Last modified by Helena on 2025/09/10 11:19

From version 29.2
edited by Helena
on 2025/05/16 14:06
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 21.8
edited by Helena
on 2025/05/15 14:21
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -183,11 +183,11 @@
183 183  
184 184  === {{id name="_Toc93847"/}}5.2.2 Structure Submission Service ===
185 185  
186 -The registry must support a mechanism for submitting structural metadata. This mechanism can be the SDMX REST interface for structural metadata (this is defined in the corresponding GitHub project, dedicated to the SDMX REST API: [[__https:~~/~~/github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest__>>https://https:github.comsdmx-twgsdmx-rest]]). In order for the architecture to be scalable, the finest-grained piece of structural metadata that can be processed by the SDMX-RR is a MaintainableArtefact, with the exception of Item Schemes, where changes at an Item level is also possible (see next section on the SDMX Information Model).
186 +The registry must support a mechanism for submitting structural metadata. This mechanism can be the SDMX REST interface for structural metadata (this is defined in the corresponding GitHub project, dedicated to the SDMX REST API: __[[https:~~/~~/github.com/sdmx>>url:https://github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest]][[->>url:https://github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest]][[twg/sdmx>>url:https://github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest]][[->>url:https://github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest]][[rest>>url:https://github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest]]__[[)>>url:https://github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest]]. In order for the architecture to be scalable, the finest-grained piece of structural metadata that can be processed by the SDMX-RR is a MaintainableArtefact, with the exception of Item Schemes, where changes at an Item level is also possible (see next section on the SDMX Information Model).
187 187  
188 188  === {{id name="_Toc93848"/}}5.2.3 Structure Query Service ===
189 189  
190 -The registry must support a mechanism for querying for structural metadata. This mechanism can be the SDMX REST interface for structural metadata (this is defined in the corresponding GitHub project, dedicated to the SDMX REST API: [[__https:~~/~~/github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest__>>https://https:github.comsdmx-twgsdmx-rest]]). The registry response to this query mechanism is the SDMX Structure message, which has as its root node:
190 +The registry must support a mechanism for querying for structural metadata. This mechanism can be the SDMX REST interface for structural metadata (this is defined in the corresponding GitHub project, dedicated to the SDMX REST API: __[[https:~~/~~/github.com/sdmx>>url:https://github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest]][[->>url:https://github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest]][[twg/sdmx>>url:https://github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest]][[->>url:https://github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest]][[rest>>url:https://github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest]]__ [[)>>url:https://github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest]]. The registry response to this query mechanism is the SDMX Structure message, which has as its root node:
191 191  
192 192  * Structure
193 193  
... ... @@ -280,7 +280,7 @@
280 280  Subscription management involves a user submitting a subscription request which contains:
281 281  
282 282  * a query or constraint expression in terms of a filter which defines the events for which the user is interested (e.g., new data for a specific dataflow, or for a domain category, or changes to a Data Structure Definition).
283 -* a list of URIs or endpoints to which an XML notification message can be sent. Supported endpoint types will be email (mailto~: ) and HTTP POST (a normal http:~/~/ address);
283 +* a list of URIs or endpoints to which an XML notification message can be sent. Supported endpoint types will be email (mailto~:) and HTTP POST (a normal http:~/~/ address);
284 284  * request for a list of submitted subscriptions;
285 285  * deletion of a subscription;
286 286  
... ... @@ -304,6 +304,7 @@
304 304  |(% style="width:188px" %)**Interface**|(% style="width:542px" %)**Behaviour**
305 305  |(% style="width:188px" %) |(% style="width:542px" %)(((
306 306  b) Not be explicitly{{footnote}}With semantic versioning, it is allowed to reference a range of artefacts, e.g., a DSD referencing a Codelist with version 1.2.3+ means all patch versions greater than 1.2.3. This means that deleting 1.2.4-draft does not break integrity of the aforementioned DSD.{{/footnote}} referenced from any other object in the Registry.
307 +
307 307  4) The semantic versioning rules in the SDMX documentation MUST be obeyed.
308 308  )))
309 309  |(% style="width:188px" %)Structure submission|(% style="width:542px" %)Structures are submitted at the level of the Maintainable Artefact and the behaviour in “All” above is therefore at the level of the Maintainable Artefact.
... ... @@ -328,12 +328,14 @@
328 328  
329 329  The table below shows the identification and related data attributes to be stored in a registry for objects that are one of:
330 330  
331 -* //nnotable//
332 +* //Annotable//
332 332  * //Identifiable//
333 333  * //Nameable//
334 334  * //Versionable//
335 335  * //Maintainable//
336 336  
338 +:
339 +
337 337  (((
338 338  (% style="width:1052.29px" %)
339 339  |**Object Type**|(% style="width:241px" %)**Data Attributes**|(% style="width:156px" %)**Status**|**Data type**|(% style="width:457px" %)**Notes**
... ... @@ -361,9 +361,9 @@
361 361  
362 362  **Table 1: Common Attributes of Object Types**
363 363  
364 -== {{id name="_Toc93856"/}}6.2 Unique identification of SDMX objects ==
367 +=== {{id name="_Toc93856"/}}6.2 Unique identification of SDMX objects ===
365 365  
366 -=== {{id name="_Toc93857"/}}6.2.1 Agencies and Metadata Providers ===
369 +===== {{id name="_Toc93857"/}}6.2.1 Agencies and Metadata Providers =====
367 367  
368 368  The Maintenance Agency in SDMX is maintained in an Agency Scheme which itself is a sub class of Organisation Scheme – this is shown in the class diagram below.
