Changes for page 12 Validation and Transformation Language (VTL)

Summary

• Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Content

...	...	@@ -14,8 +14,10 @@
14	14
15	15	The VTL language can be applied to SDMX artefacts by mapping the SDMX IM model artefacts to the model artefacts that VTL can manipulate{{footnote}}In this chapter, in order to distinguish VTL and SDMX model artefacts, the VTL ones are written in the Arial font while the SDMX ones in Courier New{{/footnote}}. Thus, the SDMX artefacts can be used in VTL as inputs and/or outputs of Transformations. It is important to be aware that the artefacts do not always have the same names in the SDMX and VTL IMs, nor do they always have the same meaning. The more evident example is given by the SDMX Dataset and the VTL "Data Set", which do not correspond one another: as a matter of fact, the VTL "Data Set" maps to the SDMX "Dataflow", while the SDMX "Dataset" has no explicit mapping to VTL (such an abstraction is not needed in the definition of VTL Transformations). A SDMX "Dataset", however, is an instance of a SDMX "Dataflow" and can be the artefact on which the VTL transformations are executed (i.e., the Transformations are defined on Dataflows and are applied to Dataflow instances that can be Datasets).
16	16
17		-The VTL programs (Transformation Schemes) are represented in SDMX through the TransformationScheme maintainable class which is composed of Transformation (nameable artefact). Each Transformation assigns the outcome of the evaluation of a VTL expression to a result.
	17	+The VTL programs (Transformation Schemes) are represented in SDMX through the TransformationScheme maintainable class which is composed of
18	18
	19	+Transformation (nameable artefact). Each Transformation assigns the outcome of the evaluation of a VTL expression to a result.
	20	+
19	19	This section does not explain the VTL language or any of the content published in the VTL guides. Rather, this is a description of how the VTL can be used in the SDMX context and applied to SDMX artefacts.
20	20
21	21	== 12.2 References to SDMX artefacts from VTL statements ==
...	...	@@ -26,8 +26,10 @@
26	26
27	27	The alias of an SDMX artefact can be its URN (Universal Resource Name), an abbreviation of its URN or another user-defined name.
28	28
29		-In any case, the aliases used in the VTL Transformations have to be mapped to the SDMX artefacts through the VtlMappingScheme and VtlMapping classes (see the section of the SDMX IM relevant to the VTL). A VtlMapping allows specifying the aliases to be used in the VTL Transformations, Rulesets{{footnote}}See also the section "VTL-DL Rulesets" in the VTL Reference Manual.{{/footnote}} or User Defined Operators{{footnote}}The VTLMappings are used also for User Defined Operators (UDO). Although UDOs are envisaged to be defined on generic operands, so that the specific artefacts to be manipulated are passed as parameters at their invocation, it is also possible that an UDO invokes directly some specific SDMX artefacts. These SDMX artefacts have to be mapped to the corresponding aliases used in the definition of the UDO through the VtlMappingScheme and VtlMapping classes as well.{{/footnote}} to reference SDMX artefacts. A VtlMappingScheme is a container for zero or more VtlMapping.
	31	+In any case, the aliases used in the VTL Transformations have to be mapped to the
30	30
	33	+SDMX artefacts through the VtlMappingScheme and VtlMapping classes (see the section of the SDMX IM relevant to the VTL). A VtlMapping allows specifying the aliases to be used in the VTL Transformations, Rulesets{{footnote}}See also the section "VTL-DL Rulesets" in the VTL Reference Manual.{{/footnote}} or User Defined Operators{{footnote}}The VTLMappings are used also for User Defined Operators (UDO). Although UDOs are envisaged to be defined on generic operands, so that the specific artefacts to be manipulated are passed as parameters at their invocation, it is also possible that an UDO invokes directly some specific SDMX artefacts. These SDMX artefacts have to be mapped to the corresponding aliases used in the definition of the UDO through the VtlMappingScheme and VtlMapping classes as well.{{/footnote}} to reference SDMX artefacts. A VtlMappingScheme is a container for zero or more VtlMapping.
	34	+
31	31	The correspondence between an alias and a SDMX artefact must be one-to-one, meaning that a generic alias identifies one and just one SDMX artefact while a SDMX artefact is identified by one and just one alias. In other words, within a VtlMappingScheme an artefact can have just one alias and different artefacts cannot have the same alias.
32	32
33	33	The references through the URN and the abbreviated URN are described in the following paragraphs.
...	...	@@ -198,7 +198,7 @@
198	198
199	199	=== 12.3.3 Mapping from SDMX to VTL data structures ===
200	200
201		-==== 12.3.3.1 Basic Mapping ====
	205	+**12.3.3.1 Basic Mapping**
202	202
203	203	The main mapping method from SDMX to VTL is called **Basic **mapping. This is considered as the default mapping method and is applied unless a different method is specified through the VtlMappingScheme and VtlDataflowMapping classes. When transforming **from SDMX to VTL**, this method consists in leaving the components unchanged and maintaining their names and roles, according to the following table:
204	204
...	...	@@ -211,43 +211,55 @@
211	211
212	212	The SDMX DataAttributes, in VTL they are all considered "at data point / observation level" (i.e. dependent on all the VTL Identifiers), because VTL does not have the SDMX AttributeRelationships, which defines the construct to which the DataAttribute is related (e.g. observation, dimension or set or group of dimensions, whole data set).
213	213
214		-With the Basic mapping, one SDMX observation{{footnote}}Here an SDMX observation is meant to correspond to one combination of values of the DimensionComponents.{{/footnote}} generates one VTL data point.
	218	+With the Basic mapping, one SDMX observation^^27^^ generates one VTL data point.
215	215
216	216	==== 12.3.3.2 Pivot Mapping ====
217	217
218	218	An alternative mapping method from SDMX to VTL is the **Pivot **mapping, which makes sense and is different from the Basic method only for the SDMX data structures that contain a Dimension that plays the role of measure dimension (like in SDMX 2.1) and just one Measure. Through this method, these structures can be mapped to multimeasure VTL data structures. Besides that, a user may choose to use any Dimension acting as a list of Measures (e.g., a Dimension with indicators), either by considering the “Measure” role of a Dimension, or at will using any coded Dimension. Of course, in SDMX 3.0, this can only work when only one Measure is defined in the DSD.
219	219
220		-In SDMX 2.1 the MeasureDimension was a subclass of DimensionComponent like Dimension and TimeDimension. In the current SDMX version, this subclass does not exist anymore, however a Dimension can have the role of measure dimension (i.e. a Dimension that contributes to the identification of the measures). In SDMX 2.1 a DataStructure could have zero or one MeasureDimensions, in the current version of the standard, from zero to many Dimension may have the role of measure dimension. Hereinafter a Dimension that plays the role of measure dimension is referenced for simplicity as “MeasureDimension“, i.e. maintaining the capital letters and the courier font even if the MeasureDimension is not anymore a class in the SDMX Information Model of the current SDMX version. For the sake of simplicity, the description below considers just one Dimension having the role of MeasureDimension (i.e., the more simple and common case). Nevertheless, it maintains its validity also if in the DataStructure there are more dimension with the role of MeasureDimensions: in this case what is said about the MeasureDimension must be applied to the combination of all the MeasureDimensions considered as a joint variable{{footnote}}E.g., if in the data structure there exist 3 Dimensions C,D,E having the role of MeasureDimension, they should be considered as a joint MeasureDimension Z=(C,D,E); therefore when the description says “each possible value Cj of the MeasureDimension …” it means “each possible combination of values (Cj, Dk, Ew) of the joint MeasureDimension Z=(C,D,E)”.{{/footnote}}.
	224	+In SDMX 2.1 the MeasureDimension was a subclass of DimensionComponent like Dimension and TimeDimension. In the current SDMX version, this subclass does not exist anymore, however a Dimension can have the role of measure dimension (i.e. a Dimension that contributes to the identification of the measures). In SDMX 2.1 a DataStructure could have zero or one MeasureDimensions, in the current version of the standard, from zero to many Dimension may have the role of measure dimension. Hereinafter a Dimension that plays the role of measure dimension is referenced for simplicity as “MeasureDimension“, i.e. maintaining the capital letters and the courier font even if the MeasureDimension is not anymore a class in the SDMX Information Model of the current SDMX version. For the sake of simplicity, the description below considers just one Dimension having the role of MeasureDimension (i.e., the more simple and common case). Nevertheless, it maintains its validity also if in the DataStructure there are more dimension with the role of MeasureDimensions: in this case what is said about the MeasureDimension must be applied to the combination of all the
221	221
	226	+MeasureDimensions considered as a joint variable^^[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^24^^>>path:#sdfootnote24sym||name="sdfootnote24anc"]](%%)^^.
