Changes for page SDMX 2.1 Standards. Section 6. Technical Notes
Last modified by Artur on 2025/08/19 10:43
Summary
-
Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -143,21 +143,18 @@ 143 143 144 144 === 3.4.1 Reporting and Dissemination Guidelines === 145 145 146 - ====3.4.1.1 Central Institutions and Their Role in Statistical Data Exchanges====146 +**3.4.1.1 Central Institutions and Their Role in Statistical Data Exchanges **Central institutions are the organisations to which other partner institutions "report" statistics. These statistics are used by central institutions either to compile aggregates and/or they are put together and made available in a uniform manner (e.g. on-line or on a CD-ROM or through file transfers). Therefore, central institutions receive data from other institutions and, usually, they also "disseminate" data to individual and/or institutions for end-use. Within a country, a NSI or a national central bank (NCB) plays, of course, a central institution role as it collects data from other entities and it disseminates statistical information to end users. In SDMX the role of central institution is very important: every statistical message is based on underlying structural definitions (statistical concepts, code lists, DSDs) which have been devised by a particular agency, usually a central institution. Such an institution plays the role of the reference "structural definitions maintenance agency" for the corresponding messages which are exchanged. Of course, two institutions could exchange data using/referring to structural information devised by a third institution. 147 147 148 -Central institutions are the organisations to which other partner institutions "report" statistics. These statistics are used by central institutions either to compile aggregates and/or they are put together and made available in a uniform manner (e.g. on-line or on a CD-ROM or through file transfers). Therefore, central institutions receive data from other institutions and, usually, they also "disseminate" data to individual and/or institutions for end-use. Within a country, a NSI or a national central bank (NCB) plays, of course, a central institution role as it collects data from other entities and it disseminates statistical information to end users. In SDMX the role of central institution is very important: every statistical message is based on underlying structural definitions (statistical concepts, code lists, DSDs) which have been devised by a particular agency, usually a central institution. Such an institution plays the role of the reference "structural definitions maintenance agency" for the corresponding messages which are exchanged. Of course, two institutions could exchange data using/referring to structural information devised by a third institution. 149 - 150 150 Central institutions can play a double role: 151 151 152 152 * collecting and further disseminating statistics; 153 153 * devising structural definitions for use in data exchanges. 154 154 155 - ====3.4.1.2 Defining Data Structure Definitions (DSDs)====153 +**3.4.1.2 Defining Data Structure Definitions (DSDs)** 156 156 157 157 The following guidelines are suggested for building a DSD. However, it is expected that these guidelines will be considered by central institutions when devising new DSDs. 158 158 159 -(% class="wikigeneratedid" id="HDimensions2CAttributesandCodeLists" %) 160 -__Dimensions, Attributes and Code Lists__ 157 +=== Dimensions, Attributes and Code Lists === 161 161 162 162 **//Avoid dimensions that are not appropriate for all the series in the data structure definition.//** If some dimensions are not applicable (this is evident from the need to have a code in a code list which is marked as “not applicable”, “not relevant” or “total”) for some series then consider moving these series to a new data structure definition in which these dimensions are dropped from the key structure. This is a judgement call as it is sometimes difficult to achieve this without increasing considerably the number of DSDs. 163 163 ... ... @@ -187,8 +187,7 @@ 187 187 188 188 The same code list can be used for several statistical concepts, within a data structure definition or across DSDs. Note that SDMX has recognised that these classifications are often quite large and the usage of codes in any one DSD is only a small extract of the full code list. In this version of the standard it is possible to exchange and disseminate a **partial code list** which is extracted from the full code list and which supports the dimension values valid for a particular DSD. 189 189 190 -(% class="wikigeneratedid" id="HDataStructureDefinitionStructure" %) 191 -__Data Structure Definition Structure__ 187 +=== Data Structure Definition Structure === 192 192 193 193 The following items have to be specified by a structural definitions maintenance agency when defining a new data structure definition: 194 194 ... ... @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ 218 218 * code list name 219 219 * code values and descriptions 220 220 221 -Definition of data flow definitions. Two (or more) partners performing data exchanges in a certain context need to agree on: 217 +Definition of data flow definitions. Two (or more) partners performing data exchanges in a certain context need to agree on: 222 222 223 223 * the list of data set identifiers they will be using; 224 224 * for each data flow: ... ... @@ -247,21 +247,21 @@ 247 247 * If the “observation status” changes and the observation remains unchanged, both components would have to be reported. 248 248 * For Data Structure Definitions having also the observation level attributes “observation confidentiality” and "observation pre-break" defined, this rule applies to these attribute as well: if an institution receives from another institution an observation with an observation status attribute only attached, this means that the associated observation confidentiality and prebreak observation attributes either never existed or from now they do not have a value for this observation. 249 249 250 -=== 3.4.2 Best Practices for Batch Data Exchange === 246 +==== 3.4.2 Best Practices for Batch Data Exchange ==== 251 251 252 - ====3.4.2.1 Introduction====248 +**3.4.2.1 Introduction** 253 253 254 254 Batch data exchange is the exchange and maintenance of entire databases between counterparties. It is an activity that often employs SDMX-EDI formats, and might also use the SDMX-ML DSD-specific data set. The following points apply equally to both formats. 255 255 256 - ====3.4.2.2 Positioning of the Dimension "Frequency"====252 +**3.4.2.2 Positioning of the Dimension "Frequency"** 257 257 258 258 The position of the “frequency” dimension is unambiguously identified in the data structure definition. Moreover, most central institutions devising structural definitions have decided to assign to this dimension the first position in the key structure. This facilitates the easy identification of this dimension, something that it is necessary to frequency's crucial role in several database systems and in attaching attributes at the “sibling” group level. 259 259 260 - ====3.4.2.3 Identification of Data Structure Definitions (DSDs)====256 +**3.4.2.3 Identification of Data Structure Definitions (DSDs)** 261 261 262 262 In order to facilitate the easy and immediate recognition of the structural definition maintenance agency that defined a data structure definition, most central institutions devising structural definitions use the first characters of the data structure definition identifiers to identify their institution: e.g. BIS_EER, EUROSTAT_BOP_01, ECB_BOP1, etc. 263 263 264 - ====3.4.2.4 Identification of the Data Flows====260 +**3.4.2.4 Identification of the Data Flows** 265 265 266 266 In order to facilitate the easy and immediate recognition of the institution administrating a data flow definitions, many central institutions prefer to use the first characters of the data flow definition identifiers to identify their institution: e.g. BIS_EER, ECB_BOP1, ECB_BOP1, etc. Note that in GESMES/TS the Data Set plays the role of the data flow definition (see //DataSet //in the SDMX-IM//)//. 267 267 ... ... @@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ 269 269 270 270 Note that the role of the Data Flow (called //DataflowDefintion// in the model) and Data Set is very specific in the model, and the terminology used may not be the same as used in all organisations, and specifically the term Data Set is used differently in SDMX than in GESMES/TS. Essentially the GESMES/TS term "Data Set" is, in SDMX, the "Dataflow Definition" whist the term "Data Set" in SDMX is used to describe the "container" for an instance of the data. 271 271 272 - ====3.4.2.5 Special Issues====268 +**3.4.2.5 Special Issues** 273 273 274 274 ===== 3.4.2.5.1 "Frequency" related issues ===== 275 275 ... ... @@ -280,6 +280,7 @@ 280 280 281 281 **//Tick data.