Last modified by Helena on 2025/09/10 11:19

From version 29.4
edited by Helena
on 2025/05/16 14:10
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 21.2
edited by Helena
on 2025/05/15 14:07
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
11 11  |(% style="width:188px" %)1.0|(% style="width:205px" %)October 2021|(% style="width:441px" %)Public release for SDMX 3.0
12 12  )))
13 13  
14 -= 1 Introduction =
14 += {{id name="_Toc93831"/}}1 Introduction =
15 15  
16 16  The business vision for SDMX envisages the promotion of a “data sharing” model to facilitate low-cost, high-quality statistical data and metadata exchange. Data sharing reduces the reporting burden of organisations by allowing them to publish data once and let their counterparties “pull” data and related metadata as required. The scenario is based on:
17 17  
... ... @@ -33,10 +33,12 @@
33 33  
34 34  These architectural standards address the ‘how’, rather than the ‘what’, and are aimed at enabling existing SDMX standards to achieve their mission. The architectural standards address registry services, which initially comprise:
35 35  
36 -* structural metadata repository
37 -* data and metadata registration
38 -* query
36 +• structural metadata repository
39 39  
38 +• data and metadata registration
39 +
40 +• query
41 +
40 40  The registry services outlined in this specification are designed to help the SDMX community manage the proliferation of SDMX assets and to support data sharing for reporting and dissemination.
41 41  
42 42  = {{id name="_Toc93832"/}}2 Scope and Normative Status =
... ... @@ -79,8 +79,7 @@
79 79  
80 80  [[image:SDMX 3-0-0 SECTION 5 FINAL-1.0_en_28806f51.jpg||height="539" width="443"]]
81 81  
82 -(% class="wikigeneratedid" id="HFigure1:SchematicoftheBasicStructuralArtefactsintheSDMX-IM" %)
83 -**Figure 1: Schematic of the Basic Structural Artefacts in the SDMX-IM**
84 +====== Figure 1: Schematic of the Basic Structural Artefacts in the SDMX-IM ======
84 84  
85 85  Note that in Figure 1 (but also most of the relevant subsequent figures) terms that include both data and metadata have been used. For example:
86 86  
... ... @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@
107 107  
108 108  Notifying interested parties of newly published or re-published data, reference metadata or changes in structural metadata involves:
109 109  
110 -* registry support of a subscription-based notification service which sends an email or notifies an HTTP address announcing all published data that meets the criteria contained in the subscription request.
111 + registry support of a subscription-based notification service which sends an email or notifies an HTTP address announcing all published data that meets the criteria contained in the subscription request.
111 111  
112 112  == {{id name="_Toc93838"/}}3.5 Discovery ==
113 113  
... ... @@ -166,8 +166,9 @@
166 166  
167 167  The registry interfaces are invoked in one of two ways:
168 168  
169 -1. The interface is the name of the root node of the SDMX-ML document
170 -1. The interface is invoked as a child element of the RegistryInterface message where the RegistryInterface is the root node of the SDMX-ML document.
170 +*
171 +*1. The interface is the name of the root node of the SDMX-ML document
172 +*1. The interface is invoked as a child element of the RegistryInterface message where the RegistryInterface is the root node of the SDMX-ML document.
171 171  
172 172  In addition to these interfaces the registry must support a mechanism for submitting and querying for structural metadata. This is detailed in sections 5.2.2 and 5.2.3.
173 173  
... ... @@ -183,11 +183,11 @@
183 183  
184 184  === {{id name="_Toc93847"/}}5.2.2 Structure Submission Service ===
185 185  
186 -The registry must support a mechanism for submitting structural metadata. This mechanism can be the SDMX REST interface for structural metadata (this is defined in the corresponding GitHub project, dedicated to the SDMX REST API: [[__https:~~/~~/github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest__>>https://https:github.comsdmx-twgsdmx-rest]]). In order for the architecture to be scalable, the finest-grained piece of structural metadata that can be processed by the SDMX-RR is a MaintainableArtefact, with the exception of Item Schemes, where changes at an Item level is also possible (see next section on the SDMX Information Model).
188 +The registry must support a mechanism for submitting structural metadata. This mechanism can be the SDMX REST interface for structural metadata (this is defined in the corresponding GitHub project, dedicated to the SDMX REST API: __[[https:~~/~~/github.com/sdmx>>url:https://github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest]][[->>url:https://github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest]][[twg/sdmx>>url:https://github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest]][[->>url:https://github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest]][[rest>>url:https://github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest]]__[[)>>url:https://github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest]]. In order for the architecture to be scalable, the finest-grained piece of structural metadata that can be processed by the SDMX-RR is a MaintainableArtefact, with the exception of Item Schemes, where changes at an Item level is also possible (see next section on the SDMX Information Model).
187 187  
188 188  === {{id name="_Toc93848"/}}5.2.3 Structure Query Service ===
189 189  
190 -The registry must support a mechanism for querying for structural metadata. This mechanism can be the SDMX REST interface for structural metadata (this is defined in the corresponding GitHub project, dedicated to the SDMX REST API: [[__https:~~/~~/github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest__>>https://https:github.comsdmx-twgsdmx-rest]]). The registry response to this query mechanism is the SDMX Structure message, which has as its root node:
192 +The registry must support a mechanism for querying for structural metadata. This mechanism can be the SDMX REST interface for structural metadata (this is defined in the corresponding GitHub project, dedicated to the SDMX REST API: __[[https:~~/~~/github.com/sdmx>>url:https://github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest]][[->>url:https://github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest]][[twg/sdmx>>url:https://github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest]][[->>url:https://github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest]][[rest>>url:https://github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest]]__ [[)>>url:https://github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest]]. The registry response to this query mechanism is the SDMX Structure message, which has as its root node:
191 191  
192 192  * Structure
193 193  
... ... @@ -243,22 +243,23 @@
243 243  * that the components (Dimensions, Attributes, Measures, Metadata Attributes, etc.) are consistent with the Data Structure Definition or Metadata Structure Definition;
244 244  * that the valid representations of the concepts to which these components correspond conform to the definition in the Data Structure Definition or Metadata Structure Definition. The Registration has an action attribute which takes one of the following values:
245 245  
246 -(% style="width:755.294px" %)
247 -|(% style="width:187px" %)**Action Attribute Value**|(% style="width:566px" %)**Behaviour**
248 -|(% style="width:187px" %)Append|(% style="width:566px" %)Add this registration to the registry
249 -|(% style="width:187px" %)Replace|(% style="width:566px" %)Replace the existing Registration with this Registration identified by the id in the Registration of the Submit Registration Request
250 -|(% style="width:187px" %)Delete|(% style="width:566px" %)Delete the existing Registration identified by the id in the Registration of the Submit Registration Request
248 +|**Action Attribute Value**|**Behaviour**
249 +|Append|Add this registration to the registry
250 +|Replace|Replace the existing Registration with this Registration identified by the id in the Registration of the Submit Registration Request
251 +|Delete|Delete the existing Registration identified by the id in the Registration of the Submit Registration Request
251 251  
252 252  The Registration has three Boolean attributes which may be present to determine how an SDMX compliant dataset or metadataset indexing application must index the datasets or metadatasets upon registration. The indexing application behaviour is as follows:
253 253  
254 -(% style="width:759.294px" %)
255 -|(% style="width:191px" %)**Boolean Attribute**|(% style="width:565px" %)**Behaviour if Value is “true”**
256 -|(% style="width:191px" %)indexTimeSeries|(% style="width:565px" %)A compliant indexing application must index all the time series keys (for a Dataset registration) or metadata target values (for a Metadataset registration)
257 -|(% style="width:191px" %)indexDataSet|(% style="width:565px" %)(((
258 -A compliant indexing application must index the range of actual (present) values for each dimension of the Dataset (for a Dataset registration) or the range of actual (present) values for each Metadata Attribute which takes an enumerated value.
255 +|**Boolean Attribute**|**Behaviour if Value is “true”**
256 +|indexTimeSeries|A compliant indexing application must index all the time series keys (for a Dataset registration) or metadata target values (for a Metadataset registration)
257 +|indexDataSet|(((
258 +A compliant indexing application must index the range of actual
259 +
260 +(present) values for each dimension of the Dataset (for a Dataset registration) or the range of actual (present) values for each Metadata Attribute which takes an enumerated value.
261 +
259 259  Note that for data this requires much less storage than full key indexing, but this method cannot guarantee that a specific combination of Dimension values (the Key) is actually present in the Dataset
260 260  )))
261 -|(% style="width:191px" %)indexReportingPeriod|(% style="width:565px" %)A compliant indexing application must index the time period range(s) for which data are present in the Dataset. The validity period of the Metadatasets may also be indexed.
264 +|indexReportingPeriod|A compliant indexing application must index the time period range(s) for which data are present in the Dataset. The validity period of the Metadatasets may also be indexed.
262 262  
263 263  === {{id name="_Toc93850"/}}5.2.5 Data and Reference Metadata Discovery ===
264 264  
... ... @@ -280,7 +280,7 @@
280 280  Subscription management involves a user submitting a subscription request which contains:
281 281  
282 282  * a query or constraint expression in terms of a filter which defines the events for which the user is interested (e.g., new data for a specific dataflow, or for a domain category, or changes to a Data Structure Definition).
283 -* a list of URIs or endpoints to which an XML notification message can be sent. Supported endpoint types will be email (mailto~: ) and HTTP POST (a normal http:~/~/ address);
286 +* a list of URIs or endpoints to which an XML notification message can be sent. Supported endpoint types will be email (mailto~:) and HTTP POST (a normal http:~/~/ address);
284 284  * request for a list of submitted subscriptions;
285 285  * deletion of a subscription;
286 286  
... ... @@ -292,9 +292,8 @@
292 292  
293 293  Given the above, the behaviour described in the following table concerns either draft Artefacts using semantic versioning or any Artefacts using the old versioning scheme. Nevertheless, in the case of semantic versioning the registry must respect the versioning rules when performing the actions below. For example, it is not possible to replace a non-draft Artefact that follows semantic versioning, unless a newer version is introduced according to the semantic versioning rules. Furthermore, even when draft Artefacts are submitted, the registry has to verify semantic versioning is respected against the previous non-draft versions. It is worth noting that the rules for semantic versioning and replacing or maintaining semantically versioned Artefacts applies to externally shared Artefacts. This means that any system may internally perform any change within a version of an Artefact, until the latter is shared outside of that system or becomes public. Then (as also explained in the SDMX Standards Section 6 “Technical Notes”) the Artefacts must adhere to the Semantic Versioning rules.
294 294  
295 -(% style="width:757.294px" %)
296 -|(% style="width:188px" %)**Interface**|(% style="width:542px" %)**Behaviour**
297 -|(% style="width:188px" %)All|(% style="width:542px" %)(((
298 +|**Interface**|**Behaviour**
299 +|All|(((
298 298  1. If the action is set to “replace” (or a maintainable Artefact is PUT or POSTed) then the entire contents of the existing maintainable object in the Registry MUST be replaced by the object submitted.
299 299  1. Cross referenced structures MUST exist in either the submitted document (in Structures or Structure Location) or in the registry to which the request is submitted.
300 300  1. If the action is set to “delete” (or a maintainable Artefact is DELETEd) then the Registry MUST verify that the object can be deleted. In order to qualify for deletion, the object must:
... ... @@ -301,12 +301,14 @@
301 301  
302 302  a) Be a draft version.
