other alcoholic beer|0213 - Beer o02131 - Lager beer o 02132 - Other alcoholic beer
214 -**02133 - Low and non-alcoholic beer**
231 +|• 0213 - Beer o02131 - Lager beer o02132 - Other alcoholic beer|• 0213 - Beer o02131 - Lager beer o 02132 - Other alcoholic beer o **02133 - Low and non-alcoholic beer**
215 215  |(% colspan="2" %)Code 02133 has been added to hierarchy 0213
216 216  
217 217  **Example 6 – Changes to hierarchies in a Hierarchical Code List. Major impact: +.0**
... ... @@ -219,17 +219,17 @@
219 219  |(% colspan="2" %)**ADDING A NEW CODE IN AN EXISTING HIERARCHY – HIERARCHICAL CODE LIST**
220 220  |**Old version**|**New version**
221 221  |(((
222 - A1 - World (codelist ref. ECB@CL_AREAS@1.0) o E1 - Europe (ECB@CL_COUNTRIES@1.0)
239 + A1 - World (codelist ref. ECB@CL_AREAS@1.0) o E1 - Europe (ECB@CL_COUNTRIES@1.0)
223 223  
224 -ES - Spain FR - France
241 + ES - Spain FR - France
225 225  
226 226  GR - Greece
227 227  
228 228  IT - Italy o E4 - Africaetc.
229 229  )))|(((
230 -A1=World (codelist ref. ECB@CL_AREAS@1.0) o E1 =Europe (ECB@CL_COUNTRIES@1.0)
247 +A1=World (codelist ref. ECB@CL_AREAS@1.0) o E1 =Europe (ECB@CL_COUNTRIES@1.0)
231 231  
232 -ES = Spain FR = FranceGR = Greece
249 + ES = Spain FR = FranceGR = Greece
233 233  
234 234  IT = Italy
235 235  
© Semantic R&D Group, 2026