//** The issue of data collected at irregular intervals at a higher than daily frequency (e.g. tick-by-tick data) is not discussed here either. However, for data exchange purposes, such series can already be exchanged in the SDMX-EDI format by using the option to send observations with the associated time stamp. 282 282 279 + 283 283 = 4 General Notes for Implementers = 284 284 285 285 This section discusses a number of topics other than the exchange of data sets in SDMX-ML and SDMX-EDI. Supported only in SDMX-ML, these topics include the use of the reference metadata mechanism in SDMX, the use of Structure Sets and Reporting Taxonomies, the use of Processes, a discussion of time and data-typing, and some of the conventional mechanisms within the SDMX-ML Structure message regarding versioning and external referencing. ... ... @@ -290,31 +290,39 @@ 290 290 291 291 There are several different representations in SDMX-ML, taken from XML Schemas and common programming languages. The table below describes the various representations which are found in SDMX-ML, and their equivalents. 292 292 293 -(% style="width:912.294px" %) 294 -|(% style="width:172px" %)**SDMX-ML Data Type**|(% style="width:204px" %)**XML Schema Data Type**|(% style="width:189px" %)**.NET Framework Type**|(% style="width:342px" %)((( 295 -**Java Data Type ** 290 +|**SDMX-ML Data Type**|**XML Schema Data Type**|**.NET Framework Type**|((( 291 +**Java Data Type** 292 + 293 +**~ ** 296 296 ))) 297 -|(% style="width:172px" %)String|(% style="width:204px" %)xsd:string|(% style="width:189px" %)System.String|(% style="width:342px" %)java.lang.String 298 -|(% style="width:172px" %)Big Integer|(% style="width:204px" %)xsd:integer|(% style="width:189px" %)System.Decimal|(% style="width:342px" %)java.math.BigInteg er 299 -|(% style="width:172px" %)Integer|(% style="width:204px" %)xsd:int|(% style="width:189px" %)System.Int32|(% style="width:342px" %)int 300 -|(% style="width:172px" %)Long|(% style="width:204px" %)xsd.long|(% style="width:189px" %)System.Int64|(% style="width:342px" %)long 301 -|(% style="width:172px" %)Short|(% style="width:204px" %)xsd:short|(% style="width:189px" %)System.Int16|(% style="width:342px" %)short 302 -|(% style="width:172px" %)Decimal|(% style="width:204px" %)xsd:decimal|(% style="width:189px" %)System.Decimal|(% style="width:342px" %)java.math.BigDecim al 303 -|(% style="width:172px" %)Float|(% style="width:204px" %)xsd:float|(% style="width:189px" %)System.Single|(% style="width:342px" %)float 304 -|(% style="width:172px" %)Double|(% style="width:204px" %)xsd:double|(% style="width:189px" %)System.Double|(% style="width:342px" %)double 305 -|(% style="width:172px" %)Boolean|(% style="width:204px" %)xsd:boolean|(% style="width:189px" %)System.Boolean|(% style="width:342px" %)boolean 306 -|(% style="width:172px" %)URI|(% style="width:204px" %)xsd:anyURI|(% style="width:189px" %)System.Uri|(% style="width:342px" %)Java.net.URI or java.lang.String 307 -|(% style="width:172px" %)DateTime|(% style="width:204px" %)xsd:dateTime|(% style="width:189px" %)System.DateTime|(% style="width:342px" %)javax.xml.datatype .XMLGregorianCalen dar 308 -|(% style="width:172px" %)Time|(% style="width:204px" %)xsd:time|(% style="width:189px" %)System.DateTime|(% style="width:342px" %)javax.xml.datatype .XMLGregorianCalen dar 309 -|(% style="width:172px" %)GregorianYear|(% style="width:204px" %)xsd:gYear|(% style="width:189px" %)System.DateTime|(% style="width:342px" %)javax.xml.datatype .XMLGregorianCalen dar 310 -|(% style="width:172px" %)GregorianMonth|(% style="width:204px" %)xsd:gYearMonth|(% style="width:189px" %)System.DateTime|(% style="width:342px" %)javax.xml.datatype .XMLGregorianCalen dar 311 -|(% style="width:172px" %)GregorianDay|(% style="width:204px" %)xsd:date|(% style="width:189px" %)System.DateTime|(% style="width:342px" %)javax.xml.datatype .XMLGregorianCalen dar 312 -|(% style="width:172px" %)((( 313 -Day, MonthDay, Month 314 -)))|(% style="width:204px" %)xsd:g*|(% style="width:189px" %)System.DateTime|(% style="width:342px" %)javax.xml.datatype .XMLGregorianCalen dar 315 -|(% style="width:172px" %)Duration|(% style="width:204px" %)xsd:duration |(% style="width:189px" %)System.TimeSpa|(% style="width:342px" %)javax.xml.datatype 316 -|(% style="width:172px" %) |(% style="width:204px" %) |(% style="width:189px" %)n|(% style="width:342px" %).Duration 295 +|String|xsd:string|System.String|java.lang.String 296 +|Big Integer|xsd:integer|System.Decimal|java.math.BigInteg er 297 +|Integer|xsd:int|System.Int32|int 298 +|Long|xsd.long|System.Int64|long 299 +|Short|xsd:short|System.Int16|short 300 +|Decimal|xsd:decimal|System.Decimal|java.math.BigDecim al 301 +|Float|xsd:float|System.Single|float 302 +|Double|xsd:double|System.Double|double 303 +|Boolean|xsd:boolean|System.Boolean|boolean 304 +|URI|xsd:anyURI|System.Uri|Java.net.URI or java.lang.String 305 +|DateTime|xsd:dateTime|System.DateTim e|javax.xml.datatype .XMLGregorianCalen dar 306 +|Time|xsd:time|System.DateTim e|javax.xml.datatype .XMLGregorianCalen dar 307 +|GregorianYear|xsd:gYear|System.DateTim e|javax.xml.datatype .XMLGregorianCalen dar 308 +|GregorianMont h|xsd:gYearMont h|System.DateTim e|javax.xml.datatype .XMLGregorianCalen dar 309 +|GregorianDay|xsd:date|System.DateTim e|javax.xml.datatype .XMLGregorianCalen dar 310 +|((( 311 +Day, 317 317 313 +MonthDay, Month 314 +)))|xsd:g*|System.DateTim e|javax.xml.datatype .XMLGregorianCalen dar 315 +|Duration|xsd:duration |System.TimeSpa|javax.xml.datatype 316 +|**SDMX-ML Data Type**|**XML Schema Data Type**|**.NET Framework Type**|((( 317 +**Java Data Type** 318 + 319 +**~ ** 320 +))) 321 +| | |n|.Duration 322 + 318 318 There are also a number of SDMX-ML data types which do not have these direct correspondences, often because they are composite representations or restrictions of a broader data type. For most of these, there are simple types which can be referenced from the SDMX schemas, for others a derived simple type will be necessary: 319 319 320 320 * AlphaNumeric (common:AlphaNumericType, string which only allows A-z and 0-9) ... ... @@ -340,8 +340,10 @@ 340 340 * KeyValues (common:DataKeyType) 341 341 * IdentifiableReference (types for each identifiable object) 342 342 * DataSetReference (common:DataSetReferenceType) 343 -* AttachmentConstraintReference (common:AttachmentConstraintReferenceType)348 +* AttachmentConstraintReference 344 344 350 +(common:AttachmentConstraintReferenceType) 351 + 345 345 Data types also have a set of facets: 346 346 347 347 * isSequence = true | false (indicates a sequentially increasing value) ... ... @@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ 363 363 364 364 == 4.2 Time and Time Format == 365 365 366 -=== 4.2.1 Introduction === 373 +==== 4.2.1 Introduction ==== 367 367 368 368 First, it is important to recognize that most observation times are a period. SDMX specifies precisely how Time is handled. 369 369 ... ... @@ -371,47 +371,50 @@ 371 371 372 372 The hierarchy of time formats is as follows (**bold** indicates a category which is made up of multiple formats, //italic// indicates a distinct format): 373 373 374 -* **Observational Time Period** 375 -** **Standard Time Period** 376 -*** **Basic Time Period** 377 -**** **Gregorian Time Period** 378 -**** //Date Time// 379 -*** **Reporting Time Period** 380 -** //Time Range// 381 +* **Observational Time Period **o **Standard Time Period** 381 381 383 + § **Basic Time Period** 384 + 385 +* **Gregorian Time Period** 386 +* //Date Time// 387 + 388 +§ **Reporting Time Period **o //Time Range// 389 + 382 382 The details of these time period categories and of the distinct formats which make them up are detailed in the sections to follow. 383 383 384 -=== 4.2.2 Observational Time Period === 392 +==== 4.2.2 Observational Time Period ==== 385 385 386 386 This is the superset of all time representations in SDMX. This allows for time to be expressed as any of the allowable formats. 387 387 388 -=== 4.2.3 Standard Time Period === 396 +==== 4.2.3 Standard Time Period ==== 389 389 390 390 This is the superset of any predefined time period or a distinct point in time. A time period consists of a distinct start and end point. If the start and end of a period are expressed as date instead of a complete date time, then it is implied that the start of the period is the beginning of the start day (i.e. 00:00:00) and the end of the period is the end of the end day (i.e. 23:59:59). 