303 303  )))
304 -|(% style="width:188px" %) |(% style="width:542px" %)(((
305 -b) Not be explicitly{{footnote}}With semantic versioning, it is allowed to reference a range of artefacts, e.g., a DSD referencing a Codelist with version 1.2.3+ means all patch versions greater than 1.2.3. This means that deleting 1.2.4-draft does not break integrity of the aforementioned DSD.{{/footnote}} referenced from any other object in the Registry.
306 +|**Interface**|**Behaviour**
307 +| |(((
308 +b) Not be explicitly^^[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^1^^>>path:#sdfootnote1sym||name="sdfootnote1anc"]](%%)^^ referenced from any other object in the Registry.
309 +
306 306  4) The semantic versioning rules in the SDMX documentation MUST be obeyed.
307 307  )))
308 -|(% style="width:188px" %)Structure submission|(% style="width:542px" %)Structures are submitted at the level of the Maintainable Artefact and the behaviour in “All” above is therefore at the level of the Maintainable Artefact.
309 -|(% style="width:188px" %)SubmitRegistrationRequest|(% style="width:542px" %)If the datasource is a file (simple datasource) then the file MAY be retrieved and indexed according to the Boolean attributes set in the Registration. For a queryable datasource the Registry MAY validate that the source exists and can accept an SDMX data query.
312 +|Structure submission|Structures are submitted at the level of the Maintainable Artefact and the behaviour in “All” above is therefore at the level of the Maintainable Artefact.
313 +|SubmitRegistrationRequest|If the datasource is a file (simple datasource) then the file MAY be retrieved and indexed according to the Boolean attributes set in the Registration. For a queryable datasource the Registry MAY validate that the source exists and can accept an SDMX data query.
310 310  
311 311  = {{id name="_Toc93853"/}}6 Identification of SDMX Objects =
312 312  
... ... @@ -327,42 +327,43 @@
327 327  
328 328  The table below shows the identification and related data attributes to be stored in a registry for objects that are one of:
329 329  
330 -* //nnotable//
334 +* //Annotable//
331 331  * //Identifiable//
332 332  * //Nameable//
333 333  * //Versionable//
334 334  * //Maintainable//
335 335  
340 +:
341 +
336 336  (((
337 -(% style="width:1052.29px" %)
338 -|**Object Type**|(% style="width:241px" %)**Data Attributes**|(% style="width:156px" %)**Status**|**Data type**|(% style="width:457px" %)**Notes**
339 -|(% rowspan="4" %)//Annotable//|(% style="width:241px" %)AnnotationTitle|(% style="width:156px" %)C|string|(% style="width:457px" %)
340 -|(% style="width:241px" %)AnnotationType|(% style="width:156px" %)C|string|(% style="width:457px" %)
341 -|(% style="width:241px" %)AnnotationURN|(% style="width:156px" %)C|string|(% style="width:457px" %)
342 -|(% style="width:241px" %)AnnotationText in the form of InternationalString|(% style="width:156px" %)C| |(% style="width:457px" %)This can have languagespecific variants
343 -|(% rowspan="4" %)//Identifiable//|(% style="width:241px" %)All content as for //Annotable// plus|(% style="width:156px" %) | |(% style="width:457px" %)
344 -|(% style="width:241px" %)id|(% style="width:156px" %)M|string|(% style="width:457px" %)
345 -|(% style="width:241px" %)uri|(% style="width:156px" %)C|string|(% style="width:457px" %)
346 -|(% style="width:241px" %)urn|(% style="width:156px" %)C|string|(% style="width:457px" %)Although the urn is computable and therefore may not be submitted or stored physically, the Registry must return the urn for each object, and must be able to service a query on an object referenced solely by its urn.
347 -|(% rowspan="3" %)//Nameable//|(% style="width:241px" %)All content as for //Identifiable// plus|(% style="width:156px" %) | |(% style="width:457px" %)
348 -|(% style="width:241px" %)Name in the form of InternationalString|(% style="width:156px" %)M|string|(% style="width:457px" %)This can have language specific variants.
349 -|(% style="width:241px" %)Description in the form of InternationalString|(% style="width:156px" %)C|string|(% style="width:457px" %)This can have language specific variants.
350 -|(% rowspan="4" %)//Versionable//|(% style="width:241px" %)All content as for //Identifiable// plus|(% style="width:156px" %) | |(% style="width:457px" %)
351 -|(% style="width:241px" %)version|(% style="width:156px" %)M|string|(% style="width:457px" %)This is the version number according to SDMX versioning rules.
352 -|(% style="width:241px" %)validFrom|(% style="width:156px" %)C|Date/time|(% style="width:457px" %)
353 -|(% style="width:241px" %)validTo|(% style="width:156px" %)C|Date/time|(% style="width:457px" %)
354 -|//Maintainable//|(% style="width:241px" %)All content as for //Versionable// plus|(% style="width:156px" %) | |(% style="width:457px" %)
355 -| |(% style="width:241px" %)isExternalReference|(% style="width:156px" %)C|boolean|(% style="width:457px" %)Value of “true” indicates that the actual resource is held outside of this registry. The actual reference is given in the registry URI or the structureURL, each of which must return a valid SDMX-ML file.
356 -| |(% style="width:241px" %)serviceURL|(% style="width:156px" %)C|string|(% style="width:457px" %)The url of the service that can be queried for this resource.
357 -| |(% style="width:241px" %)structureURL|(% style="width:156px" %)C|string|(% style="width:457px" %)The url of the resource.
358 -| |(% style="width:241px" %)(Maintenance) organisationId|(% style="width:156px" %)M|string|(% style="width:457px" %)The object must be linked to a maintenance organisation, i.e., Agency or Metadata Provider.
343 +|**Object Type**|**Data Attributes**|**Status**|**Data type**|**Notes**
344 +|(% rowspan="4" %)//Annotable//|AnnotationTitle|C|string|
345 +|AnnotationType|C|string|
346 +|AnnotationURN|C|string|
347 +|AnnotationText in the form of InternationalString|C| |This can have languagespecific variants
348 +|(% rowspan="4" %)//Identifiable//|All content as for //Annotable// plus| | |
349 +|id|M|string|
350 +|uri|C|string|
351 +|urn|C|string|Although the urn is computable and therefore may not be submitted or stored physically, the Registry must return the urn for each object, and must be able to service a query on an object referenced solely by its urn.
352 +|(% rowspan="3" %)//Nameable//|All content as for //Identifiable// plus| | |
353 +|Name in the form of InternationalString|M|string|This can have language specific variants.
354 +|Description in the form of InternationalString|C|string|This can have language specific variants.
355 +|(% rowspan="4" %)//Versionable//|All content as for //Identifiable// plus| | |
356 +|version|M|string|This is the version number according to SDMX versioning rules.
357 +|validFrom|C|Date/time|
358 +|validTo|C|Date/time|
359 +|//Maintainable//|All content as for //Versionable// plus| | |
360 +| |isExternalReference|C|boolean|Value of “true” indicates that the actual resource is held outside of this registry. The actual reference is given in the registry URI or the structureURL, each of which must return a valid SDMX-ML file.
361 +| |serviceURL|C|string|The url of the service that can be queried for this resource.
362 +| |structureURL|C|string|The url of the resource.
363 +| |(Maintenance) organisationId|M|string|The object must be linked to a maintenance organisation, i.e., Agency or Metadata Provider.
359 359  )))
360 360  
361 361  **Table 1: Common Attributes of Object Types**
362 362  
363 -== {{id name="_Toc93856"/}}6.2 Unique identification of SDMX objects ==
368 +=== {{id name="_Toc93856"/}}6.2 Unique identification of SDMX objects ===
364 364  
365 -=== {{id name="_Toc93857"/}}6.2.1 Agencies and Metadata Providers ===
370 +===== {{id name="_Toc93857"/}}6.2.1 Agencies and Metadata Providers =====
366 366  
367 367  The Maintenance Agency in SDMX is maintained in an Agency Scheme which itself is a sub class of Organisation Scheme – this is shown in the class diagram below.
368 368  
... ... @@ -404,8 +404,32 @@
404 404  
405 405  An example of this is shown in the XML snippet below:
406 406  
407 -[[image:1747307906944-697.png]]
412 +**<str:Codelists>**
408 408  
414 +**<str:Codelist id="CL_FREQ" agencyID="SDMX" version="1.0.0">**
415 +
416 +**<com:Name xml:lang="en">Standard frequency Codelist</com:Name>**
417 +
418 +**</str:Codelist>**
419 +
420 +**<str:Codelist id="CL_FREQ" agencyID="AA" version="1.0.0">**
421 +
422 +**<com:Name xml:lang="en">Codelist maintained by agency AA</com:Name>**
423 +
424 +**</str:Codelist>**
425 +
426 +**<str:Codelist id="CL_FREQ" agencyID="AA.CC" version="1.0.0">**
427 +
428 +**<com:Name xml:lang="en">Codelist maintained by the AA unit CC</com:Name>**
429 +
430 +**</str:Codelist>**
431 +
432 +**<str:Codelist id="CL_FREQ" agencyID="BB.CC" version="1.0.0">**
433 +
434 +**<com:Name xml:lang="en">Codelist maintained by the BB unit CC</com:Name>**
435 +
436 +**</str:Codelist>**
437 +
409 409  **Figure 8: Example Showing Use of Agency Identifiers**
410 410  
411 411  Each of these maintenance agencies has an identical Code list with the Id CL_BOP. However, each is uniquely identified by means of the hierarchic agency structure.
... ... @@ -412,16 +412,14 @@
412 412  
413 413  Following the same principles, the Metadata Provider is the maintenance organisation for a special subset of Maintainable Artefacts, i.e., the Metadatasets; the latter are the containers of reference metadata combined with a target that those metadata refer to.
414 414  
415 -=== {{id name="_Toc93858"/}}6.2.2 Universal Resource Name (URN) ===
444 +===== {{id name="_Toc93858"/}}6.2.2 Universal Resource Name (URN) =====
416 416  
417 -==== 6.2.2.1 Introduction ====
446 +**6.2.2.1 Introduction**
418 418  
419 419  To provide interoperability between SDMX Registry/Repositories in a distributed network environment, it is important to have a scheme for uniquely identifying (and thus accessing) all first-class (Identifiable) SDMX-IM objects. Most of these unique identifiers are composite (containing maintenance agency, or parent object identifiers), and there is a need to be able to construct a unique reference as a single string. This is achieved by having a globally unique identifier called a universal resource name (URN) which is generated from the actual identification components in the SDMX-RR APIs. In other words, the URN for any Identifiable Artefact is constructed from its component identifiers (agency, id, version etc.).
420 420  
421 -==== 6.2.2.2 URN Structure ====
450 +**6.2.2.2 URN Structure //__Case Rules for URN__//**//&nbsp;//
422 422  
423 -===== **//__Case Rules for URN__//** =====
424 -
425 425  For the URN, all parts of the string are case sensitive. The generic structure of the URN is as follows:
426 426  
427 427  SDMXprefix.SDMX-IM-package-name.class-name=agencyid:maintainedobjectid(maintainedobject-version).*containerobject-id.object-id
... ... @@ -432,7 +432,7 @@
432 432  
433 433  The Maintenance agency identifier is separated from the maintainable artefact identifier by a colon ‘:’. All other identifiers in the SDMX URN syntax are separated by a period ‘.’. The version information is encapsulated in parentheses ‘()’ and adheres to the SDMX versioning rules, as explained in SDMX Standards Section 6 “Technical Notes”, paragraph “4.3 Versioning.