	227	+
222	222	Among other things, the Pivot method provides also backward compatibility with the SDMX 2.1 data structures that contained a MeasureDimension.
223	223
224	224	If applied to SDMX structures that do not contain any MeasureDimension, this method behaves like the Basic mapping (see the previous paragraph).
225	225
226		-Here an SDMX observation is meant to correspond to one combination of values of the DimensionComponents.
	232	+^^27^^ Here an SDMX observation is meant to correspond to one combination of values of the DimensionComponents.
227	227
228	228	The SDMX structures that contain a MeasureDimension are mapped as described below (this mapping is equivalent to a pivoting operation):
229	229
230	230	* A SDMX simple dimension becomes a VTL (simple) identifier and a SDMX TimeDimension becomes a VTL (time) identifier;
231		-* Each possible Code Cj of the SDMX MeasureDimension is mapped to a VTL Measure, having the same name as the SDMX Code (i.e. Cj); the VTL Measure Cj is a new VTL component even if the SDMX data structure has not such a Component;
	237	+* Each possible Code Cj of the SDMX MeasureDimension is mapped to a VTL Measure, having the same name as the SDMX Code (i.e. Cj); the VTL Measure Cj is a new VTL component even if the SDMX data structure has not such a
	238	+
	239	+Component;
	240	+
232	232	* The SDMX MeasureDimension is not mapped to VTL (it disappears in the VTL Data Structure);
233	233	* The SDMX Measure is not mapped to VTL as well (it disappears in the VTL Data Structure);
234	234	* An SDMX DataAttribute is mapped in different ways according to its AttributeRelationship:
235		-** If, according to the SDMX AttributeRelationship, the values of the DataAttribute do not depend on the values of the MeasureDimension, the SDMX DataAttribute becomes a VTL Attribute having the same name. This happens if the AttributeRelationship is not specified (i.e. the DataAttribute does not depend on any DimensionComponent and therefore is at data set level), or if it refers to a set (or a group) of dimensions which does not include the MeasureDimension;
	244	+** If, according to the SDMX AttributeRelationship, the values of the DataAttribute do not depend on the values of the MeasureDimension, the SDMX DataAttribute becomes a VTL Attribute having the same name. This happens if the
	245	+
	246	+AttributeRelationship is not specified (i.e. the DataAttribute does not depend on any DimensionComponent and therefore is at data set level), or if it refers to a set (or a group) of dimensions which does not include the MeasureDimension;
	247	+
	248	+*
236	236	** Otherwise, if, according to the SDMX AttributeRelationship, the values of the DataAttribute depend on the MeasureDimension, the SDMX DataAttribute is mapped to one VTL Attribute for each possible Code of the SDMX MeasureDimension. By default, the names of the VTL Attributes are obtained by concatenating the name of the SDMX DataAttribute and the names of the correspondent Code of the MeasureDimension separated by underscore. For example, if the SDMX DataAttribute is named DA and the possible Codes of the SDMX MeasureDimension are named C1, C2, …, Cn, then the corresponding VTL Attributes will be named DA_C1, DA_C2, …, DA_Cn (if different names are desired, they can be achieved afterwards by renaming the Attributes through VTL operators).
237	237	** Like in the Basic mapping, the resulting VTL Attributes are considered as dependent on all the VTL identifiers (i.e. "at data point / observation level"), because VTL does not have the SDMX notion of Attribute Relationship.
238	238
239	239	The summary mapping table of the "pivot" mapping from SDMX to VTL for the SDMX data structures that contain a MeasureDimension is the following:
240	240
241		-(% style="width:769.294px" %)
242		-|(% style="width:401px" %)**SDMX**|(% style="width:366px" %)**VTL**
243		-|(% style="width:401px" %)Dimension|(% style="width:366px" %)(Simple) Identifier
244		-|(% style="width:401px" %)TimeDimension|(% style="width:366px" %)(Time) Identifier
245		-|(% style="width:401px" %)MeasureDimension & one Measure|(% style="width:366px" %)(((
246		-One Measure for each Code of the SDMX MeasureDimension
	254	+|**SDMX**|**VTL**
	255	+|Dimension|(Simple) Identifier
	256	+|TimeDimension|(Time) Identifier
	257	+|MeasureDimension & one Measure|(((
	258	+One Measure for each Code of the
	259	+
	260	+SDMX MeasureDimension
247	247	)))
248		-|(% style="width:401px" %)DataAttribute not depending on the MeasureDimension|(% style="width:366px" %)Attribute
249		-|(% style="width:401px" %)DataAttribute depending on the MeasureDimension|(% style="width:366px" %)(((
250		-One Attribute for each Code of the SDMX MeasureDimension
	262	+|DataAttribute not depending on the MeasureDimension|Attribute
	263	+|DataAttribute depending on the MeasureDimension|(((
	264	+One Attribute for each Code of the
	265	+
	266	+SDMX MeasureDimension
251	251	)))
252	252
253	253	Using this mapping method, the components of the data structure can change in the conversion from SDMX to VTL and it must be taken into account that the VTL statements can reference only the components of the resulting VTL data structure.
...	...	@@ -262,7 +262,7 @@
262	262	* The value of the Measure of the SDMX observation belonging to the set above and having MeasureDimension=Cj becomes the value of the VTL Measure Cj
263	263	* For the SDMX DataAttributes depending on the MeasureDimension, the value of the DataAttribute DA of the SDMX observation belonging to the set above and having MeasureDimension=Cj becomes the value of the VTL Attribute DA_Cj
264	264
265		-==== 12.3.3.3 From SDMX DataAttributes to VTL Measures ====
	281	+**12.3.3.3 From SDMX DataAttributes to VTL Measures**
266	266
267	267	* In some cases, it may happen that the DataAttributes of the SDMX DataStructure need to be managed as Measures in VTL. Therefore, a variant of both the methods above consists in transforming all the SDMX DataAttributes in VTL Measures. When DataAttributes are converted to Measures, the two methods above are called Basic_A2M and Pivot_A2M (the suffix "A2M" stands for Attributes to Measures). Obviously, the resulting VTL data structure is, in general, multi-measure and does not contain
268	268
...	...	@@ -274,7 +274,7 @@
274	274
275	275	=== 12.3.4 Mapping from VTL to SDMX data structures ===
276	276
277		-==== 12.3.4.1 Basic Mapping ====
	293	+**12.3.4.1 Basic Mapping**
278	278
279	279	The main mapping method **from VTL to SDMX** is called **Basic **mapping as well.
280	280
...	...	@@ -284,12 +284,11 @@
284	284
285	285	Mapping table:
286	286
287		-(% style="width:667.294px" %)
288		-|(% style="width:272px" %)**VTL**|(% style="width:392px" %)**SDMX**
289		-|(% style="width:272px" %)(Simple) Identifier|(% style="width:392px" %)Dimension
290		-|(% style="width:272px" %)(Time) Identifier|(% style="width:392px" %)TimeDimension
291		-|(% style="width:272px" %)Measure|(% style="width:392px" %)Measure
292		-|(% style="width:272px" %)Attribute|(% style="width:392px" %)DataAttribute
	303	+|**VTL**|**SDMX**
	304	+|(Simple) Identifier|Dimension
	305	+|(Time) Identifier|TimeDimension
	306	+|Measure|Measure
	307	+|Attribute|DataAttribute
293	293
294	294	If the distinction between simple identifier and time identifier is not maintained in the VTL environment, the classification between Dimension and TimeDimension exists only in SDMX, as declared in the relevant DataStructureDefinition.
295	295
...	...	@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@
299	299
300	300	As said, the resulting SDMX definitions must be compliant with the SDMX consistency rules. For example, the SDMX DSD must have the AttributeRelationship for the DataAttributes, which does not exist in VTL.
301	301
302		-==== 12.3.4.2 Unpivot Mapping ====
	317	+**12.3.4.2 Unpivot Mapping**
303	303
304	304	An alternative mapping method from VTL to SDMX is the **Unpivot **mapping.