391 391 392 -=== 4.2.4 Gregorian Time Period === 400 +==== 4.2.4 Gregorian Time Period ==== 393 393 394 394 A Gregorian time period is always represented by a Gregorian year, year-month, or day. These are all based on ISO 8601 dates. The representation in SDMX-ML messages and the period covered by each of the Gregorian time periods are as follows: 395 395 396 -**Gregorian Year:** 404 +**Gregorian Year:** 405 + 397 397 Representation: xs:gYear (YYYY) 398 -Period: the start of January 1 to the end of December 31 399 399 400 -**Gregorian Year Month**: 408 +Period: the start of January 1 to the end of December 31 **Gregorian Year Month**: 409 + 401 401 Representation: xs:gYearMonth (YYYY-MM) 402 -Period: the start of the first day of the month to end of the last day of the month 403 403 404 -**Gregorian Day**: 412 +Period: the start of the first day of the month to end of the last day of the month **Gregorian Day**: 413 + 405 405 Representation: xs:date (YYYY-MM-DD) 415 + 406 406 Period: the start of the day (00:00:00) to the end of the day (23:59:59) 407 407 408 -=== 4.2.5 Date Time === 418 +==== 4.2.5 Date Time ==== 409 409 410 410 This is used to unambiguously state that a date-time represents an observation at a single point in time. Therefore, if one wants to use SDMX for data which is measured at a distinct point in time rather than being reported over a period, the date-time representation can be used. 411 411 412 -Representation: xs:dateTime (YYYY-MM-DDThh:mm:ss)[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[1~]^^>>path:#_ftn1]]422 +Representation: xs:dateTime (YYYY-MM-DDThh:mm:ss)[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[1~]^^>>path:#_ftn1]] 413 413 414 -=== 4.2.6 Standard Reporting Period === 424 +==== 4.2.6 Standard Reporting Period ==== 415 415 416 416 Standard reporting periods are periods of time in relation to a reporting year. Each of these standard reporting periods has a duration (based on the ISO 8601 definition) associated with it. The general format of a reporting period is as follows: 417 417 ... ... @@ -418,52 +418,75 @@ 418 418 [REPORTING_YEAR]-[PERIOD_INDICATOR][PERIOD_VALUE] 419 419 420 420 Where: 431 + 421 421 REPORTING_YEAR represents the reporting year as four digits (YYYY) PERIOD_INDICATOR identifies the type of period which determines the duration of the period 433 + 422 422 PERIOD_VALUE indicates the actual period within the year 423 423 424 424 The following section details each of the standard reporting periods defined in SDMX: 425 425 426 -**Reporting Year**: 427 -Period Indicator: A 438 +**Reporting Year**: 439 + 440 + Period Indicator: A 441 + 428 428 Period Duration: P1Y (one year) 443 + 429 429 Limit per year: 1 430 -Representation: common:ReportingYearType (YYYY-A1, e.g. 2000-A1) 431 431 432 -**Reporting Semester:** 433 -Period Indicator: S 446 +Representation: common:ReportingYearType (YYYY-A1, e.g. 2000-A1) **Reporting Semester:** 447 + 448 + Period Indicator: S 449 + 434 434 Period Duration: P6M (six months) 451 + 435 435 Limit per year: 2 436 -Representation: common:ReportingSemesterType (YYYY-Ss, e.g. 2000-S2) 437 437 438 -**Reporting Trimester:** 439 -Period Indicator: T 454 +Representation: common:ReportingSemesterType (YYYY-Ss, e.g. 2000-S2) **Reporting Trimester:** 455 + 456 + Period Indicator: T 457 + 440 440 Period Duration: P4M (four months) 459 + 441 441 Limit per year: 3 442 -Representation: common:ReportingTrimesterType (YYYY-Tt, e.g. 2000-T3) 443 443 444 -**Reporting Quarter:** 445 -Period Indicator: Q 462 +Representation: common:ReportingTrimesterType (YYYY-Tt, e.g. 2000-T3) **Reporting Quarter:** 463 + 464 + Period Indicator: Q 465 + 446 446 Period Duration: P3M (three months) 467 + 447 447 Limit per year: 4 448 -Representation: common:ReportingQuarterType (YYYY-Qq, e.g. 2000-Q4) 449 449 450 -**Reporting Month**: 470 +Representation: common:ReportingQuarterType (YYYY-Qq, e.g. 2000-Q4) **Reporting Month**: 471 + 451 451 Period Indicator: M 473 + 452 452 Period Duration: P1M (one month) 475 + 453 453 Limit per year: 1 477 + 454 454 Representation: common:ReportingMonthType (YYYY-Mmm, e.g. 2000-M12) Notes: The reporting month is always represented as two digits, therefore 1-9 are 0 padded (e.g. 01). This allows the values to be sorted chronologically using textual sorting methods. 455 455 456 456 **Reporting Week**: 481 + 457 457 Period Indicator: W 483 + 458 458 Period Duration: P7D (seven days) 485 + 459 459 Limit per year: 53 487 + 460 460 Representation: common:ReportingWeekType (YYYY-Www, e.g. 2000-W53) 461 -Notes: There are either 52 or 53 weeks in a reporting year. This is based on the ISO 8601 definition of a week (Monday - Saturday), where the first week of a reporting year is defined as the week with the first Thursday on or after the reporting year start day.[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[2~]^^>>path:#_ftn2]](%%) The reporting week is always represented as two digits, therefore 1-9 are 0 padded (e.g. 01). This allows the values to be sorted chronologically using textual sorting methods. 462 462 490 +Notes: There are either 52 or 53 weeks in a reporting year. This is based on the ISO 8601 definition of a week (Monday - Saturday), where the first week of a reporting year is defined as the week with the first Thursday on or after the reporting year start day.[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[2~]^^>>path:#_ftn2]](%%) The reporting week is always represented as two digits, therefore 1-9 are 0 padded (e.g. 01). This allows the values to be sorted chronologically using textual sorting methods. 491 + 463 463 **Reporting Day**: 493 + 464 464 Period Indicator: D 495 + 465 465 Period Duration: P1D (one day) 497 + 466 466 Limit per year: 366 499 + 467 467 Representation: common:ReportingDayType (YYYY-Dddd, e.g. 2000-D366) Notes: There are either 365 or 366 days in a reporting year, depending on whether the reporting year includes leap day (February 29). The reporting day is always represented as three digits, therefore 1-99 are 0 padded (e.g. 001). 468 468 469 469 This allows the values to be sorted chronologically using textual sorting methods. ... ... @@ -474,39 +474,55 @@ 474 474 475 475 Since the duration and the reporting year start day are known for any reporting period, it is possible to relate any reporting period to a distinct calendar period. The actual Gregorian calendar period covered by the reporting period can be computed as follows (based on the standard format of [REPROTING_YEAR][PERIOD_INDICATOR][PERIOD_VALUE] and the reporting year start day as [REPORTING_YEAR_START_DAY]): 476 476 477 -**~1. Determine [REPORTING_YEAR_BASE]:** 510 +1. **Determine [REPORTING_YEAR_BASE]:** 511 + 478 478 Combine [REPORTING_YEAR] of the reporting period value (YYYY) with [REPORTING_YEAR_START_DAY] (MM-DD) to get a date (YYYY-MM-DD). 513 + 479 479 This is the [REPORTING_YEAR_START_DATE] 480 -**a) If the [PERIOD_INDICATOR] is W: 481 -~1. If [REPORTING_YEAR_START_DATE] is a Friday, Saturday, or Sunday:** 515 + 516 +**a) If the [PERIOD_INDICATOR] is W:** 517 + 518 +1. 519 +11. 520 +111. 521 +1111. **If [REPORTING_YEAR_START_DATE] is a Friday, Saturday, or Sunday:** 522 + 482 482 Add^^3^^ (P3D, P2D, or P1D respectively) to the [REPORTING_YEAR_START_DATE]. The result is the [REPORTING_YEAR_BASE]. 483 483 484 -2. **If [REPORTING_YEAR_START_DATE] is a Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday:** 525 +1. 526 +11. 527 +111. 528 +1111. **If [REPORTING_YEAR_START_DATE] is a Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday:** 529 + 485 485 Add^^3^^ (P0D, -P1D, -P2D, or -P3D respectively) to the [REPORTING_YEAR_START_DATE]. The result is the [REPORTING_YEAR_BASE]. 486 -b) **Else:** 487 -The [REPORTING_YEAR_START_DATE] is the [REPORTING_YEAR_BASE] 488 488 489 -** 2. Determine [PERIOD_DURATION]:**532 +b) **Else:** 490 490 491 -a) If the [PERIOD_INDICATOR] is A, the [PERIOD_DURATION] is P1Y. 492 -b) If the [PERIOD_INDICATOR] is S, the [PERIOD_DURATION] is P6M. 493 -c) If the [PERIOD_INDICATOR] is T, the [PERIOD_DURATION] is P4M. 494 -d) If the [PERIOD_INDICATOR] is Q, the [PERIOD_DURATION] is P3M. 495 -e) If the [PERIOD_INDICATOR] is M, the [PERIOD_DURATION] is P1M. 496 -f) If the [PERIOD_INDICATOR] is W, the [PERIOD_DURATION] is P7D. 497 -g) If the [PERIOD_INDICATOR] is D, the [PERIOD_DURATION] is P1D. 534 +The [REPORTING_YEAR_START_DATE] is the [REPORTING_YEAR_BASE]. 498 498 499 -**3. Determine [PERIOD_START]:** 500 -Subtract one from the [PERIOD_VALUE] and multiply this by the [PERIOD_DURATION]. Add[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[3~]^^>>path:#_ftn3]](%%) this to the [REPORTING_YEAR_BASE]. The result is the [PERIOD_START]. 536 +1. **Determine [PERIOD_DURATION]:** 537 +11. 