Changes for page SDMX 2.1 Standards. Section 5. Registry Specification: Logical Interfaces

Summary

• Page properties (2 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
• Attachments (0 modified, 0 added, 10 removed)
  • 1747829078194-749.png
  • 1747829109466-595.png
  • 1747829139951-378.png
  • 1747829204737-370.png
  • 1747829290890-122.png
  • 1747829477882-750.png
  • 1747829554603-150.png
  • 1747829675568-610.png
  • 1747832400104-286.png
  • 1747994320263-112.png

Details

Page properties

Title

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-SDMX 2.1 Standards. Section 5. Registry Specification – Logical Interfaces
	1	+SDMX 2.1 Standards. Section. 5. Registry Specification – Logical Interfaces

Content

...	...	@@ -4,11 +4,10 @@
4	4
5	5	**Revision History**
6	6
7		-(% style="width:833.294px" %)
8		-|(% style="width:122px" %)**Revision**|(% style="width:126px" %)**Date**|(% style="width:581px" %)**Contents**
9		-|(% style="width:122px" %) |(% style="width:126px" %)April 2011|(% style="width:581px" %)Initial release
10		-|(% style="width:122px" %)1.0|(% style="width:126px" %)July 2011|(% style="width:581px" %)Rectification of problems of the specifications dated April 2011
11		-|(% style="width:122px" %)2.0|(% style="width:126px" %)July 2020|(% style="width:581px" %)Addition of VTL (Validation and Transformation Language) package, maintainable artefacts, nameable artefacts to 5.2.3, 6.2.2, 6.2.3, 6.2.4, 7.1.1
	7	+|**Revision**|**Date**|**Contents**
	8	+| |April 2011|Initial release
	9	+|1.0|July 2011|Rectification of problems of the specifications dated April 2011
	10	+|2.0|July 2020|Addition of VTL (Validation and Transformation Language) package, maintainable artefacts, nameable artefacts to 5.2.3, 6.2.2, 6.2.3, 6.2.4, 7.1.1
12	12
13	13	**Corrigendum**
14	14
...	...	@@ -289,22 +289,27 @@
289	289	* that a queryable data source exists - this would necessitate the registration service querying the service to determine its existence
290	290	* that a simple data source exists (i.e. a file accessible at a URL)
291	291	* that the correct Data Structure Definition or Metadata Structure Definition is used by the registered data that the components (Dimensions, Attributes, Measures, Identifier Components etc.) are consistent with the Data Structure Definition or Metadata Structure Definition
292		-* that the valid representations of the concepts to which these components correspond conform to the definition in the Data Structure Definition or Metadata Structure Definition
	291	+*  that the valid representations of the concepts to which these components 382 correspond conform to the definition in the Data Structure Definition or Metadata Structure Definition
293	293
294		-The Registration has an action attribute which takes one of the following values:
	293	+3The Registration has an action attribute which takes one of the following values:
295	295
296		-|(% style="width:219px" %)**Action Attribute Value**|(% style="width:1652px" %)**Behaviour**
297		-|(% style="width:219px" %)Append|(% style="width:1652px" %)Add this registration to the registry
298		-|(% style="width:219px" %)Replace|(% style="width:1652px" %)Replace the existing Registration with this Registration identified by the id in the Registration of the Submit Registration Request
299		-|(% style="width:219px" %)Delete|(% style="width:1652px" %)Delete the existing Registration identified by the id in the Registration of the Submit Registration Request
	295	+|(% style="width:249px" %)(((
	296	+**Action Attribute Value**
	297	+)))|(% style="width:1622px" %)**Behaviour**
	298	+|(% style="width:249px" %)Append|(% style="width:1622px" %)Add this registration to the registry
	299	+|(% style="width:249px" %)Replace|(% style="width:1622px" %)Replace the existing Registration with this Registration identified by the id in the Registration of the Submit Registration Request
	300	+|(% style="width:249px" %)Delete|(% style="width:1622px" %)Delete the existing Registration identified by the id in the Registration of the Submit Registration Request
300	300
301	301	The Registration has three Boolean attributes which may be present to determine how an SDMX compliant Dataset or Metadata Set indexing application must index the Datasets or Metadata Set upon registration. The indexing application behaviour is as follows:
302	302
303		-|(% style="width:228px" %)**Boolean Attribute**|(% style="width:1644px" %)**Behaviour if Value is “true”**
304		-|(% style="width:228px" %)indexTimeSeries|(% style="width:1644px" %)A compliant indexing application must index all the time series keys (for a Dataset registration) or metadata target values (for a Metadata Set registration)
305		-|(% style="width:228px" %)indexDataSet|(% style="width:1644px" %)A compliant indexing application must index the range of actual (present) values for each dimension of the Dataset (for a Dataset registration) or the range of actual (present) values for each Metadata Attribute which takes an enumerated value.
	304	+|**Boolean Attribute**|**Behaviour if Value is “true”**
	305	+|indexTimeSeries|A compliant indexing application must index all the time series keys (for a Dataset registration) or metadata target values (for a Metadata Set registration)
	306	+|indexDataSet|(((
	307	+A compliant indexing application must index the range of actual (present) values for each dimension of the Dataset (for a Dataset registration) or the range of actual (present) values for each Metadata Attribute which takes an enumerated value.
	308	+
306	306	Note that for data this requires much less storage than full key indexing, but this method cannot guarantee that a specific combination of Dimension values (the Key) is actually present in the Dataset
307		-|(% style="width:228px" %)indexReportingPeriod|(% style="width:1644px" %)A compliant indexing application must index the time period range(s) for which data are present in the Dataset or Metadata Set
	310	+)))
	311	+|indexReportingPeriod|A compliant indexing application must index the time period range(s) for which data are present in the Dataset or Metadata Set
308	308
309	309	=== 5.2.5 Data and Reference Metadata Discovery ===
310	310
...	...	@@ -326,7 +326,7 @@
326	326	Subscription management involves a user submitting a subscription request which contains:
327	327
328	328	* a query or constraint expression in terms of a filter which defines the events for which the user is interested (e.g. new data for a specific dataflow, or for a domain category, or changes to a Data Structure Definition).
329		-* a list of URIs or end-points to which an XML notification message can be sent. Supported end-point types will be email (mailto : ) and HTTP POST (a normal http:~/~/ address)
	333	+* a list of URIs or end-points to which an XML notification message can be sent. Supported end-point types will be email (mailto~:) and HTTP POST (a normal http:~/~/ address)
330	330	* request for a list of submitted subscriptions
331	331	* deletion of a subscription
332	332
...	...	@@ -336,8 +336,8 @@
336	336
337	337	The following table defines the behaviour of the SDMX Registry for the various Registry Interface messages.
338	338
339		-|(% style="width:227px" %)**Interface**|(% style="width:1644px" %)**Behaviour**
340		-|(% style="width:227px" %)All|(% style="width:1644px" %)(((
	343	+|(% style="width:244px" %)**Interface**|**Behaviour**
	344	+|(% style="width:244px" %)All|(((
341	341	1) If the action is set to “replace” then the entire contents of the existing maintainable object in the Registry MUST be replaced by the object submitted, unless the final attribute is set to “true” in which case the only changes that are allowed are to the following constructs:
342	342
343	343	* Name – this applies to the Maintainable object and its contained elements, such a Code in a Code list.
...	...	@@ -351,6 +351,7 @@
351	351	* isExternalReference
352	352
353	353	2) Cross referenced structures MUST exist in either the submitted document (in Structures or Structure Location) or in the registry to which the request is submitted.
	358	+
354	354	3) If the action is set to “delete” then the Registry MUST verify that the object can deleted. In order to qualify for deletion the object must:
355	355
356	356	а) Not have the final attribute set to “true”
...	...	@@ -357,11 +357,12 @@
357	357	b) Not be referenced from any other object in the Registry.
358	358
359	359	4) The version rules in the SDMX Schema documentation MUST be obeyed.
	365	+
360	360	5) The specific rules for the elements and attributes documented in the SDMX Schema MUST be obeyed.
361	361	)))
362		-|(% style="width:227px" %)SubmitStructureRequest|(% style="width:1644px" %)Structures are submitted at the level of the Maintainable Artefact and the behaviour in “All” above is therefore at the level of the Maintainable Artefact.
363		-|(% style="width:227px" %)SubmitProvisioningRequest|(% style="width:1644px" %)No additional behaviour.
364		-|(% style="width:227px" %)Submit Registration Request|(% style="width:1644px" %)(((
	368	+|(% style="width:244px" %)SubmitStructureRequest|Structures are submitted at the level of the Maintainable Artefact and the behaviour in “All” above is therefore at the level of the Maintainable Artefact.
	369	+|(% style="width:244px" %)SubmitProvisioningRequest|No additional behaviour.
	370	+|(% style="width:244px" %)Submit Registration Request|(((
365	365	If the datasource is a file (simple datasource) then the file MAY be retrieved and indexed according to the Boolean attributes set in the Registration.
366	366	For a queryable datasource the Registry MAY validate that the source exists and can accept an SDMX-ML data query.
367	367	)))
...	...	@@ -427,8 +427,6 @@
427	427
428	428	The Maintenance Agency in SDMX is maintained in an Agency Scheme which itself is a sub class of Organisation Scheme – this is shown in the class diagram below.
429	429
430		-[[image:1747994320263-112.png]]
431		-