305	305
...	...	@@ -323,12 +323,11 @@
323	323
324	324	The summary mapping table of the **unpivot** mapping method is the following:
325	325
326		-(% style="width:994.294px" %)
327		-|(% style="width:306px" %)**VTL**|(% style="width:684px" %)**SDMX**
328		-|(% style="width:306px" %)(Simple) Identifier|(% style="width:684px" %)Dimension
329		-|(% style="width:306px" %)(Time) Identifier|(% style="width:684px" %)TimeDimension
330		-|(% style="width:306px" %)All Measure Components|(% style="width:684px" %)MeasureDimension (having one Code for each VTL measure component) & one Measure
331		-|(% style="width:306px" %)Attribute|(% style="width:684px" %)DataAttribute depending on all SDMX Dimensions including the TimeDimension and except the MeasureDimension
	341	+|**VTL**|**SDMX**
	342	+|(Simple) Identifier|Dimension
	343	+|(Time) Identifier|TimeDimension
	344	+|All Measure Components|MeasureDimension (having one Code for each VTL measure component) & one Measure
	345	+|Attribute|DataAttribute depending on all SDMX Dimensions including the TimeDimension and except the MeasureDimension
332	332
333	333	At observation / data point level:
334	334
...	...	@@ -342,7 +342,7 @@
342	342
343	343	In any case, the resulting SDMX definitions must be compliant with the SDMX consistency rules. For example, the possible Codes of the SDMX MeasureDimension need to be listed in a SDMX Codelist, with proper id, agency and version; moreover, the SDMX DSD must have the AttributeRelationship for the DataAttributes, which does not exist in VTL.
344	344
345		-==== 12.3.4.3 From VTL Measures to SDMX Data Attributes ====
	359	+**12.3.4.3 From VTL Measures to SDMX Data Attributes**
346	346
347	347	More than all for the multi-measure VTL structures (having more than one Measure Component), it may happen that the Measures of the VTL Data Structure need to be managed as DataAttributes in SDMX. Therefore, a third mapping method consists in transforming some VTL measures in a corresponding SDMX Measures and all the other VTL Measures in SDMX DataAttributes. This method is called M2A (“M2A” stands for “Measures to DataAttributes”).
348	348
...	...	@@ -350,13 +350,12 @@
350	350
351	351	The mapping table is the following:
352	352
353		-(% style="width:689.294px" %)
354		-|(% style="width:344px" %)VTL|(% style="width:341px" %)SDMX
355		-|(% style="width:344px" %)(Simple) Identifier|(% style="width:341px" %)Dimension
356		-|(% style="width:344px" %)(Time) Identifier|(% style="width:341px" %)TimeDimension
357		-|(% style="width:344px" %)Some Measures|(% style="width:341px" %)Measure
358		-|(% style="width:344px" %)Other Measures|(% style="width:341px" %)DataAttribute
359		-|(% style="width:344px" %)Attribute|(% style="width:341px" %)DataAttribute
	367	+|VTL|SDMX
	368	+|(Simple) Identifier|Dimension
	369	+|(Time) Identifier|TimeDimension
	370	+|Some Measures|Measure
	371	+|Other Measures|DataAttribute
	372	+|Attribute|DataAttribute
360	360
361	361	Even in this case, the resulting SDMX definitions must be compliant with the SDMX consistency rules. For example, the SDMX DSD must have the attributeRelationship for the DataAttributes, which does not exist in VTL.
362	362
...	...	@@ -374,20 +374,20 @@
374	374
375	375	Until now it has been assumed to map one SMDX Dataflow to one VTL Data Set and vice-versa. This mapping one-to-one is not mandatory according to VTL because a VTL Data Set is meant to be a set of observations (data points) on a logical plane, having the same logical data structure and the same general meaning, independently of the possible physical representation or storage (see VTL 2.0 User Manual page 24), therefore a SDMX Dataflow can be seen either as a unique set of data observations (corresponding to one VTL Data Set) or as the union of many sets of data observations (each one corresponding to a distinct VTL Data Set).
376	376
377		-As a matter of fact, in some cases it can be useful to define VTL operations involving definite parts of a SDMX Dataflow instead than the whole.{{footnote}}A typical example of this kind is the validation, and more in general the manipulation, of individual time series belonging to the same Dataflow, identifiable through the DimensionComponents of the Dataflow except the TimeDimension. The coding of these kind of operations might be simplified by mapping distinct time series (i.e. different parts of a SDMX Dataflow) to distinct VTL Data Sets.{{/footnote}}
	390	+As a matter of fact, in some cases it can be useful to define VTL operations involving definite parts of a SDMX Dataflow instead than the whole.^^[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^25^^>>path:#sdfootnote25sym||name="sdfootnote25anc"]](%%)^^
378	378
379		-Therefore, in order to make the coding of VTL operations simpler when applied on parts of SDMX Dataflows, it is allowed to map distinct parts of a SDMX Dataflow to distinct VTL Data Sets according to the following rules and conventions. This kind of mapping is possible both from SDMX to VTL and from VTL to SDMX, as better explained below.{{footnote}}Please note that this kind of mapping is only an option at disposal of the definer of VTL Transformations; in fact it remains always possible to manipulate the needed parts of SDMX Dataflows by means of VTL operators (e.g. “sub”, “filter”, “calc”, “union” …), maintaining a mapping one-to-one between SDMX Dataflows and VTL Data Sets.{{/footnote}}
	392	+Therefore, in order to make the coding of VTL operations simpler when applied on parts of SDMX Dataflows, it is allowed to map distinct parts of a SDMX Dataflow to distinct VTL Data Sets according to the following rules and conventions. This kind of mapping is possible both from SDMX to VTL and from VTL to SDMX, as better explained below.^^[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^26^^>>path:#sdfootnote26sym||name="sdfootnote26anc"]](%%)^^
380	380
381	381	Given a SDMX Dataflow and some predefined Dimensions of its DataStructure, it is allowed to map the subsets of observations that have the same combination of values for such Dimensions to correspondent VTL datasets.
382	382
383	383	For example, assuming that the SDMX Dataflow DF1(1.0.0) has the Dimensions INDICATOR, TIME_PERIOD and COUNTRY, and that the user declares the Dimensions INDICATOR and COUNTRY as basis for the mapping (i.e. the mapping dimensions): the observations that have the same values for INDICATOR and COUNTRY would be mapped to the same VTL dataset (and vice-versa). In practice, this kind mapping is obtained like follows:
384	384
385		-* For a given SDMX Dataflow, the user (VTL definer) declares the DimensionComponents on which the mapping will be based, in a given order.{{footnote}}This definition is made through the ToVtlSubspace and ToVtlSpaceKey classes and/or the FromVtlSuperspace and FromVtlSpaceKey classes, depending on the direction of the mapping (“key” means “dimension”). The mapping of Dataflow subsets can be applied independently in the two directions, also according to different Dimensions. When no Dimension is declared for a given direction, it is assumed that the option of mapping different parts of a SDMX Dataflow to different VTL Data Sets is not used.{{/footnote}} Following the example above, imagine that the user declares the Dimensions INDICATOR and COUNTRY.
	398	+* For a given SDMX Dataflow, the user (VTL definer) declares the DimensionComponents on which the mapping will be based, in a given order.^^[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^27^^>>path:#sdfootnote27sym||name="sdfootnote27anc"]](%%)^^ Following the example above, imagine that the user declares the Dimensions INDICATOR and COUNTRY.
386	386	* The VTL Data Set is given a name using a special notation also called “ordered concatenation” and composed of the following parts:
387	387	** The reference to the SDMX Dataflow (expressed according to the rules described in the previous paragraphs, i.e. URN, abbreviated URN or another alias); for example DF(1.0.0);
388		-** a slash (“/”) as a separator;{{footnote}}As a consequence of this formalism, a slash in the name of the VTL Data Set assumes the specific meaning of separator between the name of the Dataflow and the values of some of its Dimensions.{{/footnote}}
	401	+** a slash (“/”) as a separator; ^^[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^28^^>>path:#sdfootnote28sym||name="sdfootnote28anc"]](%%)^^
389	389
390		-The reference to a specific part of the SDMX Dataflow above, expressed as the concatenation of the values that the SDMX DimensionComponents declared above must have, separated by dots (“.”) and written in the order in which these DimensionComponents are defined{{footnote}}This is the order in which the dimensions are defined in the ToVtlSpaceKey class or in the FromVtlSpaceKey class, depending on the direction of the mapping.{{/footnote}}. For example POPULATION.USA would mean that such a VTL Data Set is mapped to the SDMX observations for which the dimension //INDICATOR// is equal to POPULATION and the dimension //COUNTRY// is equal to USA.