434 434  
435 -==== 6.2.2.3 Explanation of the generic structure ====
462 +**6.2.2.3 Explanation of the generic structure**
436 436  
437 437  In the explanation below the actual object that is the target of the URN is called the **actual object**.
438 438  
... ... @@ -442,23 +442,10 @@
442 442  
443 443  The packages are:
444 444  
445 -base
446 -codelist
447 -conceptscheme
448 -datastructure
449 -categoryscheme
450 -registry
451 -metadatastructure
452 -process
453 -structuremapping
454 -transformation
472 +base codelist conceptscheme datastructure categoryscheme registry metadatastructure process structuremapping transformation
455 455  
456 -**maintainable-object-id** is the identifier of the maintainable object. This will always be present as all identifiable objects are either a maintainable object or contained in a maintainable object.
474 +**maintainable-object-id** is the identifier of the maintainable object. This will always be present as all identifiable objects are either a maintainable object or contained in a maintainable object. **maintainable-object-version** is the version, according to the SDMX versioning rules, of the maintainable object and is enclosed in parentheses ‘()’, which are always present. **container-object-id** is the identifier of an intermediary object that contains the actual object which the URN is identifying. It is not mandatory as many actual objects do not have an intermediary container object. For instance, a Code is in a maintained object (Codelist) and has no intermediary container object, whereas a MetadataAttribute has an intermediary container object (MetadataAttributeDescriptor) and may have an intermediary container object, which is its parent MetadataAttribute. For this reason, the container object id may repeat, with each repetition identifying the object at the next-lower level in its hierarchy. Note that if there is only a single containing object in the model then it is NOT included in the URN structure. This applies to AttributeDescriptor, DimensionDescriptor, and MeasureDescriptor where there can be only one such object and this object has a fixed id. Therefore, whilst each of these has a URN, the id of the AttributeDescriptor, DimensionDescriptor, and MeasureDescriptor is not included when the actual object is a DataAttribute or a Dimension/ TimeDimension, or a Measure.
457 457  
458 -**maintainable-object-version** is the version, according to the SDMX versioning rules, of the maintainable object and is enclosed in parentheses ‘()’, which are always present.
459 -
460 -**container-object-id** is the identifier of an intermediary object that contains the actual object which the URN is identifying. It is not mandatory as many actual objects do not have an intermediary container object. For instance, a Code is in a maintained object (Codelist) and has no intermediary container object, whereas a MetadataAttribute has an intermediary container object (MetadataAttributeDescriptor) and may have an intermediary container object, which is its parent MetadataAttribute. For this reason, the container object id may repeat, with each repetition identifying the object at the next-lower level in its hierarchy. Note that if there is only a single containing object in the model then it is NOT included in the URN structure. This applies to AttributeDescriptor, DimensionDescriptor, and MeasureDescriptor where there can be only one such object and this object has a fixed id. Therefore, whilst each of these has a URN, the id of the AttributeDescriptor, DimensionDescriptor, and MeasureDescriptor is not included when the actual object is a DataAttribute or a Dimension/ TimeDimension, or a Measure.
461 -
462 462  Note that although a Code can have a parent Code and a Concept can have a parent Concept these are maintained in a flat structure and therefore do not have a containerobject-id.
463 463  
464 464  For example, the sequence is agency:DSDid(version).DimensionId and not agency:DSDid(version).DimensionDescriptorId.DimensionId.
... ... @@ -465,7 +465,7 @@
465 465  
466 466  object-id is the identifier of the actual object unless the actual object is a //Maintainable// object. If present it is always the last id and is not followed by any other character.
467 467  
468 -===== //__**Generic Examples of the URN Structure**__// =====
482 +//__**Generic Examples of the URN Structure**__//
469 469  
470 470  __Actual object is a maintainable__
471 471  
... ... @@ -491,27 +491,27 @@
491 491  
492 492  SDMXPrefix.SDMX-IM-package-name.classname=agencyid:maintained-objectid(version).contained-object-id.contained-object-id contained-objectid.object-id
493 493  
494 -===== //__**Concrete Examples of the URN Structure**__// =====
508 +//__**Concrete Examples of the URN Structure**__//
495 495  
496 496  The Data Structure Definition CRED_EXT_DEBT of legacy version 2.1 maintained by the toplevel Agency TFFS would have the URN:
497 497  
498 - urn:sdmx:org.sdmx.infomodel.datastructure.DataStucture=TFFS:CRED_EXT_ DEBT(2.1)
512 +urn:sdmx:org.sdmx.infomodel.datastructure.DataStucture=TFFS:CRED_EXT_ DEBT(2.1)
499 499  
500 500  The URN for a code for Argentina maintained by ISO in the code list CL_3166A2 of semantic version 1.0.0 would be:
501 501  
502 - urn:sdmx:org.sdmx.infomodel.codelist.Code=ISO:CL_3166A2(1.0.0).AR
516 +urn:sdmx:org.sdmx.infomodel.codelist.Code=ISO:CL_3166A2(1.0.0).AR
503 503  
504 504  The URN for a category (id of 1) which has parent category (id of 2) maintained by SDMX in the category scheme SUBJECT_MATTER_DOMAINS of the semantic extended version 1.0.0draft would be:
505 505  
506 - urn:sdmx:org.sdmx.infomodel.categoryscheme.Category=SDMX:SUBJECT_MATT ER_DOMAINS(1.0.0-draft).1.2
520 +urn:sdmx:org.sdmx.infomodel.categoryscheme.Category=SDMX:SUBJECT_MATT ER_DOMAINS(1.0.0-draft).1.2
507 507  
508 508  The URN for a Metadata Attribute maintained by SDMX in the MSD CONTACT_METADATA of semantic version 1.0.0 where the hierarchy of the Metadata Attribute is CONTACT_DETAILS/CONTACT_NAME would be:
509 509  
510 - urn:sdmx:org.sdmx.infomodel.metadatastructure.MetadataAttribute=SDMX: CONTACT_METADATA(1.0.0).CONTACT_DETAILS.CONTACT_NAME
524 +urn:sdmx:org.sdmx.infomodel.metadatastructure.MetadataAttribute=SDMX: CONTACT_METADATA(1.0.0).CONTACT_DETAILS.CONTACT_NAME
511 511  
512 512  The TFFS defines ABC as a sub-Agency of TFFS then the URN of a Dataflow maintained by ABC and identified as EXTERNAL_DEBT of semantic version 1.0.0 would be:
513 513  
514 - urn:sdmx:org.sdmx.infomodel.datastructure.Dataflow=TFFS.ABC:EXTERNAL_ DEBT(1.0.0)
528 +urn:sdmx:org.sdmx.infomodel.datastructure.Dataflow=TFFS.ABC:EXTERNAL_ DEBT(1.0.0)
515 515  
516 516  The SDMX-RR MUST support this globally unique identification scheme. The SDMX-RR MUST be able to create the URN from the individual identification attributes submitted and to transform the URN to these identification attributes. The identification attributes are:
517 517  
... ... @@ -520,86 +520,85 @@
520 520  
521 521  The SDMX-RR MUST be able to resolve the unique identifier of an SDMX artefact and to produce an SDMX-ML rendering of that artefact if it is located in the Registry.
522 522  
523 -=== {{id name="_Toc93859"/}}6.2.3 Table of SDMX-IM Packages and Classes ===
537 +===== {{id name="_Toc93859"/}}6.2.3 Table of SDMX-IM Packages and Classes =====
524 524  
525 525  The table below lists all of the packages in the SDMX-IM together with the concrete classes that are in these packages and whose objects have a URN.
526 526  
527 -(% style="width:651.294px" %)
528 -|(% style="width:134px" %)**Package**|(% style="width:502px" %)**URN class name (model class name where this is different)**
529 -|(% style="width:134px" %)base|(% style="width:502px" %)Agency
530 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)AgencyScheme
531 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)DataConsumer
532 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)DataConsumerScheme
533 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)DataProvider
534 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)DataProviderScheme
535 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)MetadataProvider
536 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)MetadataProviderScheme
537 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)OrganisationUnit
538 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)OrganisationUnitScheme
539 -|(% style="width:134px" %)datastructure|(% style="width:502px" %)AttributeDescriptor
540 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)DataAttribute
541 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)Dataflow
542 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)DataStructure (DataStructureDefinition)
543 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)Dimension
544 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)DimensionDescriptor
545 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)GroupDimensionDescriptor
546 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)Measure
547 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)MeasureDescriptor
548 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)TimeDimension
549 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)
550 -|(% style="width:134px" %)metadatastructure|(% style="width:502px" %)MetadataAttribute
551 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)MetadataAttributeDescriptor
552 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)MetadataStructure MetadataStructureDefinition)
553 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)Metadataflow
554 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)MetadataSet
555 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)
556 -|(% style="width:134px" %)process|(% style="width:502px" %)Process
557 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)ProcessStep
558 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)Transition
559 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)
560 -|(% style="width:134px" %)registry|(% style="width:502px" %)DataConstraint
561 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)MetadataConstraint
562 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)MetadataProvisionAgreement
563 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)ProvisionAgreement
564 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)Subscription
565 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)
566 -|(% style="width:134px" %)structuremapping|(% style="width:502px" %)CategorySchemeMap
567 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)ConceptSchemeMap
