Skip to Content
Last modified by Artur K. on 2026/05/29 14:28
From version 1.18
edited by Helena K.
on 2026/01/15 15:22
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 1.11
edited by Helena K.
on 2026/01/15 15:16
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -191,19 +191,23 @@
191 191  1011 Pure bred breeding horses, live
192 192  1012 Other horses, live
193 193  )))
194 -|(% colspan="2" %)Code **1010** is fully __**removed**__ and replaced with two __**brand new**__ codes. In this case there is a 1 to m correspondence between the codes.
194 +|(% colspan="2" %)Code __**1010**__ is fully __**removed**__ and replaced with two __**brand new**__ codes. In this case there is a 1 to m correspondence between the codes.
195 195  
196 196  |(% colspan="2" %)**REORGANISATION OF EXISTING CODES**
197 197  |**Old version**|**New version**
198 198  |(((
199 199  **3010** Fowls, weighing ≤ 185 g
200 +
200 200  **3020** Ducks, , weighing ≤ 185 g
202 +
201 201  **3030** Other poultry, weighing ≤ 185 g
204 +
202 202  **3040** Fowls, weighing > 185 g
206 +
203 203  **3050** Ducks, , weighing > 185 g
208 +
204 204  **3060** Other poultry, weighing > 185 g
205 -)))|**3025** Poultry, weighing ≤ 175 g
206 -**3045** Poultry, weighing > 175 g
210 +)))|**3025** Poultry, weighing ≤ 175 g **3045** Poultry, weighing > 175 g
207 207  |(% colspan="2" %)Codes **3010**, **3020**, **3030**, **3040**, **3050** and **3060** are fully removed and replaced with two brand new codes; furthermore the criterion for the classification used in the old version has been changed in the new version (185 g criterion versus 175 g criterion), so that it is not possible to exactly aggregate the codes from the old version to the codes of the new version (e.g. a part of **3010** goes to **3025**, another part to **3045**). In this case there is a m to n correspondence between the two sets of codes
208 208  
209 209  **Example 5 – Changes to hierarchies in a Code List. Major impact: +.0**
... ... @@ -210,16 +210,8 @@
210 210  
211 211  |(% colspan="2" %)**ADDING A NEW CODE IN AN EXISTING HIERARCHY – CODE LIST**
212 212  |**Old version**|**New version**
213 -|(((
214 -* 0213 - Beer
215 -** 02131 - Lager beer
216 -** 02132 - Other alcoholic beer
217 -)))|(((
218 -* 0213 - Beer
219 -** 02131 - Lager beer
220 -** 02132 - Other alcoholic beer
221 -* **02133 - Low and non-alcoholic beer**
222 -)))
217 +|• 0213 - Beer o02131 - Lager beer o02132 - Other alcoholic beer|0213 - Beer o02131 - Lager beer o 02132 - Other alcoholic beer
218 +**02133 - Low and non-alcoholic beer**
223 223  |(% colspan="2" %)Code 02133 has been added to hierarchy 0213
224 224  
225 225  **Example 6 – Changes to hierarchies in a Hierarchical Code List. Major impact: +.0**
... ... @@ -227,58 +227,69 @@
227 227  |(% colspan="2" %)**ADDING A NEW CODE IN AN EXISTING HIERARCHY – HIERARCHICAL CODE LIST**
228 228  |**Old version**|**New version**
229 229  |(((
230 -* A1 - World (codelist ref. ECB@CL_AREAS@1.0)
231 -** E1 - Europe (ECB@CL_COUNTRIES@1.0)
232 -*** ES - Spain FR - France
233 -*** GR - Greece
234 -*** IT - Italy
235 -** E4 - Africa
236 -*** etc.
226 + A1 - World (codelist ref. ECB@CL_AREAS@1.0) o E1 - Europe (ECB@CL_COUNTRIES@1.0)
227 +
228 +ES - Spain FR - France
229 +
230 +GR - Greece
231 +
232 +IT - Italy o E4 - Africaetc.
