Last modified by Helena on 2025/09/10 11:19

From version 7.8
edited by Helena
on 2025/05/14 13:38
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 16.2
edited by Helena
on 2025/05/16 13:18
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Title
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -1 Overview
1 +SDMX STANDARDS
Parent
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Methodology.WebHome
Content
... ... @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@
65 65  
66 66  Version 3.0 introduces breaking changes into the web services API, transmission formats and information model. A summary is given in the table below.
67 67  
68 -== //2.1 Web Services API// ==
68 +== 2.1 Web Services API ==
69 69  
70 70  (% style="width:948.039px" %)
71 71  |**REST API**|(% style="width:818px" %)(((
... ... @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
86 86  )))
87 87  |**SOAP API**|(% style="width:818px" %)The SOAP API has been deprecated.
88 88  
89 -== //2.2 Transmission Formats// ==
89 +== 2.2 Transmission Formats ==
90 90  
91 91  (((
92 92  (% style="width:952.039px" %)
... ... @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@
122 122  |(% style="width:130px" %)**SDMX-CSV**|(% style="width:820px" %)The CSV data and reference metadata messages are not backwardly compatible with those under version 2.1 due to changes to the structure of the messages needed to support new features such as the improved REST API data queries.
123 123  )))
124 124  
125 -== //2.3 Information Model// ==
125 +== 2.3 Information Model ==
126 126  
127 127  (((
128 128  (% style="width:955.039px" %)
... ... @@ -151,10 +151,7 @@
151 151  
152 152  //Conversion guidance for implementors//
153 153  
154 -A version 2.1 Metadata Structure Definition can be converted to the version 3.0 model under some circumstances, but target information is either lost or has to be translated into a metadataflow. Further, conversion of a Data Structure Definition for collecting reference metadata against a dataset would need to make changes to the dataset’s Data Structure Definition. As the Data Structure Definition may not actually be specified, judgement would need to be taken, perhaps determining the most likely candidate by examining which
155 -)))
156 -|(% style="width:132px" %) |(% style="width:819px" %)(((
157 -already have metadata reported against their datasets. A 2.1 metadata report could be converted to a version 3.0 Metadataset if it is attached to a structure, but requires a Metadata Provision Agreement which would need to be created if not already in existence.
154 +A version 2.1 Metadata Structure Definition can be converted to the version 3.0 model under some circumstances, but target information is either lost or has to be translated into a metadataflow. Further, conversion of a Data Structure Definition for collecting reference metadata against a dataset would need to make changes to the dataset’s Data Structure Definition. As the Data Structure Definition may not actually be specified, judgement would need to be taken, perhaps determining the most likely candidate by examining which already have metadata reported against their datasets. A 2.1 metadata report could be converted to a version 3.0 Metadataset if it is attached to a structure, but requires a Metadata Provision Agreement which would need to be created if not already in existence.
158 158  
159 159  Conversion from the version 3.0 model to version 2.1 cannot be performed reliably. The process would need target information to be derived from analysis of the Metadataflows and Metadata Provision Agreements. Depending on the complexity it may not be possible to express that information in a version 2.1 Data Structure Definition.
160 160  )))
... ... @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@
180 180  
181 181  = 3 Information Model =
182 182  
183 -== //3.1 Version 3.0 Information Model// ==
180 +== 3.1 Version 3.0 Information Model ==
184 184  
185 185  [[image:SDMX 3-0-0 Major Changes FINAL-1.0_en_6fc573fe.png||height="404" width="718"]]
186 186  
... ... @@ -190,7 +190,7 @@
190 190  
191 191  A number of ancillary structures including organisation schemes, process and reporting taxonomy are unchanged and have not been shown. Similarly, Organisation Scheme Map and Reporting Taxonomy Map have been omitted for simplicity. A schematic of the 2.1 model is given in Appendix A for comparison purposes.
