Changes for page Guidelines on the Versioning of SDMX Artefacts
Last modified by Artur K. on 2026/05/29 14:28
Summary
-
Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -88,6 +88,8 @@ 88 88 |**Removal of one or more codes in the HCL or removal of one or more codes in the referenced code lists**|(% style="width:150px" %)**Major**: **+.0**|(% style="width:1045px" %)Data represented using the old HCL can no longer be represented using the new HCL, thus resulting in a break in backward compatibility 89 89 |**Addition, modification or removal of one or more hierarchical levels**|(% style="width:150px" %)**Major: +.0**|(% style="width:1045px" %)The reorganisation of codes within hierarchies has a significant impact on the code aggregations 90 90 91 + 92 + 91 91 |(% colspan="3" %)**CONCEPT SCHEME (CS)** 92 92 |(% style="width:874px" %)**Type of change**|(% style="width:154px" %)**Impact**|(% style="width:1044px" %)**Comments** 93 93 |(% style="width:874px" %)**Addition of one or more new concepts in an existing CS**|(% style="width:154px" %)**Minor**: **N.+**|(% style="width:1044px" %)((( ... ... @@ -95,16 +95,18 @@ 95 95 ))) 96 96 |(% style="width:874px" %)**Removal of one or more existing concepts**|(% style="width:154px" %)**Major: +.0**|(% style="width:1044px" %)Data exchanged/disseminated using the old version of the CS can no longer be exchanged/disseminated using the new version with less concepts 97 97 100 + 101 + 98 98 |(% colspan="3" %)**DATA STRUCTURE DEFINITION (DSD)** 99 -| (% style="width:868px" %)**Type of change**|(% style="width:159px" %)**Impact**|(% style="width:1045px" %)**Comments**100 -| (% style="width:868px" %)**Addition of a dimension**|(% style="width:159px" %)**Major**: **+.0**|(% style="width:1045px" %)Adding a new dimension has a strong impact because a dimension represents the identifier of a dataset, thus requiring a remodelling of the data as existing structural validation will fail101 -| (% style="width:868px" %)**Addition of a mandatory attribute**|(% style="width:159px" %)**Major**: **+.0**|(% style="width:1045px" %)If the attribute is mandatory, the situation is the same as under point “Addition of a dimension”102 -| (% style="width:868px" %)**Addition of a conditional attribute**|(% style="width:159px" %)**Minor**: **N.+**|(% style="width:1045px" %)If the attribute is conditional backward compatibility is maintained103 -| (% style="width:868px" %)**Removal of a dimension or attribute**|(% style="width:159px" %)**Major**: **+.0**|(% style="width:1045px" %)Whatever the type of component, the change does not guarantee backward compatibility103 +|**Type of change**|**Impact**|**Comments** 104 +|**Addition of a dimension**|**Major**: **+.0**|Adding a new dimension has a strong impact because a dimension represents the identifier of a dataset, thus requiring a remodelling of the data as existing structural validation will fail 105 +|**Addition of a mandatory attribute**|**Major**: **+.0**|If the attribute is mandatory, the situation is the same as under point “Addition of a dimension” 106 +|**Addition of a conditional attribute**|**Minor**: **N.+**|If the attribute is conditional backward compatibility is maintained 107 +|**Removal of a dimension or attribute**|**Major**: **+.0**|Whatever the type of component, the change does not guarantee backward compatibility 104 104 105 105 For concrete examples, see the Appendix. 106 106 107 -= 5. How versioning works for inter-dependent artefacts = 111 +=== 5. How versioning works for inter-dependent artefacts === 108 108 109 109 This section describes how version changes to inter-dependent or parent/child artefacts affect each other. For example, how a Concept Scheme is affected when one of the Code Lists that it references changes version. 110 110 ... ... @@ -127,40 +127,51 @@ 127 127 The replacement of a reference with a different reference has the same impact for every artefact. 128 128 129 129 |(% colspan="3" %)**ALL ARTEFACTS** 130 -| (% style="width:492px" %)**Type of change**|(% style="width:441px" %)**Impact**|**Comments**131 -|( % style="width:492px" %)(((132 -**Replacement of a child artefact having a different version, but same id and Agency**133 - )))|(% style="width:441px" %)(((134 -** The child artefact version changeis replicated inthe parent artefact**134 +|**Type of change**|**Impact**|**Comments** 135 +|((( 136 +**Replacement of a child artefact having a different version, but same id and** 137 + 138 +**Agency** 135 135 )))|((( 140 +**The child artefact version change is replicated in the** 141 + 142 +**parent artefact** 143 +)))|((( 136 136 If a child artefact (e.g. a Code List) has a minor version change, then the parent artefact (e.g. a Concept Scheme) should also have a minor version change. 