	403	+The reference to a specific part of the SDMX Dataflow above, expressed as the concatenation of the values that the SDMX DimensionComponents declared above must have, separated by dots (“.”) and written in the order in which these DimensionComponents are defined^^[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^29^^>>path:#sdfootnote29sym||name="sdfootnote29anc"]](%%)^^. For example POPULATION.USA would mean that such a VTL Data Set is mapped to the SDMX observations for which the dimension //INDICATOR// is equal to POPULATION and the dimension //COUNTRY// is equal to USA.
391	391
392	392	In the VTL Transformations, this kind of dataset name must be referenced between single quotes because the slash (“/”) is not a regular character according to the VTL rules.
393	393
...	...	@@ -403,7 +403,7 @@
403	403
404	404	Let us now analyse the different meaning of this kind of mapping in the two mapping directions, i.e. from SDMX to VTL and from VTL to SDMX.
405	405
406		-As already said, the mapping from SDMX to VTL happens when the SDMX dataflows are operand of VTL Transformations, instead the mapping from VTL to SDMX happens when the VTL Data Sets that is result of Transformations{{footnote}}It should be remembered that, according to the VTL consistency rules, a given VTL dataset cannot be the result of more than one VTL Transformation.{{/footnote}} need to be treated as SDMX objects. This kind of mapping can be applied independently in the two directions and the Dimensions on which the mapping is based can be different in the two directions: these Dimensions are defined in the ToVtlSpaceKey and in the FromVtlSpaceKey classes respectively.
	419	+As already said, the mapping from SDMX to VTL happens when the SDMX dataflows are operand of VTL Transformations, instead the mapping from VTL to SDMX happens when the VTL Data Sets that is result of Transformations^^[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^30^^>>path:#sdfootnote30sym||name="sdfootnote30anc"]](%%)^^ need to be treated as SDMX objects. This kind of mapping can be applied independently in the two directions and the Dimensions on which the mapping is based can be different in the two directions: these Dimensions are defined in the ToVtlSpaceKey and in the FromVtlSpaceKey classes respectively.
407	407
408	408	First, let us see what happens in the __mapping direction from SDMX to VTL__, i.e. when parts of a SDMX Dataflow (e.g. DF1(1.0.0)) need to be mapped to distinct VTL Data Sets that are operand of some VTL Transformations.
409	409
...	...	@@ -411,7 +411,7 @@
411	411
412	412	SDMX Dataflow having INDICATOR=//INDICATORvalue //and COUNTRY=// COUNTRYvalue//. For example, the VTL dataset ‘DF1(1.0.0)/POPULATION.USA’ would contain all the observations of DF1(1.0.0) having INDICATOR = POPULATION and COUNTRY = USA.
413	413
414		-In order to obtain the data structure of these VTL Data Sets from the SDMX one, it is assumed that the SDMX DimensionComponents on which the mapping is based are dropped, i.e. not maintained in the VTL data structure; this is possible because their values are fixed for each one of the invoked VTL Data Sets{{footnote}}If these DimensionComponents would not be dropped, the various VTL Data Sets resulting from this kind of mapping would have non-matching values for the Identifiers corresponding to the mapping Dimensions (e.g. POPULATION and COUNTRY). As a consequence, taking into account that the typical binary VTL operations at dataset level (+, -, *, / and so on) are executed on the observations having matching values for the identifiers, it would not be possible to compose the resulting VTL datasets one another (e.g. it would not be possible to calculate the population ratio between USA and CANADA).{{/footnote}}. After that, the mapping method from SDMX to VTL specified for the Dataflow DF1(1.0.0) is applied (i.e.
	427	+In order to obtain the data structure of these VTL Data Sets from the SDMX one, it is assumed that the SDMX DimensionComponents on which the mapping is based are dropped, i.e. not maintained in the VTL data structure; this is possible because their values are fixed for each one of the invoked VTL Data Sets^^[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^31^^>>path:#sdfootnote31sym||name="sdfootnote31anc"]](%%)^^. After that, the mapping method from SDMX to VTL specified for the Dataflow DF1(1.0.0) is applied (i.e.
415	415
416	416	basic, pivot …).
417	417
...	...	@@ -431,7 +431,7 @@
431	431
432	432	… … …
433	433
434		-In fact the VTL operator “sub” has exactly the same behaviour. Therefore, mapping different parts of a SDMX Dataflow to different VTL Data Sets in the direction from SDMX to VTL through the ordered concatenation notation is equivalent to a proper use of the operator “**sub**” on such a Dataflow.{{footnote}}In case the ordered concatenation notation is used, the VTL Transformation described above, e.g. ‘DF1(1.0)/POPULATION.USA’ := DF1(1.0) [ sub INDICATOR=“POPULATION”, COUNTRY=“USA”], is implicitly executed. In order to test the overall compliance of the VTL program to the VTL consistency rules, it has to be considered as part of the VTL program even if it is not explicitly coded.{{/footnote}}
	447	+In fact the VTL operator “sub” has exactly the same behaviour. Therefore, mapping different parts of a SDMX Dataflow to different VTL Data Sets in the direction from SDMX to VTL through the ordered concatenation notation is equivalent to a proper use of the operator “**sub**” on such a Dataflow. ^^[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^32^^>>path:#sdfootnote32sym||name="sdfootnote32anc"]](%%)^^
435	435
436	436	In the direction from SDMX to VTL it is allowed to omit the value of one or more
437	437
...	...	@@ -459,12 +459,12 @@
459	459
460	460	Dataflow DF2(1.0.0) having the Dimensions TIME_PERIOD, INDICATOR, and COUNTRY and that such a programmer finds it convenient to calculate separately the parts of DF2(1.0.0) that have different combinations of values for INDICATOR and COUNTRY:
461	461
462		-* each part is calculated as a VTL derived Data Set, result of a dedicated VTL Transformation;{{footnote}}If the whole DF2(1.0) is calculated by means of just one VTL Transformation, then the mapping between the SDMX Dataflow and the corresponding VTL dataset is one-to-one and this kind of mapping (one SDMX Dataflow to many VTL datasets) does not apply.{{/footnote}}
463		-* the data structure of all these VTL Data Sets has the TIME_PERIOD identifier and does not have the INDICATOR and COUNTRY identifiers.{{footnote}}This is possible as each VTL dataset corresponds to one particular combination of values of INDICATOR and COUNTRY.{{/footnote}}
	475	+* each part is calculated as a VTL derived Data Set, result of a dedicated VTL Transformation; ^^[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^33^^>>path:#sdfootnote33sym||name="sdfootnote33anc"]](%%)^^
	476	+* the data structure of all these VTL Data Sets has the TIME_PERIOD identifier and does not have the INDICATOR and COUNTRY identifiers.^^[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^34^^>>path:#sdfootnote34sym||name="sdfootnote34anc"]](%%)^^
464	464
465		-Under these hypothesis, such derived VTL Data Sets can be mapped to DF2(1.0.0) by declaring the DimensionComponents INDICATOR and COUNTRY as mapping dimensions{{footnote}}The mapping dimensions are defined as FromVtlSpaceKeys of the FromVtlSuperSpace of the VtlDataflowMapping relevant to DF2(1.0).{{/footnote}}.
	478	+Under these hypothesis, such derived VTL Data Sets can be mapped to DF2(1.0.0) by declaring the DimensionComponents INDICATOR and COUNTRY as mapping dimensions^^[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^35^^>>path:#sdfootnote35sym||name="sdfootnote35anc"]](%%)^^.
466	466
467		-The corresponding VTL Transformations, assuming that the result needs to be persistent, would be of this kind:{{footnote}}the symbol of the VTL persistent assignment is used (<-){{/footnote}}
	480	+The corresponding VTL Transformations, assuming that the result needs to be persistent, would be of this kind:^^ [[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^36^^>>path:#sdfootnote36sym||name="sdfootnote36anc"]](%%)^^
468	468
469	469	‘DF2(1.0.0)/INDICATORvalue.COUNTRYvalue’ <- expression
470	470
...	...	@@ -520,9 +520,9 @@
520	520
521	521	In other words, starting from the datasets explicitly calculated through VTL (in the example ‘DF2(1.0)/GDPPERCAPITA.USA’ and so on), the first step consists in calculating other (non-persistent) VTL datasets (in the example
522	522
523		-DF2bis_GDPPERCAPITA_USA and so on) by adding the identifiers INDICATOR and COUNTRY with the desired values (//INDICATORvalue// and //COUNTRYvalue)//. Finally, all these non-persistent Data Sets are united and give the final result DF2(1.0){{footnote}}The result is persistent in this example but it can be also non persistent if needed.{{/footnote}}, which can be mapped one-to-one to the homonymous SDMX Dataflow having the dimension components TIME_PERIOD, INDICATOR and COUNTRY.