369 369  
... ... @@ -501,7 +501,7 @@
501 501  
502 502  SDMXPrefix.SDMX-IM-package-name.classname=agencyid:maintained-objectid(version).contained-object-id.contained-object-id contained-objectid.object-id
503 503  
504 -===== //__**Concrete Examples of the URN Structure**__// =====
507 +//__**Concrete Examples of the URN Structure**__//
505 505  
506 506  The Data Structure Definition CRED_EXT_DEBT of legacy version 2.1 maintained by the toplevel Agency TFFS would have the URN:
507 507  
... ... @@ -621,118 +621,136 @@
621 621  
622 622  urn:sdmx.org.sdmx.infomodel.{package}.{classname}=
623 623  
624 -(% style="width:1311.29px" %)
625 -|(% style="width:252px" %)**Classname**|(% style="width:639px" %)**Ending URN pattern**|(% style="width:418px" %)**Example**
626 -|(% style="width:252px" %)Agency{{footnote}}The identification of an Agency in the URN structure for the maintainable object is by means of the agencyId. The AgencyScheme is not identified as SDMX has a mechanism for identifying an Agency uniquely by its Id. Note that this Id may be hierarchical. For example, a sub-agency of IMF is referred like this: IMF.SubAgency1{{/footnote}}|(% style="width:639px" %)agencySchemeAgencyId:**AGENCIES**(**1.0**).agencyId|(% style="width:418px" %)ECB:**AGENCIES**(**1.0**).AA
627 -|(% style="width:252px" %)//AgencyScheme//|(% style="width:639px" %)agencySchemeAgencyId:**AGENCIES**(**1.0**)|(% style="width:418px" %)ECB:**AGENCIES**(**1.0**)
628 -|(% style="width:252px" %)//Categorisation//|(% style="width:639px" %)categorisationAgencyId:categorisationId(version)|(% style="width:418px" %)IMF:cat001(1.0.0)
629 -|(% style="width:252px" %)Category|(% style="width:639px" %)categorySchemeAgencyId:categorySchemeId(versi on).categoryId.categoryId.categoryId etc.|(% style="width:418px" %)IMF:SDDS(1.0.0):level_1_category.level_2_category …
630 -|(% style="width:252px" %)//CategoryScheme//|(% style="width:639px" %)categorySchemeAgencyId:categorySchemeId(versi on)|(% style="width:418px" %)IMF:SDDS(1.0.0)
627 +|**Classname**|**Ending URN pattern**|**Example**
628 +|Agency^^[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^2^^>>path:#sdfootnote2sym||name="sdfootnote2anc"]](%%)^^|agencySchemeAgencyId:**AGENCIES**(**1.0**).agencyId|ECB:**AGENCIES**(**1.0**).AA
629 +|//AgencyScheme//|agencySchemeAgencyId:**AGENCIES**(**1.0**)|ECB:**AGENCIES**(**1.0**)
630 +|//Categorisation//|categorisationAgencyId:categorisationId(version)|IMF:cat001(1.0.0)
631 +|Category|categorySchemeAgencyId:categorySchemeId(versi on).categoryId.categoryId.categoryId etc.|IMF:SDDS(1.0.0):level_1_category.level_2_category …
632 +|//CategoryScheme//|categorySchemeAgencyId:categorySchemeId(versi on)|IMF:SDDS(1.0.0)
631 631  
632 -|(% style="width:250px" %)**Classname**|(% style="width:639px" %)**Ending URN pattern**|(% style="width:1049px" %)**Example**
633 -|(% style="width:250px" %)//CategorySchemeMap//|(% style="width:639px" %)(((
634 -catSchemeMapAgencyId:catSchemeMapId(version)
635 -)))|(% style="width:1049px" %)SDMX:EUROSTAT_SUBJECT_DOMAIN(1.0.0)
636 -|(% style="width:250px" %)Code|(% style="width:639px" %)codeListAgencyId:codelistId(version).codeId|(% style="width:1049px" %)SDMX:CL_FREQ(1.0.0).Q
637 -|(% style="width:250px" %)//Codelist//|(% style="width:639px" %)codeListAgencyId:codeListId(version)|(% style="width:1049px" %)SDMX:CL_FREQ(1.0.0)
638 -|(% style="width:250px" %)ComponentMap|(% style="width:639px" %)structureMapAgencyId:structureMap(version).com ponentMapId|(% style="width:1049px" %)SDMX:BOP_STRUCTURES(1.0.0).REF_AREA_TO_COUNT RY
639 -|(% style="width:250px" %)Concept|(% style="width:639px" %)conceptSchemeAgencyId:conceptSchemeId(versio n).conceptId|(% style="width:1049px" %)SDMX:CROSS_DOMAIN_CONCEPTS(1.0.0).FREQ
640 -|(% style="width:250px" %)//ConceptScheme//|(% style="width:639px" %)conceptSchemeAgencyId:conceptSchemeId(versio n)|(% style="width:1049px" %)SDMX:CROSS_DOMAIN_CONCEPTS(1.0.0)
641 -|(% style="width:250px" %)//ConceptSchemeMap//|(% style="width:639px" %)(((
634 +|**Classname**|**Ending URN pattern**|**Example**
635 +|//CategorySchemeMap//|(((
636 +catSchemeMapAgencyId:catSchemeMapId(version
637 +
638 +)
639 +)))|SDMX:EUROSTAT_SUBJECT_DOMAIN(1.0.0)
640 +|Code|codeListAgencyId:codelistId(version).codeId|SDMX:CL_FREQ(1.0.0).Q
641 +|//Codelist//|codeListAgencyId:codeListId(version)|SDMX:CL_FREQ(1.0.0)
642 +|ComponentMap|structureMapAgencyId:structureMap(version).com ponentMapId|SDMX:BOP_STRUCTURES(1.0.0).REF_AREA_TO_COUNT RY
643 +|Concept|conceptSchemeAgencyId:conceptSchemeId(versio n).conceptId|SDMX:CROSS_DOMAIN_CONCEPTS(1.0.0).FREQ
644 +|//ConceptScheme//|conceptSchemeAgencyId:conceptSchemeId(versio n)|SDMX:CROSS_DOMAIN_CONCEPTS(1.0.0)
645 +|//ConceptSchemeMap//|(((
642 642  conceptSchemeMapAgencyId:conceptSchemeMap
647 +
643 643  Id(version)
644 -)))|(% style="width:1049px" %)SDMX:CONCEPT_MAP(1.0.0)
645 -|(% style="width:250px" %)CustomType|(% style="width:639px" %)customTypeSchemeAgencyId customTypeSchemeId(version) customTypeId|(% style="width:1049px" %)ECB: CUSTOM_TYPE_SCHEME(1.0.0).CUSTOM_TYPE_1
646 -|(% style="width:250px" %)//CustomTypeScheme//|(% style="width:639px" %)customTypeSchemeAgencyId customTypeSchemeId(version)|(% style="width:1049px" %)ECB:CUSTOM_TYPE_SCHEME(1.0.0)
647 -|(% style="width:250px" %)DataAttrribute|(% style="width:639px" %)dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId:dataStructureDef initionId(version).dataAttributeId|(% style="width:1049px" %)TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0).OBS_STATUS
648 -|(% style="width:250px" %)//DataConstraint//|(% style="width:639px" %)dataConstraintAgencyId:dataConstraintId(version)|(% style="width:1049px" %)TFFS:CREDITOR_DATA_CONTENT(1.0.0)
649 +)))|SDMX:CONCEPT_MAP(1.0.0)
650 +|CustomType|customTypeSchemeAgencyId customTypeSchemeId(version) customTypeId|ECB: CUSTOM_TYPE_SCHEME(1.0.0).CUSTOM_TYPE_1
651 +|//CustomTypeScheme//|customTypeSchemeAgencyId customTypeSchemeId(version)|ECB:CUSTOM_TYPE_SCHEME(1.0.0)
652 +|DataAttrribute|dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId:dataStructureDef initionId(version).dataAttributeId|TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0).OBS_STATUS
653 +|//DataConstraint//|dataConstraintAgencyId:dataConstraintId(version)|TFFS:CREDITOR_DATA_CONTENT(1.0.0)
649 649  
650 -|(% style="width:248px" %)**Classname**|(% style="width:643px" %)**Ending URN pattern**|(% style="width:1047px" %)**Example**
651 -|(% style="width:248px" %)DataConsumer|(% style="width:643px" %)dataConsumerSchemeAgencyId:**DATA_CONSUME RS**(**1.0**).dataConsumerId|(% style="width:1047px" %)SDMX:**DATA_CONSUMERS**(**1.0**).CONSUMER_1
652 -|(% style="width:248px" %)//DataConsumerScheme//|(% style="width:643px" %)(((
