Changes for page 12 Validation and Transformation Language (VTL)

Last modified by Helena on 2025/09/10 11:19

From 5.1 to 4.1 From 6.3 to 6.2

From version 6.2

edited by Helena
on 2025/05/16 12:28

Change comment: There is no comment for this version

To version 5.1

edited by Helena
on 2025/05/15 15:48

Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Raw
Rendered

Summary

Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Content

@@ -1,10 +1,8 @@
--{{box title="**Contents**"}}
--{{toc/}}
--{{/box}}
++= 12 Validation and Transformation Language (VTL) =
  == 12.1 Introduction ==
--The Validation and Transformation Language (VTL) supports the definition of Transformations, which are algorithms to calculate new data starting from already existing ones{{footnote}}The Validation and Transformation Language is a standard language designed and published under the SDMX initiative. VTL is described in the VTL User and Reference Guides available on the SDMX website https://sdmx.org.{{/footnote}}. The purpose of the VTL in the SDMX context is to enable the:
++The Validation and Transformation Language (VTL) supports the definition of Transformations, which are algorithms to calculate new data starting from already existing ones^^[[^^5^^>>path:#sdfootnote5sym||name="sdfootnote5anc"]]^^. The purpose of the VTL in the SDMX context is to enable the:
  * definition of validation and transformation algorithms, in order to specify how to calculate new data from existing ones;
  * exchange of the definition of VTL algorithms, also together the definition of the data structures of the involved data (for example, exchange the data structures of a reporting framework together with the validation rules to be applied, exchange the input and output data structures of a calculation task together with the VTL Transformations describing the calculation algorithms);
@@ -12,10 +12,12 @@
  It is important to note that the VTL has its own information model (IM), derived from the Generic Statistical Information Model (GSIM) and described in the VTL User Guide. The VTL IM is designed to be compatible with more standards, like SDMX, DDI (Data Documentation Initiative) and GSIM, and includes the model artefacts that can be manipulated (inputs and/or outputs of Transformations, e.g. "Data Set", "Data Structure") and the model artefacts that allow the definition of the transformation algorithms (e.g. "Transformation", "Transformation Scheme").
--The VTL language can be applied to SDMX artefacts by mapping the SDMX IM model artefacts to the model artefacts that VTL can manipulate{{footnote}}In this chapter, in order to distinguish VTL and SDMX model artefacts, the VTL ones are written in the Arial font while the SDMX ones in Courier New{{/footnote}}. Thus, the SDMX artefacts can be used in VTL as inputs and/or outputs of Transformations. It is important to be aware that the artefacts do not always have the same names in the SDMX and VTL IMs, nor do they always have the same meaning. The more evident example is given by the SDMX Dataset and the VTL "Data Set", which do not correspond one another: as a matter of fact, the VTL "Data Set" maps to the SDMX "Dataflow", while the SDMX "Dataset" has no explicit mapping to VTL (such an abstraction is not needed in the definition of VTL Transformations). A SDMX "Dataset", however, is an instance of a SDMX "Dataflow" and can be the artefact on which the VTL transformations are executed (i.e., the Transformations are defined on Dataflows and are applied to Dataflow instances that can be Datasets).
++The VTL language can be applied to SDMX artefacts by mapping the SDMX IM model artefacts to the model artefacts that VTL can manipulate^^[[^^6^^>>path:#sdfootnote6sym||name="sdfootnote6anc"]]^^. Thus, the SDMX artefacts can be used in VTL as inputs and/or outputs of Transformations. It is important to be aware that the artefacts do not always have the same names in the SDMX and VTL IMs, nor do they always have the same meaning. The more evident example is given by the SDMX Dataset and the VTL "Data Set", which do not correspond one another: as a matter of fact, the VTL "Data Set" maps to the SDMX "Dataflow", while the SDMX "Dataset" has no explicit mapping to VTL (such an abstraction is not needed in the definition of VTL Transformations). A SDMX "Dataset", however, is an instance of a SDMX "Dataflow" and can be the artefact on which the VTL transformations are executed (i.e., the Transformations are defined on Dataflows and are applied to Dataflow instances that can be Datasets).
--The VTL programs (Transformation Schemes) are represented in SDMX through the TransformationScheme maintainable class which is composed of Transformation (nameable artefact). Each Transformation assigns the outcome of the evaluation of a VTL expression to a result.
++The VTL programs (Transformation Schemes) are represented in SDMX through the TransformationScheme maintainable class which is composed of
++Transformation (nameable artefact). Each Transformation assigns the outcome of the evaluation of a VTL expression to a result.
++
  This section does not explain the VTL language or any of the content published in the VTL guides. Rather, this is a description of how the VTL can be used in the SDMX context and applied to SDMX artefacts.
  == 12.2 References to SDMX artefacts from VTL statements ==
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
  In any case, the aliases used in the VTL Transformations have to be mapped to the
--SDMX artefacts through the VtlMappingScheme and VtlMapping classes (see the section of the SDMX IM relevant to the VTL). A VtlMapping allows specifying the aliases to be used in the VTL Transformations, Rulesets{{footnote}}See also the section "VTL-DL Rulesets" in the VTL Reference Manual.{{/footnote}} or User Defined Operators{{footnote}}The VTLMappings are used also for User Defined Operators (UDO). Although UDOs are envisaged to be defined on generic operands, so that the specific artefacts to be manipulated are passed as parameters at their invocation, it is also possible that an UDO invokes directly some specific SDMX artefacts. These SDMX artefacts have to be mapped to the corresponding aliases used in the definition of the UDO through the VtlMappingScheme and VtlMapping classes as well.{{/footnote}} to reference SDMX artefacts. A VtlMappingScheme is a container for zero or more VtlMapping.
++SDMX artefacts through the VtlMappingScheme and VtlMapping classes (see the section of the SDMX IM relevant to the VTL). A VtlMapping allows specifying the aliases to be used in the VTL Transformations, Rulesets^^[[^^7^^>>path:#sdfootnote7sym||name="sdfootnote7anc"]]^^ or User Defined Operators^^[[^^8^^>>path:#sdfootnote8sym||name="sdfootnote8anc"]]^^ to reference SDMX artefacts. A VtlMappingScheme is a container for zero or more VtlMapping.
  The correspondence between an alias and a SDMX artefact must be one-to-one, meaning that a generic alias identifies one and just one SDMX artefact while a SDMX artefact is identified by one and just one alias. In other words, within a VtlMappingScheme an artefact can have just one alias and different artefacts cannot have the same alias.
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
  This approach has the advantage that in the VTL code the URN of the referenced artefacts is directly intelligible by a human reader but has the drawback that the references are verbose.
--The SDMX URN{{footnote}}For a complete description of the structure of the URN see the SDMX 2.1 Standards - Section 5 - Registry Specifications, paragraph 6.2.2 ("Universal Resource Name (URN)").{{/footnote}} is the concatenation of the following parts, separated by special symbols like dot, equal, asterisk, comma, and parenthesis:
++The SDMX URN^^[[^^9^^>>path:#sdfootnote9sym||name="sdfootnote9anc"]]^^ is the concatenation of the following parts, separated by special symbols like dot, equal, asterisk, comma, and parenthesis:
  * SDMXprefix
  * SDMX-IM-package-name
@@ -46,13 +46,15 @@
  * agency-id
  * maintainedobject-id
  * maintainedobject-version
--* container-object-id{{footnote}}The container-object-id can repeat and may not be present.{{/footnote}}
++* container-object-id ^^[[^^10^^>>path:#sdfootnote10sym||name="sdfootnote10anc"]]^^
  * object-id
  The generic structure of the URN is the following:
--SDMXprefix.SDMX-IM-package-name.class-name=agency-id:maintainedobject-id (maintainedobject-version).*container-object-id.object-id
++SDMXprefix.SDMX-IM-package-name.class-name=agency-id:maintainedobject-id
++(maintainedobject-version).*container-object-id.object-id
++
  The **SDMXprefix** is "urn:sdmx:org", always the same for all SDMX artefacts.
  The SDMX-IM-package-name** **is the concatenation of the string** **"sdmx.infomodel." with the package-name, which the artefact belongs to. For example, for referencing a Dataflow the SDMX-IM-package-name is "sdmx.infomodel.datastructure", because the class Dataflow belongs to the package "datastructure".
@@ -61,10 +61,13 @@
  The agency-id is the acronym of the agency that owns the definition of the artefact, for example for the Eurostat artefacts the agency-id is "ESTAT"). The agency-id can be composite (for example AgencyA.Dept1.Unit2).
--The maintainedobject-id is the name of the maintained object which the artefact belongs to, and in case the artefact itself is maintainable{{footnote}}i.e., the artefact belongs to a maintainable class{{/footnote}}, coincides with the name of the artefact. Therefore the maintainedobject-id depends on the class of the artefact:
++The maintainedobject-id is the name of the maintained object which the artefact belongs to, and in case the artefact itself is maintainable^^[[^^11^^>>path:#sdfootnote11sym||name="sdfootnote11anc"]]^^, coincides with the name of the artefact. Therefore the maintainedobject-id depends on the class of the artefact:
  * if the artefact is a Dataflow, which is a maintainable class, the maintainedobject-id is the Dataflow name (dataflow-id);
--* if the artefact is a Dimension, Measure, TimeDimension or DataAttribute, which are not maintainable and belong to the DataStructure maintainable class, the maintainedobject-id is the name of the DataStructure (dataStructure-id) which the artefact belongs to;
++* if the artefact is a Dimension, Measure, TimeDimension or DataAttribute, which are not maintainable and belong to the
++
++DataStructure maintainable class, the maintainedobject-id is the name of the DataStructure (dataStructure-id) which the artefact belongs to;
++
  * if the artefact is a Concept, which is not maintainable and belongs to the ConceptScheme maintainable class, the maintainedobject-id is the name of the ConceptScheme (conceptScheme-id) which the artefact belongs to;
  * if the artefact is a Codelist, which is a maintainable class, the maintainedobject-id is the Codelist name (codelist-id).