538 +111. If the [PERIOD_INDICATOR] is A, the [PERIOD_DURATION] is P1Y. 539 +111. If the [PERIOD_INDICATOR] is S, the [PERIOD_DURATION] is P6M. 540 +111. If the [PERIOD_INDICATOR] is T, the [PERIOD_DURATION] is P4M. 541 +111. If the [PERIOD_INDICATOR] is Q, the [PERIOD_DURATION] is P3M. 542 +111. If the [PERIOD_INDICATOR] is M, the [PERIOD_DURATION] is P1M. 543 +111. If the [PERIOD_INDICATOR] is W, the [PERIOD_DURATION] is P7D. 544 +111. If the [PERIOD_INDICATOR] is D, the [PERIOD_DURATION] is P1D. 545 +1. **Determine [PERIOD_START]:** 501 501 502 -**4. Determine the [PERIOD_END]:** 547 +Subtract one from the [PERIOD_VALUE] and multiply this by the [PERIOD_DURATION]. Add[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[3~]^^>>path:#_ftn3]](%%) this to the [REPORTING_YEAR_BASE]. The result is the [PERIOD_START]. 548 + 549 +1. **Determine the [PERIOD_END]:** 550 + 503 503 Multiply the [PERIOD_VALUE] by the [PERIOD_DURATION]. Add^^3^^ this to the [REPORTING_YEAR_BASE] add^^3^^ -P1D. The result is the [PERIOD_END]. 504 504 505 505 For all of these ranges, the bounds include the beginning of the [PERIOD_START] (i.e. 00:00:00) and the end of the [PERIOD_END] (i.e. 23:59:59). 506 506 507 -**Examples: 508 -2010-Q2, REPORTING_YEAR_START_DAY = ~-~-07-01 (July 1)** 555 +**Examples: ** 509 509 557 +**2010-Q2, REPORTING_YEAR_START_DAY = ~-~-07-01 (July 1)** 558 + 510 510 ~1. [REPORTING_YEAR_START_DATE] = 2010-07-01 511 511 512 512 b) [REPORTING_YEAR_BASE] = 2010-07-01 ... ... @@ -1191,7 +1191,7 @@ 1191 1191 1192 1192 == 10.1 Introduction == 1193 1193 1194 -The Validation and Transformation Language (VTL) supports the definition of Transformations, which are algorithms to calculate new data starting from already existing ones[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[4~]^^>>path:#_ftn4]](%%). The purpose of the VTL in the SDMX context is to enable the:1243 +The Validation and Transformation Language (VTL) supports the definition of Transformations, which are algorithms to calculate new data starting from already existing ones[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[4~]^^>>path:#_ftn4]](%%). The purpose of the VTL in the SDMX context is to enable the: 1195 1195 1196 1196 * definition of validation and transformation algorithms, in order to specify how to calculate new data from existing ones; 1197 1197 * exchange of the definition of VTL algorithms, also together the definition of the data structures of the involved data (for example, exchange the data structures of a reporting framework together with the validation rules to be applied, exchange the input and output data structures of a calculation task together with the VTL Transformations describing the calculation algorithms); ... ... @@ -1215,7 +1215,7 @@ 1215 1215 1216 1216 In any case, the aliases used in the VTL transformations have to be mapped to the 1217 1217 1218 -SDMX artefacts through the VtlMappingScheme and VtlMapping classes (see the section of the SDMX IM relevant to the VTL). A VtlMapping allows specifying the aliases to be used in the VTL transformations, rulesets[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[5~]^^>>path:#_ftn5]](%%) or user defined operators[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallinkwikiinternallink" %)^^~[6~]^^>>path:#_ftn6]](%%) to reference SDMX artefacts. A VtlMappingScheme is a container for zero or more VtlMapping.1267 +SDMX artefacts through the VtlMappingScheme and VtlMapping classes (see the section of the SDMX IM relevant to the VTL). A VtlMapping allows specifying the aliases to be used in the VTL transformations, rulesets[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[5~]^^>>path:#_ftn5]](%%) or user defined operators[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[6~]^^>>path:#_ftn6]](%%) to reference SDMX artefacts. A VtlMappingScheme is a container for zero or more VtlMapping. 1219 1219 1220 1220 The correspondence between an alias and a SDMX artefact must be one-to-one, meaning that a generic alias identifies one and just one SDMX artefact while a SDMX artefact is identified by one and just one alias. In other words, within a VtlMappingScheme an artefact can have just one alias and different artefacts cannot have the same alias. 1221 1221 ... ... @@ -1225,7 +1225,7 @@ 1225 1225 1226 1226 This approach has the advantage that in the VTL code the URN of the referenced artefacts is directly intelligible by a human reader but has the drawback that the references are verbose. 1227 1227 1228 -The SDMX URN[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[7~]^^>>path:#_ftn7]](%%) is the concatenation of the following parts, separated by special symbols like dot, equal, asterisk, comma, and parenthesis:^^ ^^1277 +The SDMX URN[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[7~]^^>>path:#_ftn7]](%%) is the concatenation of the following parts, separated by special symbols like dot, equal, asterisk, comma, and parenthesis:^^ ^^ 1229 1229 1230 1230 * SDMXprefix 1231 1231 * SDMX-IM-package-name ... ... @@ -1233,7 +1233,7 @@ 1233 1233 * agency-id 1234 1234 * maintainedobject-id 1235 1235 * maintainedobject-version 1236 -* container-object-id [[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[8~]^^>>path:#_ftn8]]1285 +* container-object-id [[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[8~]^^>>path:#_ftn8]] 1237 1237 * object-id 1238 1238 1239 1239 The generic structure of the URN is the following: ... ... @@ -1252,7 +1252,7 @@ 1252 1252 1253 1253 The **agency-id** is the acronym of the agency that owns the definition of the artefact, for example for the Eurostat artefacts the agency-id is “ESTAT”). The agency-id can be composite (for example AgencyA.Dept1.Unit2). 1254 1254 1255 -The **maintainedobject-id** is the name of the maintained object which the artefact belongs to, and in case the artefact itself is maintainable[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[9~]^^>>path:#_ftn9]](%%), coincides with the name of the artefact. Therefore the maintainedobject-id depends on the class of the artefact:1304 +The **maintainedobject-id** is the name of the maintained object which the artefact belongs to, and in case the artefact itself is maintainable[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[9~]^^>>path:#_ftn9]](%%), coincides with the name of the artefact. Therefore the maintainedobject-id depends on the class of the artefact: 1256 1256 1257 1257 * if the artefact is a ,,Dataflow,,, which is a maintainable class, the maintainedobject-id is the Dataflow name (dataflow-id); 1258 1258 * if the artefact is a Dimension, MeasureDimension, TimeDimension, PrimaryMeasure or DataAttribute, which are not maintainable and belong to the ,,DataStructure,, maintainable class, the maintainedobject-id is the name of the DataStructure (dataStructure-id) which the artefact belongs to; ... ... @@ -1272,7 +1272,7 @@ 1272 1272 1273 1273 * if the artefact is a ,,Concept ,,(the object-id is the name of the ,,Concept,,) 1274 1274 1275 -For example, by using the URN, the VTL transformation that sums two SDMX dataflows DF1 and DF2 and assigns the result to a third persistent dataflow DFR, assuming that DF1, DF2 and DFR are the maintainedobject-id of the three dataflows, that their version is 1.0 and their Agency is AG, would be written as[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[10~]^^>>path:#_ftn10]](%%):1324 +For example, by using the URN, the VTL transformation that sums two SDMX dataflows DF1 and DF2 and assigns the result to a third persistent dataflow DFR, assuming that DF1, DF2 and DFR are the maintainedobject-id of the three dataflows, that their version is 1.0 and their Agency is AG, would be written as[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[10~]^^>>path:#_ftn10]](%%): 1276 1276 1277 1277 ‘urn:sdmx:org.sdmx.infomodel.datastructure.Dataflow=AG:DFR(1.0)’ <- 1278 1278 ... ... @@ -1290,14 +1290,14 @@ 1290 1290 * The **SDMX-IM-package-name **can be omitted as well because it can be deduced from the class-name that follows it (the table of the SDMX-IM packages and classes that allows this deduction is in the SDMX 2.1 Standards - Section 5 - Registry Specifications, paragraph 6.2.3). In particular, considering the object classes of the artefacts that VTL can reference, the package is: 1291 1291 ** “datastructure” for the classes Dataflow, Dimension, MeasureDimension, TimeDimension, PrimaryMeasure, DataAttribute, 1292 1292 ** “conceptscheme” for the classes Concept and ConceptScheme o “codelist” for the class Codelist. 1293 -* The **class-name** can be omitted as it can be deduced from the VTL invocation. In particular, starting from the VTL class of the invoked artefact (e.g. dataset, component, identifier, measure, attribute, variable, valuedomain), which is known given the syntax of the invoking VTL operator[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[11~]^^>>path:#_ftn11]](%%), the SDMX class can be deduced from the mapping rules between VTL and SDMX (see the section “Mapping between VTL and SDMX” hereinafter)[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallinkwikiinternallink" %)^^~[12~]^^>>path:#_ftn12]](%%).1294 -* If the **agency-id** is not specified, it is assumed by default equal to the agency-id of the TransformationScheme, UserDefinedOperatorScheme or RulesetScheme from which the artefact is invoked. For example, the agency-id can be omitted if it is the same as the invoking T,,ransformationScheme,, and cannot be omitted if the artefact comes from another agency.