568 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)OrganisationSchemeMap
569 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)ReportingTaxonomyMap
570 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)RepresentationMap
571 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)StructureMap
572 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)
573 -|(% style="width:134px" %)codelist|(% style="width:502px" %)Code
574 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)Codelist
575 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)HierarchicalCode
576 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)Hierarchy
577 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)HierarchyAssociation
578 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)Level
579 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)ValueList
580 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)
581 -|(% style="width:134px" %)categoryscheme|(% style="width:502px" %)Categorisation
582 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)Category
583 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)CategoryScheme
584 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)ReportingCategory
585 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)ReportingTaxonomy
586 -|(% style="width:134px" %)conceptscheme|(% style="width:502px" %)Concept
587 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)ConceptScheme
588 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)
589 -|(% style="width:134px" %)transformation|(% style="width:502px" %)CustomType
590 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)CustomTypeScheme
591 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)NamePersonalisation
592 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)NamePersonalisationScheme
593 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)Ruleset
594 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)RulesetScheme
595 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)Transformation
596 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)TransformationScheme
597 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)UserDefinedOperator
598 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)UserDefinedOperatorScheme
599 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)VtlCodelistMapping
600 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)VtlConceptMapping
601 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)VtlDataflowMapping
602 -|(% style="width:134px" %) |(% style="width:502px" %)VtlMappingScheme
541 +|**Package**|**URN class name (model class name where this is different)**
542 +|base|Agency
543 +| |AgencyScheme
544 +| |DataConsumer
545 +| |DataConsumerScheme
546 +| |DataProvider
547 +| |DataProviderScheme
548 +| |MetadataProvider
549 +| |MetadataProviderScheme
550 +| |OrganisationUnit
551 +| |OrganisationUnitScheme
552 +|datastructure|AttributeDescriptor
553 +| |DataAttribute
554 +| |Dataflow
555 +| |DataStructure (DataStructureDefinition)
556 +| |Dimension
557 +| |DimensionDescriptor
558 +| |GroupDimensionDescriptor
559 +| |Measure
560 +| |MeasureDescriptor
561 +| |TimeDimension
562 +| |
563 +|metadatastructure|MetadataAttribute
564 +| |MetadataAttributeDescriptor
565 +| |MetadataStructure MetadataStructureDefinition)
566 +| |Metadataflow
567 +| |MetadataSet
568 +| |
569 +|process|Process
570 +| |ProcessStep
571 +| |Transition
572 +| |
573 +|registry|DataConstraint
574 +| |MetadataConstraint
575 +| |MetadataProvisionAgreement
576 +| |ProvisionAgreement
577 +| |Subscription
578 +| |
579 +|structuremapping|CategorySchemeMap
580 +| |ConceptSchemeMap
581 +| |OrganisationSchemeMap
582 +| |ReportingTaxonomyMap
583 +| |RepresentationMap
584 +| |StructureMap
585 +| |
586 +|codelist|Code
587 +| |Codelist
588 +| |HierarchicalCode
589 +| |Hierarchy
590 +| |HierarchyAssociation
591 +| |Level
592 +| |ValueList
593 +| |
594 +|categoryscheme|Categorisation
595 +| |Category
596 +| |CategoryScheme
597 +| |ReportingCategory
598 +| |ReportingTaxonomy
599 +|conceptscheme|Concept
600 +| |ConceptScheme
601 +| |
602 +|transformation|CustomType
603 +| |CustomTypeScheme
604 +| |NamePersonalisation
605 +| |NamePersonalisationScheme
606 +| |Ruleset
607 +| |RulesetScheme
608 +| |Transformation
609 +| |TransformationScheme
610 +| |UserDefinedOperator
611 +| |UserDefinedOperatorScheme
612 +| |VtlCodelistMapping
613 +| |VtlConceptMapping
614 +| |VtlDataflowMapping
615 +| |VtlMappingScheme
603 603  
604 604  **Table 2: SDMX-IM Packages and Contained Classes**
605 605  
... ... @@ -611,116 +611,136 @@
611 611  
612 612  urn:sdmx.org.sdmx.infomodel.{package}.{classname}=
613 613  
614 -(% style="width:1311.29px" %)
615 -|(% style="width:252px" %)**Classname**|(% style="width:639px" %)**Ending URN pattern**|(% style="width:418px" %)**Example**
616 -|(% style="width:252px" %)Agency{{footnote}}The identification of an Agency in the URN structure for the maintainable object is by means of the agencyId. The AgencyScheme is not identified as SDMX has a mechanism for identifying an Agency uniquely by its Id. Note that this Id may be hierarchical. For example, a sub-agency of IMF is referred like this: IMF.SubAgency1{{/footnote}}|(% style="width:639px" %)agencySchemeAgencyId:**AGENCIES**(**1.0**).agencyId|(% style="width:418px" %)ECB:**AGENCIES**(**1.0**).AA
617 -|(% style="width:252px" %)//AgencyScheme//|(% style="width:639px" %)agencySchemeAgencyId:**AGENCIES**(**1.0**)|(% style="width:418px" %)ECB:**AGENCIES**(**1.0**)
618 -|(% style="width:252px" %)//Categorisation//|(% style="width:639px" %)categorisationAgencyId:categorisationId(version)|(% style="width:418px" %)IMF:cat001(1.0.0)
619 -|(% style="width:252px" %)Category|(% style="width:639px" %)categorySchemeAgencyId:categorySchemeId(versi on).categoryId.categoryId.categoryId etc.|(% style="width:418px" %)IMF:SDDS(1.0.0):level_1_category.level_2_category …
620 -|(% style="width:252px" %)//CategoryScheme//|(% style="width:639px" %)categorySchemeAgencyId:categorySchemeId(versi on)|(% style="width:418px" %)IMF:SDDS(1.0.0)
621 -|(% style="width:250px" %)//CategorySchemeMap//|(% style="width:639px" %)(((
622 -catSchemeMapAgencyId:catSchemeMapId(version)
623 -)))|(% style="width:1049px" %)SDMX:EUROSTAT_SUBJECT_DOMAIN(1.0.0)
624 -|(% style="width:250px" %)Code|(% style="width:639px" %)codeListAgencyId:codelistId(version).codeId|(% style="width:1049px" %)SDMX:CL_FREQ(1.0.0).Q
625 -|(% style="width:250px" %)//Codelist//|(% style="width:639px" %)codeListAgencyId:codeListId(version)|(% style="width:1049px" %)SDMX:CL_FREQ(1.0.0)
626 -|(% style="width:250px" %)ComponentMap|(% style="width:639px" %)structureMapAgencyId:structureMap(version).com ponentMapId|(% style="width:1049px" %)SDMX:BOP_STRUCTURES(1.0.0).REF_AREA_TO_COUNT RY
627 -|(% style="width:250px" %)Concept|(% style="width:639px" %)conceptSchemeAgencyId:conceptSchemeId(versio n).conceptId|(% style="width:1049px" %)SDMX:CROSS_DOMAIN_CONCEPTS(1.0.0).FREQ
628 -|(% style="width:250px" %)//ConceptScheme//|(% style="width:639px" %)conceptSchemeAgencyId:conceptSchemeId(versio n)|(% style="width:1049px" %)SDMX:CROSS_DOMAIN_CONCEPTS(1.0.0)
629 -|(% style="width:250px" %)//ConceptSchemeMap//|(% style="width:639px" %)(((
627 +|**Classname**|**Ending URN pattern**|**Example**
628 +|Agency^^[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^2^^>>path:#sdfootnote2sym||name="sdfootnote2anc"]](%%)^^|agencySchemeAgencyId:**AGENCIES**(**1.0**).agencyId|ECB:**AGENCIES**(**1.0**).AA
629 +|//AgencyScheme//|agencySchemeAgencyId:**AGENCIES**(**1.0**)|ECB:**AGENCIES**(**1.0**)
630 +|//Categorisation//|categorisationAgencyId:categorisationId(version)|IMF:cat001(1.0.0)
631 +|Category|categorySchemeAgencyId:categorySchemeId(versi on).categoryId.categoryId.categoryId etc.|IMF:SDDS(1.0.0):level_1_category.level_2_category …
632 +|//CategoryScheme//|categorySchemeAgencyId:categorySchemeId(versi on)|IMF:SDDS(1.0.0)
633 +
634 +|**Classname**|**Ending URN pattern**|**Example**
635 +|//CategorySchemeMap//|(((
636 +catSchemeMapAgencyId:catSchemeMapId(version
637 +
638 +)
639 +)))|SDMX:EUROSTAT_SUBJECT_DOMAIN(1.0.0)
640 +|Code|codeListAgencyId:codelistId(version).codeId|SDMX:CL_FREQ(1.0.0).Q
641 +|//Codelist//|codeListAgencyId:codeListId(version)|SDMX:CL_FREQ(1.0.0)
642 +|ComponentMap|structureMapAgencyId:structureMap(version).com ponentMapId|SDMX:BOP_STRUCTURES(1.0.0).REF_AREA_TO_COUNT RY
643 +|Concept|conceptSchemeAgencyId:conceptSchemeId(versio n).conceptId|SDMX:CROSS_DOMAIN_CONCEPTS(1.0.0).FREQ
644 +|//ConceptScheme//|conceptSchemeAgencyId:conceptSchemeId(versio n)|SDMX:CROSS_DOMAIN_CONCEPTS(1.0.0)
645 +|//ConceptSchemeMap//|(((
630 630  conceptSchemeMapAgencyId:conceptSchemeMap
647 +
631 631  Id(version)
632 -)))|(% style="width:1049px" %)SDMX:CONCEPT_MAP(1.0.0)
633 -|(% style="width:250px" %)CustomType|(% style="width:639px" %)customTypeSchemeAgencyId customTypeSchemeId(version) customTypeId|(% style="width:1049px" %)ECB: CUSTOM_TYPE_SCHEME(1.0.0).CUSTOM_TYPE_1
634 -|(% style="width:250px" %)//CustomTypeScheme//|(% style="width:639px" %)customTypeSchemeAgencyId customTypeSchemeId(version)|(% style="width:1049px" %)ECB:CUSTOM_TYPE_SCHEME(1.0.0)
635 -|(% style="width:250px" %)DataAttrribute|(% style="width:639px" %)dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId:dataStructureDef initionId(version).dataAttributeId|(% style="width:1049px" %)TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0).OBS_STATUS
636 -|(% style="width:250px" %)//DataConstraint//|(% style="width:639px" %)dataConstraintAgencyId:dataConstraintId(version)|(% style="width:1049px" %)TFFS:CREDITOR_DATA_CONTENT(1.0.0)
649 +)))|SDMX:CONCEPT_MAP(1.0.0)
650 +|CustomType|customTypeSchemeAgencyId customTypeSchemeId(version) customTypeId|ECB: CUSTOM_TYPE_SCHEME(1.0.0).CUSTOM_TYPE_1
651 +|//CustomTypeScheme//|customTypeSchemeAgencyId customTypeSchemeId(version)|ECB:CUSTOM_TYPE_SCHEME(1.0.0)
652 +|DataAttrribute|dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId:dataStructureDef initionId(version).dataAttributeId|TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0).OBS_STATUS
653 +|//DataConstraint//|dataConstraintAgencyId:dataConstraintId(version)|TFFS:CREDITOR_DATA_CONTENT(1.0.0)
637 637  
638 -|(% style="width:248px" %)**Classname**|(% style="width:643px" %)**Ending URN pattern**|(% style="width:1047px" %)**Example**
639 -|(% style="width:248px" %)DataConsumer|(% style="width:643px" %)dataConsumerSchemeAgencyId:**DATA_CONSUME RS**(**1.0**).dataConsumerId|(% style="width:1047px" %)SDMX:**DATA_CONSUMERS**(**1.0**).CONSUMER_1
640 -|(% style="width:248px" %)//DataConsumerScheme//|(% style="width:643px" %)(((
