Changes for page SDMX 3.0 Standards. Summary of Major Changes and New Functionality
Last modified by Helena on 2025/09/10 11:19
Summary
-
Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
-
Attachments (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -1,13 +5,8 @@ 1 -{{box title="**Contents**"}} 2 -{{toc/}} 3 -{{/box}} 4 - 5 5 **Revision History** 6 6 7 -(% style="width:738.039px" %) 8 -|(% style="width:187px" %)Revision|(% style="width:157px" %)Date|(% style="width:390px" %)Contents 9 -|(% style="width:187px" %)DRAFT 1.0|(% style="width:157px" %)May 2021|(% style="width:390px" %)Draft release updated for SDMX 3.0 for public consultation 10 -|(% style="width:187px" %)1.0|(% style="width:157px" %)October 2021|(% style="width:390px" %)Public Release for SDMX 3.0 3 +|Revision|Date|Contents 4 +|DRAFT 1.0|May 2021|Draft release updated for SDMX 3.0 for public consultation 5 +|1.0|October 2021|Public Release for SDMX 3.0 11 11 12 12 = 1 Overview = 13 13 ... ... @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ 25 25 26 26 **Versioning of Structural Metadata Artefacts** 27 27 28 - *Adoption of the three-number semantic versioning standard for structural metadata artefacts ([[https:~~/~~/semver.org/>>https://semver.org/||rel="noopenernoreferrer" target="_blank"]])23 +• Adoption of the three-number semantic versioning standard for structural metadata artefacts [[(>>url:https://semver.org/]][[__https:~~/~~/semver.org__>>url:https://semver.org/]][[)>>url:https://semver.org/]] 29 29 30 30 **REST Web Services Application Programming Interface (API)** 31 31 ... ... @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ 36 36 37 37 **SOAP Web Services API** 38 38 39 - *The SOAP web services API has been deprecated with version 3.0 standardising on REST**;**34 +• The SOAP web services API has been deprecated with version 3.0 standardising on REST** ** 40 40 41 41 **XML, JSON, CSV and EDI Transmission formats** 42 42 ... ... @@ -67,8 +67,7 @@ 67 67 68 68 == //2.1 Web Services API// == 69 69 70 -(% style="width:948.039px" %) 71 -|**REST API**|(% style="width:818px" %)((( 65 +|**REST API**|((( 72 72 The REST API is not backwardly compatible due to modifications to the URLs and query parameters resulting in breaking changes in four of the five main resources: 73 73 74 74 * Structure queries ... ... @@ -84,15 +84,14 @@ 84 84 85 85 Implementors are also recommended to version their API services providing users with an explicit choice of which version to use. 86 86 ))) 87 -|**SOAP API**| (% style="width:818px" %)The SOAP API has been deprecated.81 +|**SOAP API**|The SOAP API has been deprecated. 88 88 89 89 == //2.2 Transmission Formats// == 90 90 91 -: 85 +: 92 92 93 93 ((( 94 -(% style="width:952.039px" %) 95 -|(% style="width:130px" %)**SDMX-ML**|(% style="width:820px" %)((( 88 +|**SDMX-ML**|((( 96 96 The following legacy XML data messages have been deprecated: 97 97 98 98 SDMX-ML 1.0/2.0 Generic (time-series) data message ... ... @@ -108,27 +108,34 @@ 108 108 The SDMX-ML structure message is not backwardly compatible primarily due to: 109 109 110 110 * Changes to the information model 111 -* Changes to the way the structures are organised into ‘collections’ within the message 104 +* Changes to the way the structures are organised into 105 + 106 +‘collections’ within the message 107 + 112 112 * Deprecation of the Agency, ID, Version option for referencing of structures in messages 113 113 ))) 114 -| (% style="width:130px" %)**SDMX-JSON**|(% style="width:820px" %)(((110 +|**SDMX-JSON**|((( 115 115 The JSON data message is not backwardly compatible with version 2.1 primarily due to changes needed to support the improved REST API data queries, in particular the ability to retrieve in one operation data from multiple datasets with potentially different Data Structure Definitions. 