Skip to Content
Last modified by Helena on 2025/09/10 11:19
From version 6.7
edited by Helena
on 2025/05/16 12:35
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 6.10
edited by Helena
on 2025/05/16 12:38
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -414,13 +414,8 @@
414 414  
415 415  It should be noted that the desired VTL Data Sets (i.e. of the kind ‘DF1(1.0.0)/// INDICATORvalue//.//COUNTRYvalue//’) can be obtained also by applying the VTL operator “**sub**” (subspace) to the Dataflow DF1(1.0.0), like in the following VTL expression:
416 416  
417 -‘DF1(1.0.0)/POPULATION.USA’ :=
418 -DF1(1.0.0) [ sub INDICATOR=“POPULATION”, COUNTRY=“USA” ];
417 +[[image:1747388275998-621.png]]
419 419  
420 -‘DF1(1.0.0)/POPULATION.CANADA’ :=
421 -DF1(1.0.0) [ sub INDICATOR=“POPULATION”, COUNTRY=“CANADA” ];
422 -… … …
423 -
424 424  In fact the VTL operator “sub” has exactly the same behaviour. Therefore, mapping different parts of a SDMX Dataflow to different VTL Data Sets in the direction from SDMX to VTL through the ordered concatenation notation is equivalent to a proper use of the operator “**sub**” on such a Dataflow.{{footnote}}In case the ordered concatenation notation is used, the VTL Transformation described above, e.g. ‘DF1(1.0)/POPULATION.USA’ := DF1(1.0) [ sub INDICATOR=“POPULATION”, COUNTRY=“USA”], is implicitly executed. In order to test the overall compliance of the VTL program to the VTL consistency rules, it has to be considered as part of the VTL program even if it is not explicitly coded.{{/footnote}}
425 425  
426 426  In the direction from SDMX to VTL it is allowed to omit the value of one or more
... ... @@ -431,8 +431,7 @@
431 431  
432 432  This is equivalent to the application of the VTL “sub” operator only to the identifier //INDICATOR//:
433 433  
434 -‘DF1(1.0.0)/POPULATION.’ :=
435 -DF1(1.0.0) [ sub INDICATOR=“POPULATION” ];
429 +[[image:1747388244829-693.png]]
436 436  
437 437  Therefore the VTL Data Set ‘DF1(1.0.0)/POPULATION.’ would have the identifiers COUNTRY and TIME_PERIOD.
438 438  
... ... @@ -459,36 +459,17 @@
459 459  
460 460  Some examples follow, for some specific values of INDICATOR and COUNTRY:
461 461  
462 -‘DF2(1.0.0)/GDPPERCAPITA.USA’ <- expression11; ‘DF2(1.0.0)/GDPPERCAPITA.CANADA’ <- expression12;
456 +[[image:1747388222879-916.png]]
463 463  
464 -… … …
465 -‘DF2(1.0.0)/POPGROWTH.USA’ <- expression21;
466 -‘DF2(1.0.0)/POPGROWTH.CANADA’ <- expression22;
467 -… … …
458 +[[image:1747388206717-256.png]]
468 468  
469 469  As said, it is assumed that these VTL derived Data Sets have the TIME_PERIOD as the only identifier. In the mapping from VTL to SMDX, the Dimensions INDICATOR and COUNTRY are added to the VTL data structure on order to obtain the SDMX one, with the following values respectively:
470 470  
471 -VTL dataset INDICATOR value COUNTRY value
462 +[[image:1747388148322-387.png]]
472 472  
473 -‘DF2(1.0.0)/GDPPERCAPITA.USA’ GDPPERCAPITA USA
474 -‘DF2(1.0.0)/GDPPERCAPITA.CANADA’ GDPPERCAPITA CANADA … … …
475 -‘DF2(1.0.0)/POPGROWTH.USA’ POPGROWTH USA
476 -‘DF2(1.0.0)/POPGROWTH.CANADA’ POPGROWTH CANADA
477 -… … …
478 -
479 479  It should be noted that the application of this many-to-one mapping from VTL to SDMX is equivalent to an appropriate sequence of VTL Transformations. These use the VTL operator “calc” to add the proper VTL identifiers (in the example, INDICATOR and COUNTRY) and to assign to them the proper values and the operator “union” in order to obtain the final VTL dataset (in the example DF2(1.0.0)), that can be mapped oneto-one to the homonymous SDMX Dataflow. Following the same example, these VTL Transformations would be:
480 480  
481 -DF2bis_GDPPERCAPITA_USA := ‘DF2(1.0.0)/GDPPERCAPITA.USA’ [calc identifier INDICATOR := ”GDPPERCAPITA”, identifier COUNTRY := ”USA”];
482 -DF2bis_GDPPERCAPITA_CANADA := ‘DF2(1.0.0)/GDPPERCAPITA.CANADA’ [calc identifier INDICATOR:=”GDPPERCAPITA”, identifier COUNTRY:=”CANADA”]; … … …
483 -DF2bis_POPGROWTH_USA := ‘DF2(1.0.0)/POPGROWTH.USA’
484 -[calc identifier INDICATOR := ”POPGROWTH”, identifier COUNTRY := ”USA”];
485 -DF2bis_POPGROWTH_CANADA’ := ‘DF2(1.0.0)/POPGROWTH.CANADA’ [calc identifier INDICATOR := ”POPGROWTH”, identifier COUNTRY := ”CANADA”]; … … …
486 -DF2(1.0) <- UNION (DF2bis_GDPPERCAPITA_USA’,
487 -DF2bis_GDPPERCAPITA_CANADA’,
488 -… ,
489 -DF2bis_POPGROWTH_USA’,
490 -DF2bis_POPGROWTH_CANADA’
491 -…);
466 +[[image:1747388179021-814.png]]
492 492  
493 493  In other words, starting from the datasets explicitly calculated through VTL (in the example ‘DF2(1.0)/GDPPERCAPITA.USA’ and so on), the first step consists in calculating other (non-persistent) VTL datasets (in the example
494 494  
... ... @@ -503,37 +503,30 @@
503 503  With reference to the VTL “model for Variables and Value domains”, the following additional mappings have to be considered:
504 504  
505 505  (% style="width:1170.29px" %)
506 -|**VTL**|(% style="width:754px" %)**SDMX**