641 -dataConsumerSchemeAgencyId:**DATA_CONSUME RS**(**1.0**)
642 -)))|(% style="width:1047px" %)SDMX:**DATA_CONSUMERS**(**1.0**)
643 -|(% style="width:248px" %)//Dataflow//|(% style="width:643px" %)dataflowAgencyId:dataflowId(version)|(% style="width:1047px" %)TFFS:CRED_EXT_DEBT(1.0.0)
644 -|(% style="width:248px" %)DataProvider|(% style="width:643px" %)(((
645 -dataProviderSchemeAgencyId:**DATA_PROVIDERS**(**1.0**).dataProviderId
646 -)))|(% style="width:1047px" %)SDMX:**DATA_PROVIDERS**(**1.0**).PROVIDER_1
647 -|(% style="width:248px" %)//DataProviderScheme//|(% style="width:643px" %)(((
648 -dataProviderSchemeAgencyId:**DATA_PROVIDERS**(**1.0**)
649 -)))|(% style="width:1047px" %)SDMX:**DATA_PROVIDERS**(**1.0**)
650 -|(% style="width:248px" %)//DataStructure//|(% style="width:643px" %)dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId:dataStructureDef initionId(version)|(% style="width:1047px" %)TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0)
651 -|(% style="width:248px" %)Dimension|(% style="width:643px" %)dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId:dataStructureDef initionId(version).dimensionId|(% style="width:1047px" %)TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0).FREQ
652 -|(% style="width:248px" %)(((
655 +|**Classname**|**Ending URN pattern**|**Example**
656 +|DataConsumer|dataConsumerSchemeAgencyId:**DATA_CONSUME RS**(**1.0**).dataConsumerId|SDMX:**DATA_CONSUMERS**(**1.0**).CONSUMER_1
657 +|//DataConsumerScheme//|(((
658 +dataConsumerSchemeAgencyId:**DATA_CONSUME**
659 +
660 +**RS**(**1.0**)
661 +)))|SDMX:**DATA_CONSUMERS**(**1.0**)
662 +|//Dataflow//|dataflowAgencyId:dataflowId(version)|TFFS:CRED_EXT_DEBT(1.0.0)
663 +|DataProvider|(((
664 +dataProviderSchemeAgencyId:**DATA_PROVIDERS**(
665 +
666 +**1.0**).dataProviderId
667 +)))|SDMX:**DATA_PROVIDERS**(**1.0**).PROVIDER_1
668 +|//DataProviderScheme//|(((
669 +dataProviderSchemeAgencyId:**DATA_PROVIDERS**(
670 +
671 +**1.0**)
672 +)))|SDMX:**DATA_PROVIDERS**(**1.0**)
673 +|//DataStructure//|dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId:dataStructureDef initionId(version)|TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0)
674 +|Dimension|dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId:dataStructureDef initionId(version).dimensionId|TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0).FREQ
675 +|(((
653 653  DimensionDescriptor
677 +
654 654  MeasureDescriptor
679 +
655 655  AttributeDescriptor
656 -)))|(% style="width:643px" %)dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId:dataStructureDef initionId(version).componentListId where the componentListId is the name of the class (there is only one occurrence of each in the Data Structure Definition)|(% style="width:1047px" %)(((
681 +)))|dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId:dataStructureDef initionId(version).componentListId where the componentListId is the name of the class (there is only one occurrence of each in the Data Structure Definition)|(((
657 657  TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0).DimensionDescriptor
683 +
658 658  TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0).MeasureDescriptor
685 +
659 659  TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0).AttributeDescriptor
660 660  )))
661 -|(% style="width:248px" %)GroupDimensionDescriptor|(% style="width:643px" %)dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId:dataStructureDef initionId(version).groupDimensionDescriptorId|(% style="width:1047px" %)TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0).SIBLING
662 -|(% style="width:248px" %)HierarchicalCode|(% style="width:643px" %)hierarchyAgencyId:hierarchyId(version).hierarchica lCode.hierarchicalCode|(% style="width:1047px" %)UNESCO:H-C-GOV(1.0.0).GOV_CODE1.GOV_CODE1_1
688 +|GroupDimensionDescriptor|dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId:dataStructureDef initionId(version).groupDimensionDescriptorId|TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0).SIBLING
689 +|HierarchicalCode|hierarchyAgencyId:hierarchyId(version).hierarchica lCode.hierarchicalCode|UNESCO:H-C-GOV(1.0.0).GOV_CODE1.GOV_CODE1_1
663 663  
664 -|(% style="width:248px" %)**Classname**|(% style="width:646px" %)**Ending URN pattern**|(% style="width:1044px" %)**Example**
665 -|(% style="width:248px" %)//Hierarchy//|(% style="width:646px" %)hierarchyAgencyId:hierarchyId(version)|(% style="width:1044px" %)UNESCO:H-C-GOV(1.0.0)
666 -|(% style="width:248px" %)//HierarchyAssociation//|(% style="width:646px" %)hierarchyAssociationAgencyId:hierarchyAssociatio nId(version)|(% style="width:1044px" %)UNESCO:CL_EXP_SOURCE(1.0.0)
667 -|(% style="width:248px" %)Level|(% style="width:646px" %)hierarchyAgencyId:hierarchyId(version).level|(% style="width:1044px" %)UNESCO:H-C-GOV(1.0.0).LVL1
668 -|(% style="width:248px" %)Measure|(% style="width:646px" %)dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId:dataStructureDef initionId(version).measureId|(% style="width:1044px" %)TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0).OBS_VALUE
669 -|(% style="width:248px" %)MetadataAttribute|(% style="width:646px" %)(((
691 +|**Classname**|**Ending URN pattern**|**Example**
692 +|//Hierarchy//|hierarchyAgencyId:hierarchyId(version)|UNESCO:H-C-GOV(1.0.0)
693 +|//HierarchyAssociation//|hierarchyAssociationAgencyId:hierarchyAssociatio nId(version)|UNESCO:CL_EXP_SOURCE(1.0.0)
694 +|Level|hierarchyAgencyId:hierarchyId(version).level|UNESCO:H-C-GOV(1.0.0).LVL1
695 +|Measure|dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId:dataStructureDef initionId(version).measureId|TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0).OBS_VALUE
696 +|MetadataAttribute|(((
670 670  msdAgencyId:msdId(version).metadataAttributeId.
698 +
671 671  metadataAttributeId
672 -)))|(% style="width:1044px" %)IMF:SDDS_MSD(1.0.0).COMPILATION.METHOD
673 -|(% style="width:248px" %)MetadataAttributeDescriptor|(% style="width:646px" %)msdAgencyId:msdId(version).metadataAttributeDe scriptorId|(% style="width:1044px" %)IMF:SDDS_MSD(1.0.0).MetadataAttributeDescriptor
674 -|(% style="width:248px" %)//MetadataConstraint//|(% style="width:646px" %)metadataConstraintAgencyId:metadataConstraintI d(version)|(% style="width:1044px" %)TFFS:CREDITOR_METADATA_CONTENT(1.0.0)
675 -|(% style="width:248px" %)//Metadataflow//|(% style="width:646px" %)metadataflowAgencyId:metadataflowId(version)|(% style="width:1044px" %)IMF:SDDS_MDF(1.0.0)
676 -|(% style="width:248px" %)MetadataProvider|(% style="width:646px" %)metadataProviderSchemeAgencyId:**METADATA_P ROVIDERS**(**1.0**).metadataProviderId|(% style="width:1044px" %)SDMX:**METADATA_PROVIDERS**(**1.0**).MD_PROVIDER_1
677 -|(% style="width:248px" %)//MetadataProviderScheme//|(% style="width:646px" %)metadataProviderSchemeAgencyId:**METADATA_P ROVIDERS**(**1.0**)|(% style="width:1044px" %)SDMX:**METADATA_PROVIDERS**(**1.0**)
678 -|(% style="width:248px" %)//MetadataProvisionAgreement//|(% style="width:646px" %)metadataProvisionAgreementAgencyId:metadataP rovisionAgreementId(version)|(% style="width:1044px" %)IMF:SDDS_MDF_AB(1.0.0)
679 -|(% style="width:248px" %)//MetadataSet//|(% style="width:646px" %)metadataProviderId:metadataSetId(version)|(% style="width:1044px" %)MD_PROVIDER:METADATASET(1.0.0)
680 -|(% style="width:248px" %)//MetadataStructure//|(% style="width:646px" %)msdAgencyId:msdId(version)|(% style="width:1044px" %)IMF:SDDS_MSD(1.0.0)
700 +)))|IMF:SDDS_MSD(1.0.0).COMPILATION.METHOD
701 +|MetadataAttributeDescriptor|msdAgencyId:msdId(version).metadataAttributeDe scriptorId|IMF:SDDS_MSD(1.0.0).MetadataAttributeDescriptor
702 +|//MetadataConstraint//|metadataConstraintAgencyId:metadataConstraintI d(version)|TFFS:CREDITOR_METADATA_CONTENT(1.0.0)
703 +|//Metadataflow//|metadataflowAgencyId:metadataflowId(version)|IMF:SDDS_MDF(1.0.0)
704 +|MetadataProvider|metadataProviderSchemeAgencyId:**METADATA_P ROVIDERS**(**1.0**).metadataProviderId|SDMX:**METADATA_PROVIDERS**(**1.0**).MD_PROVIDER_1
705 +|//MetadataProviderScheme//|metadataProviderSchemeAgencyId:**METADATA_P ROVIDERS**(**1.0**)|SDMX:**METADATA_PROVIDERS**(**1.0**)
706 +|//MetadataProvisionAgreement//|metadataProvisionAgreementAgencyId:metadataP rovisionAgreementId(version)|IMF:SDDS_MDF_AB(1.0.0)
707 +|//MetadataSet//|metadataProviderId:metadataSetId(version)|MD_PROVIDER:METADATASET(1.0.0)
708 +|//MetadataStructure//|msdAgencyId:msdId(version)|IMF:SDDS_MSD(1.0.0)
681 681  
682 -|(% style="width:248px" %)**Classname**|(% style="width:629px" %)**Ending URN pattern**|(% style="width:1061px" %)**Example**
683 -|(% style="width:248px" %)NamePersonalisation|(% style="width:629px" %)namePersonalisationSchemeAgencyId namePersonalisationSchemeId(version) namePersonalisationId|(% style="width:1061px" %)ECB:PSN_SCHEME(1.0.0).PSN1234
684 -|(% style="width:248px" %)//NamePersonalisationScheme//|(% style="width:629px" %)namePersonalisationSchemeAgencyId namePersonalisationSchemeId(version)|(% style="width:1061px" %)ECB:PSN_SCHEME(1.0.0)
685 -|(% style="width:248px" %)//OrganisationSchemeMap//|(% style="width:629px" %)orgSchemeMapAgencyId:orgSchemeMapId(versio n)|(% style="width:1061px" %)SDMX:AGENCIES_PROVIDERS(1.0.0)
686 -|(% style="width:248px" %)OrganisationUnit|(% style="width:629px" %)organisationUnitSchemeAgencyId:organisationUnitSchemeId(version).organisationUnitId|(% style="width:1061px" %)ECB:ORGANISATIONS(1.0.0).1F
687 -|(% style="width:248px" %)//OrganisationUnitScheme//|(% style="width:629px" %)organisationUnitSchemeAgencyId:organisationUni tSchemeId(version)|(% style="width:1061px" %)ECB:ORGANISATIONS(1.0.0)
688 -|(% style="width:248px" %)//Process//|(% style="width:629px" %)processAgencyId:processId{version)|(% style="width:1061px" %)BIS:PROCESS1(1.0.0)
689 -|(% style="width:248px" %)ProcessStep|(% style="width:629px" %)(((
710 +|**Classname**|**Ending URN pattern**|**Example**
711 +|NamePersonalisation|namePersonalisationSchemeAgencyId namePersonalisationSchemeId(version) namePersonalisationId|ECB:PSN_SCHEME(1.0.0).PSN1234
712 +|//NamePersonalisationScheme//|namePersonalisationSchemeAgencyId namePersonalisationSchemeId(version)|ECB:PSN_SCHEME(1.0.0)
713 +|//OrganisationSchemeMap//|orgSchemeMapAgencyId:orgSchemeMapId(versio n)|SDMX:AGENCIES_PROVIDERS(1.0.0)
714 +|OrganisationUnit|organisationUnitSchemeAgencyId:organisationUni tSchemeId(version).organisationUnitId|ECB:ORGANISATIONS(1.0.0).1F
715 +|//OrganisationUnitScheme//|organisationUnitSchemeAgencyId:organisationUni tSchemeId(version)|ECB:ORGANISATIONS(1.0.0)
716 +|//Process//|processAgencyId:processId{version)|BIS:PROCESS1(1.0.0)
717 +|ProcessStep|(((
690 690  processAgencyId:processId(version).processStepId.
