Last modified by Helena on 2025/09/10 11:19

From version 15.2
edited by Helena
on 2025/05/16 13:13
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 11.1
edited by Helena
on 2025/05/14 14:45
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -271,47 +271,48 @@
271 271  * TITLE – a multi-lingual data attribute
272 272  * SOURCE_AGENCY – a multi-value data attribute
273 273  
274 -> <Obs xsi:type="dsd:ObsType" OBS_VALUE="112" OBS_STAUS=”A” TIME_PERIOD="2010-09">
275 -> <!—- complex multi-value and multi-lingual data attributes ~-~->
276 -> <Comp id="TITLE" xsi:type="ns1:TITLE_ATTRIBUTE">
277 -> <Value>
278 -> <common:Text xml:lang="en">Some English Text</common:Text>
279 -> <common:Text xml:lang="fr">Quelques textes en anglais</common:Text>
280 -> </Value>
281 -> </Comp>
282 -> <Comp id="SOURCE_AGENCY" xsi:type="ns1:SOURCE_AGENCY_ATTRIBUTE">
283 -> <Value>4F0</Value>
284 -> <Value>4D0</Value>
285 -> <Value>CZ2</Value>
286 -> </Comp>
287 -> <!—- metadata attributes are reported like in metadata messages ~-~->
288 -> <Metadata>
289 -> <Attribute id="COLLECTION">
290 -> <Attribute id="METHOD">
291 -> <Text lang="en">AAA</Text>
292 -> </Attribute>
293 -> </Attribute>
294 -> <Attribute id="CONTACT">
295 -> <Value>CONTACT 1</Value>
296 -> <Attribute id="NAME">
297 -> <Value>Contact 1 Name 1</Value>
298 -> </Attribute>
299 -> <Attribute id="NAME">
300 -> <Value>Contact 1 Name 2</Value>
301 -> </Attribute>
302 -> </Attribute>
303 -> <Attribute id="CONTACT">
304 -> <Value>CONTACT 2</Value>
305 -> <Attribute id="NAME">
306 -> <Value>Contact 2 Name 1</Value>
307 -> </Attribute>
308 -> <Attribute id="NAME">
309 -> <Value>Contact 2 Name 2</Value>
310 -> </Attribute>
311 -> </Attribute>
312 -> </Metadata>
313 -> </Obs>
274 +<Obs xsi:type="dsd:ObsType" OBS_VALUE="112" OBS_STAUS=”A” TIME_PERIOD="2010-09">
275 +<!—- complex multi-value and multi-lingual data attributes ~-~->
276 +<Comp id="TITLE" xsi:type="ns1:TITLE_ATTRIBUTE">
277 +<Value>
278 +<common:Text xml:lang="en">Some English Text</common:Text>
279 +<common:Text xml:lang="fr">Quelques textes en anglais</common:Text>
280 +</Value>
281 +</Comp>
314 314  
283 +<Comp id="SOURCE_AGENCY" xsi:type="ns1:SOURCE_AGENCY_ATTRIBUTE">
284 +<Value>4F0</Value>
285 +<Value>4D0</Value>
286 +<Value>CZ2</Value>
287 +</Comp>
288 +<!—- metadata attributes are reported like in metadata messages ~-~->
289 +<Metadata>
290 +<Attribute id="COLLECTION">
291 +<Attribute id="METHOD">
292 +<Text lang="en">AAA</Text>
293 +</Attribute>
294 +</Attribute>
295 +<Attribute id="CONTACT">
296 +<Value>CONTACT 1</Value>
297 +<Attribute id="NAME">
298 +<Value>Contact 1 Name 1</Value>
299 +</Attribute>
300 +<Attribute id="NAME">
301 +<Value>Contact 1 Name 2</Value>
302 +</Attribute>
303 +</Attribute>
304 +<Attribute id="CONTACT">
305 +<Value>CONTACT 2</Value>
306 +<Attribute id="NAME">
307 +<Value>Contact 2 Name 1</Value>
308 +</Attribute>
309 +<Attribute id="NAME">
310 +<Value>Contact 2 Name 2</Value>
311 +</Attribute>
312 +</Attribute>
313 +</Metadata>
314 +</Obs>
315 +
315 315  === New - Metadata Provision Agreement ===
316 316  
317 317  In version 2.1 a Provision Agreement could be used to report information against a Dataflow or Metadataflow. From version 3.0 this is managed by two separate structures, the Data Provision Agreement and the Metadata Provision Agreement.