	536	+DF2bis_GDPPERCAPITA_USA and so on) by adding the identifiers INDICATOR and COUNTRY with the desired values (//INDICATORvalue// and //COUNTRYvalue)//. Finally, all these non-persistent Data Sets are united and give the final result DF2(1.0)^^[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^37^^>>path:#sdfootnote37sym||name="sdfootnote37anc"]](%%)^^, which can be mapped one-to-one to the homonymous SDMX Dataflow having the dimension components TIME_PERIOD, INDICATOR and COUNTRY.
524	524
525		-Therefore, mapping different VTL datasets having the same data structure to different parts of a SDMX Dataflow, i.e. in the direction from VTL to SDMX, through the ordered concatenation notation is equivalent to a proper use of the operators “calc” and “union” on such datasets.{{footnote}}In case the ordered concatenation notation from VTL to SDMX is used, the set of Transformations described above is implicitly performed; therefore, in order to test the overall compliance of the VTL program to the VTL consistency rules, these implicit Transformations have to be considered as part of the VTL program even if they are not explicitly coded.{{/footnote}}
	538	+Therefore, mapping different VTL datasets having the same data structure to different parts of a SDMX Dataflow, i.e. in the direction from VTL to SDMX, through the ordered concatenation notation is equivalent to a proper use of the operators “calc” and “union” on such datasets. ^^[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^38^^>>path:#sdfootnote38sym||name="sdfootnote38anc"]](%%)[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^39^^>>path:#sdfootnote39sym||name="sdfootnote39anc"]](%%)^^
526	526
527	527	It is worth noting that in the direction from VTL to SDMX it is mandatory to specify the value for every Dimension on which the mapping is based (in other word, in the name of the calculated VTL dataset is __not__ possible to omit the value of some of the Dimensions).
528	528
...	...	@@ -530,51 +530,52 @@
530	530
531	531	With reference to the VTL “model for Variables and Value domains”, the following additional mappings have to be considered:
532	532
533		-(% style="width:1170.29px" %)
534		-|**VTL**|(% style="width:754px" %)**SDMX**
535		-|**Data Set Component**|(% style="width:754px" %)Although this abstraction exists in SDMX, it does not have an explicit definition and correspond to a Component (either a DimensionComponent or a Measure or a DataAttribute) belonging to one specific Dataflow{{footnote}}Through SDMX Constraints, it is possible to specify the values that a Component of a Dataflow can assume.{{/footnote}}
536		-|**Represented Variable**|(% style="width:754px" %)(((
	546	+|VTL|SDMX
	547	+|**Data Set Component**|Although this abstraction exists in SDMX, it does not have an explicit definition and correspond to a Component (either a DimensionComponent or a Measure or a DataAttribute) belonging to one specific Dataflow^^43^^
	548	+|**Represented Variable**|(((
537	537	**Concept** with a definite
538	538
539	539	Representation
540	540	)))
541		-|**Value Domain**|(% style="width:754px" %)(((
	553	+|**Value Domain**|(((
542	542	**Representation** (see the Structure
543	543
544	544	Pattern in the Base Package)
545	545	)))
546		-|**Enumerated Value Domain / Code List**|(% style="width:754px" %)**Codelist**
547		-|**Code**|(% style="width:754px" %)(((
	558	+|**Enumerated Value Domain / Code List**|**Codelist**
	559	+|**Code**|(((
548	548	**Code** (for enumerated
549	549
550	550	DimensionComponent, Measure, DataAttribute)
551	551	)))
552		-|**Described Value Domain**|(% style="width:754px" %)(((
553		-non-enumerated** Representation**
	564	+|**Described Value Domain**|(((
	565	+non-enumerated** &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Representation**
554	554
555	555	(having Facets / ExtendedFacets, see the Structure Pattern in the Base Package)
556	556	)))
557		-|**Value**|(% style="width:754px" %)Although this abstraction exists in SDMX, it does not have an explicit definition and correspond to a **Code** of a Codelist (for enumerated Representations) or
558		-| |(% style="width:754px" %)(((
559		-to a valid **value **(for non-enumerated** **Representations)
	569	+|**Value**|Although this abstraction exists in SDMX, it does not have an explicit definition and correspond to a **Code** of a Codelist (for enumerated Representations) or
	570	+| |(((
	571	+to a valid **value &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;**(for non-enumerated** &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;**
	572	+
	573	+Representations)
560	560	)))
561		-|**Value Domain Subset / Set**|(% style="width:754px" %)This abstraction does not exist in SDMX
562		-|**Enumerated Value Domain Subset / Enumerated Set**|(% style="width:754px" %)This abstraction does not exist in SDMX
563		-|**Described Value Domain Subset / Described Set**|(% style="width:754px" %)This abstraction does not exist in SDMX
564		-|**Set list**|(% style="width:754px" %)This abstraction does not exist in SDMX
	575	+|**Value Domain Subset / Set**|This abstraction does not exist in SDMX
	576	+|**Enumerated Value Domain Subset / Enumerated Set**|This abstraction does not exist in SDMX
	577	+|**Described Value Domain Subset / Described Set**|This abstraction does not exist in SDMX
	578	+|**Set list**|This abstraction does not exist in SDMX
565	565
566	566	The main difference between VTL and SDMX relies on the fact that the VTL artefacts for defining subsets of Value Domains do not exist in SDMX, therefore the VTL features for referring to predefined subsets are not available in SDMX. These artefacts are the Value Domain Subset (or Set), either enumerated or described, the Set List (list of values belonging to enumerated subsets) and the Data Set Component (aimed at defining the set of values that the Component of a Data Set can take, possibly a subset of the codes of Value Domain).
567	567
568		-Another difference consists in the fact that all Value Domains are considered as identifiable objects in VTL either if enumerated or not, while in SDMX the Codelist (corresponding to a VTL enumerated Value Domain) is identifiable, while the SDMX non-enumerated Representation (corresponding to a VTL non-enumerated Value Domain) is not identifiable. As a consequence, the definition of the VTL Rulesets, which in VTL can refer either to enumerated or non-enumerated value domains, in SDMX can refer only to enumerated Value Domains (i.e. to SDMX Codelists). As for the mapping between VTL variables and SDMX Concepts, it should be noted that these artefacts do not coincide perfectly. In fact, the VTL variables are represented variables, defined always on the same Value Domain (“Representation” in SDMX) independently of the data set / data structure in which they appear{{footnote}}By using represented variables, VTL can assume that data structures having the same variables as identifiers can be composed one another because the correspondent values can match.{{/footnote}}, while the SDMX Concepts can have different Representations in different DataStructures.{{footnote}}A Concept becomes a Component in a DataStructureDefinition, and Components can have different LocalRepresentations in different DataStructureDefinitions, also overriding the (possible) base representation of the Concept.{{/footnote}} This means that one SDMX Concept can correspond to many VTL Variables, one for each representation the Concept has.
	582	+Another difference consists in the fact that all Value Domains are considered as identifiable objects in VTL either if enumerated or not, while in SDMX the Codelist (corresponding to a VTL enumerated Value Domain) is identifiable, while the SDMX non-enumerated Representation (corresponding to a VTL non-enumerated Value Domain) is not identifiable. As a consequence, the definition of the VTL Rulesets, which in VTL can refer either to enumerated or non-enumerated value domains, in SDMX can refer only to enumerated Value Domains (i.e. to SDMX Codelists). As for the mapping between VTL variables and SDMX Concepts, it should be noted that these artefacts do not coincide perfectly. In fact, the VTL variables are represented variables, defined always on the same Value Domain (“Representation” in SDMX) independently of the data set / data structure in which they appear^^[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^40^^>>path:#sdfootnote40sym||name="sdfootnote40anc"]](%%)^^, while the SDMX Concepts can have different Representations in different DataStructures.^^[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^41^^>>path:#sdfootnote41sym||name="sdfootnote41anc"]](%%)^^ This means that one SDMX Concept can correspond to many VTL Variables, one for each representation the Concept has.
569	569
570	570	Therefore, it is important to be aware that some VTL operations (for example the binary operations at data set level) are consistent only if the components having the same names in the operated VTL Data Sets have also the same representation (i.e. the same Value Domain as for VTL). For example, it is possible to obtain correct results from the VTL expression
571	571
572		-DS_c := DS_a + DS_b (where DS_a, DS_b, DS_c are VTL Data Sets)
	586	+DS_c := DS_a + DS_b (where DS_a, DS_b, DS_c are VTL Data Sets) if the matching components in DS_a and DS_b (e.g. ref_date, geo_area, sector …) refer to the same general representation. In simpler words, DS_a and DS_b must use the same values/codes (for ref_date, geo_area, sector … ), otherwise the relevant values would not match and the result of the operation would be wrong.