719 +
691 691  processStepId
692 -)))|(% style="width:1061px" %)BIS:PROCESS1(1.0.0).STEP1.STEP1_1
693 -|(% style="width:248px" %)//ProvisionAgreement//|(% style="width:629px" %)provisionAgreementAgencyId:provisionAgreement Id(version)|(% style="width:1061px" %)TFFS:CRED_EXT_DEBT_AB(1.0.0)
694 -|(% style="width:248px" %)ReportingCategory|(% style="width:629px" %)(((
721 +)))|BIS:PROCESS1(1.0.0).STEP1.STEP1_1
722 +|//ProvisionAgreement//|provisionAgreementAgencyId:provisionAgreement Id(version)|TFFS:CRED_EXT_DEBT_AB(1.0.0)
723 +|ReportingCategory|(((
695 695  reportingTaxonomyAgencyId:
725 +
696 696  reportingTaxonomyId(version).reportingCategoryI d.reportingCategoryId
697 -)))|(% style="width:1061px" %)IMF:REP_1(1.0.0):LVL1_REP_CAT.LVL2_REP_CAT
698 -|(% style="width:248px" %)//ReportingTaxonomy//|(% style="width:629px" %)reportingTaxonomyAgencyId:reportingTaxonomyI d(version)|(% style="width:1061px" %)IMF:REP_1(1.0.0)
699 -|(% style="width:248px" %)//ReportingTaxonomyMap//|(% style="width:629px" %)repTaxonomyAgencyId:repTaxonomyId(version)|(% style="width:1061px" %)SDMX:RT_MAP(1.0.0)
727 +)))|IMF:REP_1(1.0.0):LVL1_REP_CAT.LVL2_REP_CAT
728 +|//ReportingTaxonomy//|reportingTaxonomyAgencyId:reportingTaxonomyI d(version)|IMF:REP_1(1.0.0)
729 +|//ReportingTaxonomyMap//|repTaxonomyAgencyId:repTaxonomyId(version)|SDMX:RT_MAP(1.0.0)
700 700  
701 -|(% style="width:247px" %)**Classname**|(% style="width:649px" %)**Ending URN pattern**|(% style="width:1042px" %)**Example**
702 -|(% style="width:247px" %)//RepresentationMap//|(% style="width:649px" %)repMapAgencyId:repMapId(version)|(% style="width:1042px" %)SDMX:REF_AREA_MAPPING(1.0.0)
703 -|(% style="width:247px" %)Ruleset|(% style="width:649px" %)rulesetSchemeAgencyId rulesetSchemeId(version) rulesetId|(% style="width:1042px" %)ECB:RULESET_23(1.0.0).SET111
704 -|(% style="width:247px" %)//RulesetScheme//|(% style="width:649px" %)rulesetSchemeAgencyId rulesetSchemeId(version)|(% style="width:1042px" %)ECB:RULESET_23(1.0.0)
705 -|(% style="width:247px" %)//StructureMap//|(% style="width:649px" %)structureMapAgencyId:structureMap(version)|(% style="width:1042px" %)SDMX:BOP_STRUCTURES(1.0.0)
706 -|(% style="width:247px" %)Subscription|(% style="width:649px" %)(((
731 +|**Classname**|**Ending URN pattern**|**Example**
732 +|//RepresentationMap//|repMapAgencyId:repMapId(version)|SDMX:REF_AREA_MAPPING(1.0.0)
733 +|Ruleset|rulesetSchemeAgencyId rulesetSchemeId(version) rulesetId|ECB:RULESET_23(1.0.0).SET111
734 +|//RulesetScheme//|rulesetSchemeAgencyId rulesetSchemeId(version)|ECB:RULESET_23(1.0.0)
735 +|//StructureMap//|structureMapAgencyId:structureMap(version)|SDMX:BOP_STRUCTURES(1.0.0)
736 +|Subscription|(((
707 707  The Subscription is not itself an Identifiable Artefact and therefore it does not follow the rules for URN structure.
738 +
708 708  The name of the URN is registryURN There is no pre-determined format.
709 -)))|(% style="width:1042px" %)This cannot be generated by a common mechanism as subscriptions, although maintainable in the sense that they can be submitted and deleted, are not mandated to be created by a maintenance agency and have no versioning mechanism. It is therefore the responsibility of the target registry to generate a unique Id for the Subscription, and for the application creating the subscription to store the registry URN that is returned from the registry in the subscription response message.
710 -|(% style="width:247px" %)TimeDimension|(% style="width:649px" %)dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId:dataStructureDef initionId(version).timeDimensionId|(% style="width:1042px" %)TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0).TIME_PERIOD
711 -|(% style="width:247px" %)Transformation|(% style="width:649px" %)transformationSchemeAgencyId transformationSchemeId(version) transformationId|(% style="width:1042px" %)ECB:TRANSFORMATION_SCHEME(1.0.0).TRANS_1
712 -|(% style="width:247px" %)//TransformationScheme//|(% style="width:649px" %)transformationSchemeAgencyId transformationSchemeId(version)|(% style="width:1042px" %)ECB: TRANSFORMATION_SCHEME(1.0.0)
713 -|(% style="width:247px" %)Transition|(% style="width:649px" %)(((
740 +)))|This cannot be generated by a common mechanism as subscriptions, although maintainable in the sense that they can be submitted and deleted, are not mandated to be created by a maintenance agency and have no versioning mechanism. It is therefore the responsibility of the target registry to generate a unique Id for the Subscription, and for the application creating the subscription to store the registry URN that is returned from the registry in the subscription response message.
741 +|TimeDimension|dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId:dataStructureDef initionId(version).timeDimensionId|TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0).TIME_PERIOD
742 +|Transformation|transformationSchemeAgencyId transformationSchemeId(version) transformationId|ECB:TRANSFORMATION_SCHEME(1.0.0).TRANS_1
743 +|//TransformationScheme//|transformationSchemeAgencyId transformationSchemeId(version)|ECB: TRANSFORMATION_SCHEME(1.0.0)
744 +|**Classname**|**Ending URN pattern**|**Example**
745 +|Transition|(((
714 714  processAgencyId:processId(version).processStepId.
747 +
715 715  transitionId
716 -)))|(% style="width:1042px" %)BIS:PROCESS1(1.0.0).STEP1.TRANSITION1
717 -|(% style="width:247px" %)UserDefinedOperator|(% style="width:649px" %)userDefinedOperatorSchemeAgencyId userDefinedOperatorSchemeId(version) usserDefinedOperatorId|(% style="width:1042px" %)ECB:OS_CALC(1.2.0).OS267
718 -|(% style="width:247px" %)//UserDefinedOperatorScheme//|(% style="width:649px" %)userDefinedOperatorSchemeAgencyId userDefinedOperatorSchemeId(version)|(% style="width:1042px" %)ECB:OS_CALC(1.2.0)
719 -|(% style="width:247px" %)//ValueList//|(% style="width:649px" %)valuelistAgencyId:valuelistId(version)|(% style="width:1042px" %)SDMX:VLIST(1.0.0)
720 -|(% style="width:247px" %)VtlCodelistMapping|(% style="width:649px" %)vtlMappingSchemeAgencyId vtlMappingSchemeId(version) vtlCodelistMappingId|(% style="width:1042px" %)ECB:CLIST_MP(2.0.0).ABZ
721 -|(% style="width:247px" %)VtlConceptMapping|(% style="width:649px" %)vtlMappingSchemeAgencyId vtlMappingSchemeId(version) vtlConceptMappingId|(% style="width:1042px" %)ECB:CLIST_MP(1.0.0).XYA
722 -|(% style="width:247px" %)VtlDataflowMapping|(% style="width:649px" %)vtlMappingSchemeAgencyId vtlMappingSchemeId(version) vtlDataflowMappingId|(% style="width:1042px" %)ECB:CLIST_MP(1.0.0).MOQ
723 -|(% style="width:247px" %)//VtlMappingScheme//|(% style="width:649px" %)vtlMappingSchemeAgencyId VtlMappingSchemeId(version)|(% style="width:1042px" %)ECB:CLIST_MP(2.0.0)
749 +)))|BIS:PROCESS1(1.0.0).STEP1.TRANSITION1
750 +|UserDefinedOperator|userDefinedOperatorSchemeAgencyId userDefinedOperatorSchemeId(version) usserDefinedOperatorId|ECB:OS_CALC(1.2.0).OS267
751 +|//UserDefinedOperatorScheme//|userDefinedOperatorSchemeAgencyId userDefinedOperatorSchemeId(version)|ECB:OS_CALC(1.2.0)
752 +|//ValueList//|valuelistAgencyId:valuelistId(version)|SDMX:VLIST(1.0.0)
753 +|VtlCodelistMapping|vtlMappingSchemeAgencyId vtlMappingSchemeId(version) vtlCodelistMappingId|ECB:CLIST_MP(2.0.0).ABZ
754 +|VtlConceptMapping|vtlMappingSchemeAgencyId vtlMappingSchemeId(version) vtlConceptMappingId|ECB:CLIST_MP(1.0.0).XYA
755 +|VtlDataflowMapping|vtlMappingSchemeAgencyId vtlMappingSchemeId(version) vtlDataflowMappingId|ECB:CLIST_MP(1.0.0).MOQ
756 +|//VtlMappingScheme//|vtlMappingSchemeAgencyId VtlMappingSchemeId(version)|ECB:CLIST_MP(2.0.0)
724 724  
725 725  **Table 3: Table of identification components for SDMX Identifiable Artefacts**
726 726  
... ... @@ -728,7 +728,7 @@
728 728  
729 729  === {{id name="_Toc93862"/}}7.1 Structural Definition Metadata ===
730 730  
731 -=== {{id name="_Toc93863"/}}7.1.1 Introduction ===
764 +===== {{id name="_Toc93863"/}}7.1.1 Introduction =====
732 732  
733 733  The SDMX Registry must have the ability to support agencies in their role of defining and disseminating structural metadata artefacts. These artefacts include data structure definitions, code lists, concepts etc. and are fully defined in the SDMX-IM. An authenticated agency may submit valid structural metadata definitions which must be stored in the registry. Note that the term “structural metadata” refers as a general term to all structural components (Data Structure Definitions, Metadata Structure Definitions, Code Lists, Concept Schemes, etc.)
734 734  
... ... @@ -744,79 +744,90 @@
744 744  
745 745  The following table lists the Maintainable Artefacts.