192 192  
193 -== //3.2 Key Changes from Version 2.1// ==
190 +== 3.2 Key Changes from Version 2.1 ==
194 194  
195 195  New Maintainable Artefacts
196 196  
... ... @@ -218,7 +218,8 @@
218 218  Removed Maintainable Artefacts
219 219  
220 220  * Structure Set – replaced by Structure Map and the four item scheme maps
221 -* Hierarchical Codelist – replaced by Hierarchy and Hierarchy Association • Constraint – replaced by Data Constraint and Metadata Constraint
218 +* Hierarchical Codelist – replaced by Hierarchy and Hierarchy Association
219 +* Constraint – replaced by Data Constraint and Metadata Constraint
222 222  
223 223  Changed Maintainable Artefacts
224 224  
... ... @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@
232 232  
233 233  * GeospatialInformation – a string type where the value is an expression defining a set of geographical features using a purpose-designed syntax
234 234  
235 -== //3.3 Areas Unchanged from Version 2.1// ==
233 +== 3.3 Areas Unchanged from Version 2.1 ==
236 236  
237 237  The following areas of the information model are unchanged from version 2.1:
238 238  
... ... @@ -245,12 +245,12 @@
245 245  * Reporting taxonomy
246 246  * Process
247 247  
248 -== //3.4 Reference Metadata// ==
246 +== 3.4 Reference Metadata ==
249 249  
250 250  Reference metadata has been substantially re-designed for version 3.0 to simplify the model and better support practical use cases.
251 251  
252 -=== Simplify Metadata Structure Definition ===
253 -
250 +(% class="wikigeneratedid" id="HSimplifyMetadataStructureDefinition" %)
251 +**Simplify Metadata Structure Definition**
254 254  The Metadata Structure Definition (MSD) has been simplified to remove target information, and the support of multiple report structures. The MSD now only contains Metadata Attributes which are used to define the structure of a report.
255 255  
256 256  [[image:SDMX 3-0-0 Major Changes FINAL-1.0_en_ad5f5c97.png||height="346" width="494"]]
... ... @@ -261,8 +261,8 @@
261 261  
262 262  //Figure 3 the simplified version 3.0 MSD//
263 263  
264 -=== Change to reference metadata reported against data ===
265 -
262 +(% class="wikigeneratedid" id="HChangetoreferencemetadatareportedagainstdata" %)
263 +**Change to reference metadata reported against data**
266 266  Reference metadata associated with datasets, data series or observations are now reported with the data. The dataset’s DSD must reference an MSD to define the structure of its reference metadata. In practice reference metadata for data are transmitted as part of the data message. The metadata attributes are treated in a similar way to the data attributes appearing in the message at the dataset, data series or individual observation level as appropriate. In contrast to simple data attributes, metadata attributes defined by an MSD can be organised into a hierarchical structure as illustrated in Figure 3 above. For this reason, metadata attributes appear in data messages structured in the same way as metadata messages.
267 267  
268 268  The SDMX-ML example below is an excerpt from a structure specific data message illustrating reporting of reference metadata with a hierarchical structure at the observation level.