432	432	**Figure 6: Agency Scheme Model**
433	433
434	434	The Agency in SDMX is extremely important. The Agency Id system used in SDMX is an n-level structure. The top level of this structure is maintained by SDMX. Any Agency in this top level can declare sub agencies and any sub agency can also declare sub agencies. The Agency Scheme has a fixed id and version and is never declared explicitly in the SDMX object identification mechanism.
...	...	@@ -450,7 +450,7 @@
450	450
451	451	[[image:1747824123012-527.jpeg]]
452	452
453		-**Figure 7: Example of Hierarchic Structure of Agencies**
	457	+==== Figure 7: Example of Hierarchic Structure of Agencies ====
454	454
455	455	The following organizations maintain an Agency Scheme.
456	456
...	...	@@ -465,8 +465,9 @@
465	465
466	466	An example of this is shown in the XML snippet below.
467	467
468		-[[image:1747832400104-286.png]]
	472	+[[image:1747824123013-196.jpeg||height="309" width="446"]]
469	469
	474	+(% class="wikigeneratedid" id="HFigure8:ExampleShowingUseofAgencyIdentifiers" %)
470	470	**Figure 8: Example Showing Use of Agency Identifiers**
471	471
472	472	Each of these maintenance agencies has an identical Code list with the Id CL_BOP. However, each is uniquely identified by means of the hierarchic agency structure.
...	...	@@ -479,14 +479,13 @@
479	479
480	480	==== 6.2.2.2 URN Structure ====
481	481
482		-(% class="wikigeneratedid" id="HCaseRulesforURN" %)
483		-//Case Rules for URN//
	487	+===== //Case Rules for URN// =====
484	484
485	485	For the URN, all parts of the string are case sensitive. The Id of any object must be UPPER CASE. Therefore, CRED_ext_Debt is invalid and it should be CRED_EXT_DEBT.
486	486
487	487	The generic structure of the URN is as follows:
488	488
489		->SDMXprefix.SDMX-IM-package-name.class-name=agencyid:maintainedobject-id(maintainedobject-version).*containerobject-id.object-id
	493	+SDMXprefix.SDMX-IM-package-name.class-name=agencyid:maintainedobject-id(maintainedobject-version).*containerobject-id.object-id
490	490
491	491	~* this can repeat and may not be present (see explanation below)
492	492
...	...	@@ -498,7 +498,7 @@
498	498
499	499	In the explanation below the actual object that is the target of the URN is called the **//actual object//**.
500	500
501		-**SDMXPrefix:** urn:sdmx:org.
	505	+**SDMXPrefix:** urn:sdmx:org.
502	502
503	503	**SDMX-IM package name:** sdmx.infomodel.package=
504	504
...	...	@@ -520,15 +520,15 @@
520	520
521	521	__Actual object is a maintainable__
522	522
523		-> SDMXPrefix.SDMX-IM package name.classname=agency id:maintained-object-id(version)
	527	+SDMXPrefix.SDMX-IM package name.classname=agency id:maintained-object-id(version)
524	524
525	525	__Actual object is contained in a maintained object with no intermediate containing object__
526	526
527		-> SDMXPrefix.SDMX-IM package name.classname=agency id:maintained-object-id(version).object-id
	531	+SDMXPrefix.SDMX-IM package name.classname=agency id:maintained-object-id(version).object-id
528	528
529	529	__Actual object is contained in a maintained object with an intermediate containing object__
530	530
531		-> SDMXPrefix.SDMX-IM package name.classname=agency
	535	+SDMXPrefix.SDMX-IM package name.classname=agency
532	532
533	533	id:maintained-object-id(version).contained-object-id.object-id
534	534
...	...	@@ -536,37 +536,37 @@
536	536
537	537	In this case the object id may not be unique in itself but only within the context of the hierarchy. In the general syntax of the URN all intermediary objects in the structure (with the exception, of course, of the maintained object) are shown as a contained object. An example here would be a Category in a Category Scheme. The Category is hierarchical and all intermediate Categories are shown as a contained object. The example below shows the generic structure for Category Scheme/Category/Category
538	538
539		-> SDMXPrefix.SDMX-IM package name.classname=agency id:maintained-object-id(version).contained-object-id.object-id
	543	+SDMXPrefix.SDMX-IM package name.classname=agency id:maintained-object-id(version).contained-object-id.object-id
540	540
541		-__Actual object is contained in a maintained object with an intermediate containing object and the object type itself is hierarchical__
	545	+Actual object is contained in a maintained object with an intermediate containing object and the object type itself is hierarchical
542	542
543	543	In this case the generic syntax is the same as for the example above as the parent object is regarded as a containing object, even if it is of the same type. An example here is a Metadata Attribute where the contained objects are Report Structure (first contained object id) and Metadata Attribute (subsequent contained object Ids). The example below shows the generic structure for MSD/Report Structure/Metadata Attribute/Metadata Attribute
544	544
545		-> SDMXPrefix.SDMX-IM package name.classname=agency id:maintained-object-id(version).contained-object-id. contained-object-id contained-object-id.object-id
	549	+SDMXPrefix.SDMX-IM package name.classname=agency id:maintained-object-id(version).contained-object-id. contained-object-id contained-object-id.object-id
546	546
547		-===== __**//Concrete Examples of the URN Structure//**__ =====
	551	+===== //Concrete Examples of the URN Structure// =====
548	548
549	549	The Data Structure Definition CRED_EXT_DEBT version 1.0 maintained by the top level Agency TFFS would have the URN:
550	550
551		-> urn:sdmx:org.sdmx.infomodel.datastructure.DataStucture=TFFS:CRED_EXT_ DEBT(1.0)
	555	+urn:sdmx:org.sdmx.infomodel.datastructure.DataStucture=TFFS:CRED_EXT_ DEBT(1.0)
552	552
553	553	The URN for a code for Argentina maintained by ISO in the code list CL_3166A2 version 1.0 would be:
554	554
555		-> urn:sdmx:org.sdmx.infomodel.codelist.Code=ISO:CL_3166A2(1.0).AR
	559	+urn:sdmx:org.sdmx.infomodel.codelist.Code=ISO:CL_3166A2(1.0).AR
556	556
557	557	The URN for a category (id of 1) which has parent category (id of 2) maintained by SDMX in the category scheme SUBJECT_MATTER_DOMAINS version 1.0 would be:
558	558
559		-> urn:sdmx:org.sdmx.infomodel.categoryscheme.Category=SDMX:SUBJE CT_MATTER_DOMAINS(1.0).1.2
	563	+urn:sdmx:org.sdmx.infomodel.categoryscheme.Category=SDMX:SUBJE CT_MATTER_DOMAINS(1.0).1.2
560	560
561	561	The URN for a Metadata Attribute maintained by SDMX in the MSD CONTACT_METADATA version 1.0 in the Report Structure CONTACT_REPORT where the hierarchy of the Metadata Attribute is
562	562
563	563	CONTACT_DETAILS/CONTACT_NAME would be:
564	564
565		-> urn:sdmx:org.sdmx.infomodel.metadatastructure.MetadataAttribut e=SDMX:CONTACT_METADATA(1.0).CONTACT_REPORT.CONTACT_DETAILS.CO NTACT_NAME
	569	+urn:sdmx:org.sdmx.infomodel.metadatastructure.MetadataAttribut e=SDMX:CONTACT_METADATA(1.0).CONTACT_REPORT.CONTACT_DETAILS.CO NTACT_NAME
566	566
567	567	The TFFS defines ABC as a sub Agency of TFFS then the URN of a Dataflow maintained by ABC and identified as EXTERNAL_DEBT version 1.0 would be:
568	568
569		-> urn:sdmx:org.sdmx.infomodel.datastructure.Dataflow=TFFS.ABC:EX
	573	+urn:sdmx:org.sdmx.infomodel.datastructure.Dataflow=TFFS.ABC:EX
570	570
571	571	TERNAL_DEBT(1.0)
572	572
...	...	@@ -581,94 +581,112 @@
581	581
582	582	The table below lists all of the packages in the SDMX-IM together with the concrete classes that are in these packages and whose objects have a URN.
583	583
584		-|(% style="width:127px" %)**Package**|(% style="width:1745px" %)(((
585		-**URN Classname (model classname where this is different)**
	588	+|**Package**|(((
	589	+**URN Classname (model classname**
	590	+
	591	+**where this is different)**
586	586	)))
587		-|(% style="width:127px" %)base|(% style="width:45px" %)Agency
588		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:45px" %)OrganisationUnitScheme
589		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:45px" %)AgencyScheme
590		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:45px" %)DataProviderScheme
591		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:45px" %)DataConsumerScheme
592		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:45px" %)OrganisationUnit
593		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:45px" %)DataProvider
594		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:45px" %)DataConsumer
595		-|(% style="width:127px" %)datastructure|(% style="width:45px" %)DataStructure (DataStructureDefinition)
596		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:45px" %)AttributeDescriptor
597		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:45px" %)DataAttribute
598		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:45px" %)GroupDimensionDescriptor
599		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:45px" %)DimensionDescriptor
600		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:45px" %)Dimension
601		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:45px" %)MeasureDimension
602		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:45px" %)TimeDimension
603		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:45px" %)MeasureDescriptor
604		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:45px" %)PrimaryMeasure
605		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:45px" %)Dataflow (DataflowDefinition)
606		-|(% style="width:127px" %)metadatastructure|(% style="width:45px" %)MetadataTarget
607		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:45px" %)DimensionDescriptorValueTarget
608		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:45px" %)IdentifiableObjectTarget
609		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:45px" %)ReportPeriodTarget
610		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:45px" %)DataSetTarget
611		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:45px" %)ReportStructure
612		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:45px" %)MetadataAttribute
613		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:45px" %)(((
	593	+|base|Agency