@@ -77,10 +77,12 @@
  * if the artefact is a Dimension, TimeDimension, Measure or DataAttribute (the object-id is the name of one of the artefacts above, which are data structure components)
  * if the artefact is a Concept (the object-id is the name of the Concept)
--For example, by using the URN, the VTL Transformation that sums two SDMX Dataflows DF1 and DF2 and assigns the result to a third persistent Dataflow DFR, assuming that DF1, DF2 and DFR are the maintainedobject-id of the three Dataflows, that their version is 1.0.0 and their Agency is AG, would be written as{{footnote}}Since these references to SDMX objects include non-permitted characters as per the VTL ID notation, they need to be included between single quotes, according to the VTL rules for irregular names.{{/footnote}}:
++For example, by using the URN, the VTL Transformation that sums two SDMX Dataflows DF1 and DF2 and assigns the result to a third persistent Dataflow DFR, assuming that DF1, DF2 and DFR are the maintainedobject-id of the three Dataflows, that their version is 1.0.0 and their Agency is AG, would be written as^^[[^^12^^>>path:#sdfootnote12sym||name="sdfootnote12anc"]]^^:
  'urn:sdmx:org.sdmx.infomodel.datastructure.Dataflow=AG:DFR(1.0.0)' <-
++
  'urn:sdmx:org.sdmx.infomodel.datastructure.Dataflow=AG:DF1(1.0.0)' +
++
  'urn:sdmx:org.sdmx.infomodel.datastructure.Dataflow=AG:DF2(1.0.0)'
  === 12.2.3 Abbreviation of the URN ===
@@ -89,10 +89,10 @@
  The URN can be abbreviated by omitting the parts that are not essential for the identification of the artefact or that can be deduced from other available information, including the context in which the invocation is made. The possible abbreviations are described below.
--* The SDMXprefix can be omitted for all the SDMX objects, because it is a prefixed string (urn:sdmx:org), always the same for SDMX objects. • The SDMX-IM-package-name** **can be omitted as well because it can be deduced from the class-name that follows it (the table of the SDMX-IM packages and classes that allows this deduction is in the SDMX 2.1 Standards - Section 5 - Registry Specifications, paragraph 6.2.3). In particular, considering the object classes of the artefacts that VTL can reference, the package is:
++* The SDMXprefix can be omitted for all the SDMX objects, because it is a prefixed string (urn:sdmx:org), always the same for SDMX objects. • The SDMX-IM-package-name** &nbsp;**can be omitted as well because it can be deduced from the class-name that follows it (the table of the SDMX-IM packages and classes that allows this deduction is in the SDMX 2.1 Standards - Section 5 - Registry Specifications, paragraph 6.2.3). In particular, considering the object classes of the artefacts that VTL can reference, the package is:
  ** "datastructure" for the classes Dataflow, Dimension, TimeDimension, Measure, DataAttribute, o "conceptscheme" for the class Concept, o "codelist" for the class Codelist.
--* The class-name can be omitted as it can be deduced from the VTL invocation. In particular, starting from the VTL class of the invoked artefact (e.g. dataset, component, identifier, measure, attribute, variable, valuedomain), which is known given the syntax of the invoking VTL operator{{footnote}}For the syntax of the VTL operators see the VTL Reference Manual{{/footnote}}, the SDMX class can be deduced from the mapping rules between VTL and SDMX (see the section "Mapping between VTL and SDMX" hereinafter){{footnote}}In case the invoked artefact is a VTL component, which can be invoked only within the invocation of a VTL data set (SDMX Dataflow), the specific SDMX class-name (e.g. Dimension, TimeDimension, Measure or DataAttribute) can be deduced from the data structure of the SDMX Dataflow, which the component belongs to.{{/footnote}}.
--* If the agency-id is not specified, it is assumed by default equal to the agency-id of the TransformationScheme, UserDefinedOperatorScheme or RulesetScheme from which the artefact is invoked. For example, the agencyid can be omitted if it is the same as the invoking TransformationScheme and cannot be omitted if the artefact comes from another agency{{footnote}}If the Agency is composite (for example AgencyA.Dept1.Unit2), the agency is considered different even if only part of the composite name is different (for example AgencyA.Dept1.Unit3 is a different Agency than the previous one). Moreover the agency-id cannot be omitted in part (i.e., if a TransformationScheme owned by AgencyA.Dept1.Unit2 references an artefact coming from AgencyA.Dept1.Unit3, the specification of the agency-id becomes mandatory and must be complete, without omitting the possibly equal parts like AgencyA.Dept1){{/footnote}}. Take also into account that, according to the VTL consistency rules, the agency of the result of a Transformation must be the same as its TransformationScheme, therefore the agency-id can be omitted for all the results (left part of Transformation statements).
++* The class-name can be omitted as it can be deduced from the VTL invocation. In particular, starting from the VTL class of the invoked artefact (e.g. dataset, component, identifier, measure, attribute, variable, valuedomain), which is known given the syntax of the invoking VTL operator^^[[^^13^^>>path:#sdfootnote13sym||name="sdfootnote13anc"]]^^, the SDMX class can be deduced from the mapping rules between VTL and SDMX (see the section "Mapping between VTL and SDMX" hereinafter)^^[[^^14^^>>path:#sdfootnote14sym||name="sdfootnote14anc"]]^^.
++* If the agency-id is not specified, it is assumed by default equal to the agency-id of the TransformationScheme, UserDefinedOperatorScheme or RulesetScheme from which the artefact is invoked. For example, the agencyid can be omitted if it is the same as the invoking TransformationScheme and cannot be omitted if the artefact comes from another agency^^[[^^15^^>>path:#sdfootnote15sym||name="sdfootnote15anc"]]^^. Take also into account that, according to the VTL consistency rules, the agency of the result of a Transformation must be the same as its TransformationScheme, therefore the agency-id can be omitted for all the results (left part of Transformation statements).
  * As for the maintainedobject-id, this is essential in some cases while in other cases it can be omitted: o if the referenced artefact is a Dataflow, which is a maintainable class, the maintainedobject-id is the dataflow-id and obviously cannot be omitted;
  ** if the referenced artefact is a Dimension, TimeDimension, Measure, DataAttribute, which are not maintainable and belong to the DataStructure maintainable class, the maintainedobject-id is the dataStructure-id and can be omitted, given that these components are always invoked within the invocation of a Dataflow, whose dataStructure-id can be deduced from the SDMX structural definitions;
  ** if the referenced artefact is a Concept, which is not maintainable and belong to the ConceptScheme maintainable class, the maintained object is the conceptScheme-id and cannot be omitted;
@@ -105,7 +105,9 @@
  For example, the full formulation that uses the complete URN shown at the end of the previous paragraph:
  'urn:sdmx:org.sdmx.infomodel.datastructure.Dataflow=AG:DFR(1.0.0)' :=
++
  'urn:sdmx:org.sdmx.infomodel.datastructure.Dataflow=AG:DF1(1.0.0)' +
++
  'urn:sdmx:org.sdmx.infomodel.datastructure.Dataflow=AG:DF2(1.0.0)'
  by omitting all the non-essential parts would become simply:
@@ -112,11 +112,11 @@
  DFR := DF1 + DF2
--The references to the Codelists can be simplified similarly. For example, given the non-abbreviated reference to the Codelist AG:CL_FREQ(1.0.0), which is{{footnote}}Single quotes are needed because this reference is not a VTL regular name.{{/footnote}}:
++The references to the Codelists can be simplified similarly. For example, given the non-abbreviated reference to the Codelist AG:CL_FREQ(1.0.0), which is^^[[^^16^^>>path:#sdfootnote16sym||name="sdfootnote16anc"]]^^:
  'urn:sdmx:org.sdmx.infomodel.codelist.Codelist=AG:CL_FREQ(1.0.0)'
--if the Codelist is referenced from a RulesetScheme belonging to the agency AG, omitting all the optional parts, the abbreviated reference would become simply{{footnote}}Single quotes are not needed in this case because CL_FREQ is a VTL regular name.{{/footnote}}:
++if the Codelist is referenced from a RulesetScheme belonging to the agency AG, omitting all the optional parts, the abbreviated reference would become simply^^19^^:
  CL_FREQ
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@
  SECTOR
--For example, the Transformation for renaming the component SECTOR of the Dataflow DF1 into SEC can be written as{{footnote}}The result DFR(1.0.0) is be equal to DF1(1.0.0) save that the component SECTOR is called SEC{{/footnote}}:
++For example, the Transformation for renaming the component SECTOR of the Dataflow DF1 into SEC can be written as^^[[^^17^^>>path:#sdfootnote17sym||name="sdfootnote17anc"]]^^:
  'DFR(1.0.0)' := 'DF1(1.0.0)' [rename SECTOR to SEC]
@@ -162,9 +162,9 @@
  The VTL Rulesets have a signature, in which the Value Domains or the Variables on which the Ruleset is defined are declared, and a body, which contains the Rules.
--In the signature, given the mapping between VTL and SDMX better described in the following paragraphs, a reference to a VTL Value Domain becomes a reference to a SDMX Codelist, while a reference to a VTL Represented Variable becomes a reference to a SDMX Concept, assuming for it a definite representation{{footnote}}Rulesets of this kind cannot be reused when the referenced Concept has a different representation.{{/footnote}}.
++In the signature, given the mapping between VTL and SDMX better described in the following paragraphs, a reference to a VTL Value Domain becomes a reference to a SDMX Codelist, while a reference to a VTL Represented Variable becomes a reference to a SDMX Concept, assuming for it a definite representation^^[[^^18^^>>path:#sdfootnote18sym||name="sdfootnote18anc"]]^^.
--In general, for referencing SDMX Codelists and Concepts, the conventions described in the previous paragraphs apply. In the Ruleset syntax, the elements that reference SDMX artefacts are called "valueDomain" and "variable" for the Datapoint Rulesets and "ruleValueDomain", "ruleVariable", "condValueDomain" "condVariable" for the Hierarchical Rulesets). The syntax of the Ruleset signature allows also to define aliases of the elements above, these aliases are valid only within the specific Ruleset definition statement and cannot be mapped to SDMX.{{footnote}}See also the section "VTL-DL Rulesets" in the VTL Reference Manual.{{/footnote}}
++In general, for referencing SDMX Codelists and Concepts, the conventions described in the previous paragraphs apply. In the Ruleset syntax, the elements that reference SDMX artefacts are called "valueDomain" and "variable" for the Datapoint Rulesets and "ruleValueDomain", "ruleVariable", "condValueDomain" "condVariable" for the Hierarchical Rulesets). The syntax of the Ruleset signature allows also to define aliases of the elements above, these aliases are valid only within the specific Ruleset definition statement and cannot be mapped to SDMX.^^[[^^19^^>>path:#sdfootnote19sym||name="sdfootnote19anc"]]^^
  In the body of the Rulesets, the Codes and in general all the Values can be written without any other specification, because the artefact, which the Values are referred (Codelist, Concept) to can be deduced from the Ruleset signature.