507 -|**Data Set Component**|(% style="width:754px" %)Although this abstraction exists in SDMX, it does not have an explicit definition and correspond to a Component (either a DimensionComponent or a Measure or a DataAttribute) belonging to one specific Dataflow{{footnote}}Through SDMX Constraints, it is possible to specify the values that a Component of a Dataflow can assume.{{/footnote}}
508 -|**Represented Variable**|(% style="width:754px" %)(((
481 +|(% style="width:392px" %)**VTL**|(% style="width:776px" %)**SDMX**
482 +|(% style="width:392px" %)**Data Set Component**|(% style="width:776px" %)Although this abstraction exists in SDMX, it does not have an explicit definition and correspond to a Component (either a DimensionComponent or a Measure or a DataAttribute) belonging to one specific Dataflow{{footnote}}Through SDMX Constraints, it is possible to specify the values that a Component of a Dataflow can assume.{{/footnote}}
483 +|(% style="width:392px" %)**Represented Variable**|(% style="width:776px" %)(((
509 509  **Concept** with a definite
510 510  
511 511  Representation
512 512  )))
513 -|**Value Domain**|(% style="width:754px" %)(((
514 -**Representation** (see the Structure
515 -
516 -Pattern in the Base Package)
488 +|(% style="width:392px" %)**Value Domain**|(% style="width:776px" %)(((
489 +**Representation** (see the Structure Pattern in the Base Package)
517 517  )))
518 -|**Enumerated Value Domain / Code List**|(% style="width:754px" %)**Codelist**
519 -|**Code**|(% style="width:754px" %)(((
491 +|(% style="width:392px" %)**Enumerated Value Domain / Code List**|(% style="width:776px" %)**Codelist**
492 +|(% style="width:392px" %)**Code**|(% style="width:776px" %)(((
520 520  **Code** (for enumerated
521 521  
522 522  DimensionComponent, Measure, DataAttribute)
523 523  )))
524 -|**Described Value Domain**|(% style="width:754px" %)(((
525 -non-enumerated** Representation**
526 -
527 -(having Facets / ExtendedFacets, see the Structure Pattern in the Base Package)
497 +|(% style="width:392px" %)**Described Value Domain**|(% style="width:776px" %)(((
498 +non-enumerated** Representation **(having Facets / ExtendedFacets, see the Structure Pattern in the Base Package)
528 528  )))
529 -|**Value**|(% style="width:754px" %)Although this abstraction exists in SDMX, it does not have an explicit definition and correspond to a **Code** of a Codelist (for enumerated Representations) or
530 -| |(% style="width:754px" %)(((
531 -to a valid **value **(for non-enumerated** **Representations)
532 -)))
533 -|**Value Domain Subset / Set**|(% style="width:754px" %)This abstraction does not exist in SDMX
534 -|**Enumerated Value Domain Subset / Enumerated Set**|(% style="width:754px" %)This abstraction does not exist in SDMX
535 -|**Described Value Domain Subset / Described Set**|(% style="width:754px" %)This abstraction does not exist in SDMX
536 -|**Set list**|(% style="width:754px" %)This abstraction does not exist in SDMX
500 +|(% style="width:392px" %)**Value**|(% style="width:776px" %)Although this abstraction exists in SDMX, it does not have an explicit definition and correspond to a **Code** of a Codelist (for enumerated Representations) or to a valid **value **(for non-enumerated** **Representations)
501 +|(% style="width:392px" %)**Value Domain Subset / Set**|(% style="width:776px" %)This abstraction does not exist in SDMX
502 +|(% style="width:392px" %)**Enumerated Value Domain Subset / Enumerated Set**|(% style="width:776px" %)This abstraction does not exist in SDMX
503 +|(% style="width:392px" %)**Described Value Domain Subset / Described Set**|(% style="width:776px" %)This abstraction does not exist in SDMX
504 +|(% style="width:392px" %)**Set list**|(% style="width:776px" %)This abstraction does not exist in SDMX
537 537  
538 538  The main difference between VTL and SDMX relies on the fact that the VTL artefacts for defining subsets of Value Domains do not exist in SDMX, therefore the VTL features for referring to predefined subsets are not available in SDMX. These artefacts are the Value Domain Subset (or Set), either enumerated or described, the Set List (list of values belonging to enumerated subsets) and the Data Set Component (aimed at defining the set of values that the Component of a Data Set can take, possibly a subset of the codes of Value Domain).
539 539  
1747388148322-387.png
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.helena
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +23.0 KB
Content
1747388179021-814.png
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.helena
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +66.2 KB
Content
1747388206717-256.png
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.helena
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +10.3 KB
Content
1747388222879-916.png
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.helena
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +9.9 KB
Content
1747388244829-693.png
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.helena
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +7.4 KB
Content
1747388275998-621.png
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.helena
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +19.2 KB
Content