573	573
574		-if the matching components in DS_a and DS_b (e.g. ref_date, geo_area, sector …) refer to the same general representation. In simpler words, DS_a and DS_b must use the same values/codes (for ref_date, geo_area, sector … ), otherwise the relevant values would not match and the result of the operation would be wrong.
575		-
576	576	As mentioned, the property above is not enforced by construction in SDMX, and different representations of the same Concept can be not compatible one another (for example, it may happen that geo_area is represented by ISO-alpha-3 codes in DS_a and by ISO alpha-2 codes in DS_b). Therefore, it will be up to the definer of VTL
577	577
	590	+[[image:SDMX 3-0-0 SECTION 6 FINAL-1.0_en_59eee18f.gif||alt="Shape5" height="1" width="192"]]
	591	+
578	578	Transformations to ensure that the VTL expressions are consistent with the actual representations of the correspondent SDMX Concepts.
579	579
580	580	It remains up to the SDMX-VTL definer also the assurance of the consistency between a VTL Ruleset defined on Variables and the SDMX Components on which the Ruleset is applied. In fact, a VTL Ruleset is expressed by means of the values of the Variables (i.e. SDMX Concepts), i.e. assuming definite representations for them (e.g. ISOalpha-3 for country). If the Ruleset is applied to SDMX Components that have the same name of the Concept they refer to but different representations (e.g. ISO-alpha-2 for country), the Ruleset cannot work properly.
...	...	@@ -589,8 +589,7 @@
589	589
590	590	[[image:SDMX 3-0-0 SECTION 6 FINAL-1.0_en_e3df33ae.png||height="543" width="483"]]
591	591
592		-(% class="wikigeneratedid" id="HFigure222013VTLDataTypes" %)
593		-**Figure 22 – VTL Data Types**
	606	+==== Figure 22 – VTL Data Types ====
594	594
595	595	The VTL scalar types are in turn subdivided in basic scalar types, which are elementary (not defined in term of other data types) and Value Domain and Set scalar types, which are defined in terms of the basic scalar types.
596	596
...	...	@@ -597,12 +597,131 @@
597	597	The VTL basic scalar types are listed below and follow a hierarchical structure in terms of supersets/subsets (e.g. "scalar" is the superset of all the basic scalar types):
598	598
599	599
600		-**Figure 23 – VTL Basic Scalar Types**
601	601
602	602	(((
603		-
	615	+//n//
	616	+
	617	+//a//
	618	+
	619	+//e//
	620	+
	621	+//l//
	622	+
	623	+//o//
	624	+
	625	+//o//
	626	+
	627	+//B//
	628	+
	629	+//n//
	630	+
	631	+//o//
	632	+
	633	+//i//
	634	+
	635	+//t//
	636	+
	637	+//a//
	638	+
	639	+//r//
	640	+
	641	+//u//
	642	+
	643	+//D//
	644	+
	645	+//d//
	646	+
	647	+//o//
	648	+
	649	+//i//
	650	+
	651	+//r//
	652	+
	653	+//e//
	654	+
	655	+//p//
	656	+
	657	+//_//
	658	+
	659	+//e//
	660	+
	661	+//m//
	662	+
	663	+//i//
	664	+
	665	+//T//
	666	+
	667	+//e//
	668	+
	669	+//t//
	670	+
	671	+//a//
	672	+
	673	+//D//
	674	+
	675	+//e//
	676	+
	677	+//m//
	678	+
	679	+//i//
	680	+
	681	+//T//
	682	+
	683	+//r//
	684	+
	685	+//e//
	686	+
	687	+//g//
	688	+
	689	+//e//
	690	+
	691	+//t//
	692	+
	693	+//n//
	694	+
	695	+//I//
	696	+
	697	+//r//
	698	+
	699	+//e//
	700	+
	701	+//b//
	702	+
	703	+//m//
	704	+
	705	+//u//
	706	+
	707	+//N//
	708	+
	709	+//g//
	710	+
	711	+//n//
	712	+
	713	+//i//
	714	+
	715	+//r//
	716	+
	717	+//t//
	718	+
	719	+//S//
	720	+
	721	+//r//
	722	+
	723	+//a//
	724	+
	725	+//l//
	726	+
	727	+//a//
	728	+
	729	+//c//
	730	+
	731	+//S//
	732	+
	733	+[[image:SDMX 3-0-0 SECTION 6 FINAL-1.0_en_82d45833.gif||alt="Shape6" height="231" width="184"]]
604	604	)))
605	605
	736	+==== Figure 23 – VTL Basic Scalar Types ====
	737	+
606	606	=== 12.4.2 VTL basic scalar types and SDMX data types ===
607	607
608	608	The VTL assumes that a basic scalar type has a unique internal representation and can have more external representations.
...	...	@@ -625,159 +625,204 @@
625	625
626	626	The following table describes the default mapping for converting from the SDMX data types to the VTL basic scalar types.
627	627
628		-(% style="width:823.294px" %)
629		-|(% style="width:509px" %)**SDMX data type (BasicComponentDataType)**|(% style="width:312px" %)**Default VTL basic scalar type**
630		-|(% style="width:509px" %)(((
	760	+|SDMX data type (BasicComponentDataType)|Default VTL basic scalar type
	761	+|(((
631	631	String
	763	+
632	632	(string allowing any character)
633		-)))|(% style="width:312px" %)string
634		-|(% style="width:509px" %)(((
	765	+)))|string
	766	+|(((
635	635	Alpha
	768	+
636	636	(string which only allows A-z)
637		-)))|(% style="width:312px" %)string
638		-|(% style="width:509px" %)(((
	770	+)))|string
	771	+|(((
639	639	AlphaNumeric
	773	+
640	640	(string which only allows A-z and 0-9)
641		-)))|(% style="width:312px" %)string
642		-|(% style="width:509px" %)(((
	775	+)))|string
	776	+|(((
643	643	Numeric
	778	+
644	644	(string which only allows 0-9, but is not numeric so that is can having leading zeros)
645		-)))|(% style="width:312px" %)string
646		-|(% style="width:509px" %)(((
	780	+)))|string
	781	+|(((
647	647	BigInteger
	783	+
648	648	(corresponds to XML Schema xs:integer datatype; infinite set of integer values)
649		-)))|(% style="width:312px" %)integer
650		-|(% style="width:509px" %)(((
	785	+)))|integer
	786	+|(((
651	651	Integer
652		-(corresponds to XML Schema xs:int datatype; between -2147483648 and +2147483647 (inclusive))
653		-)))|(% style="width:312px" %)integer
654		-|(% style="width:509px" %)(((
	788	+
	789	+(corresponds to XML Schema xs:int datatype; between -2147483648 and +2147483647
	790	+
	791	+(inclusive))
	792	+)))|integer
	793	+|(((
655	655	Long
656		-(corresponds to XML Schema xs:long datatype; between -9223372036854775808 and +9223372036854775807 (inclusive))
657		-)))|(% style="width:312px" %)integer
658		-|(% style="width:509px" %)(((
	795	+
	796	+(corresponds to XML Schema xs:long datatype; between -9223372036854775808 and
	797	+
	798	++9223372036854775807 (inclusive))
	799	+)))|integer
	800	+|(((
659	659	Short
	802	+
660	660	(corresponds to XML Schema xs:short datatype; between -32768 and -32767 (inclusive))
661		-)))|(% style="width:312px" %)integer
662		-|(% style="width:509px" %)Decimal (corresponds to XML Schema xs:decimal datatype; subset of real numbers that can be represented as decimals)|(% style="width:312px" %)number
663		-|(% style="width:509px" %)(((
	804	+)))|integer
	805	+|Decimal (corresponds to XML Schema xs:decimal datatype; subset of real numbers that can be represented as decimals)|number
	806	+|(((
664	664	Float
	808	+
665	665	(corresponds to XML Schema xs:float datatype; patterned after the IEEE single-precision 32-bit floating point type)
666		-)))|(% style="width:312px" %)number
667		-|(% style="width:509px" %)(((
	810	+)))|number
	811	+|(((
668	668	Double
	813	+
669	669	(corresponds to XML Schema xs:double datatype; patterned after the IEEE double-precision 64-bit floating point type)
670		-)))|(% style="width:312px" %)number
671		-|(% style="width:509px" %)(((
	815	+)))|number
	816	+|(((
672	672	Boolean
673		-(corresponds to the XML Schema xs:boolean datatype; support the mathematical concept of binary-valued logic: {true, false})
674		-)))|(% style="width:312px" %)boolean
675	675
676		-(% style="width:822.294px" %)