@@ -176,15 +176,15 @@
  Every time a SDMX object is referenced in a VTL Transformation as an input operand, there is the need to generate a VTL definition of the object, so that the VTL operations can take place. This can be made starting from the SDMX definition and applying a SDMX-VTL mapping method in the direction from SDMX to VTL. The possible mapping methods from SDMX to VTL are described in the following paragraphs and are conceived to allow the automatic deduction of the VTL definition of the object from the knowledge of the SDMX definition.
--In the opposite direction, every time an object calculated by means of VTL must be treated as a SDMX object (for example for exchanging it through SDMX), there is the need of a SDMX definition of the object, so that the SDMX operations can take place. The SDMX definition is needed for the VTL objects for which a SDMX use is envisaged{{footnote}}If a calculated artefact is persistent, it needs a persistent definition, i.e. a SDMX definition in a SDMX environment. In addition, possible calculated artefact that are not persistent may require a SDMX definition, for example when the result of a non-persistent calculation is disseminated through SDMX tools (like an inquiry tool).{{/footnote}}.
++In the opposite direction, every time an object calculated by means of VTL must be treated as a SDMX object (for example for exchanging it through SDMX), there is the need of a SDMX definition of the object, so that the SDMX operations can take place. The SDMX definition is needed for the VTL objects for which a SDMX use is envisaged^^[[^^20^^>>path:#sdfootnote20sym||name="sdfootnote20anc"]]^^.
  The mapping methods from VTL to SDMX are described in the following paragraphs as well, however they do not allow the complete SDMX definition to be automatically deduced from the VTL definition, more than all because the former typically contains additional information in respect to the latter. For example, the definition of a SDMX DSD includes also some mandatory information not available in VTL (like the concept scheme to which the SDMX components refer, the ‘usage’ and ‘attributeRelationship’ for the DataAttributes and so on). Therefore the mapping methods from VTL to SDMX provide only a general guidance for generating SDMX definitions properly starting from the information available in VTL, independently of how the SDMX definition it is actually generated (manually, automatically or part and part).
  === 12.3.2 General mapping of VTL and SDMX data structures ===
--This section makes reference to the VTL "Model for data and their structure"{{footnote}}See the VTL 2.0 User Manual{{/footnote}} and the correspondent SDMX "Data Structure Definition"{{footnote}}See the SDMX Standards Section 2 – Information Model{{/footnote}}.
++This section makes reference to the VTL "Model for data and their structure"^^[[^^21^^>>path:#sdfootnote21sym||name="sdfootnote21anc"]]^^ and the correspondent SDMX "Data Structure Definition"^^[[^^22^^>>path:#sdfootnote22sym||name="sdfootnote22anc"]]^^.
--The main type of artefact that the VTL can manipulate is the VTL Data Set, which in general is mapped to the SDMX Dataflow. This means that a VTL Transformation, in the SDMX context, expresses the algorithm for calculating a derived Dataflow starting from some already existing Dataflows (either collected or derived).{{footnote}}Besides the mapping between one SDMX Dataflow and one VTL Data Set, it is also possible to map distinct parts of a SDMX Dataflow to different VTL Data Set, as explained in a following paragraph.{{/footnote}}
++The main type of artefact that the VTL can manipulate is the VTL Data Set, which in general is mapped to the SDMX Dataflow. This means that a VTL Transformation, in the SDMX context, expresses the algorithm for calculating a derived Dataflow starting from some already existing Dataflows (either collected or derived).^^[[^^23^^>>path:#sdfootnote23sym||name="sdfootnote23anc"]]^^
  While the VTL Transformations are defined in term of Dataflow definitions, they are assumed to be executed on instances of such Dataflows, provided at runtime to the VTL engine (the mechanism for identifying the instances to be processed are not part of the VTL specifications and depend on the implementation of the VTL-based systems). As already said, the SDMX Datasets are instances of SDMX Dataflows, therefore a VTL Transformation defined on some SDMX Dataflows can be applied on some corresponding SDMX Datasets.
@@ -204,28 +204,32 @@
  The main mapping method from SDMX to VTL is called **Basic **mapping. This is considered as the default mapping method and is applied unless a different method is specified through the VtlMappingScheme and VtlDataflowMapping classes. When transforming **from SDMX to VTL**, this method consists in leaving the components unchanged and maintaining their names and roles, according to the following table:
--(% style="width:529.294px" %)
--|(% style="width:151px" %)**SDMX**|(% style="width:375px" %)**VTL**
--|(% style="width:151px" %)Dimension|(% style="width:375px" %)(Simple) Identifier
--|(% style="width:151px" %)TimeDimension|(% style="width:375px" %)(Time) Identifier
--|(% style="width:151px" %)Measure|(% style="width:375px" %)Measure
--|(% style="width:151px" %)DataAttribute|(% style="width:375px" %)Attribute
++|**SDMX**|**VTL**
++|Dimension|(Simple) Identifier
++|TimeDimension|(Time) Identifier
++[[image:SDMX 3-0-0 SECTION 6 FINAL-1.0_en_59eee18f.gif||alt="Shape4" height="1" width="192"]]
++
++|Measure|Measure
++|DataAttribute|Attribute
++
  The SDMX DataAttributes, in VTL they are all considered "at data point / observation level" (i.e. dependent on all the VTL Identifiers), because VTL does not have the SDMX AttributeRelationships, which defines the construct to which the DataAttribute is related (e.g. observation, dimension or set or group of dimensions, whole data set).
--With the Basic mapping, one SDMX observation{{footnote}}Here an SDMX observation is meant to correspond to one combination of values of the DimensionComponents.{{/footnote}} generates one VTL data point.
++With the Basic mapping, one SDMX observation^^27^^ generates one VTL data point.
--==== 12.3.3.2 Pivot Mapping ====
++**12.3.3.2 Pivot Mapping**
  An alternative mapping method from SDMX to VTL is the **Pivot **mapping, which makes sense and is different from the Basic method only for the SDMX data structures that contain a Dimension that plays the role of measure dimension (like in SDMX 2.1) and just one Measure. Through this method, these structures can be mapped to multimeasure VTL data structures. Besides that, a user may choose to use any Dimension acting as a list of Measures (e.g., a Dimension with indicators), either by considering the “Measure” role of a Dimension, or at will using any coded Dimension. Of course, in SDMX 3.0, this can only work when only one Measure is defined in the DSD.
--In SDMX 2.1 the MeasureDimension was a subclass of DimensionComponent like Dimension and TimeDimension. In the current SDMX version, this subclass does not exist anymore, however a Dimension can have the role of measure dimension (i.e. a Dimension that contributes to the identification of the measures). In SDMX 2.1 a DataStructure could have zero or one MeasureDimensions, in the current version of the standard, from zero to many Dimension may have the role of measure dimension. Hereinafter a Dimension that plays the role of measure dimension is referenced for simplicity as “MeasureDimension“, i.e. maintaining the capital letters and the courier font even if the MeasureDimension is not anymore a class in the SDMX Information Model of the current SDMX version. For the sake of simplicity, the description below considers just one Dimension having the role of MeasureDimension (i.e., the more simple and common case). Nevertheless, it maintains its validity also if in the DataStructure there are more dimension with the role of MeasureDimensions: in this case what is said about the MeasureDimension must be applied to the combination of all the MeasureDimensions considered as a joint variable{{footnote}}E.g., if in the data structure there exist 3 Dimensions C,D,E having the role of MeasureDimension, they should be considered as a joint MeasureDimension Z=(C,D,E); therefore when the description says “each possible value Cj of the MeasureDimension …” it means “each possible combination of values (Cj, Dk, Ew) of the joint MeasureDimension Z=(C,D,E)”.{{/footnote}}.
++In SDMX 2.1 the MeasureDimension was a subclass of DimensionComponent like Dimension and TimeDimension. In the current SDMX version, this subclass does not exist anymore, however a Dimension can have the role of measure dimension (i.e. a Dimension that contributes to the identification of the measures). In SDMX 2.1 a DataStructure could have zero or one MeasureDimensions, in the current version of the standard, from zero to many Dimension may have the role of measure dimension. Hereinafter a Dimension that plays the role of measure dimension is referenced for simplicity as “MeasureDimension“, i.e. maintaining the capital letters and the courier font even if the MeasureDimension is not anymore a class in the SDMX Information Model of the current SDMX version. For the sake of simplicity, the description below considers just one Dimension having the role of MeasureDimension (i.e., the more simple and common case). Nevertheless, it maintains its validity also if in the DataStructure there are more dimension with the role of MeasureDimensions: in this case what is said about the MeasureDimension must be applied to the combination of all the
++MeasureDimensions considered as a joint variable^^[[^^24^^>>path:#sdfootnote24sym||name="sdfootnote24anc"]]^^.
++
  Among other things, the Pivot method provides also backward compatibility with the SDMX 2.1 data structures that contained a MeasureDimension.
  If applied to SDMX structures that do not contain any MeasureDimension, this method behaves like the Basic mapping (see the previous paragraph).
--Here an SDMX observation is meant to correspond to one combination of values of the DimensionComponents.
++^^27^^ Here an SDMX observation is meant to correspond to one combination of values of the DimensionComponents.
  The SDMX structures that contain a MeasureDimension are mapped as described below (this mapping is equivalent to a pivoting operation):
@@ -241,22 +241,25 @@
  AttributeRelationship is not specified (i.e. the DataAttribute does not depend on any DimensionComponent and therefore is at data set level), or if it refers to a set (or a group) of dimensions which does not include the MeasureDimension;
--*
++*
  ** Otherwise, if, according to the SDMX AttributeRelationship, the values of the DataAttribute depend on the MeasureDimension, the SDMX DataAttribute is mapped to one VTL Attribute for each possible Code of the SDMX MeasureDimension. By default, the names of the VTL Attributes are obtained by concatenating the name of the SDMX DataAttribute and the names of the correspondent Code of the MeasureDimension separated by underscore. For example, if the SDMX DataAttribute is named DA and the possible Codes of the SDMX MeasureDimension are named C1, C2, …, Cn, then the corresponding VTL Attributes will be named DA_C1, DA_C2, …, DA_Cn (if different names are desired, they can be achieved afterwards by renaming the Attributes through VTL operators).
  ** Like in the Basic mapping, the resulting VTL Attributes are considered as dependent on all the VTL identifiers (i.e. "at data point / observation level"), because VTL does not have the SDMX notion of Attribute Relationship.