116 116 117 117 The JSON structure message is not backwardly compatible primarily due to: 118 118 119 119 * Changes to the information model 120 -* Changes to the way the structures are organised into ‘collections’ within the message 116 +* Changes to the way the structures are organised into 117 + 118 +‘collections’ within the message 119 + 121 121 * Deprecation of the Agency, ID, Version option for referencing of structures in messages 122 122 ))) 123 -| (% style="width:130px" %)**SDMX-EDI**|(% style="width:820px" %)The EDI format for both structures and data has been deprecated.124 -| (% style="width:130px" %)**SDMX-CSV**|(% style="width:820px" %)The CSV data and reference metadata messages are not backwardly compatible with those under version 2.1 due to changes to the structure of the messages needed to support new features such as the improved REST API data queries.** **122 +|**SDMX-EDI**|The EDI format for both structures and data has been deprecated. 123 +|**SDMX-CSV**|The CSV data and reference metadata messages are not backwardly compatible with those under version 2.1 due to changes to the structure of the messages needed to support new features such as the improved REST API data queries.** ** 125 125 ))) 126 126 127 127 == //2.3 Information Model// == 128 128 128 +: 129 + 129 129 ((( 130 -(% style="width:955.039px" %) 131 -|(% style="width:132px" %)**Data Structure Definition**|(% style="width:819px" %)((( 131 +|**Data Structure Definition**|((( 132 132 The version 3.0 Data Structure Definition (DSD) model is not directly backwardly compatible with 2.1 primarily due to the deprecation of the special MeasureDimension. 133 133 134 134 //Conversion guidance for implementors// ... ... @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ 137 137 138 138 Version 3.0 DSDs cannot be reliably converted to the 2.1 model due to the introduction of new features such as multiple measures and value arrays for measures and attributes. 139 139 ))) 140 -| (% style="width:132px" %)**Structure mapping model**|(% style="width:819px" %)(((140 +|**Structure mapping model**|((( 141 141 The structure mapping model has changed significantly in version 3.0 with deprecation of the Structure Set maintainable artefact and introduction of five new ones: Representation Map and four variants of item scheme map. 142 142 143 143 //Conversion guidance for implementors// ... ... @@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ 146 146 147 147 Conversion from the version 3.0 structure mapping model to 2.1 is generally possible. However, when attempting to convert mapping rules from 2.1 to 3.0 and back to 2.1, the resulting Structure Set will not be precisely the same as the original. In converting to version 3.0, the system must generate IDs for each of the new maintainable artefacts, but details of the original Structure Set artefacts are lost. 148 148 ))) 149 -| (% style="width:132px" %)**Reference metadata model**|(% style="width:819px" %)(((149 +|**Reference metadata model**|((( 150 150 The reference metadata model has changed in version 3.0 with modifications to the role of the Data Structure Definition, Metadata Structure Definition and Metadataflow artefacts. Metadata Provision Agreement and Metadata Provider Scheme have been added. Metadatasets are now identifiable. 