653 -dataConsumerSchemeAgencyId:**DATA_CONSUME RS**(**1.0**)
654 -)))|(% style="width:1047px" %)SDMX:**DATA_CONSUMERS**(**1.0**)
655 -|(% style="width:248px" %)//Dataflow//|(% style="width:643px" %)dataflowAgencyId:dataflowId(version)|(% style="width:1047px" %)TFFS:CRED_EXT_DEBT(1.0.0)
656 -|(% style="width:248px" %)DataProvider|(% style="width:643px" %)(((
657 -dataProviderSchemeAgencyId:**DATA_PROVIDERS**(**1.0**).dataProviderId
658 -)))|(% style="width:1047px" %)SDMX:**DATA_PROVIDERS**(**1.0**).PROVIDER_1
659 -|(% style="width:248px" %)//DataProviderScheme//|(% style="width:643px" %)(((
660 -dataProviderSchemeAgencyId:**DATA_PROVIDERS**(**1.0**)
661 -)))|(% style="width:1047px" %)SDMX:**DATA_PROVIDERS**(**1.0**)
662 -|(% style="width:248px" %)//DataStructure//|(% style="width:643px" %)dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId:dataStructureDef initionId(version)|(% style="width:1047px" %)TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0)
663 -|(% style="width:248px" %)Dimension|(% style="width:643px" %)dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId:dataStructureDef initionId(version).dimensionId|(% style="width:1047px" %)TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0).FREQ
664 -|(% style="width:248px" %)(((
655 +|**Classname**|**Ending URN pattern**|**Example**
656 +|DataConsumer|dataConsumerSchemeAgencyId:**DATA_CONSUME RS**(**1.0**).dataConsumerId|SDMX:**DATA_CONSUMERS**(**1.0**).CONSUMER_1
657 +|//DataConsumerScheme//|(((
658 +dataConsumerSchemeAgencyId:**DATA_CONSUME**
659 +
660 +**RS**(**1.0**)
661 +)))|SDMX:**DATA_CONSUMERS**(**1.0**)
662 +|//Dataflow//|dataflowAgencyId:dataflowId(version)|TFFS:CRED_EXT_DEBT(1.0.0)
663 +|DataProvider|(((
664 +dataProviderSchemeAgencyId:**DATA_PROVIDERS**(
665 +
666 +**1.0**).dataProviderId
667 +)))|SDMX:**DATA_PROVIDERS**(**1.0**).PROVIDER_1
668 +|//DataProviderScheme//|(((
669 +dataProviderSchemeAgencyId:**DATA_PROVIDERS**(
670 +
671 +**1.0**)
672 +)))|SDMX:**DATA_PROVIDERS**(**1.0**)
673 +|//DataStructure//|dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId:dataStructureDef initionId(version)|TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0)
674 +|Dimension|dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId:dataStructureDef initionId(version).dimensionId|TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0).FREQ
675 +|(((
665 665  DimensionDescriptor
677 +
666 666  MeasureDescriptor
679 +
667 667  AttributeDescriptor
668 -)))|(% style="width:643px" %)dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId:dataStructureDef initionId(version).componentListId where the componentListId is the name of the class (there is only one occurrence of each in the Data Structure Definition)|(% style="width:1047px" %)(((
681 +)))|dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId:dataStructureDef initionId(version).componentListId where the componentListId is the name of the class (there is only one occurrence of each in the Data Structure Definition)|(((
669 669  TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0).DimensionDescriptor
683 +
670 670  TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0).MeasureDescriptor
685 +
671 671  TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0).AttributeDescriptor
672 672  )))
673 -|(% style="width:248px" %)GroupDimensionDescriptor|(% style="width:643px" %)dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId:dataStructureDef initionId(version).groupDimensionDescriptorId|(% style="width:1047px" %)TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0).SIBLING
674 -|(% style="width:248px" %)HierarchicalCode|(% style="width:643px" %)hierarchyAgencyId:hierarchyId(version).hierarchica lCode.hierarchicalCode|(% style="width:1047px" %)UNESCO:H-C-GOV(1.0.0).GOV_CODE1.GOV_CODE1_1
688 +|GroupDimensionDescriptor|dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId:dataStructureDef initionId(version).groupDimensionDescriptorId|TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0).SIBLING
689 +|HierarchicalCode|hierarchyAgencyId:hierarchyId(version).hierarchica lCode.hierarchicalCode|UNESCO:H-C-GOV(1.0.0).GOV_CODE1.GOV_CODE1_1
675 675  
676 -|(% style="width:248px" %)**Classname**|(% style="width:646px" %)**Ending URN pattern**|(% style="width:1044px" %)**Example**
677 -|(% style="width:248px" %)//Hierarchy//|(% style="width:646px" %)hierarchyAgencyId:hierarchyId(version)|(% style="width:1044px" %)UNESCO:H-C-GOV(1.0.0)
678 -|(% style="width:248px" %)//HierarchyAssociation//|(% style="width:646px" %)hierarchyAssociationAgencyId:hierarchyAssociatio nId(version)|(% style="width:1044px" %)UNESCO:CL_EXP_SOURCE(1.0.0)
679 -|(% style="width:248px" %)Level|(% style="width:646px" %)hierarchyAgencyId:hierarchyId(version).level|(% style="width:1044px" %)UNESCO:H-C-GOV(1.0.0).LVL1
680 -|(% style="width:248px" %)Measure|(% style="width:646px" %)dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId:dataStructureDef initionId(version).measureId|(% style="width:1044px" %)TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0).OBS_VALUE
681 -|(% style="width:248px" %)MetadataAttribute|(% style="width:646px" %)(((
691 +|**Classname**|**Ending URN pattern**|**Example**
692 +|//Hierarchy//|hierarchyAgencyId:hierarchyId(version)|UNESCO:H-C-GOV(1.0.0)
693 +|//HierarchyAssociation//|hierarchyAssociationAgencyId:hierarchyAssociatio nId(version)|UNESCO:CL_EXP_SOURCE(1.0.0)
694 +|Level|hierarchyAgencyId:hierarchyId(version).level|UNESCO:H-C-GOV(1.0.0).LVL1
695 +|Measure|dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId:dataStructureDef initionId(version).measureId|TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0).OBS_VALUE
696 +|MetadataAttribute|(((
682 682  msdAgencyId:msdId(version).metadataAttributeId.
698 +
683 683  metadataAttributeId
684 -)))|(% style="width:1044px" %)IMF:SDDS_MSD(1.0.0).COMPILATION.METHOD
685 -|(% style="width:248px" %)MetadataAttributeDescriptor|(% style="width:646px" %)msdAgencyId:msdId(version).metadataAttributeDe scriptorId|(% style="width:1044px" %)IMF:SDDS_MSD(1.0.0).MetadataAttributeDescriptor
686 -|(% style="width:248px" %)//MetadataConstraint//|(% style="width:646px" %)metadataConstraintAgencyId:metadataConstraintI d(version)|(% style="width:1044px" %)TFFS:CREDITOR_METADATA_CONTENT(1.0.0)
687 -|(% style="width:248px" %)//Metadataflow//|(% style="width:646px" %)metadataflowAgencyId:metadataflowId(version)|(% style="width:1044px" %)IMF:SDDS_MDF(1.0.0)
688 -|(% style="width:248px" %)MetadataProvider|(% style="width:646px" %)metadataProviderSchemeAgencyId:**METADATA_P ROVIDERS**(**1.0**).metadataProviderId|(% style="width:1044px" %)SDMX:**METADATA_PROVIDERS**(**1.0**).MD_PROVIDER_1