	594	+| |OrganisationUnitScheme
	595	+| |AgencyScheme
	596	+| |DataProviderScheme
	597	+| |DataConsumerScheme
	598	+| |OrganisationUnit
	599	+| |DataProvider
	600	+| |DataConsumer
	601	+| |
	602	+|datastructure|DataStructure (DataStructureDefinition)
	603	+| |AttributeDescriptor
	604	+| |DataAttribute
	605	+| |GroupDimensionDescriptor
	606	+| |DimensionDescriptor
	607	+| |Dimension
	608	+| |MeasureDimension
	609	+| |TimeDimension
	610	+| |MeasureDescriptor
	611	+| |PrimaryMeasure
	612	+| |Dataflow (DataflowDefinition)
	613	+| |
	614	+|metadatastructure|MetadataTarget
	615	+| |DimensionDescriptorValueTarget
	616	+| |IdentifiableObjectTarget
	617	+| |ReportPeriodTarget
	618	+| |DataSetTarget
	619	+| |ReportStructure
	620	+| |MetadataAttribute
	621	+| |(((
614	614	MetadataStructure
615	615
616	616	(MetadataStructureDefinition)
617	617	)))
618		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:45px" %)Metadataflow (MetadataflowDefinition)
619		-|(% style="width:127px" %)process|(% style="width:45px" %)Process
620		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:45px" %)ProcessStep
621		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:45px" %)Transition
622		-|(% style="width:127px" %)registry|(% style="width:45px" %)ProvisionAgreement
623		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:45px" %)AttachmentConstraint
624		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:45px" %)ContentConstraint
625		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:45px" %)Subscription
626		-|(% style="width:127px" %)mapping|(% style="width:45px" %)StructureMap
627		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:45px" %)StructureSet
628		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:45px" %)ComponentMap
629		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:1745px" %)ConceptSchemeMap
630		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:1745px" %)OrganisationSchemeMap
631		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:1745px" %)CodelistMap
632		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:1745px" %)CategorySchemeMap
633		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:1745px" %)ReportingTaxonomyMap
634		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:1745px" %)ConceptMap
635		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:1745px" %)OrganisationMap
636		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:1745px" %)CodeMap
637		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:1745px" %)HybridCodelistMap
638		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:1745px" %)CategoryMap
639		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:1745px" %)HybridCodeMap
640		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:1745px" %)ReportingCategoryMap
641		-|(% style="width:127px" %)codelist|(% style="width:1745px" %)Codelist
642		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:1745px" %)HierarchicalCodelist
643		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:1745px" %)Hierarchy
644		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:1745px" %)Hierarchy
645		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:1745px" %)Code
646		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:1745px" %)HierarchicalCode
647		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:1745px" %)Level
648		-|(% style="width:127px" %)categoryscheme|(% style="width:1745px" %)CategoryScheme
649		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:1745px" %)Category
650		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:1745px" %)Categorisation
651		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:1745px" %)ReportingTaxonomy
652		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:1745px" %)ReportingCategory
653		-|(% style="width:127px" %)conceptscheme|(% style="width:1745px" %)ConceptScheme
654		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:1745px" %)Concept
655		-|(% style="width:127px" %)transformation|(% style="width:1745px" %)TransformationScheme
656		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:1745px" %)Transformation
657		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:1745px" %)CustomTypeScheme
658		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:1745px" %)CustomType
659		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:1745px" %)NamePersonalisationScheme
660		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:1745px" %)NamePersonalisation
661		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:1745px" %)VtlCodelistMapping
662		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:1745px" %)VtlConceptMapping
663		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:1745px" %)VtlDataflowMapping
664		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:1745px" %)VtlConceptSchemeMapping
665		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:1745px" %)RulesetScheme
666		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:1745px" %)Ruleset
667		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:1745px" %)UserDefinedOperatorScheme
668		-|(% style="width:127px" %) |(% style="width:1745px" %)UserDefinedOperator
	626	+| |Metadataflow (MetadataflowDefinition)
	627	+| |
	628	+|process|Process
	629	+| |ProcessStep
	630	+| |Transition
	631	+| |
	632	+|registry|ProvisionAgreement
	633	+| |AttachmentConstraint
	634	+| |ContentConstraint
	635	+| |Subscription
	636	+| |
	637	+|mapping|StructureMap
	638	+| |StructureSet
	639	+| |ComponentMap
	640	+|**Package**|(((
	641	+**URN Classname (model classname**
669	669
	643	+**where this is different)**
	644	+)))
	645	+| |ConceptSchemeMap
	646	+| |OrganisationSchemeMap
	647	+| |CodelistMap
	648	+| |CategorySchemeMap
	649	+| |ReportingTaxonomyMap
	650	+| |ConceptMap
	651	+| |OrganisationMap
	652	+| |CodeMap
	653	+| |HybridCodelistMap
	654	+| |CategoryMap
	655	+| |HybridCodeMap
	656	+| |ReportingCategoryMap
	657	+| |
	658	+|codelist|Codelist
	659	+| |HierarchicalCodelist
	660	+| |Hierarchy
	661	+| |Hierarchy
	662	+| |Code
	663	+| |HierarchicalCode
	664	+| |Level
	665	+| |
	666	+|categoryscheme|CategoryScheme
	667	+| |Category
	668	+| |Categorisation
	669	+| |ReportingTaxonomy
	670	+| |ReportingCategory
	671	+| |
	672	+|conceptscheme|ConceptScheme
	673	+| |Concept
	674	+| |
	675	+|transformation|TransformationScheme
	676	+| |Transformation
	677	+| |CustomTypeScheme
	678	+| |CustomType
	679	+| |NamePersonalisationScheme
	680	+| |NamePersonalisation
	681	+| |VtlCodelistMapping
	682	+| |VtlConceptMapping
	683	+| |VtlDataflowMapping
	684	+| |VtlConceptSchemeMapping
	685	+| |RulesetScheme
	686	+| |Ruleset
	687	+| |UserDefinedOperatorScheme
	688	+| |UserDefinedOperator
	689	+| |
	690	+
670	670	**Table 2: SDMX-IM Packages and Contained Classes**
671	671
	693	+
672	672	=== 6.2.4 URN Identification components of SDMX objects ===
673	673
674	674	The table below describes the identification components for all SDMX object types that have identification. Note the actual attributes are all Id, but have been prefixed by their class name or multiple class names to show navigation, e.g. conceptSchemeAgencyId is really the Id attribute of the Agency class that is associated to the ConceptScheme.
...	...	@@ -677,50 +677,78 @@
677	677
678	678	Note that for brevity the URN examples omit the prefix. All URNs have the prefix
679	679
680		-> urn:sdmx.org.sdmx.infomodel.{package}.{classname}=
	702	+urn:sdmx.org.sdmx.infomodel.{package}.{classname}=
681	681
682		-(% style="width:1091.29px" %)
683		-|(% style="width:250px" %)**SDMX Class**|(% style="width:444px" %)**Key attribute(s)**|(% style="width:396px" %)**Example of URN**
684		-|(% style="width:250px" %)Agency|(% style="width:444px" %)The URN for an Agency is shown later in this table. The identification of an Agency in the URN structure for the maintainable object is by means of the agencyId. The AgencyScheme is not identified as SDMX has a mechanism for identifying an Agency uniquely by its Id. Note that this Id may be hierarchical.|(% style="width:396px" %)(((
	704	+
	705	+|**SDMX Class**|**Key attribute(s)**|**Example of URN**
	706	+|Agency|The URN for an Agency is shown later in this table. The identification of an Agency in the URN structure for the maintainable object is by means of the agencyId. The AgencyScheme is not identified as SDMX has a mechanism for identifying an Agency uniquely by its Id. Note that this Id may be hierarchical.|(((
685	685	IMF
	708	+
	709	+
686	686	Sub agency in the IMF AGENCIES
	711	+
	712	+
687	687	IMF.SubAgency1
688	688	)))
689		-|(% style="width:250px" %)*ConceptScheme|(% style="width:444px" %)conceptSchemeAgencyId:conceptSchemeId(ve rsion)|(% style="width:396px" %)SDMX:CROSS_DOMAIN_CONCEPTS(1.0)
690		-|(% style="width:250px" %)Concept|(% style="width:444px" %)conceptSchemeAgencyId:
691		-conceptSchemeId(version).conceptId|(% style="width:396px" %)SDMX:CROSS_DOMAIN_CONCEPTS(1.0).FREQ
692		-|(% style="width:250px" %)*Codelist|(% style="width:444px" %)codeListAgencyId:codeListId(version)|(% style="width:396px" %)SDMX:CL_FREQ(1.0)
693		-|(% style="width:250px" %)Code|(% style="width:444px" %)codeListAgencyId:codelistId(version).codeId|(% style="width:396px" %)SDMX:CL_FREQ(1.0).Q
694		-|(% style="width:250px" %)(((
695		-*Hierarchical Codelist
696		-)))|(% style="width:444px" %)hierachicalCodelistAgencyId: hierarchicalCodelistId(version)|(% style="width:396px" %)(((
697		-UNESCO:CL_EXP_SOURCE(1.0(% style="background-color:transparent" %))
	715	+|*ConceptScheme|conceptSchemeAgencyId:conceptSchemeId(ve rsion)|SDMX:CROSS_DOMAIN_CONCEPTS(1.0)
	716	+|Concept|(((
	717	+conceptSchemeAgencyId:
	718	+
	719	+conceptSchemeId(version).conceptId
	720	+)))|SDMX:CROSS_DOMAIN_CONCEPTS(1.0).FREQ
	721	+|*Codelist|codeListAgencyId:codeListId(version)|SDMX:CL_FREQ(1.0)
	722	+|Code|codeListAgencyId:codelistId(version).codeId|(((
	723	+SDMX:CL_FREQ(1.0).Q
	724	+
	725	+
698	698	)))
699		-|(% style="width:250px" %)Hierarchy|(% style="width:444px" %)(((
	727	+
	728	+
	729	+
	730	+|(((