151 151 152 152 Version 2.1 reference metadata models are not valid in version 3.0. ... ... @@ -155,12 +155,12 @@ 155 155 156 156 A version 2.1 Metadata Structure Definition can be converted to the version 3.0 model under some circumstances, but target information is either lost or has to be translated into a metadataflow. Further, conversion of a Data Structure Definition for collecting reference metadata against a dataset would need to make changes to the dataset’s Data Structure Definition. As the Data Structure Definition may not actually be specified, judgement would need to be taken, perhaps determining the most likely candidate by examining which 157 157 ))) 158 -| (% style="width:132px" %)|(% style="width:819px" %)(((158 +||((( 159 159 already have metadata reported against their datasets. A 2.1 metadata report could be converted to a version 3.0 Metadataset if it is attached to a structure, but requires a Metadata Provision Agreement which would need to be created if not already in existence. 160 160 161 161 Conversion from the version 3.0 model to version 2.1 cannot be performed reliably. The process would need target information to be derived from analysis of the Metadataflows and Metadata Provision Agreements. Depending on the complexity it may not be possible to express that information in a version 2.1 Data Structure Definition. 162 162 ))) 163 -| (% style="width:132px" %)**Constraint model**|(% style="width:819px" %)(((163 +|**Constraint model**|((( 164 164 The version 2.1 Content Constraint artefact has been deprecated in version 3.0 and replaced by the Data Constraint for data, and the Metadata Constraint for reference metadata. 165 165 166 166 //Conversion guidance for implementors// ... ... @@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ 169 169 170 170 Conversion from 3.0 to 2.1 presents challenges where wildcards have been used, in those cases requiring expansion of the wildcard into explicit values. 171 171 ))) 172 -| (% style="width:132px" %)**Hierarchical codelist structures**|(% style="width:819px" %)(((172 +|**Hierarchical codelist structures**|((( 173 173 The version 2.1 Hierarchical Codelist artefact has been deprecated in version 3.0 and replaced by two new artefacts, Hierarchy and Hierarchy Association. 174 174 175 175 //Conversion guidance for implementors// ... ... @@ -503,7 +503,7 @@ 503 503 504 504 = 4 Versioning of Structural Metadata Artefacts = 505 505 506 -Version 3.0 adopts semantic versioning principles for versioning of metadata artefacts following the rules set out at __[[https:~~/~~/semver.org>>https://semver.org]]__However, this is not mandatory, and organisations may continue to use the pre-existing two-digit versioning strategy, or not to version artefacts by omitting the //version// property. The version number no longer defaults to 1.0 if not explicitly set.506 +Version 3.0 adopts semantic versioning principles for versioning of metadata artefacts following the rules set out at [[__https:~~/~~/semver.org__>>url:https://semver.org/]][[.>>url:https://semver.org/]] However, this is not mandatory, and organisations may continue to use the pre-existing two-digit versioning strategy, or not to version artefacts by omitting the //version// property. The version number no longer defaults to 1.0 if not explicitly set. 507 507 508 508 Semantic version numbers are three digits: 509 509 ... ... @@ -585,12 +585,11 @@ 585 585 586 586 /data/dataflow/ESTAT/ICP?c[REF_AREA]=DE&c[ICP_ITEM]=sw:01&c[TIME_PERIOD]=ge:2015 Operators include: 587 587 588 -(% style="width:531.039px" %) 589 -|(% style="width:151px" %)eq|(% style="width:378px" %)Equals 590 -|(% style="width:151px" %)ne|(% style="width:378px" %)Not equal to 591 -|(% style="width:151px" %)le|(% style="width:378px" %)Less than 592 -|(% style="width:151px" %)ge|(% style="width:378px" %)Greater than or equal to 593 -|(% style="width:151px" %)sw|(% style="width:378px" %)Starts with 588 +|eq|Equals 