689 -|(% style="width:248px" %)//MetadataProviderScheme//|(% style="width:646px" %)metadataProviderSchemeAgencyId:**METADATA_P ROVIDERS**(**1.0**)|(% style="width:1044px" %)SDMX:**METADATA_PROVIDERS**(**1.0**)
690 -|(% style="width:248px" %)//MetadataProvisionAgreement//|(% style="width:646px" %)metadataProvisionAgreementAgencyId:metadataP rovisionAgreementId(version)|(% style="width:1044px" %)IMF:SDDS_MDF_AB(1.0.0)
691 -|(% style="width:248px" %)//MetadataSet//|(% style="width:646px" %)metadataProviderId:metadataSetId(version)|(% style="width:1044px" %)MD_PROVIDER:METADATASET(1.0.0)
692 -|(% style="width:248px" %)//MetadataStructure//|(% style="width:646px" %)msdAgencyId:msdId(version)|(% style="width:1044px" %)IMF:SDDS_MSD(1.0.0)
700 +)))|IMF:SDDS_MSD(1.0.0).COMPILATION.METHOD
701 +|MetadataAttributeDescriptor|msdAgencyId:msdId(version).metadataAttributeDe scriptorId|IMF:SDDS_MSD(1.0.0).MetadataAttributeDescriptor
702 +|//MetadataConstraint//|metadataConstraintAgencyId:metadataConstraintI d(version)|TFFS:CREDITOR_METADATA_CONTENT(1.0.0)
703 +|//Metadataflow//|metadataflowAgencyId:metadataflowId(version)|IMF:SDDS_MDF(1.0.0)
704 +|MetadataProvider|metadataProviderSchemeAgencyId:**METADATA_P ROVIDERS**(**1.0**).metadataProviderId|SDMX:**METADATA_PROVIDERS**(**1.0**).MD_PROVIDER_1
705 +|//MetadataProviderScheme//|metadataProviderSchemeAgencyId:**METADATA_P ROVIDERS**(**1.0**)|SDMX:**METADATA_PROVIDERS**(**1.0**)
706 +|//MetadataProvisionAgreement//|metadataProvisionAgreementAgencyId:metadataP rovisionAgreementId(version)|IMF:SDDS_MDF_AB(1.0.0)
707 +|//MetadataSet//|metadataProviderId:metadataSetId(version)|MD_PROVIDER:METADATASET(1.0.0)
708 +|//MetadataStructure//|msdAgencyId:msdId(version)|IMF:SDDS_MSD(1.0.0)
693 693  
694 -|(% style="width:248px" %)**Classname**|(% style="width:629px" %)**Ending URN pattern**|(% style="width:1061px" %)**Example**
695 -|(% style="width:248px" %)NamePersonalisation|(% style="width:629px" %)namePersonalisationSchemeAgencyId namePersonalisationSchemeId(version) namePersonalisationId|(% style="width:1061px" %)ECB:PSN_SCHEME(1.0.0).PSN1234
696 -|(% style="width:248px" %)//NamePersonalisationScheme//|(% style="width:629px" %)namePersonalisationSchemeAgencyId namePersonalisationSchemeId(version)|(% style="width:1061px" %)ECB:PSN_SCHEME(1.0.0)
697 -|(% style="width:248px" %)//OrganisationSchemeMap//|(% style="width:629px" %)orgSchemeMapAgencyId:orgSchemeMapId(versio n)|(% style="width:1061px" %)SDMX:AGENCIES_PROVIDERS(1.0.0)
698 -|(% style="width:248px" %)OrganisationUnit|(% style="width:629px" %)organisationUnitSchemeAgencyId:organisationUnitSchemeId(version).organisationUnitId|(% style="width:1061px" %)ECB:ORGANISATIONS(1.0.0).1F
699 -|(% style="width:248px" %)//OrganisationUnitScheme//|(% style="width:629px" %)organisationUnitSchemeAgencyId:organisationUni tSchemeId(version)|(% style="width:1061px" %)ECB:ORGANISATIONS(1.0.0)
700 -|(% style="width:248px" %)//Process//|(% style="width:629px" %)processAgencyId:processId{version)|(% style="width:1061px" %)BIS:PROCESS1(1.0.0)
701 -|(% style="width:248px" %)ProcessStep|(% style="width:629px" %)(((
710 +|**Classname**|**Ending URN pattern**|**Example**
711 +|NamePersonalisation|namePersonalisationSchemeAgencyId namePersonalisationSchemeId(version) namePersonalisationId|ECB:PSN_SCHEME(1.0.0).PSN1234
712 +|//NamePersonalisationScheme//|namePersonalisationSchemeAgencyId namePersonalisationSchemeId(version)|ECB:PSN_SCHEME(1.0.0)
713 +|//OrganisationSchemeMap//|orgSchemeMapAgencyId:orgSchemeMapId(versio n)|SDMX:AGENCIES_PROVIDERS(1.0.0)
714 +|OrganisationUnit|organisationUnitSchemeAgencyId:organisationUni tSchemeId(version).organisationUnitId|ECB:ORGANISATIONS(1.0.0).1F
715 +|//OrganisationUnitScheme//|organisationUnitSchemeAgencyId:organisationUni tSchemeId(version)|ECB:ORGANISATIONS(1.0.0)
716 +|//Process//|processAgencyId:processId{version)|BIS:PROCESS1(1.0.0)
717 +|ProcessStep|(((
702 702  processAgencyId:processId(version).processStepId.
719 +
703 703  processStepId
704 -)))|(% style="width:1061px" %)BIS:PROCESS1(1.0.0).STEP1.STEP1_1
705 -|(% style="width:248px" %)//ProvisionAgreement//|(% style="width:629px" %)provisionAgreementAgencyId:provisionAgreement Id(version)|(% style="width:1061px" %)TFFS:CRED_EXT_DEBT_AB(1.0.0)
706 -|(% style="width:248px" %)ReportingCategory|(% style="width:629px" %)(((
721 +)))|BIS:PROCESS1(1.0.0).STEP1.STEP1_1
722 +|//ProvisionAgreement//|provisionAgreementAgencyId:provisionAgreement Id(version)|TFFS:CRED_EXT_DEBT_AB(1.0.0)
723 +|ReportingCategory|(((
707 707  reportingTaxonomyAgencyId:
725 +
708 708  reportingTaxonomyId(version).reportingCategoryI d.reportingCategoryId
709 -)))|(% style="width:1061px" %)IMF:REP_1(1.0.0):LVL1_REP_CAT.LVL2_REP_CAT
710 -|(% style="width:248px" %)//ReportingTaxonomy//|(% style="width:629px" %)reportingTaxonomyAgencyId:reportingTaxonomyI d(version)|(% style="width:1061px" %)IMF:REP_1(1.0.0)
711 -|(% style="width:248px" %)//ReportingTaxonomyMap//|(% style="width:629px" %)repTaxonomyAgencyId:repTaxonomyId(version)|(% style="width:1061px" %)SDMX:RT_MAP(1.0.0)
727 +)))|IMF:REP_1(1.0.0):LVL1_REP_CAT.LVL2_REP_CAT
728 +|//ReportingTaxonomy//|reportingTaxonomyAgencyId:reportingTaxonomyI d(version)|IMF:REP_1(1.0.0)
729 +|//ReportingTaxonomyMap//|repTaxonomyAgencyId:repTaxonomyId(version)|SDMX:RT_MAP(1.0.0)
712 712  
713 -|(% style="width:247px" %)**Classname**|(% style="width:649px" %)**Ending URN pattern**|(% style="width:1042px" %)**Example**
714 -|(% style="width:247px" %)//RepresentationMap//|(% style="width:649px" %)repMapAgencyId:repMapId(version)|(% style="width:1042px" %)SDMX:REF_AREA_MAPPING(1.0.0)
715 -|(% style="width:247px" %)Ruleset|(% style="width:649px" %)rulesetSchemeAgencyId rulesetSchemeId(version) rulesetId|(% style="width:1042px" %)ECB:RULESET_23(1.0.0).SET111
716 -|(% style="width:247px" %)//RulesetScheme//|(% style="width:649px" %)rulesetSchemeAgencyId rulesetSchemeId(version)|(% style="width:1042px" %)ECB:RULESET_23(1.0.0)
717 -|(% style="width:247px" %)//StructureMap//|(% style="width:649px" %)structureMapAgencyId:structureMap(version)|(% style="width:1042px" %)SDMX:BOP_STRUCTURES(1.0.0)
718 -|(% style="width:247px" %)Subscription|(% style="width:649px" %)(((
731 +|**Classname**|**Ending URN pattern**|**Example**
732 +|//RepresentationMap//|repMapAgencyId:repMapId(version)|SDMX:REF_AREA_MAPPING(1.0.0)
733 +|Ruleset|rulesetSchemeAgencyId rulesetSchemeId(version) rulesetId|ECB:RULESET_23(1.0.0).SET111
734 +|//RulesetScheme//|rulesetSchemeAgencyId rulesetSchemeId(version)|ECB:RULESET_23(1.0.0)
735 +|//StructureMap//|structureMapAgencyId:structureMap(version)|SDMX:BOP_STRUCTURES(1.0.0)
736 +|Subscription|(((
719 719  The Subscription is not itself an Identifiable Artefact and therefore it does not follow the rules for URN structure.