[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[13~]^^>>path:#_ftn13]](%%) Take also into account that, according to the VTL consistency rules, the agency of the result of a ,,Transformation,, must be the same as its ,,TransformationScheme,,, therefore the agency-id can be omitted for all the results (left part of ,,Transformation,, statements).1342 +* The **class-name** can be omitted as it can be deduced from the VTL invocation. In particular, starting from the VTL class of the invoked artefact (e.g. dataset, component, identifier, measure, attribute, variable, valuedomain), which is known given the syntax of the invoking VTL operator[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[11~]^^>>path:#_ftn11]](%%), the SDMX class can be deduced from the mapping rules between VTL and SDMX (see the section “Mapping between VTL and SDMX” hereinafter)[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[12~]^^>>path:#_ftn12]](%%). 1343 +* If the **agency-id** is not specified, it is assumed by default equal to the agency-id of the TransformationScheme, UserDefinedOperatorScheme or RulesetScheme from which the artefact is invoked. For example, the agency-id can be omitted if it is the same as the invoking T,,ransformationScheme,, and cannot be omitted if the artefact comes from another agency.[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[13~]^^>>path:#_ftn13]](%%) Take also into account that, according to the VTL consistency rules, the agency of the result of a ,,Transformation,, must be the same as its ,,TransformationScheme,,, therefore the agency-id can be omitted for all the results (left part of ,,Transformation,, statements). 1295 1295 * As for the **maintainedobject-id**, this is essential in some cases while in other cases it can be omitted: o if the referenced artefact is a ,,Dataflow,,, which is a maintainable class, the maintainedobject-id is the dataflow-id and obviously cannot be omitted; 1296 1296 ** if the referenced artefact is a Dimension, MeasureDimension, TimeDimension, PrimaryMeasure, DataAttribute, which are not maintainable and belong to the ,,DataStructure,, maintainable class, the maintainedobject-id is the dataStructure-id and can be omitted, given that these components are always invoked within the invocation of a ,,Dataflow,,, whose dataStructure-id can be deduced from the 1297 1297 1298 1298 SDMX structural definitions; o if the referenced artefact is a ,,Concept, ,,which is not maintainable and belong to the ,,ConceptScheme ,,maintainable class,,, ,,the maintained object is the conceptScheme-id and cannot be omitted; 1299 1299 1300 -* 1349 +* 1301 1301 ** if the referenced artefact is a ,,ConceptScheme, ,,which is a,, ,,maintainable class,,, ,,the maintained object is the ,,conceptScheme-id,, and obviously cannot be omitted; 1302 1302 ** if the referenced artefact is a ,,Codelist, ,,which is a maintainable class, the maintainedobject-id is the ,,codelist-id,, and obviously cannot be omitted. 1303 1303 * When the maintainedobject-id is omitted, the **maintainedobject-version** is omitted too. When the maintainedobject-id is not omitted and the maintainedobject-version is omitted, the version 1.0 is assumed by default.,, ,, ... ... @@ -1318,11 +1318,11 @@ 1318 1318 1319 1319 DFR := DF1 + DF2 1320 1320 1321 -The references to the ,,Codelists,, can be simplified similarly. For example, given the non-abbreviated reference to the ,,Codelist,, AG:CL_FREQ(1.0), which is[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[14~]^^>>path:#_ftn14]](%%):1370 +The references to the ,,Codelists,, can be simplified similarly. For example, given the non-abbreviated reference to the ,,Codelist,, AG:CL_FREQ(1.0), which is[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[14~]^^>>path:#_ftn14]](%%): 1322 1322 1323 1323 ‘urn:sdmx:org.sdmx.infomodel.codelist.Codelist=AG:CL_FREQ(1.0)’ 1324 1324 1325 -if the ,,Codelist,, is referenced from a ruleset scheme belonging to the agency AG, omitting all the optional parts, the abbreviated reference would become simply[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[15~]^^>>path:#_ftn15]](%%):1374 +if the ,,Codelist,, is referenced from a ruleset scheme belonging to the agency AG, omitting all the optional parts, the abbreviated reference would become simply[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[15~]^^>>path:#_ftn15]](%%): 1326 1326 1327 1327 CL_FREQ 1328 1328 ... ... @@ -1332,7 +1332,7 @@ 1332 1332 1333 1333 SECTOR 1334 1334 1335 -For example, the transformation for renaming the component SECTOR of the dataflow DF1 into SEC can be written as[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[16~]^^>>path:#_ftn16]](%%):1384 +For example, the transformation for renaming the component SECTOR of the dataflow DF1 into SEC can be written as[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[16~]^^>>path:#_ftn16]](%%): 1336 1336 1337 1337 ‘DFR(1.0)’ := ‘DF1(1.0)’ [rename SECTOR to SEC] 1338 1338 ... ... @@ -1366,9 +1366,9 @@ 1366 1366 1367 1367 The VTL Rulesets have a signature, in which the Value Domains or the Variables on which the Ruleset is defined are declared, and a body, which contains the rules. 1368 1368 1369 -In the signature, given the mapping between VTL and SDMX better described in the following paragraphs, a reference to a VTL Value Domain becomes a reference to a SDMX Codelist or to a SDMX ConceptScheme (for SDMX measure dimensions), while a reference to a VTL Represented Variable becomes a reference to a SDMX Concept, assuming for it a definite representation[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[17~]^^>>path:#_ftn17]](%%).1418 +In the signature, given the mapping between VTL and SDMX better described in the following paragraphs, a reference to a VTL Value Domain becomes a reference to a SDMX Codelist or to a SDMX ConceptScheme (for SDMX measure dimensions), while a reference to a VTL Represented Variable becomes a reference to a SDMX Concept, assuming for it a definite representation[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[17~]^^>>path:#_ftn17]](%%). 1370 1370 1371 -In general, for referencing SDMX Codelists and Concepts, the conventions described in the previous paragraphs apply. In the Ruleset syntax, the elements that reference SDMX artefacts are called “valueDomain” and “variable” for the Datapoint Rulesets and “ruleValueDomain”, “ruleVariable”, “condValueDomain” “condVariable” for the Hierarchical Rulesets). The syntax of the Ruleset signature allows also to define aliases of the elements above, these aliases are valid only within the specific ruleset definition statement and cannot be mapped to SDMX.[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[18~]^^>>path:#_ftn18]](%%)1420 +In general, for referencing SDMX Codelists and Concepts, the conventions described in the previous paragraphs apply. In the Ruleset syntax, the elements that reference SDMX artefacts are called “valueDomain” and “variable” for the Datapoint Rulesets and “ruleValueDomain”, “ruleVariable”, “condValueDomain” “condVariable” for the Hierarchical Rulesets). The syntax of the Ruleset signature allows also to define aliases of the elements above, these aliases are valid only within the specific ruleset definition statement and cannot be mapped to SDMX.[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[18~]^^>>path:#_ftn18]](%%) 1372 1372 1373 1373 In the body of the Rulesets, the Codes and in general all the Values can be written without any other specification, because the artefact which the Values are referred (Codelist, ConceptScheme, Concept) to can be deduced from the Ruleset signature. 1374 1374 ... ... @@ -1382,15 +1382,15 @@ 1382 1382 1383 1383 Every time a SDMX object is referenced in a VTL Transformation as an input operand, there is the need to generate a VTL definition of the object, so that the VTL operations can take place. This can be made starting from the SDMX definition and applying a SDMX-VTL mapping method in the direction from SDMX to VTL. The possible mapping methods from SDMX to VTL are described in the following paragraphs and are conceived to allow the automatic deduction of the VTL definition of the object from the knowledge of the SDMX definition. 