145 + 137 137 If there are several child artefact version changes, the most severe impact is replicated in the parent artefact. For example, if two Code Lists have minor changes, and one Code List has a major change at the same time, the parent Concept Scheme has a major version change 138 138 ))) 139 -|(% style="width:492px" %)((( 140 -**Replacement of a referenced child artefact having a different id or Agency** 141 -)))|(% style="width:441px" %)**The parent artefact version impact depends on the backward/ forward compatibility as shown in the tables above**|Technically, the child artefact is not considered to be related to the previous child artefact. It needs to be checked whether exchange contracts can still be guaranteed (backward/forward compatibility principle) 148 +|((( 149 +**Replacement of a referenced child artefact having a** 142 142 151 +**different id or Agency** 152 +)))|**The parent artefact version impact depends on the backward/ forward compatibility as shown in the tables above**|Technically, the child artefact is not considered to be related to the previous child artefact. It needs to be checked whether exchange contracts can still be guaranteed (backward/forward compatibility principle) 153 + 143 143 ==== b. Addition or removal of referenced artefacts ==== 144 144 145 -|(% colspan="3" style="width:876px" %)**CONCEPT SCHEME (CS)** 146 -|(% style="width:845px" %)**Type of change**|(% style="width:156px" %)**Impact**|(% style="width:1071px" %)**Comments** 147 -|(% style="width:845px" %)((( 148 -**Addition or removal of a child Code List** 149 -)))|(% style="width:156px" %)**Minor: N.+**|(% style="width:1071px" %)The child Code Lists in a Data Structure Definition have priority over those referenced in a Concept Scheme. Child Code Lists added to or removed from a Concept Scheme do not have a direct impact on the data exchange. Backward/forward compatibility depends on the way Code Lists are referenced in Data Structure Definitions referencing the concept scheme. This needs to be taken into account when creating a new version of a DSD accordingly 156 +| |(% colspan="2" %)**CONCEPT SCHEME (CS)** 157 +|**Type of change**|**Impact**|**Comments** 158 +|((( 159 +**Addition or removal of a child** 150 150 161 +**Code List** 162 +)))|**Minor: N.+**|The child Code Lists in a Data Structure Definition have priority over those referenced in a Concept Scheme. Child Code Lists added to or removed from a Concept Scheme do not have a direct impact on the data exchange. Backward/forward compatibility depends on the way Code Lists are referenced in Data Structure Definitions referencing the concept scheme. This needs to be taken into account when creating a new version of a DSD accordingly 151 151 152 152 153 -|(% colspan="3" %)**DATA STRUCTURE DEFINITION (DSD)** 165 + 166 +| |(% colspan="2" %)**DATA STRUCTURE DEFINITION (DSD)** 154 154 |**Type of change**|**Impact**|**Comments** 155 155 |**Addition or removal of a child Code List**|((( 156 -**If same id and Agency, then the child artefact version change is replicated in the parent artefact. 157 -If different id or Agency, impact wil depend on the backward/forward compatibility as shown in the tables above** 169 +**If same id and Agency, then the child artefact version change is replicated in the parent artefact.** 170 + 171 +**If different id or Agency, impact wil depend on the backward/forward compatibility as shown in the tables above** 158 158 )))|((( 159 159 If a child Code List has a minor version change, then the DSD should also have a minor version change. 174 + 160 160 If there are several Code List version changes, the most severe impact is replicated in the DSD. For example, if two Code Lists have minor changes, and one Code List has a major change at the same time, the parent DSD has a major version change 161 161 ))) 162 162 163 -= 6. Appendix - Examples = 178 +=== 6. Appendix - Examples === 164 164 165 165 **Example 1 – Change to a Code List name, for clarification purposes**. **Patch Impact: N.M.