738 +
720 720  The name of the URN is registryURN There is no pre-determined format.
721 -)))|(% style="width:1042px" %)This cannot be generated by a common mechanism as subscriptions, although maintainable in the sense that they can be submitted and deleted, are not mandated to be created by a maintenance agency and have no versioning mechanism. It is therefore the responsibility of the target registry to generate a unique Id for the Subscription, and for the application creating the subscription to store the registry URN that is returned from the registry in the subscription response message.
722 -|(% style="width:247px" %)TimeDimension|(% style="width:649px" %)dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId:dataStructureDef initionId(version).timeDimensionId|(% style="width:1042px" %)TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0).TIME_PERIOD
723 -|(% style="width:247px" %)Transformation|(% style="width:649px" %)transformationSchemeAgencyId transformationSchemeId(version) transformationId|(% style="width:1042px" %)ECB:TRANSFORMATION_SCHEME(1.0.0).TRANS_1
724 -|(% style="width:247px" %)//TransformationScheme//|(% style="width:649px" %)transformationSchemeAgencyId transformationSchemeId(version)|(% style="width:1042px" %)ECB: TRANSFORMATION_SCHEME(1.0.0)
725 -|(% style="width:247px" %)Transition|(% style="width:649px" %)(((
740 +)))|This cannot be generated by a common mechanism as subscriptions, although maintainable in the sense that they can be submitted and deleted, are not mandated to be created by a maintenance agency and have no versioning mechanism. It is therefore the responsibility of the target registry to generate a unique Id for the Subscription, and for the application creating the subscription to store the registry URN that is returned from the registry in the subscription response message.
741 +|TimeDimension|dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId:dataStructureDef initionId(version).timeDimensionId|TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0).TIME_PERIOD
742 +|Transformation|transformationSchemeAgencyId transformationSchemeId(version) transformationId|ECB:TRANSFORMATION_SCHEME(1.0.0).TRANS_1
743 +|//TransformationScheme//|transformationSchemeAgencyId transformationSchemeId(version)|ECB: TRANSFORMATION_SCHEME(1.0.0)
744 +|**Classname**|**Ending URN pattern**|**Example**
745 +|Transition|(((
726 726  processAgencyId:processId(version).processStepId.
747 +
727 727  transitionId
728 -)))|(% style="width:1042px" %)BIS:PROCESS1(1.0.0).STEP1.TRANSITION1
729 -|(% style="width:247px" %)UserDefinedOperator|(% style="width:649px" %)userDefinedOperatorSchemeAgencyId userDefinedOperatorSchemeId(version) usserDefinedOperatorId|(% style="width:1042px" %)ECB:OS_CALC(1.2.0).OS267
730 -|(% style="width:247px" %)//UserDefinedOperatorScheme//|(% style="width:649px" %)userDefinedOperatorSchemeAgencyId userDefinedOperatorSchemeId(version)|(% style="width:1042px" %)ECB:OS_CALC(1.2.0)
731 -|(% style="width:247px" %)//ValueList//|(% style="width:649px" %)valuelistAgencyId:valuelistId(version)|(% style="width:1042px" %)SDMX:VLIST(1.0.0)
732 -|(% style="width:247px" %)VtlCodelistMapping|(% style="width:649px" %)vtlMappingSchemeAgencyId vtlMappingSchemeId(version) vtlCodelistMappingId|(% style="width:1042px" %)ECB:CLIST_MP(2.0.0).ABZ
733 -|(% style="width:247px" %)VtlConceptMapping|(% style="width:649px" %)vtlMappingSchemeAgencyId vtlMappingSchemeId(version) vtlConceptMappingId|(% style="width:1042px" %)ECB:CLIST_MP(1.0.0).XYA
734 -|(% style="width:247px" %)VtlDataflowMapping|(% style="width:649px" %)vtlMappingSchemeAgencyId vtlMappingSchemeId(version) vtlDataflowMappingId|(% style="width:1042px" %)ECB:CLIST_MP(1.0.0).MOQ
735 -|(% style="width:247px" %)//VtlMappingScheme//|(% style="width:649px" %)vtlMappingSchemeAgencyId VtlMappingSchemeId(version)|(% style="width:1042px" %)ECB:CLIST_MP(2.0.0)
749 +)))|BIS:PROCESS1(1.0.0).STEP1.TRANSITION1
750 +|UserDefinedOperator|userDefinedOperatorSchemeAgencyId userDefinedOperatorSchemeId(version) usserDefinedOperatorId|ECB:OS_CALC(1.2.0).OS267
751 +|//UserDefinedOperatorScheme//|userDefinedOperatorSchemeAgencyId userDefinedOperatorSchemeId(version)|ECB:OS_CALC(1.2.0)
752 +|//ValueList//|valuelistAgencyId:valuelistId(version)|SDMX:VLIST(1.0.0)
753 +|VtlCodelistMapping|vtlMappingSchemeAgencyId vtlMappingSchemeId(version) vtlCodelistMappingId|ECB:CLIST_MP(2.0.0).ABZ
754 +|VtlConceptMapping|vtlMappingSchemeAgencyId vtlMappingSchemeId(version) vtlConceptMappingId|ECB:CLIST_MP(1.0.0).XYA
755 +|VtlDataflowMapping|vtlMappingSchemeAgencyId vtlMappingSchemeId(version) vtlDataflowMappingId|ECB:CLIST_MP(1.0.0).MOQ
756 +|//VtlMappingScheme//|vtlMappingSchemeAgencyId VtlMappingSchemeId(version)|ECB:CLIST_MP(2.0.0)
736 736  
737 737  **Table 3: Table of identification components for SDMX Identifiable Artefacts**
738 738  
... ... @@ -740,7 +740,7 @@
740 740  
741 741  === {{id name="_Toc93862"/}}7.1 Structural Definition Metadata ===
742 742  
743 -=== {{id name="_Toc93863"/}}7.1.1 Introduction ===
764 +===== {{id name="_Toc93863"/}}7.1.1 Introduction =====
744 744  
745 745  The SDMX Registry must have the ability to support agencies in their role of defining and disseminating structural metadata artefacts. These artefacts include data structure definitions, code lists, concepts etc. and are fully defined in the SDMX-IM. An authenticated agency may submit valid structural metadata definitions which must be stored in the registry. Note that the term “structural metadata” refers as a general term to all structural components (Data Structure Definitions, Metadata Structure Definitions, Code Lists, Concept Schemes, etc.)
746 746  
... ... @@ -756,79 +756,90 @@
756 756  
757 757  The following table lists the Maintainable Artefacts.