1384 1384 1385 -In the opposite direction, every time an object calculated by means of VTL must be treated as a SDMX object (for example for exchanging it through SDMX), there is the need of a SDMX definition of the object, so that the SDMX operations can take place. The SDMX definition is needed for the VTL objects for which a SDMX use is envisaged[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[19~]^^>>path:#_ftn19]](%%).1434 +In the opposite direction, every time an object calculated by means of VTL must be treated as a SDMX object (for example for exchanging it through SDMX), there is the need of a SDMX definition of the object, so that the SDMX operations can take place. The SDMX definition is needed for the VTL objects for which a SDMX use is envisaged[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[19~]^^>>path:#_ftn19]](%%). 1386 1386 1387 1387 The mapping methods from VTL to SDMX are described in the following paragraphs as well, however they do not allow the complete SDMX definition to be automatically deduced from the VTL definition, more than all because the former typically contains additional information in respect to the latter. For example, the definition of a SDMX DSD includes also some mandatory information not available in VTL (like the concept scheme to which the SDMX components refer, the assignmentStatus and attributeRelationship for the DataAttributes and so on). Therefore the mapping methods from VTL to SDMX provide only a general guidance for generating SDMX definitions properly starting from the information available in VTL, independently of how the SDMX definition it is actually generated (manually, automatically or part and part). 1388 1388 1389 1389 === 10.3.2 General mapping of VTL and SDMX data structures === 1390 1390 1391 -This section makes reference to the VTL “Model for data and their structure”[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[20~]^^>>path:#_ftn20]](%%) and the correspondent SDMX “Data Structure Definition”[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallinkwikiinternallink" %)^^~[21~]^^>>path:#_ftn21]](%%).1440 +This section makes reference to the VTL “Model for data and their structure”[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[20~]^^>>path:#_ftn20]](%%) and the correspondent SDMX “Data Structure Definition”[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[21~]^^>>path:#_ftn21]](%%). 1392 1392 1393 -The main type of artefact that the VTL can manipulate is the VTL Data Set, which in general is mapped to the SDMX Dataflow. This means that a VTL Transformation, in the SDMX context, expresses the algorithm for calculating a derived Dataflow starting from some already existing Dataflows (either collected or derived).[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[22~]^^>>path:#_ftn22]](%%)1442 +The main type of artefact that the VTL can manipulate is the VTL Data Set, which in general is mapped to the SDMX Dataflow. This means that a VTL Transformation, in the SDMX context, expresses the algorithm for calculating a derived Dataflow starting from some already existing Dataflows (either collected or derived).[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[22~]^^>>path:#_ftn22]](%%) 1394 1394 1395 1395 While the VTL Transformations are defined in term of Dataflow definitions, they are assumed to be executed on instances of such Dataflows, provided at runtime to the VTL engine (the mechanism for identifying the instances to be processed are not part of the VTL specifications and depend on the implementation of the VTL-based systems). As already said, the SDMX Datasets are instances of SDMX Dataflows, therefore a VTL Transformation defined on some SDMX Dataflows can be applied on some corresponding SDMX Datasets. 1396 1396 ... ... @@ -1400,7 +1400,7 @@ 1400 1400 1401 1401 SDMX DimensionComponent can be a Dimension, a TimeDimension or a MeasureDimension. Correspondingly, in the SDMX implementation of the VTL, the VTL Identifiers can be (optionally) distinguished in three sub-classes (Simple Identifier, Time Identifier, Measure Identifier) even if such a distinction is not evidenced in the VTL IM. 1402 1402 1403 -However, a VTL Data Structure can have any number of Identifiers, Measures and Attributes, while a SDMX 2.1 DataStructureDefinition can have any number of Dimensions and DataAttributes but just one PrimaryMeasure[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[23~]^^>>path:#_ftn23]](%%). This is due to a difference between SDMX 2.1 and VTL in the possible representation methods of the data that contain more measures.1452 +However, a VTL Data Structure can have any number of Identifiers, Measures and Attributes, while a SDMX 2.1 DataStructureDefinition can have any number of Dimensions and DataAttributes but just one PrimaryMeasure[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[23~]^^>>path:#_ftn23]](%%). This is due to a difference between SDMX 2.1 and VTL in the possible representation methods of the data that contain more measures. 1404 1404 1405 1405 As for SDMX, because the data structure cannot contain more than one measure component (i.e., the primaryMeasure), the representation of data having more measures is possible only by means of a particular dimension, called MeasureDimension, which is aimed at containing the name of the measure concepts, so that for each observation the value contained in the PrimaryMeasure component is the value of the measure concept reported in the MeasureDimension component. 1406 1406 ... ... @@ -1464,7 +1464,7 @@ 1464 1464 1465 1465 The set of SDMX observations having the same values for all the Dimensions except than the MeasureDimension become one multi-measure VTL Data Point, having one Measure for each Concept Cj of the SDMX MeasureDimension; 1466 1466 1467 -* 1516 +* 1468 1468 ** The values of the SDMX simple Dimensions, TimeDimension and DataAttributes not depending on the MeasureDimension (these components by definition have always the same values for all the observations of the set above) become the values of the corresponding VTL (simple) Identifiers, (time) Identifier and Attributes. 1469 1469 ** The value of the PrimaryMeasure of the SDMX observation belonging to the set above and having MeasureDimension=Cj becomes the value of the VTL Measure Cj 1470 1470 ** For the SDMX DataAttributes depending on the MeasureDimension, the value of the DataAttribute DA of the SDMX observation belonging to the set above and having MeasureDimension=Cj becomes the value of the VTL Attribute DA_Cj ... ... @@ -1471,7 +1471,7 @@ 1471 1471 1472 1472 **10.3.3.3 From SDMX DataAttributes to VTL Measures ** 1473 1473 1474 -* 1523 +* 1475 1475 ** In some cases it may happen that the DataAttributes of the SDMX DataStructure need to be managed as Measures in VTL. Therefore, a variant of both the methods above consists in transforming all the SDMX DataAttributes in VTL Measures. When DataAttributes are converted to Measures, the two methods above are called Basic_A2M and Pivot_A2M (the suffix “A2M” stands for Attributes to Measures). Obviously, the resulting VTL data structure is, in general, multi-measure and does not contain Attributes. 1476 1476 1477 1477 The Basic_A2M and Pivot_A2M behaves respectively like the Basic and Pivot methods, except that the final VTL components, which according to the Basic and Pivot methods would have had the role of Attribute, assume instead the role of Measure. ... ... @@ -1490,7 +1490,7 @@ 1490 1490 1491 1491 This mapping method cannot be applied for SDMX 2.1 if the VTL data structure has more than one measure component, given that the SDMX 2.1 DataStructureDefinition allows just one measure component (the 1492 1492 1493 -PrimaryMeasure). In this case it becomes mandatory to specify a different 1958 mapping method through the VtlMappingScheme and VtlDataflowMapping 1959 classes.[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[24~]^^>>path:#_ftn24]](%%)1542 +PrimaryMeasure). In this case it becomes mandatory to specify a different 1958 mapping method through the VtlMappingScheme and VtlDataflowMapping 1959 classes.[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[24~]^^>>path:#_ftn24]](%%) 1494 1494 1495 1495 1960 Please note that the VTL measures can have any name while in SDMX 2.1 the 1961 MeasureComponent has the mandatory name “obs_value”, therefore the name of the VTL measure name must become “obs_value” in SDMX 2.1. 1496 1496 ... ... @@ -1557,7 +1557,7 @@ 1557 1557 1558 1558 the values of the VTL identifiers become the values of the corresponding SDMX Dimensions, for all the observations of the set above 1559 1559 1560 -* 1609 +* 1561 1561 ** the name of the j^^th^^ VTL measure (e.g. “Cj”) becomes the value of the SDMX MeasureDimension of the j^^th^^ observation of the set (i.e. the Concept Cj) 1562 1562 ** the value of the j^^th^^ VTL measure becomes the value of the SDMX PrimaryMeasure of the j^^th^^ observation of the set 1563 1563 ** the values of the VTL Attributes become the values of the corresponding SDMX DataAttributes (in principle for all the observations of the set above) ... ... @@ -1607,15 +1607,15 @@ 1607 1607 1608 1608 The VtlMappingScheme is a container for zero or more VtlDataflowMapping (besides possible mappings to artefacts other than dataflows). 