+** 166 166 ... ... @@ -181,29 +181,36 @@ 181 181 182 182 |(% colspan="2" %)**AGGREGATION OF EXISTING CODES** 183 183 |**Old version**|**New version** 184 -|**2011** Heifers (female bovine that never calved), live 185 -**2012** Cows, live|**2010** Heifers and cows, live 186 -|(% colspan="2" %)Codes **2011** and **2012** are fully{{footnote}}i.e. without integration into or combination with another existing code.{{/footnote}} __**removed**__ and replaced with one __**brand new**__ code. In this case there is a many to 1 correspondence between the codes. 199 +|**2011** Heifers (female bovine that never calved), live **2012** Cows, live|**2010** Heifers and cows, live 200 +|(% colspan="2" %)Codes **2011** and **2012** are fully{{footnote}}i.e. without integration into or combination with another existing code.{{/footnote}} **removed** and replaced with one **brand new** code. In this case there is a many to 1 correspondence between the codes. 187 187 202 + 203 + 188 188 |(% colspan="2" %)**DISAGGREGATION OF EXISTING CODES** 189 189 |**Old version**|**New version** 190 190 |**1010** Live horses|((( 191 -1 011Pure bred breeding horses, live192 -1 012Other horses, live207 +1. Pure bred breeding horses, live 208 +1. Other horses, live 193 193 ))) 194 -|(% colspan="2" %)Code **1010** is fully __**removed**__and replaced with two__**brand new**__codes. In this case there is a 1 to m correspondence between the codes.210 +|(% colspan="2" %)Code **1010** is fully **removed** and replaced with two **brand new** codes. In this case there is a 1 to m correspondence between the codes. 195 195 212 + 213 + 196 196 |(% colspan="2" %)**REORGANISATION OF EXISTING CODES** 197 197 |**Old version**|**New version** 198 198 |((( 199 199 **3010** Fowls, weighing ≤ 185 g 218 + 200 200 **3020** Ducks, , weighing ≤ 185 g 220 + 201 201 **3030** Other poultry, weighing ≤ 185 g 222 + 202 202 **3040** Fowls, weighing > 185 g 224 + 203 203 **3050** Ducks, , weighing > 185 g 226 + 204 204 **3060** Other poultry, weighing > 185 g 205 -)))|**3025** Poultry, weighing ≤ 175 g 206 -**3045** Poultry, weighing > 175 g 228 +)))|**3025** Poultry, weighing ≤ 175 g **3045** Poultry, weighing > 175 g 207 207 |(% colspan="2" %)Codes **3010**, **3020**, **3030**, **3040**, **3050** and **3060** are fully removed and replaced with two brand new codes; furthermore the criterion for the classification used in the old version has been changed in the new version (185 g criterion versus 175 g criterion), so that it is not possible to exactly aggregate the codes from the old version to the codes of the new version (e.g. a part of **3010** goes to **3025**, another part to **3045**). In this case there is a m to n correspondence between the two sets of codes 208 208 209 209 **Example 5 – Changes to hierarchies in a Code List. Major impact: +.0** ... ... @@ -210,16 +210,7 @@ 210 210 211 211 |(% colspan="2" %)**ADDING A NEW CODE IN AN EXISTING HIERARCHY – CODE LIST** 212 212 |**Old version**|**New version** 213 -|((( 214 -* 0213 - Beer 215 -** 02131 - Lager beer 216 -** 02132 - Other alcoholic beer 217 -)))|((( 218 -* 0213 - Beer 219 -** 02131 - Lager beer 220 -** 02132 - Other alcoholic beer 221 -* **02133 - Low and non-alcoholic beer** 222 -))) 235 +|• 0213 - Beer o02131 - Lager beer o02132 - Other alcoholic beer|• 0213 - Beer o02131 - Lager beer o 02132 - Other alcoholic beer o **02133 - Low and non-alcoholic beer** 223 223 |(% colspan="2" %)Code 02133 has been added to hierarchy 0213 224 224 225 225 **Example 6 – Changes to hierarchies in a Hierarchical Code List. Major impact: +.0** ... ... @@ -227,17 +227,17 @@ 227 227 |(% colspan="2" %)**ADDING A NEW CODE IN AN EXISTING HIERARCHY – HIERARCHICAL CODE LIST** 228 228 |**Old version**|**New version** 229 229 |((( 230 - A1 - World (codelist ref. ECB@CL_AREAS@1.0) o E1 - Europe (ECB@CL_COUNTRIES@1.0) 243 +• A1 - World (codelist ref. ECB@CL_AREAS@1.0) o E1 - Europe (ECB@CL_COUNTRIES@1.0) 231 231 232 -ES - Spain FR - France 245 + ES - Spain FR - France 233 233 234 234 GR - Greece 235 235 236 236 IT - Italy o E4 - Africaetc. 237 237 )))|((( 238 -A1=World (codelist ref. ECB@CL_AREAS@1.0) o E1 =Europe (ECB@CL_COUNTRIES@1.0) 251 +• A1=World (codelist ref. ECB@CL_AREAS@1.0) o E1 =Europe (ECB@CL_COUNTRIES@1.0) 239 239 240 -ES = Spain FR = FranceGR = Greece 253 + ES = Spain FR = FranceGR = Greece 241 241 242 242 IT = Italy 243 243