Changes for page SDMX 3.0 Standards. Summary of Major Changes and New Functionality
Last modified by Helena on 2025/09/10 11:19
Summary
-
Page properties (4 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
-
Objects (0 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - 1Overview1 +SDMX STANDARDS - Parent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Methodology.WebHome - Content
-
... ... @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ 65 65 66 66 Version 3.0 introduces breaking changes into the web services API, transmission formats and information model. A summary is given in the table below. 67 67 68 -== //2.1 Web Services API//==68 +== 2.1 Web Services API == 69 69 70 70 (% style="width:948.039px" %) 71 71 |**REST API**|(% style="width:818px" %)((( ... ... @@ -86,10 +86,8 @@ 86 86 ))) 87 87 |**SOAP API**|(% style="width:818px" %)The SOAP API has been deprecated. 88 88 89 -== //2.2 Transmission Formats//==89 +== 2.2 Transmission Formats == 90 90 91 -: 92 - 93 93 ((( 94 94 (% style="width:952.039px" %) 95 95 |(% style="width:130px" %)**SDMX-ML**|(% style="width:820px" %)((( ... ... @@ -117,20 +117,15 @@ 117 117 The JSON structure message is not backwardly compatible primarily due to: 118 118 119 119 * Changes to the information model 120 -* Changes to the way the structures are organised into 121 - 122 -‘collections’ within the message 123 - 118 +* Changes to the way the structures are organised into ‘collections’ within the message 124 124 * Deprecation of the Agency, ID, Version option for referencing of structures in messages 125 125 ))) 126 126 |(% style="width:130px" %)**SDMX-EDI**|(% style="width:820px" %)The EDI format for both structures and data has been deprecated. 127 -|(% style="width:130px" %)**SDMX-CSV**|(% style="width:820px" %)The CSV data and reference metadata messages are not backwardly compatible with those under version 2.1 due to changes to the structure of the messages needed to support new features such as the improved REST API data queries. ** **122 +|(% style="width:130px" %)**SDMX-CSV**|(% style="width:820px" %)The CSV data and reference metadata messages are not backwardly compatible with those under version 2.1 due to changes to the structure of the messages needed to support new features such as the improved REST API data queries. 128 128 ))) 129 129 130 -== //2.3 Information Model//==125 +== 2.3 Information Model == 131 131 132 -: 133 - 134 134 ((( 135 135 (% style="width:955.039px" %) 136 136 |(% style="width:132px" %)**Data Structure Definition**|(% style="width:819px" %)((( ... ... @@ -158,10 +158,7 @@ 158 158 159 159 //Conversion guidance for implementors// 160 160 161 -A version 2.1 Metadata Structure Definition can be converted to the version 3.0 model under some circumstances, but target information is either lost or has to be translated into a metadataflow. Further, conversion of a Data Structure Definition for collecting reference metadata against a dataset would need to make changes to the dataset’s Data Structure Definition. As the Data Structure Definition may not actually be specified, judgement would need to be taken, perhaps determining the most likely candidate by examining which 162 -))) 163 -|(% style="width:132px" %) |(% style="width:819px" %)((( 164 -already have metadata reported against their datasets. A 2.1 metadata report could be converted to a version 3.0 Metadataset if it is attached to a structure, but requires a Metadata Provision Agreement which would need to be created if not already in existence. 