... ... @@ -273,158 +273,96 @@
273 273  * TITLE – a multi-lingual data attribute
274 274  * SOURCE_AGENCY – a multi-value data attribute
275 275  
276 -<Obs xsi:type="dsd:ObsType" OBS_VALUE="112" OBS_STAUS=”A” TIME_PERIOD="2010-09">
274 +> <Obs xsi:type="dsd:ObsType" OBS_VALUE="112" OBS_STAUS=”A” TIME_PERIOD="2010-09">
275 +> <!—- complex multi-value and multi-lingual data attributes ~-~->
276 +> <Comp id="TITLE" xsi:type="ns1:TITLE_ATTRIBUTE">
277 +> <Value>
278 +> <common:Text xml:lang="en">Some English Text</common:Text>
279 +> <common:Text xml:lang="fr">Quelques textes en anglais</common:Text>
280 +> </Value>
281 +> </Comp>
282 +> <Comp id="SOURCE_AGENCY" xsi:type="ns1:SOURCE_AGENCY_ATTRIBUTE">
283 +> <Value>4F0</Value>
284 +> <Value>4D0</Value>
285 +> <Value>CZ2</Value>
286 +> </Comp>
287 +> <!—- metadata attributes are reported like in metadata messages ~-~->
288 +> <Metadata>
289 +> <Attribute id="COLLECTION">
290 +> <Attribute id="METHOD">
291 +> <Text lang="en">AAA</Text>
292 +> </Attribute>
293 +> </Attribute>
294 +> <Attribute id="CONTACT">
295 +> <Value>CONTACT 1</Value>
296 +> <Attribute id="NAME">
297 +> <Value>Contact 1 Name 1</Value>
298 +> </Attribute>
299 +> <Attribute id="NAME">
300 +> <Value>Contact 1 Name 2</Value>
301 +> </Attribute>
302 +> </Attribute>
303 +> <Attribute id="CONTACT">
304 +> <Value>CONTACT 2</Value>
305 +> <Attribute id="NAME">
306 +> <Value>Contact 2 Name 1</Value>
307 +> </Attribute>
308 +> <Attribute id="NAME">
309 +> <Value>Contact 2 Name 2</Value>
310 +> </Attribute>
311 +> </Attribute>
312 +> </Metadata>
313 +> </Obs>
277 277  
278 -<!—- complex multi-value and multi-lingual data attributes ~-~->
279 -
280 -<Comp id="TITLE" xsi:type="ns1:TITLE_ATTRIBUTE">
281 -
282 -<Value>
283 -
284 -<common:Text xml:lang="en">Some English Text</common:Text>
285 -
286 -<common:Text xml:lang="fr">Quelques textes en anglais</common:Text>
287 -
288 -</Value>
289 -
290 -</Comp>
291 -
292 -<Comp id="SOURCE_AGENCY" xsi:type="ns1:SOURCE_AGENCY_ATTRIBUTE">
293 -
294 -<Value>4F0</Value>
295 -
296 -<Value>4D0</Value>
297 -
298 -<Value>CZ2</Value>
299 -
300 -</Comp>
301 -
302 -<!—- metadata attributes are reported like in metadata messages ~-~->
303 -
304 -<Metadata>
305 -
306 -<Attribute id="COLLECTION">
307 -
308 -<Attribute id="METHOD">
309 -
310 -<Text lang="en">AAA</Text>
311 -
312 -</Attribute>
313 -
314 -</Attribute>
315 -
316 -<Attribute id="CONTACT">
317 -
318 -<Value>CONTACT 1</Value>
319 -
320 -<Attribute id="NAME">
321 -
322 -<Value>Contact 1 Name 1</Value>
323 -
324 -</Attribute>
325 -
326 -<Attribute id="NAME">
327 -
328 -<Value>Contact 1 Name 2</Value>
329 -
330 -</Attribute>
331 -
332 -</Attribute>
333 -
334 -<Attribute id="CONTACT">
335 -
336 -<Value>CONTACT 2</Value>
337 -
338 -<Attribute id="NAME">
339 -
340 -<Value>Contact 2 Name 1</Value>
341 -
342 -</Attribute>
343 -
344 -<Attribute id="NAME">
345 -
346 -<Value>Contact 2 Name 2</Value>
347 -
348 -</Attribute>
349 -
350 -</Attribute>
351 -
352 -</Metadata>
353 -
354 -</Obs>
355 -
356 -=== New - Metadata Provision Agreement ===
357 -
315 +(% class="wikigeneratedid" id="HNew-MetadataProvisionAgreement" %)
316 +**New - Metadata Provision Agreement**
358 358  In version 2.1 a Provision Agreement could be used to report information against a Dataflow or Metadataflow. From version 3.0 this is managed by two separate structures, the Data Provision Agreement and the Metadata Provision Agreement.