237 237  )))|(((
238 -* A1=World (codelist ref. ECB@CL_AREAS@1.0)
239 -** E1 =Europe (ECB@CL_COUNTRIES@1.0)
240 -** ES = Spain FR = FranceGR = Greece
241 -** IT = Italy
242 -** **DE= Germany**
243 -* E4 =Africa
244 -** etc.
234 +A1=World (codelist ref. ECB@CL_AREAS@1.0) o E1 =Europe (ECB@CL_COUNTRIES@1.0)
235 +
236 +ES = Spain FR = FranceGR = Greece
237 +
238 +IT = Italy
239 +
240 +**DE= Germany**
241 +
242 +o E4 =Africaetc.
245 245  )))
246 246  |(% colspan="2" %)The id of the hierarchical codes are assumed to be equal to those of the code lists referenced. The code DE has been added to hierarchy E1
247 247  
248 248  **Example 7.1 – Dependencies between artefacts: Concept Scheme and Code List. Minor impact: N.+**
249 249  
250 -|(% style="width:492px" %)**Id:Artefact Type:Details**|(% style="width:732px" %)**Change type**|(% style="width:558px" %)**Version Impact**|(% style="width:139px" %)**Old version**|(% style="width:151px" %)(((
251 -**New version**
248 +|**Id:Artefact Type:Details**|**Change type**|**Version Impact**|**Old version**|(((
249 +**New**
250 +
251 +**version**
252 252  )))
253 -|(% style="width:492px" %)**CL_OBS_STATUS:Code List**|(% style="width:732px" %)Addition of a new code X|(% style="width:558px" %)**Minor: N.+**|(% style="width:139px" %)**1.0**|(% style="width:151px" %)**1.1**
254 -|(% style="width:492px" %)**CS_TRADE:Concept Scheme: References CL_OBS_STATUS v1.0 above**|(% style="width:732px" %)(((
253 +|**CL_OBS_STATUS:Code List**|Addition of a new code X|**Minor: N.+**|**1.0**|**1.1**
254 +|**CS_TRADE:Concept Scheme: References CL_OBS_STATUS v1.0 above**|(((
255 255  Adoption of new code X
256 256  
257 -**//Change type//**: Replacement of a child artefact having a different version, but the same id and Agency
258 -)))|(% style="width:558px" %)(((
257 +**//Change type//**: Replacement of a child artefact having a different version, but the same id and
258 +
259 +Agency
260 +)))|(((
259 259  **Minor: N.+**
260 -The child version impact is replicated in the parent artefact
261 -)))|(% style="width:139px" %)**2.0**|(% style="width:151px" %)**2.1**
262 262  
263 +The child version impact is replicated in the parent
264 +
265 +artefact
266 +)))|**2.0**|**2.1**
267 +
263 263  **Example 7.2 – Dependencies between artefacts: Concept Scheme and Code List. Major impact: +.0**
264 264  
265 -|(% style="width:489px" %)**Id:Artefact Type:Details**|(% style="width:734px" %)**Change type**|(% style="width:562px" %)**Version Impact**|**Old version**|(((
266 -**New version**
270 +|**Id:Artefact Type:Details**|**Change type**|**Version Impact**|**Old version**|(((
271 +**New**
272 +
273 +**version**
267 267  )))
268 -|(% style="width:489px" %)**CL_OBS_STATUS:Code List**|(% style="width:734px" %)Removal of code U|(% style="width:562px" %)**Major: +.0**|**1.0**|**2.0**
269 -|(% style="width:489px" %)(((
275 +|**CL_OBS_STATUS:Code List**|Removal of code U|**Major: +.0**|**1.0**|**2.0**
276 +|(((
270 270  **CS_TRADE:Concept**
271 271  
272 272  **Scheme:References**
273 273  
274 274  **CL_OBS_STATUS v1.0 above**
275 -)))|(% style="width:734px" %)(((
282 +)))|(((
276 276  Adoption of new CL_OBS_STATUS without U.