758 758  
759 -(% style="width:881.294px" %)
760 -|(% colspan="2" style="width:522px" %)**Maintainable Artefacts**|(% style="width:490px" %)**Content**
761 -|(% style="width:198px" %)**Abstract Class**|(% style="width:324px" %)**Concrete Class**|(% style="width:490px" %)
762 -|(% style="width:198px" %)Item Scheme|(% style="width:324px" %)Codelist|(% style="width:490px" %)Code
763 -|(% style="width:198px" %) |(% style="width:324px" %)Concept Scheme|(% style="width:490px" %)Concept
764 -|(% style="width:198px" %) |(% style="width:324px" %)Category Scheme|(% style="width:490px" %)Category
765 -|(% style="width:198px" %) |(% style="width:324px" %)Organisation Unit Scheme|(% style="width:490px" %)Organisation Unit
766 -|(% style="width:198px" %) |(% style="width:324px" %)Agency Scheme|(% style="width:490px" %)Agency
767 -|(% style="width:198px" %) |(% style="width:324px" %)Data Provider Scheme|(% style="width:490px" %)Data Provider
768 -|(% style="width:198px" %) |(% style="width:324px" %)Metadata Provider Scheme|(% style="width:490px" %)Metadata Provider
769 -|(% style="width:198px" %) |(% style="width:324px" %)Data Consumer Scheme|(% style="width:490px" %)Data Consumer
770 -|(% style="width:198px" %) |(% style="width:324px" %)Reporting Taxonomy|(% style="width:490px" %)Reporting Category
771 -|(% style="width:198px" %) |(% style="width:324px" %)Transformation Scheme|(% style="width:490px" %)Transformation
772 -|(% style="width:198px" %) |(% style="width:324px" %)Custom Type Scheme|(% style="width:490px" %)Custom Type
773 -|(% style="width:198px" %) |(% style="width:324px" %)Name Personalisation Scheme|(% style="width:490px" %)Name Personalisation
774 -|(% style="width:198px" %) |(% style="width:324px" %)Vtl Mapping Scheme|(% style="width:490px" %)Vtl Codelist Mapping Vtl Concept Mapping
775 -|(% style="width:198px" %) |(% style="width:324px" %)Ruleset Scheme|(% style="width:490px" %)Ruleset
776 -|(% style="width:198px" %) |(% style="width:324px" %)User Defined Operator Scheme|(% style="width:490px" %)User Defined Operator
777 -|(% style="width:198px" %)Enumerated List|(% style="width:324px" %)ValueList|(% style="width:490px" %)Value Item
778 -|(% style="width:198px" %)Structure|(% style="width:324px" %)Data Structure Definition|(% style="width:490px" %)(((
780 +|(% colspan="2" %)**Maintainable Artefacts**|**Content**
781 +|**Abstract Class**|**Concrete Class**|
782 +|Item Scheme|Codelist|Code
783 +| |Concept Scheme|Concept
784 +| |Category Scheme|Category
785 +| |Organisation Unit Scheme|Organisation Unit
786 +| |Agency Scheme|Agency
787 +| |Data Provider Scheme|Data Provider
788 +| |Metadata Provider Scheme|Metadata Provider
789 +| |Data Consumer Scheme|Data Consumer
790 +| |Reporting Taxonomy|Reporting Category
791 +| |Transformation Scheme|Transformation
792 +| |Custom Type Scheme|Custom Type
793 +| |Name Personalisation Scheme|Name Personalisation
794 +| |Vtl Mapping Scheme|Vtl Codelist Mapping Vtl Concept Mapping
795 +| |Ruleset Scheme|Ruleset
796 +| |User Defined Operator Scheme|User Defined Operator
797 +|Enumerated List|ValueList|Value Item
798 +|Structure|Data Structure Definition|(((
779 779  Dimension Descriptor
800 +
780 780  Group Dimension Descriptor
802 +
781 781  Dimension
804 +
782 782  Time Dimension
806 +
783 783  Attribute Descriptor
808 +
784 784  Data Attribute
810 +
785 785  Measure Descriptor
812 +
786 786  Measure
787 787  )))
788 -|(% style="width:198px" %) |(% style="width:324px" %)Metadata Structure Definition|(% style="width:490px" %)Metadata Attribute Descriptor Metadata Attribute
789 -|(% style="width:198px" %)Structure Usage|(% style="width:324px" %)Dataflow|(% style="width:490px" %)
790 -|(% style="width:198px" %) |(% style="width:324px" %)Metadataflow|(% style="width:490px" %)
791 -|(% style="width:198px" %)None|(% style="width:324px" %)Process|(% style="width:490px" %)Process Step
792 -|(% style="width:198px" %)None|(% style="width:324px" %)Structure Map|(% style="width:490px" %)(((
815 +| |Metadata Structure Definition|Metadata Attribute Descriptor Metadata Attribute
816 +|Structure Usage|Dataflow|
817 +| |Metadataflow|
818 +|None|Process|Process Step
819 +|None|Structure Map|(((
793 793  Component Map
821 +
794 794  Epoch Map
823 +
795 795  Date Pattern Map
796 796  )))
797 -|(% style="width:198px" %)None|(% style="width:324px" %)Representation Map|(% style="width:490px" %)Representation Mapping
798 -|(% style="width:198px" %)Item Scheme Map|(% style="width:324px" %)Organisation Scheme Map|(% style="width:490px" %)Item Map
799 -|(% style="width:198px" %) |(% style="width:324px" %)Concept Scheme Map|(% style="width:490px" %)Item Map
800 -|(% style="width:198px" %) |(% style="width:324px" %)Category Scheme Map|(% style="width:490px" %)Item Map
801 -|(% style="width:198px" %) |(% style="width:324px" %)Reporting Taxonomy Map|(% style="width:490px" %)Item Map
802 -|(% style="width:198px" %)None|(% style="width:324px" %)Provision Agreement|(% style="width:490px" %)
803 -|(% style="width:198px" %)None|(% style="width:324px" %)Metadata Provision Agreement|(% style="width:490px" %)
804 -|(% style="width:198px" %)None|(% style="width:324px" %)Hierarchy|(% style="width:490px" %)Hierarchical Code
805 -|(% style="width:198px" %)None|(% style="width:324px" %)Hierarchy Association|(% style="width:490px" %)
806 -|(% style="width:198px" %)None|(% style="width:324px" %)Categorisation|(% style="width:490px" %)
826 +|None|Representation Map|Representation Mapping
827 +|Item Scheme Map|Organisation Scheme Map|Item Map
828 +| |Concept Scheme Map|Item Map
829 +| |Category Scheme Map|Item Map
830 +| |Reporting Taxonomy Map|Item Map
831 +|None|Provision Agreement|
832 +|None|Metadata Provision Agreement|
833 +|None|Hierarchy|Hierarchical Code
834 +|None|Hierarchy Association|
835 +|None|Categorisation|
807 807  
808 808  **Table 4: Table of Maintainable Artefacts for Structural Definition Metadata**
809 809  
810 -=== {{id name="_Toc93864"/}}7.1.2 Item Scheme, Structure ===
839 +===== {{id name="_Toc93864"/}}7.1.2 Item Scheme, Structure =====
811 811  
812 812  The artefacts included in the structural definitions are:
813 813  
814 -* All types of Item Scheme (Codelist, Concept Scheme, Category Scheme, Organisation Scheme, Agency Scheme, Data Provider Scheme, Metadata Provider Scheme, Data Consumer Scheme, Organisation Unit Scheme, Transformation Scheme, Name Personalisation Scheme, Custom Type Scheme, Vtl Mapping Scheme, Ruleset Scheme, User Defined Operator Scheme)
815 -* All types of Enumerated List (ValueList){{footnote}}Note that Codelist is also an EnumeratedList.{{/footnote}}
816 -* All types of Structure (Data Structure Definition, Metadata Structure Definition)
817 -* All types of Structure Usage (Dataflow, Metadataflow)
843 +• All types of Item Scheme (Codelist, Concept Scheme, Category Scheme, Organisation Scheme, Agency Scheme, Data Provider Scheme, Metadata Provider Scheme, Data Consumer Scheme, Organisation Unit Scheme, Transformation Scheme, Name Personalisation Scheme, Custom Type Scheme, Vtl Mapping Scheme, Ruleset Scheme, User Defined Operator Scheme)
818 818  
819 -=== {{id name="_Toc93865"/}}7.1.3 Structure Usage ===
845 + All types of Enumerated List (ValueList)^^[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^3^^>>path:#sdfootnote3sym||name="sdfootnote3anc"]](%%)^^
820 820  
821 -==== 7.1.3.1 Structure Usage: Basic Concepts ====
847 + All types of Structure (Data Structure Definition, Metadata Structure Definition)
822 822  
849 +• All types of Structure Usage (Dataflow, Metadataflow)
850 +
851 +===== {{id name="_Toc93865"/}}7.1.3 Structure Usage =====
852 +
853 +**7.1.3.1 Structure Usage: Basic Concepts**
854 +
823 823  The Structure Usage defines, in its concrete classes of Dataflow and Metadataflow, which flows of data and metadata use which specific Structure, and importantly for the support of data and metadata discovery, the Structure Usage can be linked to one or more Category in one or more Category Scheme using the Categorisation mechanism. This gives the ability for an application to discover data and metadata by “drilling down” the Category Schemes.