154 +A version 2.1 Metadata Structure Definition can be converted to the version 3.0 model under some circumstances, but target information is either lost or has to be translated into a metadataflow. Further, conversion of a Data Structure Definition for collecting reference metadata against a dataset would need to make changes to the dataset’s Data Structure Definition. As the Data Structure Definition may not actually be specified, judgement would need to be taken, perhaps determining the most likely candidate by examining which already have metadata reported against their datasets. A 2.1 metadata report could be converted to a version 3.0 Metadataset if it is attached to a structure, but requires a Metadata Provision Agreement which would need to be created if not already in existence. 165 165 166 166 Conversion from the version 3.0 model to version 2.1 cannot be performed reliably. The process would need target information to be derived from analysis of the Metadataflows and Metadata Provision Agreements. Depending on the complexity it may not be possible to express that information in a version 2.1 Data Structure Definition. 167 167 ))) ... ... @@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ 187 187 188 188 = 3 Information Model = 189 189 190 -== //3.1 Version 3.0 Information Model//==180 +== 3.1 Version 3.0 Information Model == 191 191 192 192 [[image:SDMX 3-0-0 Major Changes FINAL-1.0_en_6fc573fe.png||height="404" width="718"]] 193 193 ... ... @@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ 197 197 198 198 A number of ancillary structures including organisation schemes, process and reporting taxonomy are unchanged and have not been shown. Similarly, Organisation Scheme Map and Reporting Taxonomy Map have been omitted for simplicity. A schematic of the 2.1 model is given in Appendix A for comparison purposes. 199 199 200 -== //3.2 Key Changes from Version 2.1//==190 +== 3.2 Key Changes from Version 2.1 == 201 201 202 202 New Maintainable Artefacts 203 203 ... ... @@ -225,7 +225,8 @@ 225 225 Removed Maintainable Artefacts 226 226 227 227 * Structure Set – replaced by Structure Map and the four item scheme maps 228 -* Hierarchical Codelist – replaced by Hierarchy and Hierarchy Association • Constraint – replaced by Data Constraint and Metadata Constraint 218 +* Hierarchical Codelist – replaced by Hierarchy and Hierarchy Association 219 +* Constraint – replaced by Data Constraint and Metadata Constraint 229 229 230 230 Changed Maintainable Artefacts 231 231 ... ... @@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ 239 239 240 240 * GeospatialInformation – a string type where the value is an expression defining a set of geographical features using a purpose-designed syntax 241 241 242 -== //3.3 Areas Unchanged from Version 2.1//==233 +== 3.3 Areas Unchanged from Version 2.1 == 243 243 244 244 The following areas of the information model are unchanged from version 2.1: 245 245 ... ... @@ -252,12 +252,12 @@ 252 252 * Reporting taxonomy 253 253 * Process 254 254 255 -== //3.4 Reference Metadata//==246 +== 3.4 Reference Metadata == 256 256 257 257 Reference metadata has been substantially re-designed for version 3.0 to simplify the model and better support practical use cases. 258 258 259 -= ==SimplifyMetadataStructureDefinition===260 - 250 +(% class="wikigeneratedid" id="HSimplifyMetadataStructureDefinition" %) 251 +**Simplify Metadata Structure Definition** 261 261 The Metadata Structure Definition (MSD) has been simplified to remove target information, and the support of multiple report structures. The MSD now only contains Metadata Attributes which are used to define the structure of a report. 