  The summary mapping table of the "pivot" mapping from SDMX to VTL for the SDMX data structures that contain a MeasureDimension is the following:
--(% style="width:769.294px" %)
--|(% style="width:401px" %)**SDMX**|(% style="width:366px" %)**VTL**
--|(% style="width:401px" %)Dimension|(% style="width:366px" %)(Simple) Identifier
--|(% style="width:401px" %)TimeDimension|(% style="width:366px" %)(Time) Identifier
--|(% style="width:401px" %)MeasureDimension & one Measure|(% style="width:366px" %)(((
--One Measure for each Code of the SDMX MeasureDimension
++|**SDMX**|**VTL**
++|Dimension|(Simple) Identifier
++|TimeDimension|(Time) Identifier
++|MeasureDimension & one Measure|(((
++One Measure for each Code of the
++
++SDMX MeasureDimension
  )))
--|(% style="width:401px" %)DataAttribute not depending on the MeasureDimension|(% style="width:366px" %)Attribute
--|(% style="width:401px" %)DataAttribute depending on the MeasureDimension|(% style="width:366px" %)(((
--One Attribute for each Code of the SDMX MeasureDimension
++|DataAttribute not depending on the MeasureDimension|Attribute
++|DataAttribute depending on the MeasureDimension|(((
++One Attribute for each Code of the
++
++SDMX MeasureDimension
  )))
  Using this mapping method, the components of the data structure can change in the conversion from SDMX to VTL and it must be taken into account that the VTL statements can reference only the components of the resulting VTL data structure.
@@ -271,7 +271,7 @@
  * The value of the Measure of the SDMX observation belonging to the set above and having MeasureDimension=Cj becomes the value of the VTL Measure Cj
  * For the SDMX DataAttributes depending on the MeasureDimension, the value of the DataAttribute DA of the SDMX observation belonging to the set above and having MeasureDimension=Cj becomes the value of the VTL Attribute DA_Cj
--==== 12.3.3.3 From SDMX DataAttributes to VTL Measures ====
++**12.3.3.3 From SDMX DataAttributes to VTL Measures**
  * In some cases, it may happen that the DataAttributes of the SDMX DataStructure need to be managed as Measures in VTL. Therefore, a variant of both the methods above consists in transforming all the SDMX DataAttributes in VTL Measures. When DataAttributes are converted to Measures, the two methods above are called Basic_A2M and Pivot_A2M (the suffix "A2M" stands for Attributes to Measures). Obviously, the resulting VTL data structure is, in general, multi-measure and does not contain
@@ -283,7 +283,7 @@
  === 12.3.4 Mapping from VTL to SDMX data structures ===
--==== 12.3.4.1 Basic Mapping ====
++**12.3.4.1 Basic Mapping**
  The main mapping method **from VTL to SDMX** is called **Basic **mapping as well.
@@ -293,12 +293,11 @@
  Mapping table:
--(% style="width:667.294px" %)
--|(% style="width:272px" %)**VTL**|(% style="width:392px" %)**SDMX**
--|(% style="width:272px" %)(Simple) Identifier|(% style="width:392px" %)Dimension
--|(% style="width:272px" %)(Time) Identifier|(% style="width:392px" %)TimeDimension
--|(% style="width:272px" %)Measure|(% style="width:392px" %)Measure
--|(% style="width:272px" %)Attribute|(% style="width:392px" %)DataAttribute
++|**VTL**|**SDMX**
++|(Simple) Identifier|Dimension
++|(Time) Identifier|TimeDimension
++|Measure|Measure
++|Attribute|DataAttribute
  If the distinction between simple identifier and time identifier is not maintained in the VTL environment, the classification between Dimension and TimeDimension exists only in SDMX, as declared in the relevant DataStructureDefinition.
@@ -308,7 +308,7 @@
  As said, the resulting SDMX definitions must be compliant with the SDMX consistency rules. For example, the SDMX DSD must have the AttributeRelationship for the DataAttributes, which does not exist in VTL.
--==== 12.3.4.2 Unpivot Mapping ====
++**12.3.4.2 Unpivot Mapping**
  An alternative mapping method from VTL to SDMX is the **Unpivot **mapping.
@@ -332,12 +332,11 @@
  The summary mapping table of the **unpivot** mapping method is the following:
--(% style="width:994.294px" %)
--|(% style="width:306px" %)**VTL**|(% style="width:684px" %)**SDMX**
--|(% style="width:306px" %)(Simple) Identifier|(% style="width:684px" %)Dimension
--|(% style="width:306px" %)(Time) Identifier|(% style="width:684px" %)TimeDimension
--|(% style="width:306px" %)All Measure Components|(% style="width:684px" %)MeasureDimension (having one Code for each VTL measure component) & one Measure
--|(% style="width:306px" %)Attribute|(% style="width:684px" %)DataAttribute depending on all SDMX Dimensions including the TimeDimension and except the MeasureDimension
++|**VTL**|**SDMX**
++|(Simple) Identifier|Dimension
++|(Time) Identifier|TimeDimension
++|All Measure Components|MeasureDimension (having one Code for each VTL measure component) & one Measure
++|Attribute|DataAttribute depending on all SDMX Dimensions including the TimeDimension and except the MeasureDimension
  At observation / data point level:
@@ -351,7 +351,7 @@
  In any case, the resulting SDMX definitions must be compliant with the SDMX consistency rules. For example, the possible Codes of the SDMX MeasureDimension need to be listed in a SDMX Codelist, with proper id, agency and version; moreover, the SDMX DSD must have the AttributeRelationship for the DataAttributes, which does not exist in VTL.
--==== 12.3.4.3 From VTL Measures to SDMX Data Attributes ====
++**12.3.4.3 From VTL Measures to SDMX Data Attributes**
  More than all for the multi-measure VTL structures (having more than one Measure Component), it may happen that the Measures of the VTL Data Structure need to be managed as DataAttributes in SDMX. Therefore, a third mapping method consists in transforming some VTL measures in a corresponding SDMX Measures and all the other VTL Measures in SDMX DataAttributes. This method is called M2A (“M2A” stands for “Measures to DataAttributes”).
@@ -359,13 +359,12 @@
  The mapping table is the following:
--(% style="width:689.294px" %)
--|(% style="width:344px" %)VTL|(% style="width:341px" %)SDMX
--|(% style="width:344px" %)(Simple) Identifier|(% style="width:341px" %)Dimension
--|(% style="width:344px" %)(Time) Identifier|(% style="width:341px" %)TimeDimension
--|(% style="width:344px" %)Some Measures|(% style="width:341px" %)Measure
--|(% style="width:344px" %)Other Measures|(% style="width:341px" %)DataAttribute
--|(% style="width:344px" %)Attribute|(% style="width:341px" %)DataAttribute
++|VTL|SDMX
++|(Simple) Identifier|Dimension
++|(Time) Identifier|TimeDimension
++|Some Measures|Measure
++|Other Measures|DataAttribute
++|Attribute|DataAttribute
  Even in this case, the resulting SDMX definitions must be compliant with the SDMX consistency rules. For example, the SDMX DSD must have the attributeRelationship for the DataAttributes, which does not exist in VTL.
@@ -383,20 +383,20 @@
  Until now it has been assumed to map one SMDX Dataflow to one VTL Data Set and vice-versa. This mapping one-to-one is not mandatory according to VTL because a VTL Data Set is meant to be a set of observations (data points) on a logical plane, having the same logical data structure and the same general meaning, independently of the possible physical representation or storage (see VTL 2.0 User Manual page 24), therefore a SDMX Dataflow can be seen either as a unique set of data observations (corresponding to one VTL Data Set) or as the union of many sets of data observations (each one corresponding to a distinct VTL Data Set).
--As a matter of fact, in some cases it can be useful to define VTL operations involving definite parts of a SDMX Dataflow instead than the whole.{{footnote}}A typical example of this kind is the validation, and more in general the manipulation, of individual time series belonging to the same Dataflow, identifiable through the DimensionComponents of the Dataflow except the TimeDimension. The coding of these kind of operations might be simplified by mapping distinct time series (i.e. different parts of a SDMX Dataflow) to distinct VTL Data Sets.{{/footnote}}
++As a matter of fact, in some cases it can be useful to define VTL operations involving definite parts of a SDMX Dataflow instead than the whole.^^[[^^25^^>>path:#sdfootnote25sym||name="sdfootnote25anc"]]^^
--Therefore, in order to make the coding of VTL operations simpler when applied on parts of SDMX Dataflows, it is allowed to map distinct parts of a SDMX Dataflow to distinct VTL Data Sets according to the following rules and conventions. This kind of mapping is possible both from SDMX to VTL and from VTL to SDMX, as better explained below.{{footnote}}Please note that this kind of mapping is only an option at disposal of the definer of VTL Transformations; in fact it remains always possible to manipulate the needed parts of SDMX Dataflows by means of VTL operators (e.g. “sub”, “filter”, “calc”, “union” …), maintaining a mapping one-to-one between SDMX Dataflows and VTL Data Sets.{{/footnote}}
++Therefore, in order to make the coding of VTL operations simpler when applied on parts of SDMX Dataflows, it is allowed to map distinct parts of a SDMX Dataflow to distinct VTL Data Sets according to the following rules and conventions. This kind of mapping is possible both from SDMX to VTL and from VTL to SDMX, as better explained below.^^[[^^26^^>>path:#sdfootnote26sym||name="sdfootnote26anc"]]^^
  Given a SDMX Dataflow and some predefined Dimensions of its DataStructure, it is allowed to map the subsets of observations that have the same combination of values for such Dimensions to correspondent VTL datasets.
  For example, assuming that the SDMX Dataflow DF1(1.0.0) has the Dimensions INDICATOR, TIME_PERIOD and COUNTRY, and that the user declares the Dimensions INDICATOR and COUNTRY as basis for the mapping (i.e. the mapping dimensions): the observations that have the same values for INDICATOR and COUNTRY would be mapped to the same VTL dataset (and vice-versa). In practice, this kind mapping is obtained like follows:
--* For a given SDMX Dataflow, the user (VTL definer) declares the DimensionComponents on which the mapping will be based, in a given order.{{footnote}}This definition is made through the ToVtlSubspace and ToVtlSpaceKey classes and/or the FromVtlSuperspace and FromVtlSpaceKey classes, depending on the direction of the mapping (“key” means “dimension”). The mapping of Dataflow subsets can be applied independently in the two directions, also according to different Dimensions. When no Dimension is declared for a given direction, it is assumed that the option of mapping different parts of a SDMX Dataflow to different VTL Data Sets is not used.{{/footnote}} Following the example above, imagine that the user declares the Dimensions INDICATOR and COUNTRY.