824 824  
825 -==== 7.1.3.2 Structure Usage Schematic ====
857 +**7.1.3.2 Structure Usage Schematic**
826 826  
827 827  [[image:SDMX 3-0-0 SECTION 5 FINAL-1.0_en_52097ab5.jpg||height="246" width="438"]]
828 828  
829 829  **Figure 9: Schematic of Linking the Data and Metadata Flows to Categories and Structure Definitions**
830 830  
831 -==== 7.1.3.3 Structure Usage Model ====
863 +**7.1.3.3 Structure Usage Model**
832 832  
833 833  [[image:SDMX 3-0-0 SECTION 5 FINAL-1.0_en_302cc1a2.jpg||height="548" width="578"]]
834 834  
... ... @@ -844,9 +844,9 @@
844 844  * Categorisation to Dataflow and Category
845 845  * Categorisation to Metadataflow and Category
846 846  
847 -== {{id name="_Toc93866"/}}7.2 Data and Metadata Provisioning ==
879 +=== {{id name="_Toc93866"/}}7.2 Data and Metadata Provisioning ===
848 848  
849 -=== {{id name="_Toc93867"/}}7.2.1 Provisioning Agreement: Basic concepts ===
881 +===== {{id name="_Toc93867"/}}7.2.1 Provisioning Agreement: Basic concepts =====
850 850  
851 851  Data/Metadata provisioning defines a framework in which the provision of different types of statistical data and metadata by various data/metadata providers can be specified and controlled. This framework is the basis on which the existence of data can be made known to the SDMX-enabled community and hence the basis on which data can subsequently be discovered. Such a framework can be used to regulate the data content to facilitate the building of intelligent applications. It can also be used to facilitate the processing implied by service level agreements, or other provisioning agreements in those scenarios that are based on legal directives. Additionally, quality and timeliness metadata can be supported by this framework which makes it practical to implement information supply chain monitoring.
852 852  
... ... @@ -854,7 +854,7 @@
854 854  
855 855  Although the Provision Agreement directly supports the data-sharing “pull” model, it is also useful in “push” exchanges (bilateral and gateway scenarios), or in a dissemination environment. It should be noted, too, that in any exchange scenario, the registry functions as a repository of structural metadata.
856 856  
857 -=== {{id name="_Toc93868"/}}7.2.2 Provisioning Agreement Model – pull use case ===
889 +===== {{id name="_Toc93868"/}}7.2.2 Provisioning Agreement Model – pull use case =====
858 858  
859 859  An organisation which publishes statistical data or reference metadata and wishes to make it available to an SDMX enabled community is called a Data Provider. In terms of the SDMX Information Model, the Data Provider is maintained in a Data Provider Scheme.
860 860  
... ... @@ -876,9 +876,9 @@
876 876  
877 877  A Provision Agreement is structural metadata. Each Provision Agreement must reference a Data Provider or Metadata Provider and a Dataflow or Metadataflow Definition. The Data/Metadata Provider and the Dataflow/Metadataflow must exist already in order to set up a Metadata Provision or Provision Agreement.
878 878  
879 -== {{id name="_Toc93869"/}}7.3 Data and Metadata Constraints ==
911 +=== {{id name="_Toc93869"/}}7.3 Data and Metadata Constraints ===
880 880  
881 -=== {{id name="_Toc93870"/}}7.3.1 Data and Metadata Constraints: Basic Concepts ===
913 +===== {{id name="_Toc93870"/}}7.3.1 Data and Metadata Constraints: Basic Concepts =====
882 882  
883 883  Constraints are, effectively, lists of the valid or actual content of data and metadata. Constraints can be used to specify a subset of the theoretical content of data set or metadata set which can be derived from the specification of the DSD or MSD. A Constraint can comprise a list of keys or a list of content (usually code values) of a specific component such as a dimension or attribute.
884 884  
... ... @@ -942,14 +942,17 @@
942 942  
943 943  The Registration has an action attribute which takes one of the following values:
944 944  
977 +:
978 +
945 945  (((
946 -(% style="width:761.294px" %)
947 -|(% style="width:196px" %)**Action Attribute Value**|(% style="width:561px" %)**Behaviour**
948 -|(% style="width:196px" %)Append|(% style="width:561px" %)Add this Registration to the registry
949 -|(% style="width:196px" %)Replace|(% style="width:561px" %)(((
950 -Replace the existing Registration with identified by the id in the Registration of the SubmitRegistrationRequest
980 +|**Action Attribute Value**|**Behaviour**
981 +|Append|Add this Registration to the registry
982 +|Replace|(((
983 +Replace the existing Registration with identified by the id in the
984 +
985 +Registration of the SubmitRegistrationRequest
951 951  )))
952 -|(% style="width:196px" %)Delete|(% style="width:561px" %)Delete the existing Registration identified by the id in the Registration of the SubmitRegistrationRequest
987 +|Delete|Delete the existing Registration identified by the id in the Registration of the SubmitRegistrationRequest
953 953  )))
954 954  
955 955  [[image:SDMX 3-0-0 SECTION 5 FINAL-1.0_en_bc1dcdec.jpg||height="575" width="579"]]
... ... @@ -966,20 +966,27 @@
966 966  
967 967  Information in the data or metadata set is extracted and placed in one or more //Constraint//s (see the //Constraint// model in the SDMX Information Model – Section 2 of the SDMX Standards). The information to be extracted is indicated by the Boolean values set on the ProvisionAgreement or MetadataProvisionAgreement as shown in the table below.
968 968  
1004 +:
1005 +
969 969  (((
970 -(% style="width:678.294px" %)
971 -|**Indexing Required**|(% style="width:504px" %)**Registration Process Activity**
972 -|indexTimeSeries|(% style="width:504px" %)Extract all the series keys and create a KeySet(s) Constraint.
973 -|indexDataSet|(% style="width:504px" %)Extract all the codes and other content of the Key value of the Series Key in a Data Set and create one or more Cube Regions containing Member Selections of Dimension Components of the Constraints model in the SDMX-IM, and the associated Selection Value.
974 -|indexReportingPeriod|(% style="width:504px" %)(((
1007 +|**Indexing Required**|**Registration Process Activity**
1008 +|indexTimeSeries|Extract all the series keys and create a KeySet(s) Constraint.
1009 +|indexDataSet|Extract all the codes and other content of the Key value of the Series Key in a Data Set and create one or more Cube Regions containing Member Selections of Dimension Components of the Constraints model in the SDMX-IM, and the associated Selection Value.
1010 +|indexReportingPeriod|(((
975 975  This applies only to a registered __dataset__.
1012 +
976 976  Extract the Reporting Begin and Reporting End from the Header of the Message containing the data set, and create a Reference Period constraint.
