Skip to Content
Last modified by Artur K. on 2026/05/29 14:28
From version 2.8
edited by Helena K.
on 2026/01/15 21:58
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 2.5
edited by Helena K.
on 2026/01/15 21:56
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -117,55 +117,47 @@
117 117  
118 118  = The International Classification of Status  in Employment (ICSE-18) =
119 119  
120 -21. The International Classification of Status in Employment (ICSE-18) classifies jobs in employment for pay or profit into ten detailed categories based on the concepts of type of authority and type of economic risk described above. These categories may be aggregated according to two alternative classification hierarchies: the //International Classification of Status in Employment according to type of authority (ICSE-18-A) //and the //International Classification of Status in Employment according to type of economic risk (ICSE-18-R).//
120 +The International Classification of Status in Employment (ICSE-18) classifies jobs in employment for pay or profit into ten detailed categories based on the concepts of type of authority and type of economic risk described above. These categories may be aggregated according to two alternative classification hierarchies: the //International Classification of Status in Employment according to type of authority (ICSE-18-A) //and the //International Classification of Status in Employment according to type of economic risk (ICSE-18-R).//
121 121  
122 -22. Both hierarchies for status in employment, based on economic risk and authority, should have equal priority when producing statistics. Statistics from labour force surveys and, when possible from other relevant sources, should be compiled on a regular basis according to both hierarchies.
122 +Both hierarchies for status in employment, based on economic risk and authority, should have equal priority when producing statistics. Statistics from labour force surveys and, when possible from other relevant sources, should be compiled on a regular basis according to both hierarchies.
123 123  
124 124  == International Classification of Status in Employment according to type of authority (ICSE-18-A) ==
125 125  
126 -23. ICSE-18-A provides, at its top level, a dichotomy between independent workers and dependent workers in which:
126 +ICSE-18-A provides, at its top level, a dichotomy between independent workers and dependent workers in which:
127 127  
128 128  //Independent workers// are classified into the following groups:
129 129  
130 -A. Employers
130 +1.
131 +11. Employers
132 +111. – Employers in corporations
133 +111. – Employers in household market enterprises
134 +11. Independent workers without employees
135 +111. – Owner-operators of corporations without employees
136 +111. – Own-account workers in household market enterprises without employees
131 131  
132 -11 – Employers in corporations
133 -
134 -12 – Employers in household market enterprises
135 -
136 -B. Independent workers without employees
137 -
138 -21 – Owner-operators of corporations without employees
139 -
140 -22 – Own-account workers in household market enterprises without employees
141 -
142 142  //Dependent workers// are classified into the following groups:
143 143  
144 -C. Dependent contractors
140 +1.
141 +11. Dependent contractors
145 145  
146 146  30 – Dependent contractors
147 147  
148 -D. Employees
145 +1.
146 +11. Employees
147 +111. – Permanent employees
148 +111. – Fixed-term employees
149 +111. – Short-term and casual employees
150 +111. – Paid apprentices, trainees and interns
151 +11. Contributing family workers
149 149  
150 -41 – Permanent employees
151 -
152 -42 – Fixed-term employees
153 -
154 -43 – Short-term and casual employees
155 -
156 -44 – Paid apprentices, trainees and interns
157 -
158 -E. Contributing family workers
159 -
160 160  51 – Contributing family workers
161 161  
162 -24. This classification hierarchy is suitable for various types of labour market analysis, including analysis of the impact of economic cycles on the labour market, and of government policies related to employment creation and regulation.
155 +1. This classification hierarchy is suitable for various types of labour market analysis, including analysis of the impact of economic cycles on the labour market, and of government policies related to employment creation and regulation.
156 +1. The classification according to type of authority is also the most suitable hierarchy for use as an input variable in the compilation of statistics classified by socio-economic status.
163 163  
164 -25. The classification according to type of authority is also the most suitable hierarchy for use as an input variable in the compilation of statistics classified by socio-economic status.
165 -
166 166  == Classification of Status in Employment according  to type of economic risk (ICSE-18-R) ==
167 167  
168 -26. ICSE-18-R provides a dichotomy between employment for pay and employment for profit. This latter dichotomy is analogous to the traditional distinction between paid employment and self-employment, used for example in the SNA.
160 +1. ICSE-18-R provides a dichotomy between employment for pay and employment for profit. This latter dichotomy is analogous to the traditional distinction between paid employment and self-employment, used for example in the SNA.
169 169  
170 170  //Workers in employment for profit// are classified into the following groups:
171 171  
© Semantic R&D Group, 2026