++* For a given SDMX Dataflow, the user (VTL definer) declares the DimensionComponents on which the mapping will be based, in a given order.^^[[^^27^^>>path:#sdfootnote27sym||name="sdfootnote27anc"]]^^ Following the example above, imagine that the user declares the Dimensions INDICATOR and COUNTRY.
  * The VTL Data Set is given a name using a special notation also called “ordered concatenation” and composed of the following parts:
  ** The reference to the SDMX Dataflow (expressed according to the rules described in the previous paragraphs, i.e. URN, abbreviated URN or another alias); for example DF(1.0.0);
--** a slash (“/”) as a separator;{{footnote}}As a consequence of this formalism, a slash in the name of the VTL Data Set assumes the specific meaning of separator between the name of the Dataflow and the values of some of its Dimensions.{{/footnote}}
++** a slash (“/”) as a separator; ^^[[^^28^^>>path:#sdfootnote28sym||name="sdfootnote28anc"]]^^
--The reference to a specific part of the SDMX Dataflow above, expressed as the concatenation of the values that the SDMX DimensionComponents declared above must have, separated by dots (“.”) and written in the order in which these DimensionComponents are defined{{footnote}}This is the order in which the dimensions are defined in the ToVtlSpaceKey class or in the FromVtlSpaceKey class, depending on the direction of the mapping.{{/footnote}}. For example POPULATION.USA would mean that such a VTL Data Set is mapped to the SDMX observations for which the dimension //INDICATOR// is equal to POPULATION and the dimension //COUNTRY// is equal to USA.
++The reference to a specific part of the SDMX Dataflow above, expressed as the concatenation of the values that the SDMX DimensionComponents declared above must have, separated by dots (“.”) and written in the order in which these DimensionComponents are defined^^[[^^29^^>>path:#sdfootnote29sym||name="sdfootnote29anc"]]^^. For example POPULATION.USA would mean that such a VTL Data Set is mapped to the SDMX observations for which the dimension //INDICATOR// is equal to POPULATION and the dimension //COUNTRY// is equal to USA.
  In the VTL Transformations, this kind of dataset name must be referenced between single quotes because the slash (“/”) is not a regular character according to the VTL rules.
@@ -412,15 +412,15 @@
  Let us now analyse the different meaning of this kind of mapping in the two mapping directions, i.e. from SDMX to VTL and from VTL to SDMX.
--As already said, the mapping from SDMX to VTL happens when the SDMX dataflows are operand of VTL Transformations, instead the mapping from VTL to SDMX happens when the VTL Data Sets that is result of Transformations{{footnote}}It should be remembered that, according to the VTL consistency rules, a given VTL dataset cannot be the result of more than one VTL Transformation.{{/footnote}} need to be treated as SDMX objects. This kind of mapping can be applied independently in the two directions and the Dimensions on which the mapping is based can be different in the two directions: these Dimensions are defined in the ToVtlSpaceKey and in the FromVtlSpaceKey classes respectively.
++As already said, the mapping from SDMX to VTL happens when the SDMX dataflows are operand of VTL Transformations, instead the mapping from VTL to SDMX happens when the VTL Data Sets that is result of Transformations^^[[^^30^^>>path:#sdfootnote30sym||name="sdfootnote30anc"]]^^ need to be treated as SDMX objects. This kind of mapping can be applied independently in the two directions and the Dimensions on which the mapping is based can be different in the two directions: these Dimensions are defined in the ToVtlSpaceKey and in the FromVtlSpaceKey classes respectively.
  First, let us see what happens in the __mapping direction from SDMX to VTL__, i.e. when parts of a SDMX Dataflow (e.g. DF1(1.0.0)) need to be mapped to distinct VTL Data Sets that are operand of some VTL Transformations.
  As already said, each VTL Data Set is assumed to contain all the observations of the
--SDMX Dataflow having INDICATOR=//INDICATORvalue //and COUNTRY=// COUNTRYvalue//. For example, the VTL dataset ‘DF1(1.0.0)/POPULATION.USA’ would contain all the observations of DF1(1.0.0) having INDICATOR = POPULATION and COUNTRY = USA.
++SDMX Dataflow having INDICATOR=//INDICATORvalue //and COUNTRY=// COUNTRYvalue//. For example, the VTL dataset ‘DF1(1.0.0)/POPULATION.USA’ would contain all the observations of DF1(1.0.0) having INDICATOR = POPULATION and COUNTRY = USA.
--In order to obtain the data structure of these VTL Data Sets from the SDMX one, it is assumed that the SDMX DimensionComponents on which the mapping is based are dropped, i.e. not maintained in the VTL data structure; this is possible because their values are fixed for each one of the invoked VTL Data Sets{{footnote}}If these DimensionComponents would not be dropped, the various VTL Data Sets resulting from this kind of mapping would have non-matching values for the Identifiers corresponding to the mapping Dimensions (e.g. POPULATION and COUNTRY). As a consequence, taking into account that the typical binary VTL operations at dataset level (+, -, *, / and so on) are executed on the observations having matching values for the identifiers, it would not be possible to compose the resulting VTL datasets one another (e.g. it would not be possible to calculate the population ratio between USA and CANADA).{{/footnote}}. After that, the mapping method from SDMX to VTL specified for the Dataflow DF1(1.0.0) is applied (i.e.
++In order to obtain the data structure of these VTL Data Sets from the SDMX one, it is assumed that the SDMX DimensionComponents on which the mapping is based are dropped, i.e. not maintained in the VTL data structure; this is possible because their values are fixed for each one of the invoked VTL Data Sets^^[[^^31^^>>path:#sdfootnote31sym||name="sdfootnote31anc"]]^^. After that, the mapping method from SDMX to VTL specified for the Dataflow DF1(1.0.0) is applied (i.e.
  basic, pivot …).
@@ -440,7 +440,7 @@
  … … …
--In fact the VTL operator “sub” has exactly the same behaviour. Therefore, mapping different parts of a SDMX Dataflow to different VTL Data Sets in the direction from SDMX to VTL through the ordered concatenation notation is equivalent to a proper use of the operator “**sub**” on such a Dataflow.{{footnote}}In case the ordered concatenation notation is used, the VTL Transformation described above, e.g. ‘DF1(1.0)/POPULATION.USA’ := DF1(1.0) [ sub INDICATOR=“POPULATION”, COUNTRY=“USA”], is implicitly executed. In order to test the overall compliance of the VTL program to the VTL consistency rules, it has to be considered as part of the VTL program even if it is not explicitly coded.{{/footnote}}
++In fact the VTL operator “sub” has exactly the same behaviour. Therefore, mapping different parts of a SDMX Dataflow to different VTL Data Sets in the direction from SDMX to VTL through the ordered concatenation notation is equivalent to a proper use of the operator “**sub**” on such a Dataflow. ^^[[^^32^^>>path:#sdfootnote32sym||name="sdfootnote32anc"]]^^
  In the direction from SDMX to VTL it is allowed to omit the value of one or more
@@ -468,12 +468,12 @@
  Dataflow DF2(1.0.0) having the Dimensions TIME_PERIOD, INDICATOR, and COUNTRY and that such a programmer finds it convenient to calculate separately the parts of DF2(1.0.0) that have different combinations of values for INDICATOR and COUNTRY:
--* each part is calculated as a VTL derived Data Set, result of a dedicated VTL Transformation;{{footnote}}If the whole DF2(1.0) is calculated by means of just one VTL Transformation, then the mapping between the SDMX Dataflow and the corresponding VTL dataset is one-to-one and this kind of mapping (one SDMX Dataflow to many VTL datasets) does not apply.{{/footnote}}
--* the data structure of all these VTL Data Sets has the TIME_PERIOD identifier and does not have the INDICATOR and COUNTRY identifiers.{{footnote}}This is possible as each VTL dataset corresponds to one particular combination of values of INDICATOR and COUNTRY.{{/footnote}}
++* each part is calculated as a VTL derived Data Set, result of a dedicated VTL Transformation; ^^[[^^33^^>>path:#sdfootnote33sym||name="sdfootnote33anc"]]^^
++* the data structure of all these VTL Data Sets has the TIME_PERIOD identifier and does not have the INDICATOR and COUNTRY identifiers.^^[[^^34^^>>path:#sdfootnote34sym||name="sdfootnote34anc"]]^^
--Under these hypothesis, such derived VTL Data Sets can be mapped to DF2(1.0.0) by declaring the DimensionComponents INDICATOR and COUNTRY as mapping dimensions{{footnote}}The mapping dimensions are defined as FromVtlSpaceKeys of the FromVtlSuperSpace of the VtlDataflowMapping relevant to DF2(1.0).{{/footnote}}.
++Under these hypothesis, such derived VTL Data Sets can be mapped to DF2(1.0.0) by declaring the DimensionComponents INDICATOR and COUNTRY as mapping dimensions^^[[^^35^^>>path:#sdfootnote35sym||name="sdfootnote35anc"]]^^.
--The corresponding VTL Transformations, assuming that the result needs to be persistent, would be of this kind:{{footnote}}the symbol of the VTL persistent assignment is used (<-){{/footnote}}
++The corresponding VTL Transformations, assuming that the result needs to be persistent, would be of this kind:^^ [[^^36^^>>path:#sdfootnote36sym||name="sdfootnote36anc"]]^^
  ‘DF2(1.0.0)/INDICATORvalue.COUNTRYvalue’ <- expression
@@ -529,9 +529,9 @@
  In other words, starting from the datasets explicitly calculated through VTL (in the example ‘DF2(1.0)/GDPPERCAPITA.USA’ and so on), the first step consists in calculating other (non-persistent) VTL datasets (in the example
--DF2bis_GDPPERCAPITA_USA and so on) by adding the identifiers INDICATOR and COUNTRY with the desired values (//INDICATORvalue// and //COUNTRYvalue)//. Finally, all these non-persistent Data Sets are united and give the final result DF2(1.0){{footnote}}The result is persistent in this example but it can be also non persistent if needed.{{/footnote}}, which can be mapped one-to-one to the homonymous SDMX Dataflow having the dimension components TIME_PERIOD, INDICATOR and COUNTRY.