... ... @@ -336,25 +336,29 @@
336 336  
337 337  MeasureDimension behaviour as illustrated in the SDMX-ML example below:
338 338  
339 -> <str:MeasureList id=”MeasureDescriptor”>
340 -> <str:Measure id=”OBS_VALUE” minOccurs=”1” maxOccurs=”1” usage=”mandatory” > <str:ConceptIdentity>
341 -> <Ref id=”OBS_VALUE” maintainableParentID=”CONCEPTS” agencyID=”SDMX” maintainableParentVersion=”1.0.0” />
342 -> </str:ConceptIdentity>
343 -> <str:LocalRepresentation>
344 -> <str:TextFormat textType=”String” isMultiLingual=”true” />
345 -> </str:LocalRepresentation>
346 -> <str:ConceptRole>
347 -> <Ref id=”MEASURE” maintainableParentID=”SDMX_CONCEPT_ROLES” agencyID=”SDMX” maintainableParentVersion=”1.0.0” />
348 -> </str:ConceptRole>
349 -> </str:Measure>
350 -> ...
351 -> <str:Measure>
352 -> </str:MeasureList>
340 +<str:MeasureList id=”MeasureDescriptor”>
341 +<str:Measure id=”OBS_VALUE” minOccurs=”1” maxOccurs=”1” usage=”mandatory” > <str:ConceptIdentity>
342 +<Ref id=”OBS_VALUE” maintainableParentID=”CONCEPTS” agencyID=”SDMX” maintainableParentVersion=”1.0.0” />
343 +</str:ConceptIdentity>
344 +<str:LocalRepresentation>
345 +<str:TextFormat textType=”String” isMultiLingual=”true” />
346 +</str:LocalRepresentation>
347 +<str:ConceptRole>
348 +<Ref id=”MEASURE” maintainableParentID=”SDMX_CONCEPT_ROLES” agencyID=”SDMX” maintainableParentVersion=”1.0.0” />
349 +</str:ConceptRole>
350 +</str:Measure>
351 +...
352 +<str:Measure>
353 +</str:MeasureList>
353 353  
354 354  === Multi-value measures and attributes ===
355 355  
356 -Both measures and attributes have been extended with the option to take ‘arrays’ of 193 multiple coded or uncoded values. This supports use cases like multiple observation 194 status flags. New //minOccurs// and //maxOccurs// properties define the valid number of 195 values. The //usage// property separately defines whether the measure or attribute is //mandatory// or optional. In the SDMX-ML measure example above, the properties //minOccurs=”1” maxOccurs=”1” usage=”mandatory”// specify that OBS_VALUE must be 198 reported, and can only consist of a single value.
357 +Both measures and attributes have been extended with the option to take ‘arrays’ of 193 multiple coded or uncoded values. This supports use cases like multiple observation 194 status flags. New //minOccurs// and //maxOccurs// properties define the valid number of 195 values. The //usage// property separately defines whether the measure or attribute is
357 357  
359 +//mandatory// or optional. In the SDMX-ML measure example above, the properties
360 +
361 +//minOccurs=”1” maxOccurs=”1” usage=”mandatory”// specify that OBS_VALUE must be 198 reported, and can only consist of a single value.
362 +
358 358  === Attributes relationship to measures ===
359 359  
360 360  In addition to attaching attributes to a specific level within the dataset, their relationship 202 to measures can also be defined.
... ... @@ -380,13 +380,13 @@
380 380  * GeographicCodelist – each item includes an element to represent a specific Geo Feature Set which is described using the same expression syntax as for GeospatialInformation type.
381 381  * GeoGridCodelist – A code list defining a geographical grid composed of cells representing regular squared portions of the Earth. Each item references a cell within the grid.