677		-|(% colspan="2" style="width:507px" %)(((
	819	+(corresponds to the XML Schema xs:boolean datatype; support the mathematical concept of
	820	+
	821	+binary-valued logic: {true, false})
	822	+)))|boolean
	823	+
	824	+| |(% colspan="2" %)(((
678	678	URI
	826	+
679	679	(corresponds to the XML Schema xs:anyURI; absolute or relative Uniform Resource Identifier Reference)
680		-)))|(% colspan="1" style="width:311px" %)string
681		-|(% colspan="2" style="width:507px" %)(((
	828	+)))|(% colspan="2" %)string
	829	+| |(% colspan="2" %)(((
682	682	Count
	831	+
683	683	(an integer following a sequential pattern, increasing by 1 for each occurrence)
684		-)))|(% colspan="1" style="width:311px" %)integer
685		-|(% colspan="2" style="width:507px" %)(((
	833	+)))|(% colspan="2" %)integer
	834	+| |(% colspan="2" %)(((
686	686	InclusiveValueRange
	836	+
687	687	(decimal number within a closed interval, whose bounds are specified in the SDMX representation by the facets minValue and maxValue)
688		-)))|(% colspan="1" style="width:311px" %)number
689		-|(% colspan="2" style="width:507px" %)(((
	838	+)))|(% colspan="2" %)number
	839	+| |(% colspan="2" %)(((
690	690	ExclusiveValueRange
	841	+
691	691	(decimal number within an open interval, whose bounds are specified in the SDMX representation by the facets minValue and maxValue)
692		-)))|(% colspan="1" style="width:311px" %)number
693		-|(% colspan="2" style="width:507px" %)(((
	843	+)))|(% colspan="2" %)number
	844	+| |(% colspan="2" %)(((
694	694	Incremental
	846	+
695	695	(decimal number the increased by a specific interval (defined by the interval facet), which is typically enforced outside of the XML validation)
696		-)))|(% colspan="1" style="width:311px" %)number
697		-|(% colspan="2" style="width:507px" %)(((
	848	+)))|(% colspan="2" %)number
	849	+| |(% colspan="2" %)(((
698	698	ObservationalTimePeriod
	851	+
699	699	(superset of StandardTimePeriod and TimeRange)
700		-)))|(% colspan="1" style="width:311px" %)time
701		-|(% colspan="2" style="width:507px" %)(((
	853	+)))|(% colspan="2" %)time
	854	+| |(% colspan="2" %)(((
702	702	StandardTimePeriod
703		-(superset of BasicTimePeriod and ReportingTimePeriod)
704		-)))|(% colspan="1" style="width:311px" %)time
705		-|(% colspan="2" style="width:507px" %)(((
	856	+
	857	+(superset of BasicTimePeriod and
	858	+
	859	+ReportingTimePeriod)
	860	+)))|(% colspan="2" %)time
	861	+| |(% colspan="2" %)(((
706	706	BasicTimePeriod
	863	+
707	707	(superset of GregorianTimePeriod and DateTime)
708		-)))|(% colspan="1" style="width:311px" %)date
709		-|(% colspan="2" style="width:507px" %)(((
	865	+)))|(% colspan="2" %)date
	866	+| |(% colspan="2" %)(((
710	710	GregorianTimePeriod
	868	+
711	711	(superset of GregorianYear, GregorianYearMonth, and GregorianDay)
712		-)))|(% colspan="1" style="width:311px" %)date
713		-|(% colspan="2" style="width:507px" %)GregorianYear (YYYY)|(% colspan="1" style="width:311px" %)date
714		-|(% colspan="2" style="width:507px" %)GregorianYearMonth / GregorianMonth (YYYY-MM)|(% colspan="1" style="width:311px" %)date
715		-|(% colspan="2" style="width:507px" %)GregorianDay (YYYY-MM-DD)|(% colspan="1" style="width:311px" %)date
716		-|(% colspan="2" style="width:507px" %)(((
	870	+)))|(% colspan="2" %)date
	871	+| |(% colspan="2" %)GregorianYear (YYYY)|(% colspan="2" %)date
	872	+| |(% colspan="2" %)GregorianYearMonth / GregorianMonth (YYYY-MM)|(% colspan="2" %)date
	873	+| |(% colspan="2" %)GregorianDay (YYYY-MM-DD)|(% colspan="2" %)date
	874	+| |(% colspan="2" %)(((
717	717	ReportingTimePeriod
718		-(superset of RepostingYear, ReportingSemester, ReportingTrimester, ReportingQuarter, ReportingMonth, ReportingWeek, ReportingDay)
719		-)))|(% colspan="1" style="width:311px" %)time_period
720		-|(% colspan="2" style="width:507px" %)(((
	876	+
	877	+(superset of RepostingYear, ReportingSemester,
	878	+
	879	+ReportingTrimester, ReportingQuarter,
	880	+
	881	+ReportingMonth, ReportingWeek, ReportingDay)
	882	+)))|(% colspan="2" %)time_period
	883	+| |(% colspan="2" %)(((
721	721	ReportingYear
	885	+
722	722	(YYYY-A1 – 1 year period)
723		-)))|(% colspan="1" style="width:311px" %)time_period
724		-|(% colspan="2" style="width:507px" %)(((
	887	+)))|(% colspan="2" %)time_period
	888	+| |(% colspan="2" %)(((
725	725	ReportingSemester
	890	+
726	726	(YYYY-Ss – 6 month period)
727		-)))|(% colspan="1" style="width:311px" %)time_period
728		-|(% colspan="2" style="width:507px" %)(((
	892	+)))|(% colspan="2" %)time_period
	893	+| |(% colspan="2" %)(((
729	729	ReportingTrimester
	895	+
730	730	(YYYY-Tt – 4 month period)
731		-)))|(% colspan="1" style="width:311px" %)time_period
732		-|(% colspan="2" style="width:507px" %)(((
	897	+)))|(% colspan="2" %)time_period
	898	+| |(% colspan="2" %)(((
733	733	ReportingQuarter
	900	+
734	734	(YYYY-Qq – 3 month period)
735		-)))|(% colspan="1" style="width:311px" %)time_period
736		-|(% colspan="2" style="width:507px" %)(((
	902	+)))|(% colspan="2" %)time_period
	903	+| |(% colspan="2" %)(((
737	737	ReportingMonth
	905	+
738	738	(YYYY-Mmm – 1 month period)
739		-)))|(% colspan="1" style="width:311px" %)time_period
740		-|(% colspan="2" style="width:507px" %)ReportingWeek|(% colspan="1" style="width:311px" %)time_period
741		-|(% colspan="1" style="width:507px" %)(YYYY-Www – 7 day period; following ISO 8601 definition of a week in a year)|(% colspan="2" style="width:312px" %)
742		-|(% colspan="1" style="width:507px" %)(((
	907	+)))|(% colspan="2" %)time_period
	908	+| |(% colspan="2" %)ReportingWeek|(% colspan="2" %)time_period
	909	+| |(% colspan="2" %) |(% colspan="2" %)
	910	+| |(% colspan="2" %) |(% colspan="2" %)
	911	+|(% colspan="2" %)(YYYY-Www – 7 day period; following ISO 8601 definition of a week in a year)|(% colspan="2" %) |
	912	+|(% colspan="2" %)(((
743	743	ReportingDay
	914	+
744	744	(YYYY-Dddd – 1 day period)
745		-)))|(% colspan="2" style="width:312px" %)time_period
746		-|(% colspan="1" style="width:507px" %)(((
	916	+)))|(% colspan="2" %)time_period|
	917	+|(% colspan="2" %)(((
747	747	DateTime
	919	+
748	748	(YYYY-MM-DDThh:mm:ss)
749		-)))|(% colspan="2" style="width:312px" %)date
750		-|(% colspan="1" style="width:507px" %)(((
	921	+)))|(% colspan="2" %)date|
	922	+|(% colspan="2" %)(((
751	751	TimeRange
	924	+
752	752	(YYYY-MM-DD(Thh:mm:ss)?/<duration>)
753		-)))|(% colspan="2" style="width:312px" %)time
754		-|(% colspan="1" style="width:507px" %)(((
	926	+)))|(% colspan="2" %)time|
	927	+|(% colspan="2" %)(((
755	755	Month
	929	+
756	756	(~-~-MM; speicifies a month independent of a year; e.g. February is black history month in the United States)
757		-)))|(% colspan="2" style="width:312px" %)string
758		-|(% colspan="1" style="width:507px" %)(((
	931	+)))|(% colspan="2" %)string|
	932	+|(% colspan="2" %)(((
759	759	MonthDay
	934	+
760	760	(~-~-MM-DD; specifies a day within a month independent of a year; e.g. Christmas is December 25^^th^^; used to specify reporting year start day)
761		-)))|(% colspan="2" style="width:312px" %)string
762		-|(% colspan="1" style="width:507px" %)(((
	936	+)))|(% colspan="2" %)string|
	937	+|(% colspan="2" %)(((
763	763	Day
	939	+
764	764	(~-~--DD; specifies a day independent of a month or year; e.g. the 15^^th^^ is payday)