262 262 263 263 [[image:SDMX 3-0-0 Major Changes FINAL-1.0_en_ad5f5c97.png||height="346" width="494"]] ... ... @@ -268,8 +268,8 @@ 268 268 269 269 //Figure 3 the simplified version 3.0 MSD// 270 270 271 -= ==Changetoreferencemetadatareportedagainstdata===272 - 262 +(% class="wikigeneratedid" id="HChangetoreferencemetadatareportedagainstdata" %) 263 +**Change to reference metadata reported against data** 273 273 Reference metadata associated with datasets, data series or observations are now reported with the data. The dataset’s DSD must reference an MSD to define the structure of its reference metadata. In practice reference metadata for data are transmitted as part of the data message. The metadata attributes are treated in a similar way to the data attributes appearing in the message at the dataset, data series or individual observation level as appropriate. In contrast to simple data attributes, metadata attributes defined by an MSD can be organised into a hierarchical structure as illustrated in Figure 3 above. For this reason, metadata attributes appear in data messages structured in the same way as metadata messages. 274 274 275 275 The SDMX-ML example below is an excerpt from a structure specific data message illustrating reporting of reference metadata with a hierarchical structure at the observation level. ... ... @@ -280,158 +280,96 @@ 280 280 * TITLE – a multi-lingual data attribute 281 281 * SOURCE_AGENCY – a multi-value data attribute 282 282 283 -<Obs xsi:type="dsd:ObsType" OBS_VALUE="112" OBS_STAUS=”A” TIME_PERIOD="2010-09"> 274 +> <Obs xsi:type="dsd:ObsType" OBS_VALUE="112" OBS_STAUS=”A” TIME_PERIOD="2010-09"> 275 +> <!—- complex multi-value and multi-lingual data attributes ~-~-> 276 +> <Comp id="TITLE" xsi:type="ns1:TITLE_ATTRIBUTE"> 277 +> <Value> 278 +> <common:Text xml:lang="en">Some English Text</common:Text> 279 +> <common:Text xml:lang="fr">Quelques textes en anglais</common:Text> 280 +> </Value> 281 +> </Comp> 282 +> <Comp id="SOURCE_AGENCY" xsi:type="ns1:SOURCE_AGENCY_ATTRIBUTE"> 283 +> <Value>4F0</Value> 284 +> <Value>4D0</Value> 285 +> <Value>CZ2</Value> 286 +> </Comp> 287 +> <!—- metadata attributes are reported like in metadata messages ~-~-> 288 +> <Metadata> 289 +> <Attribute id="COLLECTION"> 290 +> <Attribute id="METHOD"> 291 +> <Text lang="en">AAA</Text> 292 +> </Attribute> 293 +> </Attribute> 294 +> <Attribute id="CONTACT"> 295 +> <Value>CONTACT 1</Value> 296 +> <Attribute id="NAME"> 297 +> <Value>Contact 1 Name 1</Value> 298 +> </Attribute> 299 +> <Attribute id="NAME"> 300 +> <Value>Contact 1 Name 2</Value> 301 +> </Attribute> 302 +> </Attribute> 303 +> <Attribute id="CONTACT"> 304 +> <Value>CONTACT 2</Value> 305 +> <Attribute id="NAME"> 306 +> <Value>Contact 2 Name 1</Value> 307 +> </Attribute> 308 +> <Attribute id="NAME"> 309 +> <Value>Contact 2 Name 2</Value> 310 +> </Attribute> 311 +> </Attribute> 312 +> </Metadata> 313 +> </Obs> 284 284 285 -<!—- complex multi-value and multi-lingual data attributes ~-~-> 286 - 287 -<Comp id="TITLE" xsi:type="ns1:TITLE_ATTRIBUTE"> 288 - 289 -<Value> 290 - 291 -<common:Text xml:lang="en">Some English Text</common:Text> 292 - 293 -<common:Text xml:lang="fr">Quelques textes en anglais</common:Text> 294 - 295 -</Value> 296 - 297 -</Comp> 298 - 299 -<Comp id="SOURCE_AGENCY" xsi:type="ns1:SOURCE_AGENCY_ATTRIBUTE"> 300 - 301 -<Value>4F0</Value> 302 - 303 -<Value>4D0</Value> 304 - 305 -<Value>CZ2</Value> 306 - 307 -</Comp> 308 - 309 -<!—- metadata attributes are reported like in metadata messages ~-~-> 310 - 311 -<Metadata> 312 - 313 -<Attribute id="COLLECTION"> 314 - 315 -<Attribute id="METHOD"> 316 - 317 -<Text lang="en">AAA</Text> 318 - 319 -</Attribute> 320 - 321 -</Attribute> 322 - 323 -<Attribute id="CONTACT"> 324 - 325 -<Value>CONTACT 1</Value> 326 - 327 -<Attribute id="NAME"> 328 - 329 -<Value>Contact 1 Name 1</Value> 330 - 331 -</Attribute> 332 - 333 -<Attribute id="NAME"> 334 - 335 -<Value>Contact 1 Name 2</Value> 336 - 337 -</Attribute> 338 - 339 -</Attribute> 340 - 341 -<Attribute id="CONTACT"> 342 - 343 -<Value>CONTACT 2</Value> 344 - 345 -<Attribute id="NAME"> 346 - 347 -<Value>Contact 2 Name 1</Value> 348 - 349 -</Attribute> 350 - 351 -<Attribute id="NAME"> 352 - 353 -<Value>Contact 2 Name 2</Value> 354 - 355 -</Attribute> 356 - 357 -</Attribute> 358 - 359 -</Metadata> 360 - 361 -</Obs> 362 - 363 -=== New - Metadata Provision Agreement === 364 - 315 +(% class="wikigeneratedid" id="HNew-MetadataProvisionAgreement" %) 316 +**New - Metadata Provision Agreement** 365 365 In version 2.1 a Provision Agreement could be used to report information against a Dataflow or Metadataflow. From version 3.0 this is managed by two separate structures, the Data Provision Agreement and the Metadata Provision Agreement. 