746 746  
747 -(% style="width:881.294px" %)
748 -|(% colspan="2" style="width:522px" %)**Maintainable Artefacts**|(% style="width:490px" %)**Content**
749 -|(% style="width:198px" %)**Abstract Class**|(% style="width:324px" %)**Concrete Class**|(% style="width:490px" %)
750 -|(% style="width:198px" %)Item Scheme|(% style="width:324px" %)Codelist|(% style="width:490px" %)Code
751 -|(% style="width:198px" %) |(% style="width:324px" %)Concept Scheme|(% style="width:490px" %)Concept
752 -|(% style="width:198px" %) |(% style="width:324px" %)Category Scheme|(% style="width:490px" %)Category
753 -|(% style="width:198px" %) |(% style="width:324px" %)Organisation Unit Scheme|(% style="width:490px" %)Organisation Unit
754 -|(% style="width:198px" %) |(% style="width:324px" %)Agency Scheme|(% style="width:490px" %)Agency
755 -|(% style="width:198px" %) |(% style="width:324px" %)Data Provider Scheme|(% style="width:490px" %)Data Provider
756 -|(% style="width:198px" %) |(% style="width:324px" %)Metadata Provider Scheme|(% style="width:490px" %)Metadata Provider
757 -|(% style="width:198px" %) |(% style="width:324px" %)Data Consumer Scheme|(% style="width:490px" %)Data Consumer
758 -|(% style="width:198px" %) |(% style="width:324px" %)Reporting Taxonomy|(% style="width:490px" %)Reporting Category
759 -|(% style="width:198px" %) |(% style="width:324px" %)Transformation Scheme|(% style="width:490px" %)Transformation
760 -|(% style="width:198px" %) |(% style="width:324px" %)Custom Type Scheme|(% style="width:490px" %)Custom Type
761 -|(% style="width:198px" %) |(% style="width:324px" %)Name Personalisation Scheme|(% style="width:490px" %)Name Personalisation
762 -|(% style="width:198px" %) |(% style="width:324px" %)Vtl Mapping Scheme|(% style="width:490px" %)Vtl Codelist Mapping Vtl Concept Mapping
763 -|(% style="width:198px" %) |(% style="width:324px" %)Ruleset Scheme|(% style="width:490px" %)Ruleset
764 -|(% style="width:198px" %) |(% style="width:324px" %)User Defined Operator Scheme|(% style="width:490px" %)User Defined Operator
765 -|(% style="width:198px" %)Enumerated List|(% style="width:324px" %)ValueList|(% style="width:490px" %)Value Item
766 -|(% style="width:198px" %)Structure|(% style="width:324px" %)Data Structure Definition|(% style="width:490px" %)(((
780 +|(% colspan="2" %)**Maintainable Artefacts**|**Content**
781 +|**Abstract Class**|**Concrete Class**|
782 +|Item Scheme|Codelist|Code
783 +| |Concept Scheme|Concept
784 +| |Category Scheme|Category
785 +| |Organisation Unit Scheme|Organisation Unit
786 +| |Agency Scheme|Agency
787 +| |Data Provider Scheme|Data Provider
788 +| |Metadata Provider Scheme|Metadata Provider
789 +| |Data Consumer Scheme|Data Consumer
790 +| |Reporting Taxonomy|Reporting Category
791 +| |Transformation Scheme|Transformation
792 +| |Custom Type Scheme|Custom Type
793 +| |Name Personalisation Scheme|Name Personalisation
794 +| |Vtl Mapping Scheme|Vtl Codelist Mapping Vtl Concept Mapping
795 +| |Ruleset Scheme|Ruleset
796 +| |User Defined Operator Scheme|User Defined Operator
797 +|Enumerated List|ValueList|Value Item
798 +|Structure|Data Structure Definition|(((
767 767  Dimension Descriptor
800 +
768 768  Group Dimension Descriptor
802 +
769 769  Dimension
804 +
770 770  Time Dimension
806 +
771 771  Attribute Descriptor
808 +
772 772  Data Attribute
810 +
773 773  Measure Descriptor
812 +
774 774  Measure
775 775  )))
776 -|(% style="width:198px" %) |(% style="width:324px" %)Metadata Structure Definition|(% style="width:490px" %)Metadata Attribute Descriptor Metadata Attribute
777 -|(% style="width:198px" %)Structure Usage|(% style="width:324px" %)Dataflow|(% style="width:490px" %)
778 -|(% style="width:198px" %) |(% style="width:324px" %)Metadataflow|(% style="width:490px" %)
779 -|(% style="width:198px" %)None|(% style="width:324px" %)Process|(% style="width:490px" %)Process Step
780 -|(% style="width:198px" %)None|(% style="width:324px" %)Structure Map|(% style="width:490px" %)(((
815 +| |Metadata Structure Definition|Metadata Attribute Descriptor Metadata Attribute
816 +|Structure Usage|Dataflow|
817 +| |Metadataflow|
818 +|None|Process|Process Step
819 +|None|Structure Map|(((
781 781  Component Map
821 +
782 782  Epoch Map
823 +
783 783  Date Pattern Map
784 784  )))
785 -|(% style="width:198px" %)None|(% style="width:324px" %)Representation Map|(% style="width:490px" %)Representation Mapping
786 -|(% style="width:198px" %)Item Scheme Map|(% style="width:324px" %)Organisation Scheme Map|(% style="width:490px" %)Item Map
787 -|(% style="width:198px" %) |(% style="width:324px" %)Concept Scheme Map|(% style="width:490px" %)Item Map
788 -|(% style="width:198px" %) |(% style="width:324px" %)Category Scheme Map|(% style="width:490px" %)Item Map
789 -|(% style="width:198px" %) |(% style="width:324px" %)Reporting Taxonomy Map|(% style="width:490px" %)Item Map
790 -|(% style="width:198px" %)None|(% style="width:324px" %)Provision Agreement|(% style="width:490px" %)
791 -|(% style="width:198px" %)None|(% style="width:324px" %)Metadata Provision Agreement|(% style="width:490px" %)
792 -|(% style="width:198px" %)None|(% style="width:324px" %)Hierarchy|(% style="width:490px" %)Hierarchical Code
793 -|(% style="width:198px" %)None|(% style="width:324px" %)Hierarchy Association|(% style="width:490px" %)
794 -|(% style="width:198px" %)None|(% style="width:324px" %)Categorisation|(% style="width:490px" %)
826 +|None|Representation Map|Representation Mapping
827 +|Item Scheme Map|Organisation Scheme Map|Item Map
828 +| |Concept Scheme Map|Item Map
829 +| |Category Scheme Map|Item Map
830 +| |Reporting Taxonomy Map|Item Map
831 +|None|Provision Agreement|
832 +|None|Metadata Provision Agreement|
833 +|None|Hierarchy|Hierarchical Code
834 +|None|Hierarchy Association|
835 +|None|Categorisation|
795 795  
796 796  **Table 4: Table of Maintainable Artefacts for Structural Definition Metadata**
797 797  
798 -=== {{id name="_Toc93864"/}}7.1.2 Item Scheme, Structure ===
839 +===== {{id name="_Toc93864"/}}7.1.2 Item Scheme, Structure =====
799 799  
800 800  The artefacts included in the structural definitions are:
801 801  
802 -* All types of Item Scheme (Codelist, Concept Scheme, Category Scheme, Organisation Scheme, Agency Scheme, Data Provider Scheme, Metadata Provider Scheme, Data Consumer Scheme, Organisation Unit Scheme, Transformation Scheme, Name Personalisation Scheme, Custom Type Scheme, Vtl Mapping Scheme, Ruleset Scheme, User Defined Operator Scheme)
803 -* All types of Enumerated List (ValueList){{footnote}}Note that Codelist is also an EnumeratedList.{{/footnote}}
804 -* All types of Structure (Data Structure Definition, Metadata Structure Definition)
805 -* All types of Structure Usage (Dataflow, Metadataflow)
843 +• All types of Item Scheme (Codelist, Concept Scheme, Category Scheme, Organisation Scheme, Agency Scheme, Data Provider Scheme, Metadata Provider Scheme, Data Consumer Scheme, Organisation Unit Scheme, Transformation Scheme, Name Personalisation Scheme, Custom Type Scheme, Vtl Mapping Scheme, Ruleset Scheme, User Defined Operator Scheme)
806 806  
807 -=== {{id name="_Toc93865"/}}7.1.3 Structure Usage ===
845 + All types of Enumerated List (ValueList)^^[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^3^^>>path:#sdfootnote3sym||name="sdfootnote3anc"]](%%)^^
808 808  
809 -==== 7.1.3.1 Structure Usage: Basic Concepts ====
847 + All types of Structure (Data Structure Definition, Metadata Structure Definition)
810 810  
849 +• All types of Structure Usage (Dataflow, Metadataflow)
850 +
851 +===== {{id name="_Toc93865"/}}7.1.3 Structure Usage =====
852 +
853 +**7.1.3.1 Structure Usage: Basic Concepts**
854 +
811 811  The Structure Usage defines, in its concrete classes of Dataflow and Metadataflow, which flows of data and metadata use which specific Structure, and importantly for the support of data and metadata discovery, the Structure Usage can be linked to one or more Category in one or more Category Scheme using the Categorisation mechanism. This gives the ability for an application to discover data and metadata by “drilling down” the Category Schemes.
812 812  
813 -==== 7.1.3.2 Structure Usage Schematic ====
857 +**7.1.3.2 Structure Usage Schematic**
814 814  
815 815  [[image:SDMX 3-0-0 SECTION 5 FINAL-1.0_en_52097ab5.jpg||height="246" width="438"]]
816 816  
817 817  **Figure 9: Schematic of Linking the Data and Metadata Flows to Categories and Structure Definitions**
818 818  
819 -==== 7.1.3.3 Structure Usage Model ====
863 +**7.1.3.3 Structure Usage Model**
820 820  
821 821  [[image:SDMX 3-0-0 SECTION 5 FINAL-1.0_en_302cc1a2.jpg||height="548" width="578"]]
822 822  
... ... @@ -832,9 +832,9 @@
832 832  * Categorisation to Dataflow and Category
833 833  * Categorisation to Metadataflow and Category
834 834  
835 -== {{id name="_Toc93866"/}}7.2 Data and Metadata Provisioning ==
879 +=== {{id name="_Toc93866"/}}7.2 Data and Metadata Provisioning ===
836 836  
837 -=== {{id name="_Toc93867"/}}7.2.1 Provisioning Agreement: Basic concepts ===
881 +===== {{id name="_Toc93867"/}}7.2.1 Provisioning Agreement: Basic concepts =====
838 838  
839 839  Data/Metadata provisioning defines a framework in which the provision of different types of statistical data and metadata by various data/metadata providers can be specified and controlled. This framework is the basis on which the existence of data can be made known to the SDMX-enabled community and hence the basis on which data can subsequently be discovered. Such a framework can be used to regulate the data content to facilitate the building of intelligent applications. It can also be used to facilitate the processing implied by service level agreements, or other provisioning agreements in those scenarios that are based on legal directives. Additionally, quality and timeliness metadata can be supported by this framework which makes it practical to implement information supply chain monitoring.
840 840  
... ... @@ -842,7 +842,7 @@
842 842  
843 843  Although the Provision Agreement directly supports the data-sharing “pull” model, it is also useful in “push” exchanges (bilateral and gateway scenarios), or in a dissemination environment. It should be noted, too, that in any exchange scenario, the registry functions as a repository of structural metadata.
844 844  
845 -=== {{id name="_Toc93868"/}}7.2.2 Provisioning Agreement Model – pull use case ===
889 +===== {{id name="_Toc93868"/}}7.2.2 Provisioning Agreement Model – pull use case =====
846 846  
847 847  An organisation which publishes statistical data or reference metadata and wishes to make it available to an SDMX enabled community is called a Data Provider. In terms of the SDMX Information Model, the Data Provider is maintained in a Data Provider Scheme.
848 848  
... ... @@ -864,9 +864,9 @@
864 864  
865 865  A Provision Agreement is structural metadata. Each Provision Agreement must reference a Data Provider or Metadata Provider and a Dataflow or Metadataflow Definition. The Data/Metadata Provider and the Dataflow/Metadataflow must exist already in order to set up a Metadata Provision or Provision Agreement.