359 359  
360 -=== Move target to Metadataflow and Metadata Provision Agreement ===
361 -
319 +(% class="wikigeneratedid" id="HMovetargettoMetadataflowandMetadataProvisionAgreement" %)
320 +**Move target to Metadataflow and Metadata Provision Agreement**
362 362  For reference metadata that is reported against structures, the allowable targets information which is used to specify what structures the reference metadata can be reported against, has moved to the Metadataflow and can be further refined in the Metadata Provision Agreement.
363 363  
364 -=== Add maintainable properties to reference metadata ===
365 -
323 +(% class="wikigeneratedid" id="HAddmaintainablepropertiestoreferencemetadata" %)
324 +**Add maintainable properties to reference metadata**
366 366  A Metadataset now has mandatory identification information, (owner id, id, version) enabling metadata providers to uniquely identify their reports for create, update or delete maintenance operations.
367 367  
368 -== //3.5 Microdata Exchange// ==
327 +== 3.5 Microdata Exchange ==
369 369  
370 370  Several changes have been made the Data Structure Definition to support microdata use cases in addition to aggregated time series.
371 371  
372 -=== Multiple measures ===
331 +(% class="wikigeneratedid" id="HMultiplemeasures" %)
332 +**Multiple measures**
333 +Multiple measures are a common characteristic of microdatasets. To support this use case, the MeasureDimension has been deprecated and replaced with the option to define zero or more measures. Measures now act like any other component in that they use concepts, can have their own local coded or uncoded representation defined within the Data Structure Definition, and can be either mandatory or conditional. Creating a measure with the “MEASURE” concept role applied emulates the version 2.1 MeasureDimension behaviour as illustrated in the SDMX-ML example below:
373 373  
374 -Multiple measures are a common characteristic of microdatasets. To support this use case, the MeasureDimension has been deprecated and replaced with the option to define zero or more measures. Measures now act like any other component in that they use concepts, can have their own local coded or uncoded representation defined within the
335 +> <str:MeasureList id=”MeasureDescriptor”>
336 +> <str:Measure id=”OBS_VALUE” minOccurs=”1” maxOccurs=”1” usage=”mandatory” > <str:ConceptIdentity>
337 +> <Ref id=”OBS_VALUE” maintainableParentID=”CONCEPTS” agencyID=”SDMX” maintainableParentVersion=”1.0.0” />
338 +> </str:ConceptIdentity>
339 +> <str:LocalRepresentation>
340 +> <str:TextFormat textType=”String” isMultiLingual=”true” />
341 +> </str:LocalRepresentation>
342 +> <str:ConceptRole>
343 +> <Ref id=”MEASURE” maintainableParentID=”SDMX_CONCEPT_ROLES” agencyID=”SDMX” maintainableParentVersion=”1.0.0” />
344 +> </str:ConceptRole>
345 +> </str:Measure>
346 +> ...
347 +> <str:Measure>
348 +> </str:MeasureList>
375 375  
376 -Data Structure Definition, and can be either mandatory or conditional. Creating a measure with the “MEASURE” concept role applied emulates the version 2.1
350 +(% class="wikigeneratedid" id="HMulti-valuemeasuresandattributes" %)
351 +**Multi-value measures and attributes**
352 +Both measures and attributes have been extended with the option to take ‘arrays’ of 193 multiple coded or uncoded values. This supports use cases like multiple observation 194 status flags. New //minOccurs// and //maxOccurs// properties define the valid number of 195 values. The //usage// property separately defines whether the measure or attribute is //mandatory// or optional. In the SDMX-ML measure example above, the properties //minOccurs=”1” maxOccurs=”1” usage=”mandatory”// specify that OBS_VALUE must be 198 reported, and can only consist of a single value.