765		-)))|(% colspan="2" style="width:312px" %)string
766		-|(% colspan="1" style="width:507px" %)(((
	941	+)))|(% colspan="2" %)string|
	942	+|(% colspan="2" %)(((
767	767	Time
	944	+
768	768	(hh:mm:ss; time independent of a date; e.g. coffee break is at 10:00 AM)
769		-)))|(% colspan="2" style="width:312px" %)string
770		-|(% colspan="1" style="width:507px" %)(((
	946	+)))|(% colspan="2" %)string|
	947	+|(% colspan="2" %)(((
771	771	Duration
	949	+
772	772	(corresponds to XML Schema xs:duration datatype)
773		-)))|(% colspan="2" style="width:312px" %)duration
774		-|(% colspan="1" style="width:507px" %)XHTML|(% colspan="2" style="width:312px" %)Metadata type – not applicable
775		-|(% colspan="1" style="width:507px" %)KeyValues|(% colspan="2" style="width:312px" %)Metadata type – not applicable
776		-|(% colspan="1" style="width:507px" %)IdentifiableReference|(% colspan="2" style="width:312px" %)Metadata type – not applicable
777		-|(% colspan="1" style="width:507px" %)DataSetReference|(% colspan="2" style="width:312px" %)Metadata type – not applicable
	951	+)))|(% colspan="2" %)duration|
	952	+|(% colspan="2" %)XHTML|(% colspan="2" %)Metadata type – not applicable|
	953	+|(% colspan="2" %)KeyValues|(% colspan="2" %)Metadata type – not applicable|
	954	+|(% colspan="2" %)IdentifiableReference|(% colspan="2" %)Metadata type – not applicable|
	955	+|(% colspan="2" %)DataSetReference|(% colspan="2" %)Metadata type – not applicable|
778	778
779		-(% class="wikigeneratedid" id="HFigure142013MappingsfromSDMXdatatypestoVTLBasicScalarTypes" %)
780		-**Figure 14 – Mappings from SDMX data types to VTL Basic Scalar Types**
	957	+==== Figure 14 – Mappings from SDMX data types to VTL Basic Scalar Types ====
781	781
782	782	When VTL takes in input SDMX artefacts, it is assumed that a type conversion according to the table above always happens. In case a different VTL basic scalar type is desired, it can be achieved in the VTL program taking in input the default VTL basic scalar type above and applying to it the VTL type conversion features (see the implicit and explicit type conversion and the "cast" operator in the VTL Reference Manual).
783	783
...	...	@@ -785,32 +785,39 @@
785	785
786	786	The following table describes the default conversion from the VTL basic scalar types to the SDMX data types .
787	787
788		-(% style="width:1073.29px" %)
789		-|(% style="width:207px" %)(((
790		-**VTL basic scalar type**
791		-)))|(% style="width:462px" %)(((
792		-**Default SDMX data type (BasicComponentDataType)**
793		-)))|(% style="width:402px" %)**Default output format**
794		-|(% style="width:207px" %)String|(% style="width:462px" %)String|(% style="width:402px" %)Like XML (xs:string)
795		-|(% style="width:207px" %)Number|(% style="width:462px" %)Float|(% style="width:402px" %)Like XML (xs:float)
796		-|(% style="width:207px" %)Integer|(% style="width:462px" %)Integer|(% style="width:402px" %)Like XML (xs:int)
797		-|(% style="width:207px" %)Date|(% style="width:462px" %)DateTime|(% style="width:402px" %)YYYY-MM-DDT00:00:00Z
798		-|(% style="width:207px" %)Time|(% style="width:462px" %)StandardTimePeriod|(% style="width:402px" %)<date>/<date> (as defined above)
799		-|(% style="width:207px" %)time_period|(% style="width:462px" %)(((
	965	+|(((
	966	+VTL basic
	967	+
	968	+scalar type
	969	+)))|(((
	970	+Default SDMX data type
	971	+
	972	+(BasicComponentDataType
	973	+
	974	+)
	975	+)))|Default output format
	976	+|String|String|Like XML (xs:string)
	977	+|Number|Float|Like XML (xs:float)
	978	+|Integer|Integer|Like XML (xs:int)
	979	+|Date|DateTime|YYYY-MM-DDT00:00:00Z
	980	+|Time|StandardTimePeriod|<date>/<date> (as defined above)
	981	+|time_period|(((
800	800	ReportingTimePeriod
	983	+
801	801	(StandardReportingPeriod)
802		-)))|(% style="width:402px" %)(((
	985	+)))|(((
803	803	YYYY-Pppp
	987	+
804	804	(according to SDMX )
805	805	)))
806		-|(% style="width:207px" %)Duration|(% style="width:462px" %)Duration|(% style="width:402px" %)(((
	990	+|Duration|Duration|(((
807	807	Like XML (xs:duration)
	992	+
808	808	PnYnMnDTnHnMnS
809	809	)))
810		-|(% style="width:207px" %)Boolean|(% style="width:462px" %)Boolean|(% style="width:402px" %)Like XML (xs:boolean) with the values "true" or "false"
	995	+|Boolean|Boolean|Like XML (xs:boolean) with the values "true" or "false"
811	811
812		-(% class="wikigeneratedid" id="HFigure142013MappingsfromSDMXdatatypestoVTLBasicScalarTypes-1" %)
813		-**Figure 14 – Mappings from SDMX data types to VTL Basic Scalar Types**
	997	+==== Figure 14 – Mappings from SDMX data types to VTL Basic Scalar Types ====
814	814
815	815	In case a different default conversion is desired, it can be achieved through the CustomTypeScheme and CustomType artefacts (see also the section Transformations and Expressions of the SDMX information model).
816	816
...	...	@@ -864,7 +864,7 @@
864	864	|N|fixed number of digits used in the preceding textual representation of the month or the day
865	865	| |
866	866
867		-The default conversion, either standard or customized, can be used to deduce automatically the representation of the components of the result of a VTL Transformation. In alternative, the representation of the resulting SDMX Dataflow can be given explicitly by providing its DataStructureDefinition. In other words, the representation specified in the DSD, if available, overrides any default conversion{{footnote}}The representation given in the DSD should obviously be compatible with the VTL data type.{{/footnote}}.
	1051	+The default conversion, either standard or customized, can be used to deduce automatically the representation of the components of the result of a VTL Transformation. In alternative, the representation of the resulting SDMX Dataflow can be given explicitly by providing its DataStructureDefinition. In other words, the representation specified in the DSD, if available, overrides any default conversion^^[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^42^^>>path:#sdfootnote42sym||name="sdfootnote42anc"]](%%)^^.
868	868
869	869	=== 12.4.5 Null Values ===
870	870
...	...	@@ -882,8 +882,10 @@
882	882
883	883	A different format can be specified in the attribute "vtlLiteralFormat" of the CustomType artefact (see also the section Transformations and Expressions of the SDMX information model).
884	884
885		-Like in the case of the conversion of NULLs described in the previous paragraph, the overriding assumption is applied, for a certain VTL basic scalar type, if a value is found for the vtlLiteralFormat attribute of the CustomType of such VTL basic scalar type. The overriding assumption is applied for all the literals of a related VTL TransformationScheme.
	1069	+Like in the case of the conversion of NULLs described in the previous paragraph, the overriding assumption is applied, for a certain VTL basic scalar type, if a value is found for the vtlLiteralFormat attribute of the CustomType of such VTL basic scalar type. The overriding assumption is applied for all the literals of a related VTL
886	886
	1071	+TransformationScheme.
	1072	+
887	887	In case a literal is operand of a VTL Cast operation, the format specified in the Cast overrides all the possible otherwise specified formats.
888	888
889	889	{{putFootnotes/}}