Last modified by Helena on 2025/09/10 11:19

From version 6.10
edited by Helena
on 2025/05/16 12:38
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 6.8
edited by Helena
on 2025/05/16 12:37
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -414,8 +414,13 @@
414 414  
415 415  It should be noted that the desired VTL Data Sets (i.e. of the kind ‘DF1(1.0.0)/// INDICATORvalue//.//COUNTRYvalue//’) can be obtained also by applying the VTL operator “**sub**” (subspace) to the Dataflow DF1(1.0.0), like in the following VTL expression:
416 416  
417 -[[image:1747388275998-621.png]]
417 +‘DF1(1.0.0)/POPULATION.USA’ :=
418 +DF1(1.0.0) [ sub INDICATOR=“POPULATION”, COUNTRY=“USA” ];
418 418  
420 +‘DF1(1.0.0)/POPULATION.CANADA’ :=
421 +DF1(1.0.0) [ sub INDICATOR=“POPULATION”, COUNTRY=“CANADA” ];
422 +… … …
423 +
419 419  In fact the VTL operator “sub” has exactly the same behaviour. Therefore, mapping different parts of a SDMX Dataflow to different VTL Data Sets in the direction from SDMX to VTL through the ordered concatenation notation is equivalent to a proper use of the operator “**sub**” on such a Dataflow.{{footnote}}In case the ordered concatenation notation is used, the VTL Transformation described above, e.g. ‘DF1(1.0)/POPULATION.USA’ := DF1(1.0) [ sub INDICATOR=“POPULATION”, COUNTRY=“USA”], is implicitly executed. In order to test the overall compliance of the VTL program to the VTL consistency rules, it has to be considered as part of the VTL program even if it is not explicitly coded.{{/footnote}}
420 420  
421 421  In the direction from SDMX to VTL it is allowed to omit the value of one or more
... ... @@ -478,30 +478,37 @@
478 478  With reference to the VTL “model for Variables and Value domains”, the following additional mappings have to be considered:
479 479  
480 480  (% style="width:1170.29px" %)
481 -|(% style="width:392px" %)**VTL**|(% style="width:776px" %)**SDMX**
482 -|(% style="width:392px" %)**Data Set Component**|(% style="width:776px" %)Although this abstraction exists in SDMX, it does not have an explicit definition and correspond to a Component (either a DimensionComponent or a Measure or a DataAttribute) belonging to one specific Dataflow{{footnote}}Through SDMX Constraints, it is possible to specify the values that a Component of a Dataflow can assume.{{/footnote}}
483 -|(% style="width:392px" %)**Represented Variable**|(% style="width:776px" %)(((
486 +|**VTL**|(% style="width:754px" %)**SDMX**
487 +|**Data Set Component**|(% style="width:754px" %)Although this abstraction exists in SDMX, it does not have an explicit definition and correspond to a Component (either a DimensionComponent or a Measure or a DataAttribute) belonging to one specific Dataflow{{footnote}}Through SDMX Constraints, it is possible to specify the values that a Component of a Dataflow can assume.{{/footnote}}
488 +|**Represented Variable**|(% style="width:754px" %)(((
484 484  **Concept** with a definite
485 485  
486 486  Representation
487 487  )))
488 -|(% style="width:392px" %)**Value Domain**|(% style="width:776px" %)(((
489 -**Representation** (see the Structure Pattern in the Base Package)
493 +|**Value Domain**|(% style="width:754px" %)(((
494 +**Representation** (see the Structure
495 +
496 +Pattern in the Base Package)
490 490  )))
491 -|(% style="width:392px" %)**Enumerated Value Domain / Code List**|(% style="width:776px" %)**Codelist**
492 -|(% style="width:392px" %)**Code**|(% style="width:776px" %)(((
498 +|**Enumerated Value Domain / Code List**|(% style="width:754px" %)**Codelist**
499 +|**Code**|(% style="width:754px" %)(((
493 493  **Code** (for enumerated
494 494  
495 495  DimensionComponent, Measure, DataAttribute)
496 496  )))
497 -|(% style="width:392px" %)**Described Value Domain**|(% style="width:776px" %)(((
498 -non-enumerated** Representation **(having Facets / ExtendedFacets, see the Structure Pattern in the Base Package)
504 +|**Described Value Domain**|(% style="width:754px" %)(((
505 +non-enumerated** Representation**
506 +
507 +(having Facets / ExtendedFacets, see the Structure Pattern in the Base Package)
499 499  )))
500 -|(% style="width:392px" %)**Value**|(% style="width:776px" %)Although this abstraction exists in SDMX, it does not have an explicit definition and correspond to a **Code** of a Codelist (for enumerated Representations) or to a valid **value **(for non-enumerated** **Representations)
501 -|(% style="width:392px" %)**Value Domain Subset / Set**|(% style="width:776px" %)This abstraction does not exist in SDMX
502 -|(% style="width:392px" %)**Enumerated Value Domain Subset / Enumerated Set**|(% style="width:776px" %)This abstraction does not exist in SDMX
503 -|(% style="width:392px" %)**Described Value Domain Subset / Described Set**|(% style="width:776px" %)This abstraction does not exist in SDMX
504 -|(% style="width:392px" %)**Set list**|(% style="width:776px" %)This abstraction does not exist in SDMX
509 +|**Value**|(% style="width:754px" %)Although this abstraction exists in SDMX, it does not have an explicit definition and correspond to a **Code** of a Codelist (for enumerated Representations) or
510 +| |(% style="width:754px" %)(((
511 +to a valid **value **(for non-enumerated** **Representations)
512 +)))
513 +|**Value Domain Subset / Set**|(% style="width:754px" %)This abstraction does not exist in SDMX
514 +|**Enumerated Value Domain Subset / Enumerated Set**|(% style="width:754px" %)This abstraction does not exist in SDMX
515 +|**Described Value Domain Subset / Described Set**|(% style="width:754px" %)This abstraction does not exist in SDMX
516 +|**Set list**|(% style="width:754px" %)This abstraction does not exist in SDMX
505 505  
506 506  The main difference between VTL and SDMX relies on the fact that the VTL artefacts for defining subsets of Value Domains do not exist in SDMX, therefore the VTL features for referring to predefined subsets are not available in SDMX. These artefacts are the Value Domain Subset (or Set), either enumerated or described, the Set List (list of values belonging to enumerated subsets) and the Data Set Component (aimed at defining the set of values that the Component of a Data Set can take, possibly a subset of the codes of Value Domain).
507 507  
1747388275998-621.png
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.helena
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -19.2 KB
Content