1609 1609 1610 -=== 10.3.6 Mapping dataflow subsets to distinct VTL data sets[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^**~[25~]**^^>>path:#_ftn25]](%%) ===1659 +=== 10.3.6 Mapping dataflow subsets to distinct VTL data sets[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^**~[25~]**^^>>path:#_ftn25]](%%) === 1611 1611 1612 1612 Until now it as been assumed to map one SMDX Dataflow to one VTL dataset and vice-versa. This mapping one-to-one is not mandatory according to VTL because a VTL data set is meant to be a set of observations (data points) on a logical plane, having the same logical data structure and the same general meaning, independently of the possible physical representation or storage (see VTL 2.0 User Manual page 1613 1613 1614 1614 24), therefore a SDMX Dataflow can be seen either as a unique set of data observations (corresponding to one VTL data set) or as the union of many sets of data observations (each one corresponding to a distinct VTL data set). 1615 1615 1616 -As a matter of fact, in some cases it can be useful to define VTL operations involving definite parts of a SDMX Dataflow instead than the whole.[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[26~]^^>>path:#_ftn26]](%%)1665 +As a matter of fact, in some cases it can be useful to define VTL operations involving definite parts of a SDMX Dataflow instead than the whole.[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[26~]^^>>path:#_ftn26]](%%) 1617 1617 1618 -Therefore, in order to make the coding of VTL operations simpler when applied on parts of SDMX Dataflows, it is allowed to map distinct parts of a SDMX Dataflow to distinct VTL data sets according to the following rules and conventions. This kind of mapping is possible both from SDMX to VTL and from VTL to SDMX, as better explained below.[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[27~]^^>>path:#_ftn27]](%%)1667 +Therefore, in order to make the coding of VTL operations simpler when applied on parts of SDMX Dataflows, it is allowed to map distinct parts of a SDMX Dataflow to distinct VTL data sets according to the following rules and conventions. This kind of mapping is possible both from SDMX to VTL and from VTL to SDMX, as better explained below.[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[27~]^^>>path:#_ftn27]](%%) 1619 1619 1620 1620 Given a SDMX Dataflow and some predefined Dimensions of its 1621 1621 ... ... @@ -1627,14 +1627,14 @@ 1627 1627 1628 1628 In practice, this kind mapping is obtained like follows: 1629 1629 1630 -* For a given SDMX dataflow, the user (VTL definer) declares the dimension components on which the mapping will be based, in a given order.[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[28~]^^>>path:#_ftn28]](%%) Following the example above, imagine that the user declares the dimensions INDICATOR and COUNTRY.1679 +* For a given SDMX dataflow, the user (VTL definer) declares the dimension components on which the mapping will be based, in a given order.[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[28~]^^>>path:#_ftn28]](%%) Following the example above, imagine that the user declares the dimensions INDICATOR and COUNTRY. 1631 1631 * The VTL dataset is given a name using a special notation also called “ordered concatenation” and composed of the following parts: 1632 1632 ** The reference to the SDMX dataflow (expressed according to the rules described in the previous paragraphs, i.e. URN, abbreviated 1633 1633 1634 -URN or another alias); for example DF(1.0); o a slash (“/”) as a separator; [[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[29~]^^>>path:#_ftn29]]1683 +URN or another alias); for example DF(1.0); o a slash (“/”) as a separator; [[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[29~]^^>>path:#_ftn29]] 1635 1635 1636 -* 1637 -** The reference to a specific part of the SDMX dataflow above, expressed as the concatenation of the values that the SDMX dimensions declared above must have, separated by dots (“.”) and written in the order in which these dimensions are defined[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[30~]^^>>path:#_ftn30]](%%) . For example POPULATION.USA would mean that such a VTL dataset is mapped to the SDMX observations for which the dimension //INDICATOR// is equal to POPULATION and the dimension //COUNTRY// is equal to USA.1685 +* 1686 +** The reference to a specific part of the SDMX dataflow above, expressed as the concatenation of the values that the SDMX dimensions declared above must have, separated by dots (“.”) and written in the order in which these dimensions are defined[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[30~]^^>>path:#_ftn30]](%%) . For example POPULATION.USA would mean that such a VTL dataset is mapped to the SDMX observations for which the dimension //INDICATOR// is equal to POPULATION and the dimension //COUNTRY// is equal to USA. 1638 1638 1639 1639 In the VTL transformations, this kind of dataset name must be referenced between single quotes because the slash (“/”) is not a regular character according to the VTL rules. 1640 1640 ... ... @@ -1652,7 +1652,7 @@ 1652 1652 1653 1653 Let us now analyse the different meaning of this kind of mapping in the two mapping directions, i.e. from SDMX to VTL and from VTL to SDMX. 1654 1654 1655 -As already said, the mapping from SDMX to VTL happens when the VTL datasets are operand of VTL transformations, instead the mapping from VTL to SDMX happens when the VTL datasets are result of VTL transformations[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[31~]^^>>path:#_ftn31]](%%) and need to be treated as SDMX objects. This kind of mapping can be applied independently in the two directions and the Dimensions on which the mapping is based can be different in the two directions: these Dimensions are defined in the ToVtlSpaceKey and in the FromVtlSpaceKey classes respectively.1704 +As already said, the mapping from SDMX to VTL happens when the VTL datasets are operand of VTL transformations, instead the mapping from VTL to SDMX happens when the VTL datasets are result of VTL transformations[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[31~]^^>>path:#_ftn31]](%%) and need to be treated as SDMX objects. This kind of mapping can be applied independently in the two directions and the Dimensions on which the mapping is based can be different in the two directions: these Dimensions are defined in the ToVtlSpaceKey and in the FromVtlSpaceKey classes respectively. 1656 1656 1657 1657 First, let us see what happens in the mapping direction from SDMX to VTL, i.e. when parts of a SDMX dataflow (e.g. DF1(1.0)) need to be mapped to distinct VTL datasets that are operand of some VTL transformations. 1658 1658 ... ... @@ -1662,7 +1662,7 @@ 1662 1662 1663 1663 //COUNTRYvalue//. For example, the VTL dataset ‘DF1(1.0)/POPULATION.USA’ would contain all the observations of DF1(1.0) having INDICATOR = POPULATION and COUNTRY = USA. 1664 1664 1665 -In order to obtain the data structure of these VTL datasets from the SDMX one, it is assumed that the SDMX dimensions on which the mapping is based are dropped, i.e. not maintained in the VTL data structure; this is possible because their values are fixed for each one of the invoked VTL datasets[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[32~]^^>>path:#_ftn32]](%%). After that, the mapping method from SDMX to VTL specified for the dataflow DF1(1.0) is applied (i.e. basic, pivot …).1714 +In order to obtain the data structure of these VTL datasets from the SDMX one, it is assumed that the SDMX dimensions on which the mapping is based are dropped, i.e. not maintained in the VTL data structure; this is possible because their values are fixed for each one of the invoked VTL datasets[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[32~]^^>>path:#_ftn32]](%%). After that, the mapping method from SDMX to VTL specified for the dataflow DF1(1.0) is applied (i.e. basic, pivot …). 