366 366 367 -= ==MovetargettoMetadataflowandMetadataProvisionAgreement===368 - 319 +(% class="wikigeneratedid" id="HMovetargettoMetadataflowandMetadataProvisionAgreement" %) 320 +**Move target to Metadataflow and Metadata Provision Agreement** 369 369 For reference metadata that is reported against structures, the allowable targets information which is used to specify what structures the reference metadata can be reported against, has moved to the Metadataflow and can be further refined in the Metadata Provision Agreement. 370 370 371 -= ==Addmaintainablepropertiestoreferencemetadata===372 - 323 +(% class="wikigeneratedid" id="HAddmaintainablepropertiestoreferencemetadata" %) 324 +**Add maintainable properties to reference metadata** 373 373 A Metadataset now has mandatory identification information, (owner id, id, version) enabling metadata providers to uniquely identify their reports for create, update or delete maintenance operations. 374 374 375 -== //3.5 Microdata Exchange//==327 +== 3.5 Microdata Exchange == 376 376 377 377 Several changes have been made the Data Structure Definition to support microdata use cases in addition to aggregated time series. 378 378 379 -=== Multiple measures === 331 +(% class="wikigeneratedid" id="HMultiplemeasures" %) 332 +**Multiple measures** 333 +Multiple measures are a common characteristic of microdatasets. To support this use case, the MeasureDimension has been deprecated and replaced with the option to define zero or more measures. Measures now act like any other component in that they use concepts, can have their own local coded or uncoded representation defined within the Data Structure Definition, and can be either mandatory or conditional. Creating a measure with the “MEASURE” concept role applied emulates the version 2.1 MeasureDimension behaviour as illustrated in the SDMX-ML example below: 380 380 381 -Multiple measures are a common characteristic of microdatasets. To support this use case, the MeasureDimension has been deprecated and replaced with the option to define zero or more measures. Measures now act like any other component in that they use concepts, can have their own local coded or uncoded representation defined within the 335 +> <str:MeasureList id=”MeasureDescriptor”> 336 +> <str:Measure id=”OBS_VALUE” minOccurs=”1” maxOccurs=”1” usage=”mandatory” > <str:ConceptIdentity> 337 +> <Ref id=”OBS_VALUE” maintainableParentID=”CONCEPTS” agencyID=”SDMX” maintainableParentVersion=”1.0.0” /> 338 +> </str:ConceptIdentity> 339 +> <str:LocalRepresentation> 340 +> <str:TextFormat textType=”String” isMultiLingual=”true” /> 341 +> </str:LocalRepresentation> 342 +> <str:ConceptRole> 343 +> <Ref id=”MEASURE” maintainableParentID=”SDMX_CONCEPT_ROLES” agencyID=”SDMX” maintainableParentVersion=”1.0.0” /> 344 +> </str:ConceptRole> 345 +> </str:Measure> 346 +> ... 347 +> <str:Measure> 348 +> </str:MeasureList> 382 382 383 -Data Structure Definition, and can be either mandatory or conditional. Creating a measure with the “MEASURE” concept role applied emulates the version 2.1 350 +(% class="wikigeneratedid" id="HMulti-valuemeasuresandattributes" %) 351 +**Multi-value measures and attributes** 352 +Both measures and attributes have been extended with the option to take ‘arrays’ of 193 multiple coded or uncoded values. This supports use cases like multiple observation 194 status flags. New //minOccurs// and //maxOccurs// properties define the valid number of 195 values. The //usage// property separately defines whether the measure or attribute is //mandatory// or optional. In the SDMX-ML measure example above, the properties //minOccurs=”1” maxOccurs=”1” usage=”mandatory”// specify that OBS_VALUE must be 198 reported, and can only consist of a single value. 