++DF2bis_GDPPERCAPITA_USA and so on) by adding the identifiers INDICATOR and COUNTRY with the desired values (//INDICATORvalue// and //COUNTRYvalue)//. Finally, all these non-persistent Data Sets are united and give the final result DF2(1.0)^^[[^^37^^>>path:#sdfootnote37sym||name="sdfootnote37anc"]]^^, which can be mapped one-to-one to the homonymous SDMX Dataflow having the dimension components TIME_PERIOD, INDICATOR and COUNTRY.
--Therefore, mapping different VTL datasets having the same data structure to different parts of a SDMX Dataflow, i.e. in the direction from VTL to SDMX, through the ordered concatenation notation is equivalent to a proper use of the operators “calc” and “union” on such datasets.{{footnote}}In case the ordered concatenation notation from VTL to SDMX is used, the set of Transformations described above is implicitly performed; therefore, in order to test the overall compliance of the VTL program to the VTL consistency rules, these implicit Transformations have to be considered as part of the VTL program even if they are not explicitly coded.{{/footnote}}
++Therefore, mapping different VTL datasets having the same data structure to different parts of a SDMX Dataflow, i.e. in the direction from VTL to SDMX, through the ordered concatenation notation is equivalent to a proper use of the operators “calc” and “union” on such datasets. ^^[[^^38^^>>path:#sdfootnote38sym||name="sdfootnote38anc"]][[^^39^^>>path:#sdfootnote39sym||name="sdfootnote39anc"]]^^
  It is worth noting that in the direction from VTL to SDMX it is mandatory to specify the value for every Dimension on which the mapping is based (in other word, in the name of the calculated VTL dataset is __not__ possible to omit the value of some of the Dimensions).
@@ -539,51 +539,52 @@
  With reference to the VTL “model for Variables and Value domains”, the following additional mappings have to be considered:
--(% style="width:1170.29px" %)
--|**VTL**|(% style="width:754px" %)**SDMX**
--|**Data Set Component**|(% style="width:754px" %)Although this abstraction exists in SDMX, it does not have an explicit definition and correspond to a Component (either a DimensionComponent or a Measure or a DataAttribute) belonging to one specific Dataflow{{footnote}}Through SDMX Constraints, it is possible to specify the values that a Component of a Dataflow can assume.{{/footnote}}
--|**Represented Variable**|(% style="width:754px" %)(((
++|VTL|SDMX
++|**Data Set Component**|Although this abstraction exists in SDMX, it does not have an explicit definition and correspond to a Component (either a DimensionComponent or a Measure or a DataAttribute) belonging to one specific Dataflow^^43^^
++|**Represented Variable**|(((
  **Concept** with a definite
  Representation
  )))
--|**Value Domain**|(% style="width:754px" %)(((
++|**Value Domain**|(((
  **Representation** (see the Structure
  Pattern in the Base Package)
  )))
--|**Enumerated Value Domain / Code List**|(% style="width:754px" %)**Codelist**
--|**Code**|(% style="width:754px" %)(((
++|**Enumerated Value Domain / Code List**|**Codelist**
++|**Code**|(((
  **Code** (for enumerated
  DimensionComponent, Measure, DataAttribute)
  )))
--|**Described Value Domain**|(% style="width:754px" %)(((
--non-enumerated** Representation**
++|**Described Value Domain**|(((
++non-enumerated** &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Representation**
  (having Facets / ExtendedFacets, see the Structure Pattern in the Base Package)
  )))
--|**Value**|(% style="width:754px" %)Although this abstraction exists in SDMX, it does not have an explicit definition and correspond to a **Code** of a Codelist (for enumerated Representations) or
--| |(% style="width:754px" %)(((
--to a valid **value **(for non-enumerated** **Representations)
++|**Value**|Although this abstraction exists in SDMX, it does not have an explicit definition and correspond to a **Code** of a Codelist (for enumerated Representations) or
++||(((
++to a valid **value &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;**(for non-enumerated** &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;**
++
++Representations)
  )))
--|**Value Domain Subset / Set**|(% style="width:754px" %)This abstraction does not exist in SDMX
--|**Enumerated Value Domain Subset / Enumerated Set**|(% style="width:754px" %)This abstraction does not exist in SDMX
--|**Described Value Domain Subset / Described Set**|(% style="width:754px" %)This abstraction does not exist in SDMX
--|**Set list**|(% style="width:754px" %)This abstraction does not exist in SDMX
++|**Value Domain Subset / Set**|This abstraction does not exist in SDMX
++|**Enumerated Value Domain Subset / Enumerated Set**|This abstraction does not exist in SDMX
++|**Described Value Domain Subset / Described Set**|This abstraction does not exist in SDMX
++|**Set list**|This abstraction does not exist in SDMX
  The main difference between VTL and SDMX relies on the fact that the VTL artefacts for defining subsets of Value Domains do not exist in SDMX, therefore the VTL features for referring to predefined subsets are not available in SDMX. These artefacts are the Value Domain Subset (or Set), either enumerated or described, the Set List (list of values belonging to enumerated subsets) and the Data Set Component (aimed at defining the set of values that the Component of a Data Set can take, possibly a subset of the codes of Value Domain).
--Another difference consists in the fact that all Value Domains are considered as identifiable objects in VTL either if enumerated or not, while in SDMX the Codelist (corresponding to a VTL enumerated Value Domain) is identifiable, while the SDMX non-enumerated Representation (corresponding to a VTL non-enumerated Value Domain) is not identifiable. As a consequence, the definition of the VTL Rulesets, which in VTL can refer either to enumerated or non-enumerated value domains, in SDMX can refer only to enumerated Value Domains (i.e. to SDMX Codelists). As for the mapping between VTL variables and SDMX Concepts, it should be noted that these artefacts do not coincide perfectly. In fact, the VTL variables are represented variables, defined always on the same Value Domain (“Representation” in SDMX) independently of the data set / data structure in which they appear{{footnote}}By using represented variables, VTL can assume that data structures having the same variables as identifiers can be composed one another because the correspondent values can match.{{/footnote}}, while the SDMX Concepts can have different Representations in different DataStructures.{{footnote}}A Concept becomes a Component in a DataStructureDefinition, and Components can have different LocalRepresentations in different DataStructureDefinitions, also overriding the (possible) base representation of the Concept.{{/footnote}} This means that one SDMX Concept can correspond to many VTL Variables, one for each representation the Concept has.
++Another difference consists in the fact that all Value Domains are considered as identifiable objects in VTL either if enumerated or not, while in SDMX the Codelist (corresponding to a VTL enumerated Value Domain) is identifiable, while the SDMX non-enumerated Representation (corresponding to a VTL non-enumerated Value Domain) is not identifiable. As a consequence, the definition of the VTL Rulesets, which in VTL can refer either to enumerated or non-enumerated value domains, in SDMX can refer only to enumerated Value Domains (i.e. to SDMX Codelists). As for the mapping between VTL variables and SDMX Concepts, it should be noted that these artefacts do not coincide perfectly. In fact, the VTL variables are represented variables, defined always on the same Value Domain (“Representation” in SDMX) independently of the data set / data structure in which they appear^^[[^^40^^>>path:#sdfootnote40sym||name="sdfootnote40anc"]]^^, while the SDMX Concepts can have different Representations in different DataStructures.^^[[^^41^^>>path:#sdfootnote41sym||name="sdfootnote41anc"]]^^ This means that one SDMX Concept can correspond to many VTL Variables, one for each representation the Concept has.
  Therefore, it is important to be aware that some VTL operations (for example the binary operations at data set level) are consistent only if the components having the same names in the operated VTL Data Sets have also the same representation (i.e. the same Value Domain as for VTL). For example, it is possible to obtain correct results from the VTL expression
--DS_c := DS_a + DS_b (where DS_a, DS_b, DS_c are VTL Data Sets)
++DS_c := DS_a + DS_b (where DS_a, DS_b, DS_c are VTL Data Sets) if the matching components in DS_a and DS_b (e.g. ref_date, geo_area, sector …) refer to the same general representation. In simpler words, DS_a and DS_b must use the same values/codes (for ref_date, geo_area, sector … ), otherwise the relevant values would not match and the result of the operation would be wrong.
--if the matching components in DS_a and DS_b (e.g. ref_date, geo_area, sector …) refer to the same general representation. In simpler words, DS_a and DS_b must use the same values/codes (for ref_date, geo_area, sector … ), otherwise the relevant values would not match and the result of the operation would be wrong.
--
  As mentioned, the property above is not enforced by construction in SDMX, and different representations of the same Concept can be not compatible one another (for example, it may happen that geo_area is represented by ISO-alpha-3 codes in DS_a and by ISO alpha-2 codes in DS_b). Therefore, it will be up to the definer of VTL
++[[image:SDMX 3-0-0 SECTION 6 FINAL-1.0_en_59eee18f.gif||alt="Shape5" height="1" width="192"]]
++
  Transformations to ensure that the VTL expressions are consistent with the actual representations of the correspondent SDMX Concepts.
  It remains up to the SDMX-VTL definer also the assurance of the consistency between a VTL Ruleset defined on Variables and the SDMX Components on which the Ruleset is applied. In fact, a VTL Ruleset is expressed by means of the values of the Variables (i.e. SDMX Concepts), i.e. assuming definite representations for them (e.g. ISOalpha-3 for country). If the Ruleset is applied to SDMX Components that have the same name of the Concept they refer to but different representations (e.g. ISO-alpha-2 for country), the Ruleset cannot work properly.
@@ -598,8 +598,7 @@
  [[image:SDMX 3-0-0 SECTION 6 FINAL-1.0_en_e3df33ae.png||height="543" width="483"]]
--(% class="wikigeneratedid" id="HFigure222013VTLDataTypes" %)
--**Figure 22 – VTL Data Types**
++==== Figure 22 – VTL Data Types ====
  The VTL scalar types are in turn subdivided in basic scalar types, which are elementary (not defined in term of other data types) and Value Domain and Set scalar types, which are defined in terms of the basic scalar types.