866 866  
867 -== {{id name="_Toc93869"/}}7.3 Data and Metadata Constraints ==
911 +=== {{id name="_Toc93869"/}}7.3 Data and Metadata Constraints ===
868 868  
869 -=== {{id name="_Toc93870"/}}7.3.1 Data and Metadata Constraints: Basic Concepts ===
913 +===== {{id name="_Toc93870"/}}7.3.1 Data and Metadata Constraints: Basic Concepts =====
870 870  
871 871  Constraints are, effectively, lists of the valid or actual content of data and metadata. Constraints can be used to specify a subset of the theoretical content of data set or metadata set which can be derived from the specification of the DSD or MSD. A Constraint can comprise a list of keys or a list of content (usually code values) of a specific component such as a dimension or attribute.
872 872  
... ... @@ -930,14 +930,17 @@
930 930  
931 931  The Registration has an action attribute which takes one of the following values:
932 932  
977 +:
978 +
933 933  (((
934 -(% style="width:761.294px" %)
935 -|(% style="width:196px" %)**Action Attribute Value**|(% style="width:561px" %)**Behaviour**
936 -|(% style="width:196px" %)Append|(% style="width:561px" %)Add this Registration to the registry
937 -|(% style="width:196px" %)Replace|(% style="width:561px" %)(((
938 -Replace the existing Registration with identified by the id in the Registration of the SubmitRegistrationRequest
980 +|**Action Attribute Value**|**Behaviour**
981 +|Append|Add this Registration to the registry
982 +|Replace|(((
983 +Replace the existing Registration with identified by the id in the
984 +
985 +Registration of the SubmitRegistrationRequest
939 939  )))
940 -|(% style="width:196px" %)Delete|(% style="width:561px" %)Delete the existing Registration identified by the id in the Registration of the SubmitRegistrationRequest
987 +|Delete|Delete the existing Registration identified by the id in the Registration of the SubmitRegistrationRequest
941 941  )))
942 942  
943 943  [[image:SDMX 3-0-0 SECTION 5 FINAL-1.0_en_bc1dcdec.jpg||height="575" width="579"]]
... ... @@ -954,20 +954,27 @@
954 954  
955 955  Information in the data or metadata set is extracted and placed in one or more //Constraint//s (see the //Constraint// model in the SDMX Information Model – Section 2 of the SDMX Standards). The information to be extracted is indicated by the Boolean values set on the ProvisionAgreement or MetadataProvisionAgreement as shown in the table below.
956 956  
1004 +:
1005 +
957 957  (((
958 -(% style="width:678.294px" %)
959 -|**Indexing Required**|(% style="width:504px" %)**Registration Process Activity**
960 -|indexTimeSeries|(% style="width:504px" %)Extract all the series keys and create a KeySet(s) Constraint.
961 -|indexDataSet|(% style="width:504px" %)Extract all the codes and other content of the Key value of the Series Key in a Data Set and create one or more Cube Regions containing Member Selections of Dimension Components of the Constraints model in the SDMX-IM, and the associated Selection Value.
962 -|indexReportingPeriod|(% style="width:504px" %)(((
1007 +|**Indexing Required**|**Registration Process Activity**
1008 +|indexTimeSeries|Extract all the series keys and create a KeySet(s) Constraint.
1009 +|indexDataSet|Extract all the codes and other content of the Key value of the Series Key in a Data Set and create one or more Cube Regions containing Member Selections of Dimension Components of the Constraints model in the SDMX-IM, and the associated Selection Value.
1010 +|indexReportingPeriod|(((
963 963  This applies only to a registered __dataset__.
1012 +
964 964  Extract the Reporting Begin and Reporting End from the Header of the Message containing the data set, and create a Reference Period constraint.
965 965  )))
966 -|**Indexing Required**|(% style="width:504px" %)**Registration Process Activity**
967 -|indexAttributes|(% style="width:504px" %)(((
1015 +|**Indexing Required**|**Registration Process Activity**
1016 +|indexAttributes|(((
968 968  **Data Set**
969 -Extract the content of the Attribute Values in a Data Set and create one or more Cube Regions containing Member Selections of Data Attribute Components of the Constraints model in the SDMXIM, and the associated Selection Value
1018 +
1019 +Extract the content of the Attribute Values in a Data Set and create one or more Cube Regions containing Member Selections of Data Attribute Components of the Constraints model in the
1020 +
1021 +SDMXIM, and the associated Selection Value
1022 +
970 970  **Metadata Set**
1024 +
971 971  Indicate the presence of a Reported Attribute by creating one or more Cube Regions containing Member Selections of Metadata Attribute Components of the Constraints model in the SDMX-IM. Note that the content is not stored in the Selection Value.
972 972  )))
973 973  )))
... ... @@ -976,7 +976,7 @@
976 976  
977 977  The Registration must reference the ProvisionAgreement or MetadataProvisionAgreement to which it relates.
978 978  
979 -=== {{id name="_Toc93876"/}}7.4.3 Registration Response ===
1033 +===== {{id name="_Toc93876"/}}7.4.3 Registration Response =====
980 980  
981 981  After a registration request has been submitted to the registry, a response is returned to the submitter indicating success or failure. Given that a registration request can hold many Registrations, then there must be a registration status for each Registration. The SubmitRegistration class has a status field, which is either set to “Success”, “Warning” or “Failure”.
982 982  
... ... @@ -1006,18 +1006,20 @@
1006 1006  
1007 1007  Regardless of the type of registry/repository events being observed, a subscription always contains:
1008 1008  
1009 -1. set of URIs describing the end-points to which notifications must be sent if the subscription is activated. The URIs can be either mailto~: or http: protocol. In the former case an email notification is sent; in the latter an HTTP POST notification is sent.
1063 +1. A set of URIs describing the end-points to which notifications must be sent if the subscription is activated. The URIs can be either mailto~: or http: protocol. In the former case an email notification is sent; in the latter an HTTP POST notification is sent.
1010 1010  1. A user-defined identifier, which is returned in the response to the subscription request. This helps with asynchronous processing and is NOT stored in the Registry.
1011 1011  1. A validity period which defines both when the subscription becomes active and expires. The subscriber may be sent a notification on expiration of the subscription.
1012 1012  1. A selector which specifies which type of events are of interest. The set of event types is:
1013 1013  
1068 +:
1069 +::
1070 +
1014 1014  (((
1015 -(% style="width:856.294px" %)
1016 -|(% style="width:320px" %)**Event Type**|(% style="width:532px" %)**Comment**
1017 -|(% style="width:320px" %)STRUCTURAL_REPOSITORY_EVENTS|(% style="width:532px" %)Life-cycle changes to Maintainable Artefacts in the structural metadata repository.
1018 -|(% style="width:320px" %)DATA_REGISTRATION_EVENTS|(% style="width:532px" %)Whenever a published dataset is registered. This can be either a SDMXML data file or an SDMX conformant database.
1019 -|(% style="width:320px" %)METADATA_REGISTRATION_EVENTS|(% style="width:532px" %)Whenever a published metadataset is registered. This can be either a SDMXML reference metadata file or an SDMX conformant database.
1020 -|(% style="width:320px" %)ALL_EVENTS|(% style="width:532px" %)All events of the specified EventType
1072 +|**Event Type**|**Comment**
1073 +|STRUCTURAL_REPOSITORY_EVENTS|Life-cycle changes to Maintainable Artefacts in the structural metadata repository.
1074 +|DATA_REGISTRATION_EVENTS|Whenever a published dataset is registered. This can be either a SDMXML data file or an SDMX conformant database.
1075 +|METADATA_REGISTRATION_EVENTS|Whenever a published metadataset is registered. This can be either a SDMXML reference metadata file or an SDMX conformant database.
1076 +|ALL_EVENTS|All events of the specified EventType
1021 1021  )))
1022 1022  
1023 1023  === {{id name="_Toc93880"/}}7.5.3 Wildcard Facility ===
... ... @@ -1084,14 +1084,15 @@
1084 1084  
1085 1085  Whenever a dataset or metadata-set is registered a registration event is created. A subscription may be observing all data or metadata registrations, or it may focus on specific registrations as shown in the table below:
1086 1086  
1143 +:
1144 +
1087 1087  (((
1088 -(% style="width:1126.29px" %)
1089 -|(% style="width:382px" %)**Selector**|(% style="width:740px" %)**Comment**
1090 -|(% style="width:382px" %)DataProvider & MetadataProvider|(% style="width:740px" %)Any datasets or metadata sets registered by the specified data or metadata provider will activate the notification.
1091 -|(% style="width:382px" %)ProvisionAgreement & MetadataProvisionAgreement|(% style="width:740px" %)Any datasets or metadata sets registered for the agreement will activate the notification.
1092 -|(% style="width:382px" %)Dataflow & Metadataflow|(% style="width:740px" %)Any datasets or metadata sets registered for the specified dataflow (or metadataflow) will activate the notification.
1093 -|(% style="width:382px" %)DataStructureDefinition & MetadataStructureDefinition|(% style="width:740px" %)Any datasets or metadata sets registered for those dataflows (or metadataflows) that are based on the specified Data Structure Definition will activate the notification
1094 -|(% style="width:382px" %)Category|(% style="width:740px" %)Any datasets or metadata sets registered for those dataflows, metadataflows, provision agreements that are categorised by the category.
1146 +|**Selector**|**Comment**
1147 +|DataProvider & MetadataProvider|Any datasets or metadata sets registered by the specified data or metadata provider will activate the notification.
1148 +|ProvisionAgreement & MetadataProvisionAgreement|Any datasets or metadata sets registered for the agreement will activate the notification.
1149 +|Dataflow & Metadataflow|Any datasets or metadata sets registered for the specified dataflow (or metadataflow) will activate the notification.
1150 +|DataStructureDefinition & MetadataStructureDefinition|Any datasets or metadata sets registered for those dataflows (or metadataflows) that are based on the specified Data Structure Definition will activate the notification
1151 +|Category|Any datasets or metadata sets registered for those dataflows, metadataflows, provision agreements that are categorised by the category.
1095 1095  )))
1096 1096  
1097 1097  The event will also capture the semantic of the registration: deletion or replacement of an existing registration or a new registration.
... ... @@ -1123,6 +1123,10 @@
1123 1123  
1124 1124  The notification will contain the Registration.
1125 1125  
1126 -----
1183 +[[1>>path:#sdfootnote1anc||name="sdfootnote1sym"]] With semantic versioning, it is allowed to reference a range of artefacts, e.g., a DSD referencing a Codelist with version 1.2.3+ means all patch versions greater than 1.2.3. This means that deleting 1.2.4draft does not break integrity of the aforementioned DSD.
1127 1127  
1128 -{{putFootnotes/}}
1185 +[[2>>path:#sdfootnote2anc||name="sdfootnote2sym"]] The identification of an Agency in the URN structure for the maintainable object is by means of the agencyId. The AgencyScheme is not identified as SDMX has a mechanism for identifying an Agency uniquely by its Id. Note that this Id may be hierarchical. For example, a sub-agency of IMF is referred like this:
1186 +
1187 +IMF.SubAgency1
1188 +
1189 +[[3>>path:#sdfootnote3anc||name="sdfootnote3sym"]] Note that Codelist is also an EnumeratedList.
1747307906944-697.png
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.helena
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -37.9 KB
Content
SUZ.Methodology.Code.MethodologyClass[0]