384 384 385 -MeasureDimension behaviour as illustrated in the SDMX-ML example below: 386 - 387 -<str:MeasureList id=”MeasureDescriptor”> 388 - 389 -<str:Measure id=”OBS_VALUE” minOccurs=”1” maxOccurs=”1” usage=”mandatory” > <str:ConceptIdentity> 390 - 391 -<Ref id=”OBS_VALUE” maintainableParentID=”CONCEPTS” agencyID=”SDMX” maintainableParentVersion=”1.0.0” /> 392 - 393 -</str:ConceptIdentity> 394 - 395 -<str:LocalRepresentation> 396 - 397 -<str:TextFormat textType=”String” isMultiLingual=”true” /> 398 - 399 -</str:LocalRepresentation> 400 - 401 -<str:ConceptRole> 402 - 403 -<Ref id=”MEASURE” maintainableParentID=”SDMX_CONCEPT_ROLES” agencyID=”SDMX” maintainableParentVersion=”1.0.0” /> 404 - 405 -</str:ConceptRole> 406 - 407 -</str:Measure> 408 - 409 -... 410 - 411 -<str:Measure> 412 - 413 -</str:MeasureList> 414 - 415 -=== Multi-value measures and attributes === 416 - 417 -Both measures and attributes have been extended with the option to take ‘arrays’ of 193 multiple coded or uncoded values. This supports use cases like multiple observation 194 status flags. New //minOccurs// and //maxOccurs// properties define the valid number of 195 values. The //usage// property separately defines whether the measure or attribute is 418 - 419 -//mandatory// or optional. In the SDMX-ML measure example above, the properties 420 - 421 -//minOccurs=”1” maxOccurs=”1” usage=”mandatory”// specify that OBS_VALUE must be 198 reported, and can only consist of a single value. 422 - 423 -=== Attributes relationship to measures === 424 - 354 +(% class="wikigeneratedid" id="HAttributesrelationshiptomeasures" %) 355 +**Attributes relationship to measures** 425 425 In addition to attaching attributes to a specific level within the dataset, their relationship 202 to measures can also be defined. 426 426 427 -=== Value lists === 358 +(% class="wikigeneratedid" id="HValuelists" %) 359 +**Value lists** 360 +Value lists help in modelling microdata by providing an enumeration similar to code lists 206 but allowing any string values without being restricted to the rules of SDMX identifiers. That allows ValueItems (the equivalent to Code) to contain symbols like ‘¥’ and ‘€’, but also means they are not identifiable. 428 428 429 - Valuelistshelp in modelling microdata byprovidingan enumeration similar to codelists206 butallowing any string valueswithout beingrestrictedto the rules of SDMX identifiers.362 +== 3.6 Geospatial Data Exchange == 430 430 431 -That allows ValueItems (the equivalent to Code) to contain symbols like ‘¥’ and ‘€’, but 208 also means they are not identifiable. 432 - 433 -== //3.6 Geospatial Data Exchange// == 434 - 435 435 The version 3.0 model has been extended to provide explicit support for geospatial data. 436 436 437 437 === GeospatialInformation type === ... ... @@ -445,14 +445,14 @@ 445 445 * GeographicCodelist – each item includes an element to represent a specific Geo Feature Set which is described using the same expression syntax as for GeospatialInformation type. 446 446 * GeoGridCodelist – A code list defining a geographical grid composed of cells representing regular squared portions of the Earth. Each item references a cell within the grid. 447 447 448 -== =//3.7 Structure Mapping//===377 +== 3.7 Structure Mapping == 449 449 450 450 The Structure Set in version 2.1 is a container for many mapping structures including Data Structure Map, Codelist Map and Concept Map. For version 3.0 the Structure Set artefact has been deprecated and replaced with a number of new maintainables giving better flexibility and reusability, specifically: Structure Map, Concept Scheme Map, Representation Map, Reporting Taxonomy Map, Category Scheme Map and Organisation Scheme Map. 451 451 452 452 The version 2.1 Codelist Map been replaced with Representation Map which allows mappings to be defined between any combination of Code Lists, Value Lists and noncoded representations such as text strings and numbers. 