@@ -606,12 +606,131 @@
  The VTL basic scalar types are listed below and follow a hierarchical structure in terms of supersets/subsets (e.g. "scalar" is the superset of all the basic scalar types):
--**Figure 23 – VTL Basic Scalar Types**
  (((
--
++//n//
++
++//a//
++
++//e//
++
++//l//
++
++//o//
++
++//o//
++
++//B//
++
++//n//
++
++//o//
++
++//i//
++
++//t//
++
++//a//
++
++//r//
++
++//u//
++
++//D//
++
++//d//
++
++//o//
++
++//i//
++
++//r//
++
++//e//
++
++//p//
++
++//_//
++
++//e//
++
++//m//
++
++//i//
++
++//T//
++
++//e//
++
++//t//
++
++//a//
++
++//D//
++
++//e//
++
++//m//
++
++//i//
++
++//T//
++
++//r//
++
++//e//
++
++//g//
++
++//e//
++
++//t//
++
++//n//
++
++//I//
++
++//r//
++
++//e//
++
++//b//
++
++//m//
++
++//u//
++
++//N//
++
++//g//
++
++//n//
++
++//i//
++
++//r//
++
++//t//
++
++//S//
++
++//r//
++
++//a//
++
++//l//
++
++//a//
++
++//c//
++
++//S//
++
++[[image:SDMX 3-0-0 SECTION 6 FINAL-1.0_en_82d45833.gif||alt="Shape6" height="231" width="184"]]
  )))
++==== Figure 23 – VTL Basic Scalar Types ====
++
  === 12.4.2 VTL basic scalar types and SDMX data types ===
  The VTL assumes that a basic scalar type has a unique internal representation and can have more external representations.
@@ -634,159 +634,204 @@
  The following table describes the default mapping for converting from the SDMX data types to the VTL basic scalar types.
--(% style="width:823.294px" %)
--|(% style="width:509px" %)**SDMX data type (BasicComponentDataType)**|(% style="width:312px" %)**Default VTL basic scalar type**
--|(% style="width:509px" %)(((
++|SDMX data type (BasicComponentDataType)|Default VTL basic scalar type
++|(((
  String
++
  (string allowing any character)
--)))|(% style="width:312px" %)string
--|(% style="width:509px" %)(((
++)))|string
++|(((
  Alpha
++
  (string which only allows A-z)
--)))|(% style="width:312px" %)string
--|(% style="width:509px" %)(((
++)))|string
++|(((
  AlphaNumeric
++
  (string which only allows A-z and 0-9)
--)))|(% style="width:312px" %)string
--|(% style="width:509px" %)(((
++)))|string
++|(((
  Numeric
++
  (string which only allows 0-9, but is not numeric so that is can having leading zeros)
--)))|(% style="width:312px" %)string
--|(% style="width:509px" %)(((
++)))|string
++|(((
  BigInteger
++
  (corresponds to XML Schema xs:integer datatype; infinite set of integer values)
--)))|(% style="width:312px" %)integer
--|(% style="width:509px" %)(((
++)))|integer
++|(((
  Integer
--(corresponds to XML Schema xs:int datatype; between -2147483648 and +2147483647 (inclusive))
--)))|(% style="width:312px" %)integer
--|(% style="width:509px" %)(((
++
++(corresponds to XML Schema xs:int datatype; between -2147483648 and +2147483647
++
++(inclusive))
++)))|integer
++|(((
  Long
--(corresponds to XML Schema xs:long datatype; between -9223372036854775808 and +9223372036854775807 (inclusive))
--)))|(% style="width:312px" %)integer
--|(% style="width:509px" %)(((
++
++(corresponds to XML Schema xs:long datatype; between -9223372036854775808 and
++
+++9223372036854775807 (inclusive))
++)))|integer
++|(((
  Short
++
  (corresponds to XML Schema xs:short datatype; between -32768 and -32767 (inclusive))
--)))|(% style="width:312px" %)integer
--|(% style="width:509px" %)Decimal (corresponds to XML Schema xs:decimal datatype; subset of real numbers that can be represented as decimals)|(% style="width:312px" %)number
--|(% style="width:509px" %)(((
++)))|integer
++|Decimal (corresponds to XML Schema xs:decimal datatype; subset of real numbers that can be represented as decimals)|number
++|(((
  Float
++
  (corresponds to XML Schema xs:float datatype; patterned after the IEEE single-precision 32-bit floating point type)
--)))|(% style="width:312px" %)number
--|(% style="width:509px" %)(((
++)))|number
++|(((
  Double
++
  (corresponds to XML Schema xs:double datatype; patterned after the IEEE double-precision 64-bit floating point type)
--)))|(% style="width:312px" %)number
--|(% style="width:509px" %)(((
++)))|number
++|(((
  Boolean
--(corresponds to the XML Schema xs:boolean datatype; support the mathematical concept of binary-valued logic: {true, false})
--)))|(% style="width:312px" %)boolean
--(% style="width:822.294px" %)
--|(% colspan="2" style="width:507px" %)(((
++(corresponds to the XML Schema xs:boolean datatype; support the mathematical concept of
++
++binary-valued logic: {true, false})
++)))|boolean
++
++||(% colspan="2" %)(((
  URI
++
  (corresponds to the XML Schema xs:anyURI; absolute or relative Uniform Resource Identifier Reference)
--)))|(% colspan="1" style="width:311px" %)string
--|(% colspan="2" style="width:507px" %)(((
++)))|(% colspan="2" %)string
++||(% colspan="2" %)(((
  Count
++
  (an integer following a sequential pattern, increasing by 1 for each occurrence)
--)))|(% colspan="1" style="width:311px" %)integer
--|(% colspan="2" style="width:507px" %)(((
++)))|(% colspan="2" %)integer
++||(% colspan="2" %)(((
  InclusiveValueRange
++
  (decimal number within a closed interval, whose bounds are specified in the SDMX representation by the facets minValue and maxValue)
--)))|(% colspan="1" style="width:311px" %)number
--|(% colspan="2" style="width:507px" %)(((
++)))|(% colspan="2" %)number
++||(% colspan="2" %)(((
  ExclusiveValueRange
++
  (decimal number within an open interval, whose bounds are specified in the SDMX representation by the facets minValue and maxValue)
--)))|(% colspan="1" style="width:311px" %)number
--|(% colspan="2" style="width:507px" %)(((
++)))|(% colspan="2" %)number
++||(% colspan="2" %)(((
  Incremental
++
  (decimal number the increased by a specific interval (defined by the interval facet), which is typically enforced outside of the XML validation)
--)))|(% colspan="1" style="width:311px" %)number
--|(% colspan="2" style="width:507px" %)(((
++)))|(% colspan="2" %)number
++||(% colspan="2" %)(((
  ObservationalTimePeriod
++
  (superset of StandardTimePeriod and TimeRange)
--)))|(% colspan="1" style="width:311px" %)time
--|(% colspan="2" style="width:507px" %)(((
++)))|(% colspan="2" %)time
++||(% colspan="2" %)(((
  StandardTimePeriod
--(superset of BasicTimePeriod and ReportingTimePeriod)
--)))|(% colspan="1" style="width:311px" %)time
--|(% colspan="2" style="width:507px" %)(((
++
++(superset of BasicTimePeriod and
++
++ReportingTimePeriod)
++)))|(% colspan="2" %)time
++||(% colspan="2" %)(((
  BasicTimePeriod
++
  (superset of GregorianTimePeriod and DateTime)
--)))|(% colspan="1" style="width:311px" %)date
--|(% colspan="2" style="width:507px" %)(((
++)))|(% colspan="2" %)date
++||(% colspan="2" %)(((
  GregorianTimePeriod
++
  (superset of GregorianYear, GregorianYearMonth, and GregorianDay)
--)))|(% colspan="1" style="width:311px" %)date
--|(% colspan="2" style="width:507px" %)GregorianYear (YYYY)|(% colspan="1" style="width:311px" %)date
--|(% colspan="2" style="width:507px" %)GregorianYearMonth / GregorianMonth (YYYY-MM)|(% colspan="1" style="width:311px" %)date
--|(% colspan="2" style="width:507px" %)GregorianDay (YYYY-MM-DD)|(% colspan="1" style="width:311px" %)date
--|(% colspan="2" style="width:507px" %)(((
++)))|(% colspan="2" %)date
++||(% colspan="2" %)GregorianYear (YYYY)|(% colspan="2" %)date
++||(% colspan="2" %)GregorianYearMonth / GregorianMonth (YYYY-MM)|(% colspan="2" %)date
++||(% colspan="2" %)GregorianDay (YYYY-MM-DD)|(% colspan="2" %)date
++||(% colspan="2" %)(((
  ReportingTimePeriod
--(superset of RepostingYear, ReportingSemester, ReportingTrimester, ReportingQuarter, ReportingMonth, ReportingWeek, ReportingDay)
--)))|(% colspan="1" style="width:311px" %)time_period
--|(% colspan="2" style="width:507px" %)(((
++
++(superset of RepostingYear, ReportingSemester,
++
++ReportingTrimester, ReportingQuarter,
++
++ReportingMonth, ReportingWeek, ReportingDay)
++)))|(% colspan="2" %)time_period
++||(% colspan="2" %)(((
  ReportingYear
++
  (YYYY-A1 – 1 year period)
--)))|(% colspan="1" style="width:311px" %)time_period
--|(% colspan="2" style="width:507px" %)(((
++)))|(% colspan="2" %)time_period
++||(% colspan="2" %)(((
  ReportingSemester
++
  (YYYY-Ss – 6 month period)
--)))|(% colspan="1" style="width:311px" %)time_period
--|(% colspan="2" style="width:507px" %)(((
++)))|(% colspan="2" %)time_period
++||(% colspan="2" %)(((
  ReportingTrimester
++
  (YYYY-Tt – 4 month period)
--)))|(% colspan="1" style="width:311px" %)time_period
--|(% colspan="2" style="width:507px" %)(((
++)))|(% colspan="2" %)time_period
++||(% colspan="2" %)(((
  ReportingQuarter
++
  (YYYY-Qq – 3 month period)
--)))|(% colspan="1" style="width:311px" %)time_period
--|(% colspan="2" style="width:507px" %)(((
++)))|(% colspan="2" %)time_period
++||(% colspan="2" %)(((
  ReportingMonth
++
  (YYYY-Mmm – 1 month period)
--)))|(% colspan="1" style="width:311px" %)time_period
--|(% colspan="2" style="width:507px" %)ReportingWeek|(% colspan="1" style="width:311px" %)time_period
--|(% colspan="1" style="width:507px" %)(YYYY-Www – 7 day period; following ISO 8601 definition of a week in a year)|(% colspan="2" style="width:312px" %)
--|(% colspan="1" style="width:507px" %)(((
++)))|(% colspan="2" %)time_period
++||(% colspan="2" %)ReportingWeek|(% colspan="2" %)time_period
++||(% colspan="2" %)|(% colspan="2" %)
++||(% colspan="2" %)|(% colspan="2" %)
++|(% colspan="2" %)(YYYY-Www – 7 day period; following ISO 8601 definition of a week in a year)|(% colspan="2" %)|
++|(% colspan="2" %)(((
  ReportingDay
++
  (YYYY-Dddd – 1 day period)
--)))|(% colspan="2" style="width:312px" %)time_period
--|(% colspan="1" style="width:507px" %)(((
++)))|(% colspan="2" %)time_period|
++|(% colspan="2" %)(((
  DateTime
++
  (YYYY-MM-DDThh:mm:ss)
--)))|(% colspan="2" style="width:312px" %)date
