Last modified by Artur K. on 2026/05/29 14:28

From version 2.7
edited by Helena K.
on 2026/01/15 21:58
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 2.8
edited by Helena K.
on 2026/01/15 21:58
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -159,12 +159,13 @@
159 159  
160 160  51 – Contributing family workers
161 161  
162 -1. This classification hierarchy is suitable for various types of labour market analysis, including analysis of the impact of economic cycles on the labour market, and of government policies related to employment creation and regulation.
163 -1. The classification according to type of authority is also the most suitable hierarchy for use as an input variable in the compilation of statistics classified by socio-economic status.
162 +24. This classification hierarchy is suitable for various types of labour market analysis, including analysis of the impact of economic cycles on the labour market, and of government policies related to employment creation and regulation.
164 164  
164 +25. The classification according to type of authority is also the most suitable hierarchy for use as an input variable in the compilation of statistics classified by socio-economic status.
165 +
165 165  == Classification of Status in Employment according  to type of economic risk (ICSE-18-R) ==
166 166  
167 -1. ICSE-18-R provides a dichotomy between employment for pay and employment for profit. This latter dichotomy is analogous to the traditional distinction between paid employment and self-employment, used for example in the SNA.
168 +26. ICSE-18-R provides a dichotomy between employment for pay and employment for profit. This latter dichotomy is analogous to the traditional distinction between paid employment and self-employment, used for example in the SNA.
168 168  
169 169  //Workers in employment for profit// are classified into the following groups:
170 170  
© Semantic R&D Group, 2026