453 453 454 -= ===Many-to-manysourceandtargetcomponents====455 - 383 +(% class="wikigeneratedid" id="HMany-to-manysourceandtargetcomponents" %) 384 +**Many-to-many source and target components** 456 456 Structure mapping rules may be defined with both multiple source components and multiple target components in contrast to version 2.1 where only one source and target was allowed. That supports many-to-many (n-n) mapping use cases where the output of a mapping rule may be dependent on the combination of a number of input components. For instance: 457 457 458 458 Set the output component INDICATOR=”DE_A” if the input components are FREQ=”A” and REF_AREA=”DE”. ... ... @@ -462,22 +462,21 @@ 462 462 Set the output components FREQ=”A”, REF_AREA=”DE” if the input component INDICATOR=”DE_A”. 463 463 464 464 **Fixed source and target** 465 - 466 466 The Structure Map may now define input or output components which have a fixed value. 467 467 468 -= ===Timerepresentationsmapping====469 - 396 +(% class="wikigeneratedid" id="HTimerepresentationsmapping" %) 397 +**Time representations mapping** 470 470 Non SDMX time representations may now be described in a Structure Map, allowing them to be mapped into SDMX time formats. 471 471 472 -= ===Regularexpressionandsubstringmappings====473 - 400 +(% class="wikigeneratedid" id="HRegularexpressionandsubstringmappings" %) 401 +**Regular expression and substring mappings** 474 474 All item maps allow the use of regular expressions and substrings to match source values, specifically: Concept Scheme Map, Reporting Taxonomy Map, Category Scheme Map and Organisation Scheme Map. 475 475 476 -= ===Itemmapsvalidityperiod====477 - 404 +(% class="wikigeneratedid" id="HItemmapsvalidityperiod" %) 405 +**Item maps validity period** 478 478 Item maps may further define the period for which the mapping is valid, meaning the mapping rule will only be applied if the row of information being mapped is within the period. 479 479 480 -== =//3.8 Constraints//===408 +== 3.8 Constraints == 481 481 482 482 Constraints in version 3.0 are modelled using two separate artefacts which replace the version 2.1 content constraint: 483 483 ... ... @@ -492,17 +492,17 @@ 492 492 493 493 Attachment constraints have been deprecated due to a lack of use cases. 494 494 495 -== =//3.9 Code List Extension//===423 +== 3.9 Code List Extension == 496 496 497 497 In addition to the two new specialised geospatial forms, the option has been added to define a code list as an extension of, or by inheriting codes from, other lists. An optional prefix can be added to inherited codes to disambiguate duplicates. 498 498 499 499 This feature allows new code lists to be easily derived from existing lists without the need to make and manually maintain copies. When querying for extended code list structures using the REST API, the option has been added to retrieve either the definition or the materialised list. Traditional literal lists of codes continue to be supported. 500 500 501 -== =//3.10 Discriminated Union of Code Lists//===429 +== 3.10 Discriminated Union of Code Lists == 502 502 503 503 Combining code list extension with wildcarded constraints solves the discriminated union of code lists problem where a classification or breakdown has multiple “variants” which are all valid but mutually exclusive. A common example is economic activity where several alternative classification schemes are in use including ISIC revisions 1 to 4 and NACE as used in the European Community. 