	731	+*Hierarchical
	732	+
	733	+Codelist
	734	+)))|hierachicalCodelistAgencyId: hierarchicalCodelistId(version)|(((
	735	+UNESCO:CL_EXP_SOURCE(1.0)
	736	+
	737	+
	738	+)))
	739	+|Hierarchy|(((
700	700	hierachicalcodeListAgencyId:
	741	+
701	701	hierarchicalcodelistId(version).Hierarchy
702		-)))|(% style="width:396px" %)UNESCO:CL_EXP_SOURCE(1.0).
703		-H-C-GOV
704		-|(% style="width:250px" %)Level|(% style="width:444px" %)(((
	743	+)))|UNESCO:CL_EXP_SOURCE(1.0). H-C-GOV
	744	+|Level|(((
705	705	hierachicalcodeListAgencyId:
	746	+
706	706	hierarchicalcodelistId(version).Hierarchy.Level
707		-)))|(% style="width:396px" %)(((
	748	+)))|(((
708	708	ESTAT:HCL_REGION(1.0).H_1.COUNTRY
	750	+
	751	+
709	709	)))
710		-|(% style="width:250px" %)HierarchicalCode|(% style="width:444px" %)hierachicalCodeListAgencyId: hierarchicalcodelistId(version).hierarchy.hierarc hicalCode|(% style="width:396px" %)UNESCO:CL_EXP_SOURCE(1.0). H-C-GOV.GOV_CODE1
711		-|(% style="width:250px" %)*DataStructure|(% style="width:444px" %)dataStructureDefintitionAgencyId: dataStructureDefintitionId(version)|(% style="width:396px" %)TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0)
712		-|(% style="width:250px" %)(((
	753	+|HierarchicalCode|hierachicalCodeListAgencyId: hierarchicalcodelistId(version).hierarchy.hierarc hicalCode|UNESCO:CL_EXP_SOURCE(1.0). H-C-GOV.GOV_CODE1
	754	+|*DataStructure|dataStructureDefintitionAgencyId: dataStructureDefintitionId(version)|TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0)
	755	+|(((
713	713	Dimension
	757	+
714	714	Descriptor
	759	+
715	715	Measure
	761	+
716	716	Descriptor
	763	+
717	717	Attribute
	765	+
718	718	Descriptor
719		-)))|(% style="width:444px" %)(((
	767	+)))|(((
720	720	dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId: dataStructureDefinitionId(version).
	769	+
721	721	componentListId
	771	+
722	722	where the componentListId is the name of the class (there is only one occurrence of each in the Data Structure Definition)
723		-)))|(% style="width:396px" %)(((
	773	+)))|(((
724	724	TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0).DimensionDescriptor
725	725
726	726	TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0).MeasureDescriptor
...	...	@@ -727,124 +727,181 @@
727	727
728	728	TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0).AttributeDescriptor
729	729	)))
730		-|(% style="width:250px" %)(((
	780	+|(((
731	731	GroupDimension
	782	+
732	732	Descriptor
733		-)))|(% style="width:444px" %)(((
	784	+)))|(((
734	734	dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId: dataStructureDefinitionId(version).
	786	+
735	735	groupDimensionDescriptorId
736		-)))|(% style="width:396px" %)TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0).SIBLING
737		-|(% style="width:250px" %)Dimension|(% style="width:444px" %)(((
	788	+)))|TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0).SIBLING
	789	+|Dimension|(((
738	738	dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId: dataStructureDefinition (version).
	791	+
739	739	dimensionId
740		-)))|(% style="width:396px" %)TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0).FREQ
741		-|(% style="width:250px" %)TimeDimension|(% style="width:444px" %)(((
	793	+)))|TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0).FREQ
	794	+|TimeDimension|(((
742	742	dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId: dataStructureDefinition (version).
	796	+
743	743	timeDimensionId
744		-)))|(% style="width:396px" %)TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0).TIME_PERIOD
745		-|(% style="width:250px" %)Measure Dimension|(% style="width:444px" %)dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId: dataStructureDefinition (version).
746		-measureDimensionId|(% style="width:396px" %)TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0).STOCK_FLOW
747		-|(% style="width:250px" %)DataAttrribute|(% style="width:444px" %)dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId: dataStructureDefinition (version). dataAttributeId|(% style="width:396px" %)TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0).OBS_STATUS
748		-|(% style="width:250px" %)PrimaryMeasure|(% style="width:444px" %)(((
	798	+)))|TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0).TIME_PERIOD
	799	+|Measure Dimension|dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId: dataStructureDefinition (version).|TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0).STOCK_FLOW
	800	+
	801	+
	802	+
	803	+| |measureDimensionId|
	804	+|DataAttrribute|dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId: dataStructureDefinition (version). dataAttributeId|TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0).OBS_STATUS
	805	+|PrimaryMeasure|(((
749	749	dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId: dataStructureDefinition (version).
	807	+
750	750	primaryMeasureId
751		-)))|(% style="width:396px" %)TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0).OBS_VALUE
752		-|(% style="width:250px" %)(((
753		-*Category Scheme
754		-)))|(% style="width:444px" %)categorySchemeAgencyId:
755		-categorySchemeId(version)|(% style="width:396px" %)IMF:SDDS(1.0)
756		-|(% style="width:250px" %)Category|(% style="width:444px" %)categorySchemeAgencyId:
757		-categorySchemeId(version).
758		-categoryId.categoryId categoryId.categoryId etc.|(% style="width:396px" %)(((
	809	+)))|TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0).OBS_VALUE
	810	+|(((
	811	+*Category
	812	+
	813	+Scheme
	814	+)))|categorySchemeAgencyId: categorySchemeId(version)|IMF:SDDS(1.0)
	815	+|Category|categorySchemeAgencyId: categorySchemeId(version). categoryId.categoryId categoryId.categoryId etc.|(((
759	759	IMF:SDDS(1.0):
	817	+
760	760	level_1_category.level_2_category …
761	761	)))
762		-|(% style="width:250px" %)(((
763		-*Reporting Taxonomy
764		-)))|(% style="width:444px" %)reportingTaxonomyAgencyId: reportingTaxonomyId(version)|(% style="width:396px" %) IMF:REP_1(1.0)
765		-|(% style="width:250px" %)ReportingCategory|(% style="width:444px" %)reportingTaxonomyAgencyId: reportingTaxonomyId(version) reportingcategoryId.reportingcategoryId|(% style="width:396px" %)(((
	820	+|(((
	821	+*Reporting
	822	+
	823	+Taxonomy
	824	+)))|reportingTaxonomyAgencyId: reportingTaxonomyId(version)| IMF:REP_1(1.0)
	825	+|ReportingCategory|reportingTaxonomyAgencyId: reportingTaxonomyId(version) reportingcategoryId.reportingcategoryId|(((
766	766	IMF:REP_1(1.0):
	827	+
767	767	level_1_repcategory.level_2_repcategory …
768	768	)))
769		-|(% style="width:250px" %)*Categorisation|(% style="width:444px" %)categorisationAgencyId: categorisationId(version)|(% style="width:396px" %)IMF:cat001(1.0)
770		-|(% style="width:250px" %)(((
771		-*Organisation Unit Scheme
772		-)))|(% style="width:444px" %)organisationUnitSchemeAgencyId: organisationUnitSchemeId(version)|(% style="width:396px" %)ECB:ORGANISATIONS(1.0)
773		-|(% style="width:250px" %)Organisation Unit|(% style="width:444px" %)organisationUnitSchemeAgencyId: organisationUnitSchemeId(version). organisationUnitId|(% style="width:396px" %)ECB:ORGANISATIONS(1.0).1F
774		-|(% style="width:250px" %)*AgencyScheme|(% style="width:444px" %)agencySchemeAgencyId: agencySchemeId(version)|(% style="width:396px" %)ECB:AGENCIES(1.0)
	830	+|*Categorisation|categorisationAgencyId: categorisationId(version)|IMF:cat001(1.0)
	831	+|(((
	832	+*Organisation
775	775
776		-|(% style="width:262px" %)Agency|(% style="width:369px" %)agencySchemeAgencyId: agencySchemeId(version). agencyId|(% style="width:1262px" %)ECB:AGENCY(1.0).AA
777		-|(% style="width:262px" %)(((
778		-*DataProvider Scheme
779		-)))|(% style="width:369px" %)dataProviderSchemeAgencyId: dataProviderSchemeId(version)|(% style="width:1262px" %)SDMX:DATA_PROVIDERS(1.0)
780		-|(% style="width:262px" %)DataProvider|(% style="width:369px" %)dataProviderSchemeAgencyId: dataProviderSchemeId(version) dataProviderId|(% style="width:1262px" %)SDMX:DATA_PROVIDERS(1.0).PROVIDER_1
781		-|(% style="width:262px" %)(((
782		-*DataConsumer Scheme
783		-)))|(% style="width:369px" %)dataConsumerSchemeAgencyId: dataConsumerSchemeId(version)|(% style="width:1262px" %)SDMX:DATA_CONSUMERS(1.0)
784		-|(% style="width:262px" %)Data Consumer|(% style="width:369px" %)dataConsumerSchemeAgencyId: dataConsumerSchemeId(version) dataConsumerId|(% style="width:1262px" %)SDMX:DATA_CONSUMERS(1.0).CONSUMER_1
785		-|(% style="width:262px" %)(((
786		-*Metadata Structure
787		-)))|(% style="width:369px" %)MSDAgencyId:MSDId(version)|(% style="width:1262px" %)IMF:SDDS_MSD(1.0)
788		-|(% style="width:262px" %)MetadataTarget|(% style="width:369px" %)(((
	834	+Unit Scheme
	835	+)))|organisationUnitSchemeAgencyId: organisationUnitSchemeId(version)|ECB:ORGANISATIONS(1.0)
	836	+|Organisation Unit|organisationUnitSchemeAgencyId: organisationUnitSchemeId(version). organisationUnitId|ECB:ORGANISATIONS(1.0).1F
	837	+|*AgencyScheme|agencySchemeAgencyId: agencySchemeId(version)|ECB:AGENCIES(1.0)
	838	+
	839	+
	840	+
	841	+|Agency|agencySchemeAgencyId: agencySchemeId(version). agencyId|ECB:AGENCY(1.0).AA
	842	+|(((
	843	+*DataProvider
	844	+
	845	+Scheme
	846	+)))|dataProviderSchemeAgencyId: dataProviderSchemeId(version)|SDMX:DATA_PROVIDERS(1.0)
	847	+|DataProvider|dataProviderSchemeAgencyId: dataProviderSchemeId(version) dataProviderId|SDMX:DATA_PROVIDERS(1.0).PROVIDER_1
	848	+|(((
	849	+*DataConsumer
	850	+
	851	+Scheme
	852	+)))|dataConsumerSchemeAgencyId: dataConsumerSchemeId(version)|SDMX:DATA_CONSUMERS(1.0)
	853	+|Data Consumer|dataConsumerSchemeAgencyId: dataConsumerSchemeId(version) dataConsumerId|SDMX:DATA_CONSUMERS(1.0).CONSUMER_1
	854	+|(((
	855	+*Metadata
	856	+
	857	+Structure
	858	+)))|MSDAgencyId:MSDId(version)|IMF:SDDS_MSD(1.0)
	859	+|MetadataTarget|(((
789	789	MSDAgencyId:
	861	+
790	790	MSDId(version).metadataTargetId
791		-)))|(% style="width:1262px" %)IMF:SDDS_MSD(1.0).AGENCY
792		-|(% style="width:262px" %)(((
	863	+)))|IMF:SDDS_MSD(1.0).AGENCY
	864	+|(((
793	793	Dimension
	866	+