277 277  
278 278  **//Change type//**: Replacement of a child artefact having a different version, but the same id and
279 279  
280 280  Agency
281 -)))|(% style="width:562px" %)(((
288 +)))|(((
282 282  **Major: +.0**
283 283  
284 284  The child version impact is replicated in the parent artefact.
... ... @@ -286,48 +286,51 @@
286 286  
287 287  **Example 7.3 – Dependencies between artefacts: Concept Scheme and Code List. Variable impact (see below)**
288 288  
289 -|(% style="width:489px" %)**Id:Artefact Type:Details**|(% style="width:736px" %)**Change type**|(% style="width:555px" %)**Version Impact**|(% style="width:146px" %)**Old version**|(% style="width:146px" %)(((
290 -**New version**
296 +|**Id:Artefact Type:Details**|**Change type**|**Version Impact**|**Old version**|(((
297 +**New**
298 +
299 +**version**
291 291  )))
292 -|(% rowspan="3" style="width:489px" %)**CL_XYZ: Code List**|(% style="width:736px" %)(((
301 +|(% rowspan="3" %)**CL_XYZ: Code List**|(((
293 293  a) Maintenance agency changes from A to B for governance reasons.
294 294  
295 295  Nothing else changes in the code list.
296 -)))|(% rowspan="3" style="width:555px" %)**New artefact**|(% rowspan="3" style="width:146px" %)(((
305 +)))|(% rowspan="3" %)**New artefact**|(% rowspan="3" %)(((
297 297  **CL_XYZ**
298 298  
299 299  **(Agency A)**
300 -)))|(% rowspan="3" style="width:146px" %)(((
309 +)))|(% rowspan="3" %)(((
301 301  **CL_XYZ**
302 302  
303 -**(Agency B)
304 -(new maintenance agency)**
312 +**(Agency B)**
313 +
314 +**(new maintenance agency)**
305 305  )))
306 -|(% style="width:736px" %)b) Maintenance agency changes from A to B and at the same time new codes are added
307 -|(% style="width:736px" %)c) Maintenance agency changes from A to B. Since B has different coding rules, the code list itself changes as well.
308 -|(% rowspan="3" style="width:489px" %)(((
316 +|b) Maintenance agency changes from A to B and at the same time new codes are added
317 +|c) Maintenance agency changes from A to B. Since B has different coding rules, the code list itself changes as well.
318 +|(% rowspan="3" %)(((
309 309  **CS_TRADE: Concept Scheme: References**
310 310  
311 311  **CL_XYZ (Agency A) **
312 -)))|(% rowspan="3" style="width:736px" %)(((
322 +)))|(% rowspan="3" %)(((
313 313  Replacement of a child artefact having a different Agency.
314 314  
315 315  CL_XYZ (Agency A) changes to CL_XYZ (Agency B).
316 -)))|(% style="width:555px" %)(((
326 +)))|(((
317 317  **Case a): Patch: N.M.+**
318 318  
319 319  There is no impact on data exchange
320 -)))|(% style="width:146px" %)**2.0**|(% style="width:146px" %)**2.0.1**
321 -|(% style="width:555px" %)(((
330 +)))|**2.0**|**2.0.1**
331 +|(((
322 322  **Case b): Minor: N. +**
323 323  
324 324  The impact is the same as a new minor version of the code list
325 -)))|(% style="width:146px" %)**2.0**|(% style="width:146px" %)**2.1**
326 -|(% style="width:555px" %)(((
335 +)))|**2.0**|**2.1**
336 +|(((
327 327  **Case c) Major: +.0**
328 328  
329 329  The impact is the same as a new major version of the code list.
330 -)))|(% style="width:146px" %)**2.0**|(% style="width:146px" %)**3.0**
340 +)))|**2.0**|**3.0**
331 331  
332 332  **Example 7.4 – Dependencies between artefacts: Concept Scheme and DSD. Variable impact (see below)**
333 333  
© Semantic R&D Group, 2026