504 504 505 -== =//3.11 Code Hierarchies//===433 +== 3.11 Code Hierarchies == 506 506 507 507 Code hierarchies allow the definition of complex hierarchies of codes from potentially multiple lists for data discovery purposes. Hierarchical Codelist has been deprecated and replaced by two new artefacts: Hierarchy – the actual hierarchy of codes, and Hierarchy Association links hierarchies directly to any other identifiable object, a capability missing 312 from the version 2.1 model. Further, the linkage can be within a particular context, for instance linking a hierarchy to a dimension within the context of a specific Dataflow (dimension REF_AREA in the context of the ECB:EXR Dataflow). 508 508 ... ... @@ -550,7 +550,7 @@ 550 550 551 551 = 5 REST Web Services API = 552 552 553 -== //5.1 Simplified list of resources//==481 +== 5.1 Simplified list of resources == 554 554 555 555 The version 3.0 REST API has just five main resources: 556 556 ... ... @@ -564,7 +564,7 @@ 564 564 565 565 This and changes in the URLs and query parameters on the data, availability and metadata resources means that, with the exception of schema queries, the version 3.0 API is not backwardly compatible. 566 566 567 -== //5.2 Improved data queries//==495 +== 5.2 Improved data queries == 568 568 569 569 Data queries have been changed to provide more granular selections from contexts wider than just a Dataflow. 570 570 ... ... @@ -603,7 +603,7 @@ 603 603 604 604 /data/dataflow/ESTAT/ICP/1.0.0/M…A.ANR,M…A.INX,M…B.CTG 605 605 606 -== //5.3 Improved reference metadata queries//==534 +== 5.3 Improved reference metadata queries == 607 607 608 608 Reference metadata queries have been improved with a number of new options to retrieve metadata reports. 609 609 ... ... @@ -619,7 +619,7 @@ 619 619 620 620 /metadata/structure/datastructure/BIS/BIS_CBS/1.0 621 621 622 -== //5.4 Structural metadata maintenance//==550 +== 5.4 Structural metadata maintenance == 623 623 624 624 Support has been added for maintenance of structural metadata. 625 625 ... ... @@ -627,7 +627,7 @@ 627 627 628 628 = 6 XML, JSON, CSV and EDI Transmission formats = 629 629 630 -== //6.1 SDMX-ML//==558 +== 6.1 SDMX-ML == 631 631 632 632 The SDMX-ML XML messages have been modified and updated for version 3.0. While they broadly follow the same principles, there have been significant changes which break backward compatibility. 633 633 ... ... @@ -713,7 +713,7 @@ 713 713 714 714 The option to reference structures using Agency, ID and Version has been removed. From SDMX version 3.0 URN is used for all referencing purposes with the exception of local references such as where groups reference dimensions within a DSD. 715 715 716 -== //6.2 SDMX-JSON//==644 +== 6.2 SDMX-JSON == 717 717 718 718 Like SDMX-ML, the SDMX-JSON messages have been significantly modified and updated for version 3.0. They are not backwardly compatible with version 2.1. 719 719 ... ... @@ -733,7 +733,7 @@ 733 733 734 734 As for SDMX-ML, the option to reference structures using Agency, ID and Version has been removed with URN used for all non-local referencing purposes. 735 735 736 -== //6.3 SDMX-CSV//==664 +== 6.3 SDMX-CSV == 737 737 738 738 CSV in SDMX is used transmission of data and reference metadata only. 739 739 ... ... @@ -751,7 +751,7 @@ 751 751 752 752 The SDMX-CSV metadata message is new for version 3.0 and, like the SDMX-ML and SDMX-JSON equivalents, is used for the transmission reference metadata sets. 753 753 754 -=== //6.4 EDI deprecation//===682 +=== 6.4 EDI deprecation === 755 755 756 756 The EDI format for transmission of both structures and data has been deprecated. Version 3.0 is therefore not backwardly compatible with legacy EDI messages. 757 757
- SUZ.Methodology.Code.MethodologyClass[0]
-