794	794	DescriptorValues
	868	+
795	795	Target
796		-)))|(% style="width:369px" %)(((
	870	+)))|(((
797	797	MSDAgencyId: MSDId(version).
	872	+
798	798	metadataTargetId.keyDescriptorValueTargetId
799		-)))|(% style="width:1262px" %)IMF:SDDS_MSD(1.0).AGENCY.KEY
800		-|(% style="width:262px" %)Identifiable Object Target|(% style="width:369px" %)(((
801		-MSDAgencyId: MSDId(version).metadataTargetId.identifiableObjectTargetId
802		-)))|(% style="width:1262px" %)IMF:SDDS_MSD(1.0).AGENCY.STR-OBJECT
803		-|(% style="width:262px" %)DataSetTarget|(% style="width:369px" %)(((
	874	+)))|IMF:SDDS_MSD(1.0).AGENCY.KEY
	875	+|Identifiable ObjectTarget|(((
804	804	MSDAgencyId:
805		-MSDId(version).metadataTargetId.dataSetTargetId
806		-)))|(% style="width:1262px" %)IMF:SDDS_MSD(1.0).AGENCY.D1101
807		-|(% style="width:262px" %)PeportPeriod Target|(% style="width:369px" %)(((
808		-MSDAgencyId: MSDId(version).metadataTargetId.reportPeriodTargetId
809		-)))|(% style="width:1262px" %)IMF:SDDS_MSD(1.0).AGENCY.REP_PER
810	810
811		-|(% style="width:251px" %)(((
	878	+MSDId(version).metadataTargetId.identifiable
	879	+
	880	+ObjectTargetId
	881	+)))|IMF:SDDS_MSD(1.0).AGENCY.STR-OBJECT
	882	+|DataSetTarget|(((
	883	+MSDAgencyId:
	884	+
	885	+MSDId(version).metadataTargetId.dataSet
	886	+
	887	+TargetId
	888	+)))|IMF:SDDS_MSD(1.0).AGENCY.D1101
	889	+|PeportPeriod Target|(((
	890	+MSDAgencyId:
	891	+
	892	+MSDId(version).metadataTargetId.reportPeriod
	893	+
	894	+TargetId
	895	+)))|IMF:SDDS_MSD(1.0).AGENCY.REP_PER
	896	+
	897	+
	898	+
	899	+|(((
812	812	ReportStructure
813		-)))|(% style="width:442px" %)(((
814		-MSDAgencyId: MSDId(version).reportStructureId
815		-)))|(% style="width:1178px" %)IMF:SDDS_MSD(1.0).AGENCY_REPORT
816		-|(% style="width:251px" %)(((
817		-Metadata Attribute
818		-)))|(% style="width:442px" %)(((
819		-MSDAgencyId: MSDId(version).reportStructureId.metadataattri buteID
820		-)))|(% style="width:1178px" %)IMF:SDDS_MSD(1.0).AGENCY_REPORT.COMPILATION
821		-|(% style="width:251px" %)*Dataflow|(% style="width:442px" %)dataflowAgencyId: dataflowId(version)|(% style="width:1178px" %)TFFS:CRED_EXT_DEBT(1.0)
822		-|(% style="width:251px" %)*Provision Agreement|(% style="width:442px" %)(((
	901	+
	902	+
	903	+)))|(((
	904	+MSDAgencyId:
	905	+
	906	+MSDId(version).reportStructureId
	907	+)))|IMF:SDDS_MSD(1.0).AGENCY_REPORT
	908	+|(((
	909	+Metadata
	910	+
	911	+Attribute
	912	+)))|(((
	913	+MSDAgencyId:
	914	+
	915	+MSDId(version).reportStructureId.metadataattri buteID
	916	+)))|IMF:SDDS_MSD(1.0).AGENCY_REPORT.COMPILATION
	917	+|*Dataflow|dataflowAgencyId: dataflowId(version)|TFFS:CRED_EXT_DEBT(1.0)
	918	+|*Provision Agreement|(((
823	823	provisionAgreementAgencyId:provisionAgreem entId(version)
824		-)))|(% style="width:1178px" %)(((
	920	+
	921	+
	922	+)))|(((
825	825	TFFS:CRED_EXT_DEBT_AB(1.0)
	924	+
	925	+
	926	+
826	826	)))
827		-|(% style="width:251px" %)(((
828		-*Content Constraint
829		-)))|(% style="width:442px" %)constraintAgencyId:ContentConstraintId(versio n)|(% style="width:1178px" %)TFFS:CREDITOR_DATA_CONTENT(1.0)
830		-|(% style="width:251px" %)(((
831		-*Attachment Constraint
832		-)))|(% style="width:442px" %)(((
	928	+|(((
	929	+*Content
	930	+
	931	+Constraint
	932	+)))|constraintAgencyId:ContentConstraintId(versio n)|TFFS:CREDITOR_DATA_CONTENT(1.0)
	933	+|(((
	934	+*Attachment
	935	+
	936	+Constraint
	937	+)))|(((
833	833	constraintAgencyId:
834	834
835	835	attachmentConstraintId(version)
836		-)))|(% style="width:1178px" %)TFFS:CREDITOR_DATA_ATTACHMENT_CONSTRAINT_ONE(1.0)
837		-|(% style="width:251px" %)*Metadataflow|(% style="width:442px" %)metadataflowAgencyId: metadataflowId(version)|(% style="width:1178px" %)IMF:SDDS_FLOW(1.0)
838		-|(% style="width:251px" %)*StructureSet|(% style="width:442px" %)structureSetAgencyId: structureSetId(version)|(% style="width:1178px" %)SDMX:BOP_STRUCTURES(1.0)
839		-|(% style="width:251px" %)StructureMap|(% style="width:442px" %)structureSetAgencyId: structureSetId(version). structureMapId|(% style="width:1178px" %)SDMX:BOP_STRUCTURES(1.0).TABLE1_TABLE2
840		-|(% style="width:251px" %)Component Map|(% style="width:442px" %)(((
	941	+)))|TFFS:CREDITOR_DATA_ATTACHMENT_CONSTRAINT_ONE(1.0)
	942	+|*Metadataflow|metadataflowAgencyId: metadataflowId(version)|IMF:SDDS_FLOW(1.0)
	943	+|*StructureSet|structureSetAgencyId: structureSetId(version)|SDMX:BOP_STRUCTURES(1.0)
	944	+|StructureMap|structureSetAgencyId: structureSetId(version). structureMapId|SDMX:BOP_STRUCTURES(1.0).TABLE1_TABLE2
	945	+|Component Map|(((
841	841	structureSetAgencyId: structureSetId(version).
842	842
843	843	structureMapId. componentMapId
844		-)))|(% style="width:1178px" %)SDMX:BOP_STRUCTURES(1.0).TABLE1_TABLE2. REFAREA_REPCOUNTRY
845		-|(% style="width:251px" %)CodelistMap|(% style="width:442px" %)structureSetAgencyId: structureSetId(version). codelistMapId|(% style="width:1178px" %)SDMX:BOP_STRUCTURES(1.0).CLREFAREA_CLREPCOUNTRY
846		-|(% style="width:251px" %)CodeMap|(% style="width:442px" %)structureSetAgencyId: structureSetId(version).|(% style="width:1178px" %)SDMX:BOP_STRUCTURES(1.0).CLREFAREA_CLREPCOUNTRY. DE_GER
	949	+)))|SDMX:BOP_STRUCTURES(1.0).TABLE1_TABLE2. REFAREA_REPCOUNTRY
	950	+|CodelistMap|structureSetAgencyId: structureSetId(version). codelistMapId|SDMX:BOP_STRUCTURES(1.0).CLREFAREA_CLREPCOUNTRY
	951	+|CodeMap|structureSetAgencyId: structureSetId(version).|SDMX:BOP_STRUCTURES(1.0).CLREFAREA_CLREPCOUNTRY. DE_GER
847	847
	953	+
	954	+
848	848	| |(((
849	849	codeListMapId.
850	850
...	...	@@ -851,7 +851,9 @@
851	851	codeMapId
852	852	)))|
853	853	|(((
854		-CategorySchemeMap
	961	+Category
	962	+
	963	+SchemeMap
855	855	)))|structureSetAgencyId: structureSetId(version). categorySchemeMapId|SDMX:BOP_STRUCTURES(1.0).SDMX_EUROSTAT
856	856	|CategoryMap|structureSetAgencyId: structureSetId(version). categorySchemeMapId. categoryMapId|SDMX:BOP_STRUCTURES(1.0).SDMX_EUROSTAT.TOURISM_M AP
857	857	|Organisation SchemeMap|structureSetAgencyId: structureSetId(version). organisationSchemeMapId|SDMX:BOP_STRUCTURES(1.0).DATA_PROVIDER_MAP
...	...	@@ -865,53 +865,71 @@
865	865	structureSetAgencyId: structureSetId(version). conceptSchemeMapId.
866	866
867	867	conceptMapId
	977	+
868	868
869	869	)))|SDMX:BOP_STRUCTURES(1.0).SDMX_OECD.COVERAGE_AVAI LABILITY
870	870	|(((
871		-ReportingTaxonomyMap
	981	+Reporting
	982	+
	983	+TaxonomyMap
872	872	)))|structureSetAgencyId: structureSetId(version). reportingTaxonomyMapId|SDMX:BOP_STRUCTURES(1.0).TAXMAP
873	873	|(((
874		-ReportingCategoryMap
	986	+Reporting
	987	+
	988	+CategoryMap
875	875	)))|(((
876	876	structureSetAgencyId: structureSetId(version).
	991	+
877	877	reportngCategoryId
878	878	)))|SDMX:BOP_STRUCTURES(1.0).TAXMAP.TOPCAT
879	879
	995	+
	996	+
880	880	|(((
881		-HybridCodelistMap
882		-)))|structureSetAgencyId: structureSetId(version).
883		-hybridCodelistMapId.|SDMX:BOP_STRUCTURES(1.0).COUNTRY_HIERARCHYMAP
	998	+HybridCodelist
	999	+
	1000	+Map
	1001	+)))|structureSetAgencyId: structureSetId(version). hybridCodelistMapId.|SDMX:BOP_STRUCTURES(1.0).COUNTRY_HIERARCHYMAP
884	884	|HybridCodeMap|structureSetAgencyId: structureSetId(version). hybridCodelistMapId. hybridCodeMapId|SDMX:BOP_STRUCTURES(1.0).COUNTRY_HIERARCHYMAP.CO DEMAP1
885	885	|*Process|processAgencyId: processId{version]|BIS:PROCESS1(1.0)
886	886	|ProcessStep|(((
887	887	processAgencyId: processId(version).
	1006	+
888	888	processStepId
889	889	)))|BIS:PROCESS1(1.0).STEP1
890	890	|Transition|(((
891	891	processAgencyId: processId(version).
	1011	+
892	892	processStepId transitionId
893	893	)))|BIS:PROCESS1(1.0).STEP1.TRANSITION1
894	894	|Subscription|The Subscription is not itself an Identifiable Artefact and therefore it does not follow the rules for URN structure, The name of the URN is registryURN There is no pre-determined format.|This cannot be generated by a common mechanism as subscriptions, although maintainable in the sense that they can be submitted and deleted, are not mandated to be created by a maintenance agency, and have no versioning mechanism. It is therefore the responsibility of the target registry to generate a unique Id for the Subscription, and for the application creating the subscription to store the registryURN that is returned from the registry in the subscription response message.
895	895	|(((
896		-*Transformation Scheme
	1016	+*Transformation
	1017	+
	1018	+Scheme
897	897	)))|transformationSchemeAgencyId transformationSchemeId(version)|ECB: TRANSFORMATION_SCHEME(1.0)
898	898	|Transformation|(((
899	899	transformationSchemeAgencyId transformationSchemeId(version)
	1022	+
900	900	transformationId
901	901	)))|ECB:TRANSFORMATION_SCHEME(1.0).TRANS_1
902	902	|CustomType Scheme|customTypeSchemeAgencyId customTypeSchemeId(version)|ECB:CUSTOM_TYPE_SCHEME(1.0)
903	903
	1027	+
	1028	+
904	904	|CustomType|customTypeSchemeAgencyId customTypeSchemeId(version) customTypeId|ECB: CUSTOM_TYPE_SCHEME(1.0).CUSTOM_TYPE_1
905	905	|(((
906	906	Name
	1032	+
907	907	Personalisation
	1034	+
908	908	Scheme
909	909	)))|namePersonalisationSchemeAgencyId namePersonalisationSchemeId(version)|ECB:PSN_SCHEME(1.0)
910	910	|(((
911	911	Name
	1039	+
912	912	Personalisation
913		-)))|namePersonalisationSchemeAgencyId namePersonalisationSchemeId(version)
914		-namePersonalisationId|ECB:PSN_SCHEME(1.0).PSN1234
	1041	+)))|namePersonalisationSchemeAgencyId namePersonalisationSchemeId(version) namePersonalisationId|ECB:PSN_SCHEME(1.0).PSN1234
915	915	|VtlMapping Scheme|vtlMappingSchemeAgencyId VtlMappingSchemeId(version)|ECB:CLIST_MP(2.0)
916	916	|VtlCodelist Mapping|vtlMappingSchemeAgencyId vtlMappingSchemeId(version) vtlCodelistMappingId|ECB:CLIST_MP(2.0).ABZ
917	917	|VtlConcept Mapping|vtlMappingSchemeAgencyId vtlMappingSchemeId(version) vtlConceptMappingId|ECB:CLIST_MP(1.0).XYA
...	...	@@ -924,12 +924,15 @@
924	924	|RulesetScheme|rulesetSchemeAgencyId rulesetSchemeId(version)|ECB:RULESET_23(1.0)
925	925	|Ruleset|rulesetSchemeAgencyId rulesetSchemeId(version) rulesetId|ECB:RULESET_23(1.0).SET111