589 +|ne|Not equal to 590 +|le|Less than 591 +|ge|Greater than or equal to 592 +|sw|Starts with 594 594 595 595 === Support for multiple keys === 596 596 ... ... @@ -632,49 +632,47 @@ 632 632 633 633 Additionally, the way the individual artefacts are organised into ‘collections’ within the message has been significantly revised with a simpler flat structure adopted as set out in the following table: 634 634 635 -(% style="width:1102.04px" %) 636 -|(% style="width:321px" %)**Artefact type**|(% style="width:351px" %)**Version 2.1 Collection**|(% style="width:426px" %)**Version 3.0 Collection** 637 -|(% style="width:321px" %)AgencyScheme|(% style="width:351px" %)OrganisationSchemes|(% style="width:426px" %)AgencySchemes 638 -|(% style="width:321px" %)DataConsumerScheme|(% style="width:351px" %)OrganisationSchemes|(% style="width:426px" %)DataConsumerSchemes 639 -|(% style="width:321px" %)DataProviderScheme|(% style="width:351px" %)OrganisationSchemes|(% style="width:426px" %)DataProviderSchemes 640 -|(% style="width:321px" %)MetadataProviderScheme|(% style="width:351px" %)OrganisationSchemes|(% style="width:426px" %)MetadataProviderSchemes 641 -|(% style="width:321px" %)OrganisationUnitScheme|(% style="width:351px" %)OrganisationSchemes|(% style="width:426px" %)OrganisationUnitSchemes 642 -|(% style="width:321px" %)GeographicCodelist|(% style="width:351px" %)Codelists|(% style="width:426px" %)GeographicCodelists 643 -|(% style="width:321px" %)GeoGridCodelist|(% style="width:351px" %)Codelists|(% style="width:426px" %)GeoGridCodelists 644 -|(% style="width:321px" %)ConceptScheme|(% style="width:351px" %)Concepts|(% style="width:426px" %)ConceptSchemes 645 -|(% style="width:321px" %)ValueList|(% style="width:351px" %)Codelists|(% style="width:426px" %)ValueLists 646 -|(% style="width:321px" %)StructureMap|(% style="width:351px" %)StructureMappings|(% style="width:426px" %)StructureMaps 647 -|(% style="width:321px" %)RepresentationMap|(% style="width:351px" %)StructureMappings|(% style="width:426px" %)RepresentationMaps 648 -|(% style="width:321px" %)ConceptSchemeMap|(% style="width:351px" %)StructureMappings|(% style="width:426px" %)ConceptSchemeMaps 649 -|(% style="width:321px" %)CategorySchemeMap|(% style="width:351px" %)StructureMappings|(% style="width:426px" %)CategorySchemeMaps 650 -|(% style="width:321px" %)OrganisationSchemeMap|(% style="width:351px" %)StructureMappings|(% style="width:426px" %)OrganisationSchemeMaps 651 -|(% style="width:321px" %)ReportingTaxonomyMap|(% style="width:351px" %)StructureMappings|(% style="width:426px" %)ReportingTaxonomyMaps 652 -|(% style="width:321px" %)DataConstraint|(% style="width:351px" %)Constraints|(% style="width:426px" %)DataConstraints 653 -|(% style="width:321px" %)MetadataConstraint|(% style="width:351px" %)Constraints|(% style="width:426px" %)MetadataConstraints 654 -|(% style="width:321px" %)MetadataProvisionAgreement|(% style="width:351px" %)ProvisionAgreement|(% style="width:426px" %)MetadataProvisionAgreements 655 -|(% style="width:321px" %)CustomTypeScheme|(% style="width:351px" %)CustomTypes|(% style="width:426px" %)CustomTypeSchemes 656 -|(% style="width:321px" %)VtlMappingScheme|(% style="width:351px" %)VtlMappings|(% style="width:426px" %)VtlMappingSchemes 657 -|(% style="width:321px" %)NamePersonalisationScheme|(% style="width:351px" %)NamePersonalisations|(% style="width:426px" %)NamePersonalisationSchemes 658 -|(% style="width:321px" %)RulesetScheme|(% style="width:351px" %)Rulesets|(% style="width:426px" %)RulesetSchemes 659 -|(% style="width:321px" %)TransformationScheme|(% style="width:351px" %)Transformations|(% style="width:426px" %)TransformationSchemes 660 -|(% style="width:321px" %)UserDefinedOperatorScheme|(% style="width:351px" %)UserDefinedOperators|(% style="width:426px" %)UserDefinedOperatorSchemes 634 +|**Artefact type**|**Version 2.1 Collection**|**Version 3.0 Collection** 635 +|AgencyScheme|OrganisationSchemes|AgencySchemes 636 +|DataConsumerScheme|OrganisationSchemes|DataConsumerSchemes 637 +|DataProviderScheme|OrganisationSchemes|DataProviderSchemes 638 +|MetadataProviderScheme|OrganisationSchemes|MetadataProviderSchemes 639 +|OrganisationUnitScheme|OrganisationSchemes|OrganisationUnitSchemes 640 +|GeographicCodelist|Codelists|GeographicCodelists 641 +|GeoGridCodelist|Codelists|GeoGridCodelists 642 +|ConceptScheme|Concepts|ConceptSchemes 643 +|ValueList|Codelists|ValueLists 644 +|StructureMap|StructureMappings|StructureMaps 645 +|RepresentationMap|StructureMappings|RepresentationMaps 646 +|ConceptSchemeMap|StructureMappings|ConceptSchemeMaps 647 +|CategorySchemeMap|StructureMappings|CategorySchemeMaps 648 +|OrganisationSchemeMap|StructureMappings|OrganisationSchemeMaps 649 +|ReportingTaxonomyMap|StructureMappings|ReportingTaxonomyMaps 650 +|DataConstraint|Constraints|DataConstraints 651 +|MetadataConstraint|Constraints|MetadataConstraints 652 +|MetadataProvisionAgreement|ProvisionAgreement|MetadataProvisionAgreements 653 +|CustomTypeScheme|CustomTypes|CustomTypeSchemes 654 +|VtlMappingScheme|VtlMappings|VtlMappingSchemes 655 +|NamePersonalisationScheme|NamePersonalisations|NamePersonalisationSchemes 656 +|RulesetScheme|Rulesets|RulesetSchemes 657 +|TransformationScheme|Transformations|TransformationSchemes 658 +|UserDefinedOperatorScheme|UserDefinedOperators|UserDefinedOperatorSchemes 661 661 662 662 No changes have been made to the way the following artefacts are organised in the structure message: 663 663 664 -(% style="width:1106.04px" %) 665 -|(% style="width:326px" %)**Artefact type**|(% style="width:776px" %)**Collection** 666 -|(% style="width:326px" %)Dataflow|(% style="width:776px" %)Dataflows 667 -|(% style="width:326px" %)Metadataflow|(% style="width:776px" %)Metadataflows 668 -|(% style="width:326px" %)CategoryScheme|(% style="width:776px" %)CategorySchemes 669 -|(% style="width:326px" %)Categorisation|(% style="width:776px" %)Categorisations 670 -|(% style="width:326px" %)Codelist|(% style="width:776px" %)Codelists 671 -|(% style="width:326px" %)Hierarchy|(% style="width:776px" %)Hierarchies 672 -|(% style="width:326px" %)HierarchyAssociation|(% style="width:776px" %)HierarchyAssociations 673 -|(% style="width:326px" %)MetadataStructure|(% style="width:776px" %)MetadataStructures 674 -|(% style="width:326px" %)DataStructure|(% style="width:776px" %)DataStructures 675 -|(% style="width:326px" %)ReportingTaxonomy|(% style="width:776px" %)ReportingTaxonomies 676 -|(% style="width:326px" %)Process|(% style="width:776px" %)Processes 677 -|(% style="width:326px" %)ProvisionAgreement|(% style="width:776px" %)ProvisionAgreements 662 +|**Artefact type**|**Collection** 663 +|Dataflow|Dataflows 664 +|Metadataflow|Metadataflows 665 +|CategoryScheme|CategorySchemes 666 +|Categorisation|Categorisations 667 +|Codelist|Codelists 668 +|Hierarchy|Hierarchies 669 +|HierarchyAssociation|HierarchyAssociations 670 +|MetadataStructure|MetadataStructures 671 +|DataStructure|DataStructures 672 +|ReportingTaxonomy|ReportingTaxonomies 673 +|Process|Processes 674 +|ProvisionAgreement|ProvisionAgreements 678 678 679 679 From version 3.0, collections can appear in any order within a structure message. 680 680
- SDMX 3-0-0 Major Changes FINAL-1.0_en_ad5f5c97.png
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -XWiki.helena - Size
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -22.0 KB - Content