382 382  
383 -== 3.7 Structure Mapping ==
388 +=== 3.7 Structure Mapping ===
384 384  
385 385  The Structure Set in version 2.1 is a container for many mapping structures including Data Structure Map, Codelist Map and Concept Map. For version 3.0 the Structure Set artefact has been deprecated and replaced with a number of new maintainables giving better flexibility and reusability, specifically: Structure Map, Concept Scheme Map, Representation Map, Reporting Taxonomy Map, Category Scheme Map and Organisation Scheme Map.
386 386  
387 387  The version 2.1 Codelist Map been replaced with Representation Map which allows mappings to be defined between any combination of Code Lists, Value Lists and noncoded representations such as text strings and numbers.
388 388  
389 -=== Many-to-many source and target components ===
394 +==== Many-to-many source and target components ====
390 390  
391 391  Structure mapping rules may be defined with both multiple source components and multiple target components in contrast to version 2.1 where only one source and target was allowed. That supports many-to-many (n-n) mapping use cases where the output of a mapping rule may be dependent on the combination of a number of input components. For instance:
392 392  
... ... @@ -400,19 +400,19 @@
400 400  
401 401  The Structure Map may now define input or output components which have a fixed value.
402 402  
403 -=== Time representations mapping ===
408 +==== Time representations mapping ====
404 404  
405 405  Non SDMX time representations may now be described in a Structure Map, allowing them to be mapped into SDMX time formats.
406 406  
407 -=== Regular expression and substring mappings ===
412 +==== Regular expression and substring mappings ====
408 408  
409 409  All item maps allow the use of regular expressions and substrings to match source values, specifically: Concept Scheme Map, Reporting Taxonomy Map, Category Scheme Map and Organisation Scheme Map.
410 410  
411 -=== Item maps validity period ===
416 +==== Item maps validity period ====
412 412  
413 413  Item maps may further define the period for which the mapping is valid, meaning the mapping rule will only be applied if the row of information being mapped is within the period.
414 414  
415 -== 3.8 Constraints ==
420 +=== 3.8 Constraints ===
416 416  
417 417  Constraints in version 3.0 are modelled using two separate artefacts which replace the version 2.1 content constraint:
418 418  
... ... @@ -427,17 +427,17 @@
427 427  
428 428  Attachment constraints have been deprecated due to a lack of use cases.
429 429  
430 -== 3.9 Code List Extension ==
435 +=== 3.9 Code List Extension ===
431 431  
432 432  In addition to the two new specialised geospatial forms, the option has been added to define a code list as an extension of, or by inheriting codes from, other lists. An optional prefix can be added to inherited codes to disambiguate duplicates.
433 433  
434 434  This feature allows new code lists to be easily derived from existing lists without the need to make and manually maintain copies. When querying for extended code list structures using the REST API, the option has been added to retrieve either the definition or the materialised list. Traditional literal lists of codes continue to be supported.
435 435  
436 -== 3.10 Discriminated Union of Code Lists ==
441 +=== 3.10 Discriminated Union of Code Lists ===
437 437  
438 438  Combining code list extension with wildcarded constraints solves the discriminated union of code lists problem where a classification or breakdown has multiple “variants” which are all valid but mutually exclusive. A common example is economic activity where several alternative classification schemes are in use including ISIC revisions 1 to 4 and NACE as used in the European Community.
439 439  
440 -== 3.11 Code Hierarchies ==
445 +=== 3.11 Code Hierarchies ===
441 441  
442 442  Code hierarchies allow the definition of complex hierarchies of codes from potentially multiple lists for data discovery purposes. Hierarchical Codelist has been deprecated and replaced by two new artefacts: Hierarchy – the actual hierarchy of codes, and Hierarchy Association links hierarchies directly to any other identifiable object, a capability missing 312 from the version 2.1 model. Further, the linkage can be within a particular context, for instance linking a hierarchy to a dimension within the context of a specific Dataflow (dimension REF_AREA in the context of the ECB:EXR Dataflow).
443 443