926	926	|(((
927		-UserDefinedOperatorScheme
	1054	+UserDefined
	1055	+
	1056	+OperatorScheme
928	928	)))|userDefinedOperatorSchemeAgencyId userDefinedOperatorSchemeId(version)|ECB:OS_CALC(1.2)
929	929	|UserDefined Operator|userDefinedOperatorSchemeAgencyId userDefinedOperatorSchemeId(version) usserDefinedOperatorId|ECB:OS_CALC(1.2).OS267
930	930
931		-**Table 3: Table of identification components for SDMX Identifiable Artefacts**
	1060	+7**Table 3: Table of identification components for SDMX Identifiable Artefacts**
932	932
	1062	+
933	933	= 7 Implementation Notes =
934	934
935	935	== 7.1 Structural Definition Metadata ==
...	...	@@ -950,72 +950,109 @@
950	950
951	951	The following table lists the Maintainable Artefacts.
952	952
953		-(% style="width:640.294px" %)
954		-|(% colspan="2" rowspan="1" style="width:186px" %)**Maintainable Artefacts**|(% style="width:206px" %)**Content**
955		-|(% style="width:171px" %)**Abstract Class**|(% style="width:232px" %)**Concrete Class**|(% style="width:206px" %)
956		-|(% style="width:171px" %)Item Scheme|(% style="width:232px" %)Codelist|(% style="width:206px" %)Code
957		-|(% style="width:171px" %) |(% style="width:232px" %)Concept Scheme|(% style="width:206px" %)Concept
958		-|(% style="width:171px" %) |(% style="width:232px" %)Category Scheme|(% style="width:206px" %)Category
959		-|(% style="width:171px" %) |(% style="width:232px" %)Organisation Unit Scheme|(% style="width:206px" %)Organisation Unit
960		-|(% style="width:171px" %) |(% style="width:232px" %)Agency Scheme|(% style="width:206px" %)Agency
961		-|(% style="width:171px" %) |(% style="width:232px" %)Data Provider Scheme|(% style="width:206px" %)Data Provider
962		-|(% style="width:171px" %) |(% style="width:232px" %)Data Consumer Scheme|(% style="width:206px" %)Data Consumer
963		-|(% style="width:171px" %) |(% style="width:232px" %)Reporting Taxonomy|(% style="width:206px" %)Reporting Category
964		-|(% style="width:171px" %) |(% style="width:232px" %)Transformation Scheme|(% style="width:206px" %)Transformation
965		-|(% style="width:171px" %) |(% style="width:232px" %)Custom Type Scheme|(% style="width:206px" %)Custom Type
966		-|(% style="width:171px" %) |(% style="width:232px" %)Name Personalisation Scheme|(% style="width:206px" %)Name Personalisation
967		-|(% style="width:171px" %) |(% style="width:232px" %)Vtl Mapping Scheme|(% style="width:206px" %)Vtl Codelist Mapping
968		-|(% style="width:171px" %) |(% style="width:232px" %) |(% style="width:206px" %)Vtl Dataflow Mapping
969		-|(% style="width:171px" %) |(% style="width:232px" %) |(% style="width:206px" %)Vtl Concept Scheme Mapping
970		-|(% style="width:171px" %) |(% style="width:232px" %)Ruleset Scheme|(% style="width:206px" %)Ruleset
971		-|(% style="width:171px" %) |(% style="width:232px" %)User Defined Operator Scheme|(% style="width:206px" %)User Defined Operator
972		-|(% style="width:171px" %) |(% style="width:232px" %) |(% style="width:206px" %)User Defined Operator
973		-|(% style="width:171px" %)Structure|(% style="width:232px" %)Data Structure Definition|(% style="width:206px" %)(((
	1083	+|(% colspan="4" %)**Maintainable Artefacts**|(% colspan="2" %)**Content**|
	1084	+|(% colspan="2" %)**Abstract Class**|(% colspan="2" %)**Concrete Class**|(% colspan="2" %) |
	1085	+|(% colspan="2" %)Item Scheme|(% colspan="2" %)Codelist|(% colspan="2" %)Code|
	1086	+|(% colspan="2" %) |(% colspan="2" %)Concept Scheme|(% colspan="2" %)Concept|
	1087	+|(% colspan="2" %) |(% colspan="2" %)Category Scheme|(% colspan="2" %)Category|
	1088	+|(% colspan="2" %) |(% colspan="2" %)Organisation Unit Scheme|(% colspan="2" %)Organisation Unit|
	1089	+|(% colspan="2" %) |(% colspan="2" %)Agency Scheme|(% colspan="2" %)Agency|
	1090	+|(% colspan="2" %) |(% colspan="2" %)Data Provider Scheme|(% colspan="2" %)Data Provider|
	1091	+|(% colspan="2" %) |(% colspan="2" %)Data Consumer Scheme|(% colspan="2" %)Data Consumer|
	1092	+|(% colspan="2" %) |(% colspan="2" %)Reporting Taxonomy|(% colspan="2" %)Reporting Category|
	1093	+|(% colspan="2" %) |(% colspan="2" %)Transformation Scheme|(% colspan="2" %)Transformation|
	1094	+|(% colspan="2" %) |(% colspan="2" %)Custom Type Scheme|(% colspan="2" %)Custom Type|
	1095	+| |(% colspan="4" %)**Maintainable Artefacts**|(% colspan="2" %)**Content**
	1096	+| |(% colspan="2" %)**Abstract Class**|(% colspan="2" %)**Concrete Class**|(% colspan="2" %)
	1097	+| |(% colspan="2" %) |(% colspan="2" %)Name Personalisation Scheme|(% colspan="2" %)Name Personalisation
	1098	+| |(% colspan="2" %) |(% colspan="2" %)Vtl Mapping Scheme|(% colspan="2" %)Vtl Codelist Mapping
	1099	+| |(% colspan="2" %) |(% colspan="2" %) |(% colspan="2" %)Vtl Concept Mapping
	1100	+| |(% colspan="2" %) |(% colspan="2" %) |(% colspan="2" %)Vtl Dataflow Mapping
	1101	+| |(% colspan="2" %) |(% colspan="2" %) |(% colspan="2" %)(((
	1102	+Vtl Concept Scheme
	1103	+
	1104	+Mapping
	1105	+)))
	1106	+| |(% colspan="2" %) |(% colspan="2" %)Ruleset Scheme|(% colspan="2" %)Ruleset
	1107	+| |(% colspan="2" %) |(% colspan="2" %)User Defined Operator Scheme|(% colspan="2" %)User Defined Operator
	1108	+| |(% colspan="2" %) |(% colspan="2" %) |(% colspan="2" %)
	1109	+| |(% colspan="2" %)Structure|(% colspan="2" %)Data Structure Definition|(% colspan="2" %)(((
974	974	Dimension Descriptor
	1111	+
975	975	Group Dimension
	1113	+
976	976	Descriptor
	1115	+
977	977	Dimension
	1117	+
978	978	Measure Dimension
	1119	+
979	979	Time Dimension
	1121	+
980	980	Attribute Descriptor
	1123	+
981	981	Data Attribute
	1125	+
982	982	Measure Descriptor
	1127	+
983	983	Primary Measure
984	984	)))
985		-|(% style="width:171px" %) |(% style="width:232px" %)Metadata Structure Definition|(% style="width:206px" %)(((
986		-Metadata Target, Dimension Descriptor
	1130	+| |(% colspan="2" %) |(% colspan="2" %)Metadata Structure Definition|(% colspan="2" %)(((
	1131	+Metadata Target,
	1132	+
	1133	+Dimension Descriptor
	1134	+
987	987	Values Target Identifiable
	1136	+
988	988	Object Target
	1138	+
989	989	Report Period Target
	1140	+
990	990	Data SetTarget
	1142	+
991	991	Report Structure
	1144	+
992	992	Metadata Attribute
993	993	)))
994		-|(% style="width:171px" %)Structure Usage|(% style="width:232px" %)Dataflow Definition|(% style="width:206px" %)
995		-|(% style="width:171px" %) |(% style="width:232px" %)Metadataflow Definition|(% style="width:206px" %)
996		-|(% style="width:171px" %)None|(% style="width:232px" %)Process|(% style="width:206px" %)Process Step
997		-|(% style="width:171px" %)None|(% style="width:232px" %)Structure Set|(% style="width:206px" %)(((
	1147	+| |(% colspan="2" %)Structure Usage|(% colspan="2" %)Dataflow Definition|(% colspan="2" %)
	1148	+| |(% colspan="2" %) |(% colspan="2" %)Metadataflow Definition|(% colspan="2" %)
	1149	+| |(% colspan="2" %)None|(% colspan="2" %)Process|(% colspan="2" %)Process Step
	1150	+| |(% colspan="2" %)None|(% colspan="2" %)Structure Set|(% colspan="2" %)(((
998	998	Component Map
	1152	+
999	999	Concept Scheme Map
	1154	+
1000	1000	Codelist Map
	1156	+
1001	1001	Category Scheme Map
	1158	+
1002	1002	Reporting Taxonomy Map
	1160	+
1003	1003	Organisation Scheme Map
	1162	+
1004	1004	Concept Map
	1164	+
1005	1005	Code Map
	1166	+
1006	1006	Category Map
	1168	+
1007	1007	Organisation Map
	1170	+
1008	1008	Reporting Category Map
	1172	+
1009	1009	Hybrid Codelist Map
	1174	+
1010	1010	Hybrid Code Map
1011	1011	)))
1012		-|(% style="width:171px" %)None|(% style="width:232px" %)Provision Agreement|(% style="width:206px" %)
1013		-|(% style="width:171px" %)None|(% style="width:232px" %)Hierarchical Codelist|(% style="width:206px" %)(((
	1177	+| |(% colspan="2" %)None|(% colspan="2" %)Provision Agreement|(% colspan="2" %)
	1178	+| |(% colspan="2" %)None|(% colspan="2" %)Hierarchical Codelist|(% colspan="2" %)(((
1014	1014	Hierarchy
	1180	+
1015	1015	Hierarchical Code
1016	1016	)))
	1183	+| | | | | | |
1017	1017
1018		-**able 4: Table of Maintainable Artefacts for Structural Definition Metadata**
	1185	+**Table 4: Table of Maintainable Artefacts for Structural Definition Metadata**
1019	1019
1020	1020	=== 7.1.2 Item Scheme, Structure ===
1021	1021
...	...	@@ -1022,7 +1022,10 @@
1022	1022	The artefacts included in the structural definitions are:
1023	1023
1024	1024	* All types of Item Scheme (Codelist, Concept Scheme, Category Scheme, Organisation Scheme - Agency Scheme, Data Provider Scheme, Data Consumer Scheme, Organisation Unit Scheme)
1025		-* All types of Structure (Data Structure Definition, Metadata Structure Definition)
	1192	+* All types of Structure (Data Structure Definition, Metadata Structure
	1193	+
	1194	+Definition)
	1195	+
1026	1026	* All types of Structure Usage (Dataflow Definition, Metadataflow Definition)
1027	1027
1028	1028	=== 7.1.3 Structure Usage ===
...	...	@@ -1041,8 +1041,6 @@
1041	1041
1042	1042	==== 7.1.3.3 Structure Usage Model ====
1043	1043
1044		-[[image:1747829078194-749.png]]
1045		-
1046	1046	**Figure 10: SDMX-IM of links from Structure Usage to Category**
1047	1047
1048	1048	In addition to the maintenance of the Dataflow Definition and the Metadataflow Definition the following links must be maintained in the registry:
...	...	@@ -1069,10 +1069,10 @@
1069	1069
1070	1070	An organisation which publishes statistical data or reference metadata and wishes to make it available to an SDMX enabled community is called a Data Provider. In terms of the SDMX Information Model, the Data Provider is maintained in a Data Provider Scheme.
1071	1071
1072		-[[image:1747829109466-595.png]]
1073	1073
1074	1074	**Figure 11: SDMX-IM of the Data Provider**
1075	1075
	1243	+
1076	1076	Note that the Data Provider does not inherit the hierarchy association. The diagram below shows a logical schematic of the data model classes required to maintain provision agreements
1077	1077
1078	1078	[[image:1747824123019-181.jpeg]]
...	...	@@ -1081,10 +1081,8 @@
1081	1081