1666 1666 1667 1667 In the example above, for all the datasets of the kind 1668 1668 ... ... @@ -1682,7 +1682,7 @@ 1682 1682 1683 1683 … … … 1684 1684 1685 -In fact the VTL operator “sub” has exactly the same behaviour. Therefore, mapping different parts of a SDMX dataflow to different VTL datasets in the direction from SDMX to VTL through the ordered concatenation notation is equivalent to a proper use of the operator “**sub**” on such a dataflow. [[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[33~]^^>>path:#_ftn33]]1734 +In fact the VTL operator “sub” has exactly the same behaviour. Therefore, mapping different parts of a SDMX dataflow to different VTL datasets in the direction from SDMX to VTL through the ordered concatenation notation is equivalent to a proper use of the operator “**sub**” on such a dataflow. [[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[33~]^^>>path:#_ftn33]] 1686 1686 1687 1687 In the direction from SDMX to VTL it is allowed to omit the value of one or more Dimensions on which the mapping is based, but maintaining all the separating dots (therefore it may happen to find two or more consecutive dots and dots in the beginning or in the end). The absence of value means that for the corresponding Dimension all the values are kept and the Dimension is not dropped. 1688 1688 ... ... @@ -1705,12 +1705,12 @@ 1705 1705 1706 1706 For example, let us assume that the VTL programmer wants to calculate the SDMX dataflow DF2(1.0) having the Dimensions TIME_PERIOD, INDICATOR, and COUNTRY and that such a programmer finds it convenient to calculate separately the parts of DF2(1.0) that have different combinations of values for INDICATOR and COUNTRY: 1707 1707 1708 -* each part is calculated as a VTL derived dataset, result of a dedicated VTL transformation; [[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[34~]^^>>path:#_ftn34]](%%)1709 -* the data structure of all these VTL datasets has the TIME_PERIOD identifier and does not have the INDICATOR and COUNTRY identifiers.[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[35~]^^>>path:#_ftn35]]1757 +* each part is calculated as a VTL derived dataset, result of a dedicated VTL transformation; [[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[34~]^^>>path:#_ftn34]](%%) 1758 +* the data structure of all these VTL datasets has the TIME_PERIOD identifier and does not have the INDICATOR and COUNTRY identifiers.[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[35~]^^>>path:#_ftn35]] 1710 1710 1711 -Under these hypothesis, such derived VTL datasets can be mapped to DF2(1.0) by declaring the Dimensions INDICATOR and COUNTRY as mapping dimensions[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[36~]^^>>path:#_ftn36]](%%).1760 +Under these hypothesis, such derived VTL datasets can be mapped to DF2(1.0) by declaring the Dimensions INDICATOR and COUNTRY as mapping dimensions[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[36~]^^>>path:#_ftn36]](%%). 1712 1712 1713 -The corresponding VTL transformations, assuming that the result needs to be persistent, would be of this kind:^^ ^^[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[37~]^^>>path:#_ftn37]]1762 +The corresponding VTL transformations, assuming that the result needs to be persistent, would be of this kind:^^ ^^[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[37~]^^>>path:#_ftn37]] 1714 1714 1715 1715 ‘DF2(1.0)///INDICATORvalue//.//COUNTRYvalue//’ <- expression 1716 1716 ... ... @@ -1777,9 +1777,9 @@ 1777 1777 1778 1778 …); 1779 1779 1780 -In other words, starting from the datasets explicitly calculated through VTL (in the example ‘DF2(1.0)/GDPPERCAPITA.USA’ and so on), the first step consists in calculating other (non-persistent) VTL datasets (in the example DF2bis_GDPPERCAPITA_USA and so on) by adding the identifiers INDICATOR and COUNTRY with the desired values (//INDICATORvalue// and //COUNTRYvalue)//. Finally, all these non-persistent data sets are united and give the final result DF2(1.0)[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[38~]^^>>path:#_ftn38]](%%), which can be mapped one-to-one to the homonymous SDMX dataflow having the dimension components TIME_PERIOD, INDICATOR and COUNTRY.1829 +In other words, starting from the datasets explicitly calculated through VTL (in the example ‘DF2(1.0)/GDPPERCAPITA.USA’ and so on), the first step consists in calculating other (non-persistent) VTL datasets (in the example DF2bis_GDPPERCAPITA_USA and so on) by adding the identifiers INDICATOR and COUNTRY with the desired values (//INDICATORvalue// and //COUNTRYvalue)//. Finally, all these non-persistent data sets are united and give the final result DF2(1.0)[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[38~]^^>>path:#_ftn38]](%%), which can be mapped one-to-one to the homonymous SDMX dataflow having the dimension components TIME_PERIOD, INDICATOR and COUNTRY. 1781 1781 1782 -Therefore, mapping different VTL datasets having the same data structure to different parts of a SDMX dataflow, i.e. in the direction from VTL to SDMX, through the ordered concatenation notation is equivalent to a proper use of the operators “calc” and “union” on such datasets. [[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[39~]^^>>path:#_ftn39]](%%)[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallinkwikiinternallink" %)^^~[40~]^^>>path:#_ftn40]]1831 +Therefore, mapping different VTL datasets having the same data structure to different parts of a SDMX dataflow, i.e. in the direction from VTL to SDMX, through the ordered concatenation notation is equivalent to a proper use of the operators “calc” and “union” on such datasets. [[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[39~]^^>>path:#_ftn39]](%%)[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[40~]^^>>path:#_ftn40]] 1783 1783 1784 1784 It is worth noting that in the direction from VTL to SDMX it is mandatory to specify the value for every Dimension on which the mapping is based (in other word, in the name of the calculated VTL dataset is not possible to omit the value of some of the Dimensions). 1785 1785 ... ... @@ -1828,7 +1828,7 @@ 1828 1828 1829 1829 Domain) is not identifiable. As a consequence, the definition of the VTL rulesets, which in VTL can refer either to enumerated or non-enumerated value domains, in SDMX can refer only to enumerated Value Domains (i.e. to SDMX Codelists). 1830 1830 1831 -As for the mapping between VTL variables and SDMX Concepts, it should be noted that these artefacts do not coincide perfectly. In fact, the VTL variables are represented variables, defined always on the same Value Domain (“Representation” in SDMX) independently of the data set / data structure in which they appear[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[41~]^^>>path:#_ftn41]](%%), while the SDMX Concepts can have different Representations in different DataStructures.[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallinkwikiinternallink" %)^^~[42~]^^>>path:#_ftn42]](%%) This means that one SDMX Concept can correspond to many VTL Variables, one for each representation the Concept has.1880 +As for the mapping between VTL variables and SDMX Concepts, it should be noted that these artefacts do not coincide perfectly. In fact, the VTL variables are represented variables, defined always on the same Value Domain (“Representation” in SDMX) independently of the data set / data structure in which they appear[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[41~]^^>>path:#_ftn41]](%%), while the SDMX Concepts can have different Representations in different DataStructures.[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[42~]^^>>path:#_ftn42]](%%) This means that one SDMX Concept can correspond to many VTL Variables, one for each representation the Concept has. 1832 1832 1833 1833 Therefore, it is important to be aware that some VTL operations (for example the binary operations at data set level) are consistent only if the components having the same names in the operated VTL data sets have also the same representation (i.e. the same Value Domain as for VTL). For example, it is possible to obtain correct results from the VTL expression 1834 1834 ... ... @@ -2173,7 +2173,7 @@ 2173 2173 |N|fixed number of digits used in the preceding textual representation of the month or the day 2174 2174 | | 2175 2175 2176 -The default conversion, either standard or customized, can be used to deduce automatically the representation of the components of the result of a VTL transformation. In alternative, the representation of the resulting SDMX Dataflow can be given explicitly by providing its DataStructureDefinition. In other words, the representation specified in the DSD, if available, overrides any default conversion[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[43~]^^>>path:#_ftn43]](%%).2225 +The default conversion, either standard or customized, can be used to deduce automatically the representation of the components of the result of a VTL transformation. In alternative, the representation of the resulting SDMX Dataflow can be given explicitly by providing its DataStructureDefinition. In other words, the representation specified in the DSD, if available, overrides any default conversion[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^~[43~]^^>>path:#_ftn43]](%%). 2177 2177 2178 2178 === 10.4.5 Null Values === 2179 2179