977 977  )))
978 -|**Indexing Required**|(% style="width:504px" %)**Registration Process Activity**
979 -|indexAttributes|(% style="width:504px" %)(((
1015 +|**Indexing Required**|**Registration Process Activity**
1016 +|indexAttributes|(((
980 980  **Data Set**
981 -Extract the content of the Attribute Values in a Data Set and create one or more Cube Regions containing Member Selections of Data Attribute Components of the Constraints model in the SDMXIM, and the associated Selection Value
1018 +
1019 +Extract the content of the Attribute Values in a Data Set and create one or more Cube Regions containing Member Selections of Data Attribute Components of the Constraints model in the
1020 +
1021 +SDMXIM, and the associated Selection Value
1022 +
982 982  **Metadata Set**
1024 +
983 983  Indicate the presence of a Reported Attribute by creating one or more Cube Regions containing Member Selections of Metadata Attribute Components of the Constraints model in the SDMX-IM. Note that the content is not stored in the Selection Value.
984 984  )))
985 985  )))
... ... @@ -988,7 +988,7 @@
988 988  
989 989  The Registration must reference the ProvisionAgreement or MetadataProvisionAgreement to which it relates.
990 990  
991 -=== {{id name="_Toc93876"/}}7.4.3 Registration Response ===
1033 +===== {{id name="_Toc93876"/}}7.4.3 Registration Response =====
992 992  
993 993  After a registration request has been submitted to the registry, a response is returned to the submitter indicating success or failure. Given that a registration request can hold many Registrations, then there must be a registration status for each Registration. The SubmitRegistration class has a status field, which is either set to “Success”, “Warning” or “Failure”.
994 994  
... ... @@ -1018,18 +1018,20 @@
1018 1018  
1019 1019  Regardless of the type of registry/repository events being observed, a subscription always contains:
1020 1020  
1021 -1. set of URIs describing the end-points to which notifications must be sent if the subscription is activated. The URIs can be either mailto~: or http: protocol. In the former case an email notification is sent; in the latter an HTTP POST notification is sent.
1063 +1. A set of URIs describing the end-points to which notifications must be sent if the subscription is activated. The URIs can be either mailto~: or http: protocol. In the former case an email notification is sent; in the latter an HTTP POST notification is sent.
1022 1022  1. A user-defined identifier, which is returned in the response to the subscription request. This helps with asynchronous processing and is NOT stored in the Registry.
1023 1023  1. A validity period which defines both when the subscription becomes active and expires. The subscriber may be sent a notification on expiration of the subscription.
1024 1024  1. A selector which specifies which type of events are of interest. The set of event types is:
1025 1025  
1068 +:
1069 +::
1070 +
1026 1026  (((
1027 -(% style="width:856.294px" %)
1028 -|(% style="width:320px" %)**Event Type**|(% style="width:532px" %)**Comment**
1029 -|(% style="width:320px" %)STRUCTURAL_REPOSITORY_EVENTS|(% style="width:532px" %)Life-cycle changes to Maintainable Artefacts in the structural metadata repository.
1030 -|(% style="width:320px" %)DATA_REGISTRATION_EVENTS|(% style="width:532px" %)Whenever a published dataset is registered. This can be either a SDMXML data file or an SDMX conformant database.
1031 -|(% style="width:320px" %)METADATA_REGISTRATION_EVENTS|(% style="width:532px" %)Whenever a published metadataset is registered. This can be either a SDMXML reference metadata file or an SDMX conformant database.
1032 -|(% style="width:320px" %)ALL_EVENTS|(% style="width:532px" %)All events of the specified EventType
1072 +|**Event Type**|**Comment**
1073 +|STRUCTURAL_REPOSITORY_EVENTS|Life-cycle changes to Maintainable Artefacts in the structural metadata repository.
1074 +|DATA_REGISTRATION_EVENTS|Whenever a published dataset is registered. This can be either a SDMXML data file or an SDMX conformant database.
1075 +|METADATA_REGISTRATION_EVENTS|Whenever a published metadataset is registered. This can be either a SDMXML reference metadata file or an SDMX conformant database.
1076 +|ALL_EVENTS|All events of the specified EventType
1033 1033  )))
1034 1034  
1035 1035  === {{id name="_Toc93880"/}}7.5.3 Wildcard Facility ===
... ... @@ -1096,14 +1096,15 @@
1096 1096  
1097 1097  Whenever a dataset or metadata-set is registered a registration event is created. A subscription may be observing all data or metadata registrations, or it may focus on specific registrations as shown in the table below:
1098 1098  
1143 +:
1144 +
1099 1099  (((
1100 -(% style="width:1126.29px" %)
1101 -|(% style="width:382px" %)**Selector**|(% style="width:740px" %)**Comment**
1102 -|(% style="width:382px" %)DataProvider & MetadataProvider|(% style="width:740px" %)Any datasets or metadata sets registered by the specified data or metadata provider will activate the notification.
1103 -|(% style="width:382px" %)ProvisionAgreement & MetadataProvisionAgreement|(% style="width:740px" %)Any datasets or metadata sets registered for the agreement will activate the notification.
1104 -|(% style="width:382px" %)Dataflow & Metadataflow|(% style="width:740px" %)Any datasets or metadata sets registered for the specified dataflow (or metadataflow) will activate the notification.
1105 -|(% style="width:382px" %)DataStructureDefinition & MetadataStructureDefinition|(% style="width:740px" %)Any datasets or metadata sets registered for those dataflows (or metadataflows) that are based on the specified Data Structure Definition will activate the notification
1106 -|(% style="width:382px" %)Category|(% style="width:740px" %)Any datasets or metadata sets registered for those dataflows, metadataflows, provision agreements that are categorised by the category.
1146 +|**Selector**|**Comment**
1147 +|DataProvider & MetadataProvider|Any datasets or metadata sets registered by the specified data or metadata provider will activate the notification.
1148 +|ProvisionAgreement & MetadataProvisionAgreement|Any datasets or metadata sets registered for the agreement will activate the notification.
1149 +|Dataflow & Metadataflow|Any datasets or metadata sets registered for the specified dataflow (or metadataflow) will activate the notification.
1150 +|DataStructureDefinition & MetadataStructureDefinition|Any datasets or metadata sets registered for those dataflows (or metadataflows) that are based on the specified Data Structure Definition will activate the notification
1151 +|Category|Any datasets or metadata sets registered for those dataflows, metadataflows, provision agreements that are categorised by the category.
1107 1107  )))
1108 1108  
1109 1109  The event will also capture the semantic of the registration: deletion or replacement of an existing registration or a new registration.
... ... @@ -1135,6 +1135,12 @@
1135 1135  
1136 1136  The notification will contain the Registration.
1137 1137  
1138 -----
1183 +[[1>>path:#sdfootnote1anc||name="sdfootnote1sym"]] With semantic versioning, it is allowed to reference a range of artefacts, e.g., a DSD referencing a Codelist with version 1.2.3+ means all patch versions greater than 1.2.3. This means that deleting 1.2.4draft does not break integrity of the aforementioned DSD.
1139 1139  
1185 +[[2>>path:#sdfootnote2anc||name="sdfootnote2sym"]] The identification of an Agency in the URN structure for the maintainable object is by means of the agencyId. The AgencyScheme is not identified as SDMX has a mechanism for identifying an Agency uniquely by its Id. Note that this Id may be hierarchical. For example, a sub-agency of IMF is referred like this:
1186 +
1187 +IMF.SubAgency1
1188 +
1189 +[[3>>path:#sdfootnote3anc||name="sdfootnote3sym"]] Note that Codelist is also an EnumeratedList.
1190 +
1140 1140  {{putFootnotes/}}
SUZ.Methodology.Code.MethodologyClass[0]