1082	1082	The diagram below is a logical representation of the data required in order to maintain Provision Agreements.
1083	1083
1084		-[[image:1747829139951-378.png]]
1085	1085
1086		-(% class="wikigeneratedid" id="HFigure13:LogicalclassdiagramoftheinformationcontainedintheProvisionAgreement" %)
1087		-**Figure 13: Logical class diagram of the information contained in the Provision Agreement**
	1253	+==== Figure 13: Logical class diagram of the information contained in the Provision Agreement ====
1088	1088
1089	1089	A Provision Agreement is structural metadata. Each Provision Agreement must reference a Data Provider and a Dataflow or Metadataflow Definition. The Data Provider and the Dataflow/Metadataflow Definition must exist already in order to set up a Provision Agreement.
1090	1090
...	...	@@ -1112,12 +1112,13 @@
1112	1112
1113	1113	=== 7.3.3 Data and Metadata Constraints: Model ===
1114	1114
1115		-[[image:1747829204737-370.png]]
1116	1116
1117		-**Figure 15: Logical class diagram showing inheritance between and reference to constrainable artifacts**
1118	1118
1119		-The class diagram above shows that DataProvider, DataflowDefinition, MetadataflowDefinition, ProvisionAgreement, DataStructureDefinition, MetadataStructureDefinition, SimpleDatasource and QueryDatasource are all concrete sub-classes of ConstrainableArtefact and can therefore have Constraints specified. Note that the actual Constraint as submitted is associated to the reference classes which inherit from ConstrainableRef: these are used to refer to the classes to which the Constraint applies.
	1283	+==== Figure 15: Logical class diagram showing inheritance between and reference to constrainable artifacts ====
1120	1120
	1285	+The class diagram above shows that DataProvider, DataflowDefinition, MetadataflowDefinition, ProvisionAgreement, DataStructureDefinition, MetadataStructureDefinition, SimpleDatasource and QueryDatasource are all concrete sub-classes of ConstrainableArtefact and can therefore have Constraints specified. Note that the actual Constraint as submitted is associated to the reference classes which inherit from ConstrainableRef: these are used to refer to the classes to which the Constraint applies.
	1286	+
	1287	+
1121	1121	The content of the Constraint can be found in the SDMX Information Model document.
1122	1122
1123	1123	== 7.4 Data and Metadata Registration ==
...	...	@@ -1138,7 +1138,7 @@
1138	1138
1139	1139	[[image:1747824123025-411.jpeg]]
1140	1140
1141		-**Figure 16: Schematic of the Objects Concerned with Registration**
	1308	+ **Figure 16: Schematic of the Objects Concerned with Registration**
1142	1142
1143	1143	==== 7.4.2.2 Registration Request Model ====
1144	1144
...	...	@@ -1152,14 +1152,11 @@
1152	1152
1153	1153	The Registration has an action attribute which takes one of the following values:
1154	1154
1155		-(% style="width:970.294px" %)
1156		-|(% style="width:212px" %)**Action Attribute Value**|(% style="width:756px" %)**Behaviour**
1157		-|(% style="width:212px" %)Append|(% style="width:756px" %)Add this Registration to the registry
1158		-|(% style="width:212px" %)Replace|(% style="width:756px" %)Replace the existing Registration with identified by the id in the Registration of the Submit Registration Request
1159		-|(% style="width:212px" %)Delete|(% style="width:756px" %)Delete the existing Registration identified by the id in the Registration of the Submit Registration Request
	1322	+|**Action Attribute Value**|**Behaviour**
	1323	+|Append|Add this Registration to the registry
	1324	+|Replace|Replace the existing Registration with identified by the id in the Registration of the Submit Registration Request
	1325	+|Delete|Delete the existing Registration identified by the id in the Registration of the Submit Registration Request
1160	1160
1161		-[[image:1747829290890-122.png]]
1162		-
1163	1163	**Figure 17: Logical Class Diagram of Registration of Data and Metadata**
1164	1164
1165	1165	The Query Datasource is an abstract class that represents a data source which can understand an SDMX-ML query (SOAPDatasource) or RESTful query
...	...	@@ -1174,19 +1174,25 @@
1174	1174
1175	1175	Information in the data or metadata set is extracted and placed in one or more Content Constraints (see the Constraints model in the SDMX Information Model – Section 2 of the SDMX Standards). The information to be extracted is indicated by the Boolean values set on the Provision Agreement as shown in the table below.
1176	1176
1177		-|(% style="width:185px" %)**Indexing Required**|(% style="width:1686px" %)**Registration Process Activity**
1178		-|(% style="width:185px" %)indexTimeSeries|(% style="width:1686px" %)Extract all the series keys and create a KeySet(s) Constraint.
1179		-|(% style="width:185px" %)indexDataSet|(% style="width:1686px" %)(((
1180		-Extract all the codes and other content of the Key value of the Series Key in a Data Set and create one or more Cube Regions containing Member Selections of Dimension Components of the Constraints model in the SDMX-IM, and the associated Selection Value.
	1341	+|**Indexing Required**|**Registration Process Activity**
	1342	+|indexTimeSeries|Extract all the series keys and create a KeySet(s) Constraint.
	1343	+|indexDataSet|(((
	1344	+Extract all the codes and other content of the Key value of the Series Key in a Data Set and create one or more Cube
	1345	+
	1346	+Regions containing Member Selections of Dimension Components of the Constraints model in the SDMX-IM, and the associated Selection Value.
1181	1181	)))
1182		-|(% style="width:185px" %)indexReportingPeriod|(% style="width:1686px" %)(((
	1348	+|indexReportingPeriod|(((
1183	1183	This applies only to a registered dataset.
	1350	+
1184	1184	Extract the Reporting Begin and Reporting End from the Header of the Message containing the data set, and create a Reference Period constraint.
1185	1185	)))
1186		-|(% style="width:185px" %)indexAttributes|(% style="width:1686px" %)(((
	1353	+|indexAttributes|(((
1187	1187	**Data Set**
	1355	+
1188	1188	Extract the content of the Attribute Values in a Data Set and create one or more Cube Regions containing Member Selections of Data Attribute Components of the Constraints model in the SDMXIM, and the associated Selection Value
	1357	+
1189	1189	**Metadata Set**
	1359	+
1190	1190	Indicate the presence of a Reported Attribute by creating one or more Cube Regions containing Member Selections of Metadata Attribute Components of the Constraints model in the SDMX-IM. Note that the content is not stored in the Selection Value.
1191	1191	)))
1192	1192
...	...	@@ -1196,13 +1196,14 @@
1196	1196
1197	1197	=== 7.4.3 Registration Response ===
1198	1198
1199		-After a registration request has been submitted to the registry, a response is returned to the submitter indicating success or failure. Given that a registration request can hold many Registrations, then there must be a registration status for each Registration. The Submit Registration class has a status field which is either set to “Success”, “Warning” or “Failure”.
	1369	+After a registration request has been submitted to the registry, a response is returned to the submitter indicating success or failure. Given that a registration request can hold many Registrations, then there must be a registration status for each Registration. The Submit Registration class has a status field which is either set to
1200	1200
	1371	+“Success”, “Warning” or “Failure”.
	1372	+
1201	1201	If the registration has succeeded, a Registration will be returned - this holds the Registry-allocated Id of the newly registered Datasource plus a Datasource holding the URL to access the dataset, metadataset, or query service.
1202	1202
1203	1203	The Registration Response returns set of registration status (one for each registration submitted) in terms of a Status Message (this is common to all Registry Responses) that indicates success or failure. In the event of registration failure, a set of Message Text are returned, giving the error messages that occurred during registration. It is entirely possible when registering a batch of datasets, that the response will contain some successful and some failed statuses. The logical model for the Registration Response is shown below:
1204	1204
1205		-[[image:1747829477882-750.png]]
1206	1206
1207	1207	**Figure 18: Logical class diagram showing the registration response**
1208	1208
...	...	@@ -1212,12 +1212,15 @@
1212	1212
1213	1213	A user can submit a subscription in the registry that defines which events are of interest, and either an email and/or an HTTP address to which a notification of qualifying events will be delivered. The subscription will be identified in the registry by a URN which is returned to the user when the subscription is created. If the user wants to delete the subscription at a later point, the subscription URN is used as identification. Subscriptions have a validity period expressed as a date range (startDate, endDate) and the registry may delete any expired subscriptions, and will notify the subscriber on expiry.
1214	1214
1215		-When a registry/repository artefact is modified, any subscriptions which are observing the object are activated, and either an email or HTTP POST is instigated to report details of the changes to the user specified in the subscription. This is called a “notification”.
	1386	+When a registry/repository artefact is modified, any subscriptions which are observing the object are activated, and either an email or HTTP POST is instigated to report details of the changes to the user specified in the subscription. This is called a
1216	1216
1217		-=== 7.5.1Subscription Logical Class Diagram ===
	1388	+“notification”.
1218	1218
1219		-[[image:1747829554603-150.png]]
	1390	+ 7.5.1Subscription Logical Class Diagram
1220	1220
	1392	+
	1393	+[[image:1747824123028-257.png]]
	1394	+
1221	1221	**Figure 19: Logical Class Diagram of the Subscription**
1222	1222
1223	1223	=== 7.5.2 Subscription Information ===