--|(% colspan="1" style="width:507px" %)(((
++)))|(% colspan="2" %)date|
++|(% colspan="2" %)(((
  TimeRange
++
  (YYYY-MM-DD(Thh:mm:ss)?/<duration>)
--)))|(% colspan="2" style="width:312px" %)time
--|(% colspan="1" style="width:507px" %)(((
++)))|(% colspan="2" %)time|
++|(% colspan="2" %)(((
  Month
++
  (~-~-MM; speicifies a month independent of a year; e.g. February is black history month in the United States)
--)))|(% colspan="2" style="width:312px" %)string
--|(% colspan="1" style="width:507px" %)(((
++)))|(% colspan="2" %)string|
++|(% colspan="2" %)(((
  MonthDay
++
  (~-~-MM-DD; specifies a day within a month independent of a year; e.g. Christmas is December 25^^th^^; used to specify reporting year start day)
--)))|(% colspan="2" style="width:312px" %)string
--|(% colspan="1" style="width:507px" %)(((
++)))|(% colspan="2" %)string|
++|(% colspan="2" %)(((
  Day
++
  (~-~--DD; specifies a day independent of a month or year; e.g. the 15^^th^^ is payday)
--)))|(% colspan="2" style="width:312px" %)string
--|(% colspan="1" style="width:507px" %)(((
++)))|(% colspan="2" %)string|
++|(% colspan="2" %)(((
  Time
++
  (hh:mm:ss; time independent of a date; e.g. coffee break is at 10:00 AM)
--)))|(% colspan="2" style="width:312px" %)string
--|(% colspan="1" style="width:507px" %)(((
++)))|(% colspan="2" %)string|
++|(% colspan="2" %)(((
  Duration
++
  (corresponds to XML Schema xs:duration datatype)
--)))|(% colspan="2" style="width:312px" %)duration
--|(% colspan="1" style="width:507px" %)XHTML|(% colspan="2" style="width:312px" %)Metadata type – not applicable
--|(% colspan="1" style="width:507px" %)KeyValues|(% colspan="2" style="width:312px" %)Metadata type – not applicable
--|(% colspan="1" style="width:507px" %)IdentifiableReference|(% colspan="2" style="width:312px" %)Metadata type – not applicable
--|(% colspan="1" style="width:507px" %)DataSetReference|(% colspan="2" style="width:312px" %)Metadata type – not applicable
++)))|(% colspan="2" %)duration|
++|(% colspan="2" %)XHTML|(% colspan="2" %)Metadata type – not applicable|
++|(% colspan="2" %)KeyValues|(% colspan="2" %)Metadata type – not applicable|
++|(% colspan="2" %)IdentifiableReference|(% colspan="2" %)Metadata type – not applicable|
++|(% colspan="2" %)DataSetReference|(% colspan="2" %)Metadata type – not applicable|
--(% class="wikigeneratedid" id="HFigure142013MappingsfromSDMXdatatypestoVTLBasicScalarTypes" %)
--**Figure 14 – Mappings from SDMX data types to VTL Basic Scalar Types**
++==== Figure 14 – Mappings from SDMX data types to VTL Basic Scalar Types ====
  When VTL takes in input SDMX artefacts, it is assumed that a type conversion according to the table above always happens. In case a different VTL basic scalar type is desired, it can be achieved in the VTL program taking in input the default VTL basic scalar type above and applying to it the VTL type conversion features (see the implicit and explicit type conversion and the "cast" operator in the VTL Reference Manual).
@@ -794,32 +794,39 @@
  The following table describes the default conversion from the VTL basic scalar types to the SDMX data types .
--(% style="width:1073.29px" %)
--|(% style="width:207px" %)(((
--**VTL basic scalar type**
--)))|(% style="width:462px" %)(((
--**Default SDMX data type (BasicComponentDataType)**
--)))|(% style="width:402px" %)**Default output format**
--|(% style="width:207px" %)String|(% style="width:462px" %)String|(% style="width:402px" %)Like XML (xs:string)
--|(% style="width:207px" %)Number|(% style="width:462px" %)Float|(% style="width:402px" %)Like XML (xs:float)
--|(% style="width:207px" %)Integer|(% style="width:462px" %)Integer|(% style="width:402px" %)Like XML (xs:int)
--|(% style="width:207px" %)Date|(% style="width:462px" %)DateTime|(% style="width:402px" %)YYYY-MM-DDT00:00:00Z
--|(% style="width:207px" %)Time|(% style="width:462px" %)StandardTimePeriod|(% style="width:402px" %)<date>/<date> (as defined above)
--|(% style="width:207px" %)time_period|(% style="width:462px" %)(((
++|(((
++VTL basic
++
++scalar type
++)))|(((
++Default SDMX data type
++
++(BasicComponentDataType
++
++)
++)))|Default output format
++|String|String|Like XML (xs:string)
++|Number|Float|Like XML (xs:float)
++|Integer|Integer|Like XML (xs:int)
++|Date|DateTime|YYYY-MM-DDT00:00:00Z
++|Time|StandardTimePeriod|<date>/<date> (as defined above)
++|time_period|(((
  ReportingTimePeriod
++
  (StandardReportingPeriod)
--)))|(% style="width:402px" %)(((
++)))|(((
  YYYY-Pppp
++
  (according to SDMX )
  )))
--|(% style="width:207px" %)Duration|(% style="width:462px" %)Duration|(% style="width:402px" %)(((
++|Duration|Duration|(((
  Like XML (xs:duration)
++
  PnYnMnDTnHnMnS
  )))
--|(% style="width:207px" %)Boolean|(% style="width:462px" %)Boolean|(% style="width:402px" %)Like XML (xs:boolean) with the values "true" or "false"
++|Boolean|Boolean|Like XML (xs:boolean) with the values "true" or "false"
--(% class="wikigeneratedid" id="HFigure142013MappingsfromSDMXdatatypestoVTLBasicScalarTypes-1" %)
--**Figure 14 – Mappings from SDMX data types to VTL Basic Scalar Types**
++==== Figure 14 – Mappings from SDMX data types to VTL Basic Scalar Types ====
  In case a different default conversion is desired, it can be achieved through the CustomTypeScheme and CustomType artefacts (see also the section Transformations and Expressions of the SDMX information model).
@@ -826,13 +826,13 @@
  The custom output formats can be specified by means of the VTL formatting mask described in the section "Type Conversion and Formatting Mask" of the VTL Reference Manual. Such a section describes the masks for the VTL basic scalar types "number", "integer", "date", "time", "time_period" and "duration" and gives examples. As for the types "string" and "boolean" the VTL conventions are extended with some other special characters as described in the following table.
  |(% colspan="2" %)VTL special characters for the formatting masks
--|(% colspan="2" %)
++|(% colspan="2" %)
  |(% colspan="2" %)Number
  |D|one numeric digit (if the scientific notation is adopted, D is only for the mantissa)
  |E|one numeric digit (for the exponent of the scientific notation)
  |. (dot)|possible separator between the integer and the decimal parts.
  |, (comma)|possible separator between the integer and the decimal parts.
--| |
++||
  |(% colspan="2" %)Time and duration
  |C|century
  |Y|year
@@ -854,17 +854,17 @@
  |Day|lowercase textual representation of the month (e.g., monday)
  |Month|First character uppercase, then lowercase textual representation of the month (e.g., January)
  |Day|First character uppercase, then lowercase textual representation of the day using (e.g. Monday)
--| |
++||
  |(% colspan="2" %)String
  |X|any string character
  |Z|any string character from "A" to "z"
  |9|any string character from "0" to "9"
--| |
++||
  |(% colspan="2" %)Boolean
  |B|Boolean using "true" for True and "false" for False
  |1|Boolean using "1" for True and "0" for False
  |0|Boolean using "0" for True and "1" for False
--| |
++||
  |(% colspan="2" %)Other qualifiers
  |*|an arbitrary number of digits (of the preceding type)
  |+|at least one digit (of the preceding type)
@@ -871,9 +871,9 @@
  |( )|optional digits (specified within the brackets)
  |\|prefix for the special characters that must appear in the mask
  |N|fixed number of digits used in the preceding textual representation of the month or the day
--| |
++||
--The default conversion, either standard or customized, can be used to deduce automatically the representation of the components of the result of a VTL Transformation. In alternative, the representation of the resulting SDMX Dataflow can be given explicitly by providing its DataStructureDefinition. In other words, the representation specified in the DSD, if available, overrides any default conversion{{footnote}}The representation given in the DSD should obviously be compatible with the VTL data type.{{/footnote}}.
++The default conversion, either standard or customized, can be used to deduce automatically the representation of the components of the result of a VTL Transformation. In alternative, the representation of the resulting SDMX Dataflow can be given explicitly by providing its DataStructureDefinition. In other words, the representation specified in the DSD, if available, overrides any default conversion^^[[^^42^^>>path:#sdfootnote42sym||name="sdfootnote42anc"]]^^.
  === 12.4.5 Null Values ===
@@ -891,8 +891,8 @@
  A different format can be specified in the attribute "vtlLiteralFormat" of the CustomType artefact (see also the section Transformations and Expressions of the SDMX information model).
--Like in the case of the conversion of NULLs described in the previous paragraph, the overriding assumption is applied, for a certain VTL basic scalar type, if a value is found for the vtlLiteralFormat attribute of the CustomType of such VTL basic scalar type. The overriding assumption is applied for all the literals of a related VTL TransformationScheme.
++Like in the case of the conversion of NULLs described in the previous paragraph, the overriding assumption is applied, for a certain VTL basic scalar type, if a value is found for the vtlLiteralFormat attribute of the CustomType of such VTL basic scalar type. The overriding assumption is applied for all the literals of a related VTL
--In case a literal is operand of a VTL Cast operation, the format specified in the Cast overrides all the possible otherwise specified formats.
++TransformationScheme.
--{{putFootnotes/}}
++In case a literal is operand of a VTL Cast operation, the format specified in the Cast overrides all the possible otherwise specified formats.