...	...	@@ -1224,58 +1224,73 @@
1224	1224
1225	1225	Regardless of the type of registry/repository events being observed, a subscription always contains:
1226	1226
1227		-1. A set of URIs describing the end-points to which notifications must be sent if the subscription is activated. The URIs can be either mailto~: or http: protocol. In the former case an email notification is sent; in the latter an HTTP POST notification is sent.
1228		-1. A user-defined identifier which is returned in the response to the subscription request. This helps with asynchronous processing and is NOT stored in the Registry.
1229		-1. A validity period which defines both when the subscription becomes active and expires. The subscriber may be sent a notification on expiration of the subscription.
1230		-1. A selector which specifies which type of events are of interest. The set of event types is:
	1401	+~1. A set of URIs describing the end-points to which notifications must be sent if the subscription is activated. The URIs can be either mailto~: or http: protocol. In the former case an email notification is sent; in the latter an HTTP POST notification is sent.
1231	1231
1232		-|(% style="width:319px" %)**Event Type**|(% style="width:1553px" %)**Comment**
1233		-|(% style="width:319px" %)STRUCTURAL_REPOSITORY_EVENTS|(% style="width:1553px" %)Life-cycle changes to Maintainable Artefacts in the structural metadata repository.
1234		-|(% style="width:319px" %)DATA_REGISTRATION_EVENTS|(% style="width:1553px" %)Whenever a published dataset is registered. This can be either a SDMXML data file or an SDMX conformant database.
1235		-|(% style="width:319px" %)METADATA_REGISTRATION_EVENTS|(% style="width:1553px" %)Whenever a published metadataset is registered. This can be either a SDMXML reference metadata file or an SDMX conformant database.
1236		-|(% style="width:319px" %)ALL_EVENTS|(% style="width:1553px" %)All events of the specified EventType
	1403	+2. A user-defined identifier which is returned in the response to the subscription request. This helps with asynchronous processing and is NOT stored in the Registry.
1237	1237
	1405	+3. A validity period which defines both when the subscription becomes active and expires. The subscriber may be sent a notification on expiration of the subscription.
	1406	+
	1407	+4. A selector which specifies which type of events are of interest. The set of event types is:
	1408	+
	1409	+|**Event Type**|**Comment**
	1410	+|STRUCTURAL_REPOSITORY_EVENTS|Life-cycle changes to Maintainable Artefacts in the structural metadata repository.
	1411	+|DATA_REGISTRATION_EVENTS|Whenever a published dataset is registered. This can be either a SDMXML data file or an SDMX conformant database.
	1412	+|METADATA_REGISTRATION_EVENTS|Whenever a published metadataset is registered. This can be either a SDMXML reference metadata file or an SDMX conformant database.
	1413	+|ALL_EVENTS|All events of the specified EventType
	1414	+
1238	1238	=== 7.5.3 Wildcard Facility ===
1239	1239
1240	1240	Subscription notification supports wildcarded identifier components URNs, which are identiiers which have some or all of their component parts replaced by the wildcard character `%`. Identifier components comprise:
1241	1241
1242		-* agencyID
1243		-* id
1244		-* version
	1419	+ agencyID
1245	1245
	1421	+ id
	1422	+
	1423	+ version
	1424	+
1246	1246	Examples of wildcarded identifier components for an identified object type of Codelist are shown below.
1247	1247
1248		-//AgencyID = %
	1427	+AgencyID = %
	1428	+
1249	1249	Id = %
1250		-Version = %//
1251	1251
	1431	+Version = %
	1432	+
1252	1252	This subscribes to all Codelists of all versions for all agencies.
1253	1253
1254		-//AgencyID = AGENCY1
	1435	+AgencyID = AGENCY1
	1436	+
1255	1255	Id = CODELIST1
1256		-Version = %//
1257	1257
	1439	+Version = %
	1440	+
1258	1258	This subscribes to all versions of Codelist CODELIST1 maintained by the agency
1259	1259
1260		-//AGENCY1
	1443	+AGENCY1
	1444	+
1261	1261	AgencyID = AGENCY1
	1446	+
1262	1262	Id = %
1263		-Version = %//
1264	1264
	1449	+Version = %
	1450	+
1265	1265	This subscribes to all versions of all Codelist objects maintained by the agency
1266	1266
1267		-//AGENCY1
	1453	+AGENCY1
	1454	+
1268	1268	AgencyID = %
	1456	+
1269	1269	Id = CODELIST1
1270		-Version = %//
1271	1271
	1459	+Version = %
	1460	+
1272	1272	This subscribes to all versions of Codelist CODELIST1 maintained by the agency
1273	1273
1274		-//AGENCY1//
	1463	+AGENCY1
1275	1275
1276	1276	Note that if the subscription is to the latest version then this can be achieved by the * character
1277	1277
1278		-//i.e. Version = *//
	1467	+i.e. Version = *
1279	1279
1280	1280	Note that a subscription using the URN mechanism cannot use wildcard characters.
1281	1281
...	...	@@ -1287,15 +1287,16 @@
1287	1287
1288	1288	Whenever a dataset or metadata-set is registered a registration event is created. A subscription may be observing all data or metadata registrations, or it may focus on specific registrations as shown in the table below:
1289	1289
1290		-|(% style="width:405px" %)**Selector**|(% style="width:1467px" %)**Comment**
1291		-|(% style="width:405px" %)DataProvider|(% style="width:1467px" %)Any datasets or metadata sets registered by the specified data provider will activate the notification.
1292		-|(% style="width:405px" %)ProvisionAgreement|(% style="width:1467px" %)Any datasets or metadata sets registered for the provision agreement will activate the notification.
1293		-|(% style="width:405px" %)Dataflow (&Metadataflow)|(% style="width:1467px" %)Any datasets or metadata sets registered for the specified dataflow (or metadataflow) will activate the notification.
1294		-|(% style="width:405px" %)DataStructureDefinition & MetadataStructureDefinition|(% style="width:1467px" %)Any datasets or metadata sets registered for those dataflows (or metadataflows) that are based on the specified Data Structure Definition will
1295		-|(% style="width:405px" %)**Selector**|(% style="width:1467px" %)**Comment**
1296		-|(% style="width:405px" %) |(% style="width:1467px" %)activate the notification.
1297		-|(% style="width:405px" %)Category|(% style="width:1467px" %)Any datasets or metadata sets registered for those dataflows, metadataflows, provision agreements that are categorised by the category.
1298	1298
	1480	+|**Selector**|**Comment**
	1481	+|DataProvider|Any datasets or metadata sets registered by the specified data provider will activate the notification.
	1482	+|ProvisionAgreement|Any datasets or metadata sets registered for the provision agreement will activate the notification.
	1483	+|Dataflow (&Metadataflow)|Any datasets or metadata sets registered for the specified dataflow (or metadataflow) will activate the notification.
	1484	+|DataStructureDefinition & MetadataStructureDefinition|Any datasets or metadata sets registered for those dataflows (or metadataflows) that are based on the specified Data Structure Definition will
	1485	+|**Selector**|**Comment**
	1486	+| |activate the notification.
	1487	+|Category|Any datasets or metadata sets registered for those dataflows, metadataflows, provision agreements that are categorised by the category.
	1488	+
1299	1299	The event will also capture the semantic of the registration: deletion or replacement of an existing registration or a new registration.
1300	1300
1301	1301	== 7.6 Notification ==
...	...	@@ -1302,10 +1302,8 @@
1302	1302
1303	1303	=== 7.6.1 Logical Class Diagram ===
1304	1304
1305		-[[image:1747829675568-610.png]]
1306	1306
1307		-(% class="wikigeneratedid" id="HFigure20:LogicalClassDiagramoftheNotification" %)
1308		-**Figure 20: Logical Class Diagram of the Notification**
	1496	+==== Figure 20: Logical Class Diagram of the Notification ====
1309	1309
1310	1310	A notification is an XML document that is sent to a user via email or http POST whenever a subscription is activated. It is an asynchronous one-way message.
1311	1311
...	...	@@ -1325,3 +1325,5 @@
1325	1325	=== 7.6.3 Registration Event Component ===
1326	1326
1327	1327	The notification will contain the Registration.
	1516	+
	1517	+

1747829078194-749.png

Author

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-xwiki:XWiki.helena

Size

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-40.4 KB

Content

1747829109466-595.png

Author

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-xwiki:XWiki.helena

Size

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-30.4 KB

Content

1747829139951-378.png

Author

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-xwiki:XWiki.helena

Size

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-21.1 KB

Content

1747829204737-370.png

Author

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-xwiki:XWiki.helena

Size

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-55.8 KB

Content

1747829290890-122.png

Author

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-xwiki:XWiki.helena

Size

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-41.4 KB

Content

1747829477882-750.png

Author

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-xwiki:XWiki.helena

Size

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-24.6 KB

Content

1747829554603-150.png

Author

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-xwiki:XWiki.helena

Size

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-99.1 KB

Content

1747829675568-610.png

Author

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-xwiki:XWiki.helena

Size

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-31.1 KB

Content

1747832400104-286.png

Author

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-xwiki:XWiki.helena

Size

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-172.3 KB

Content

1747994320263-112.png

Author

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-xwiki:XWiki.helena

Size

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-13.9 KB

Content