377 377  
378 -MeasureDimension behaviour as illustrated in the SDMX-ML example below:
379 -
380 -<str:MeasureList id=”MeasureDescriptor”>
381 -
382 -<str:Measure id=”OBS_VALUE” minOccurs=”1” maxOccurs=”1” usage=”mandatory” > <str:ConceptIdentity>
383 -
384 -<Ref id=”OBS_VALUE” maintainableParentID=”CONCEPTS” agencyID=”SDMX” maintainableParentVersion=”1.0.0” />
385 -
386 -</str:ConceptIdentity>
387 -
388 -<str:LocalRepresentation>
389 -
390 -<str:TextFormat textType=”String” isMultiLingual=”true” />
391 -
392 -</str:LocalRepresentation>
393 -
394 -<str:ConceptRole>
395 -
396 -<Ref id=”MEASURE” maintainableParentID=”SDMX_CONCEPT_ROLES” agencyID=”SDMX” maintainableParentVersion=”1.0.0” />
397 -
398 -</str:ConceptRole>
399 -
400 -</str:Measure>
401 -
402 -...
403 -
404 -<str:Measure>
405 -
406 -</str:MeasureList>
407 -
408 -=== Multi-value measures and attributes ===
409 -
410 -Both measures and attributes have been extended with the option to take ‘arrays’ of 193 multiple coded or uncoded values. This supports use cases like multiple observation 194 status flags. New //minOccurs// and //maxOccurs// properties define the valid number of 195 values. The //usage// property separately defines whether the measure or attribute is
411 -
412 -//mandatory// or optional. In the SDMX-ML measure example above, the properties
413 -
414 -//minOccurs=”1” maxOccurs=”1” usage=”mandatory”// specify that OBS_VALUE must be 198 reported, and can only consist of a single value.
415 -
416 -=== Attributes relationship to measures ===
417 -
354 +(% class="wikigeneratedid" id="HAttributesrelationshiptomeasures" %)
355 +**Attributes relationship to measures**
418 418  In addition to attaching attributes to a specific level within the dataset, their relationship 202 to measures can also be defined.
419 419  
420 -=== Value lists ===
358 +(% class="wikigeneratedid" id="HValuelists" %)
359 +**Value lists**
360 +Value lists help in modelling microdata by providing an enumeration similar to code lists 206 but allowing any string values without being restricted to the rules of SDMX identifiers. That allows ValueItems (the equivalent to Code) to contain symbols like ‘¥’ and ‘€’, but also means they are not identifiable.
421 421  
422 -Value lists help in modelling microdata by providing an enumeration similar to code lists 206 but allowing any string values without being restricted to the rules of SDMX identifiers.
362 +== 3.6 Geospatial Data Exchange ==
423 423  
424 -That allows ValueItems (the equivalent to Code) to contain symbols like ‘¥’ and ‘€’, but 208 also means they are not identifiable.
425 -
426 -== //3.6 Geospatial Data Exchange// ==
427 -
428 428  The version 3.0 model has been extended to provide explicit support for geospatial data.
429 429  
430 430  === GeospatialInformation type ===
... ... @@ -438,14 +438,14 @@
438 438  * GeographicCodelist – each item includes an element to represent a specific Geo Feature Set which is described using the same expression syntax as for GeospatialInformation type.
439 439  * GeoGridCodelist – A code list defining a geographical grid composed of cells representing regular squared portions of the Earth. Each item references a cell within the grid.
440 440  
441 -=== //3.7 Structure Mapping// ===
377 +== 3.7 Structure Mapping ==
442 442  
443 443  The Structure Set in version 2.1 is a container for many mapping structures including Data Structure Map, Codelist Map and Concept Map. For version 3.0 the Structure Set artefact has been deprecated and replaced with a number of new maintainables giving better flexibility and reusability, specifically: Structure Map, Concept Scheme Map, Representation Map, Reporting Taxonomy Map, Category Scheme Map and Organisation Scheme Map.
444 444  
445 445  The version 2.1 Codelist Map been replaced with Representation Map which allows mappings to be defined between any combination of Code Lists, Value Lists and noncoded representations such as text strings and numbers.
446 446  
447 -==== Many-to-many source and target components ====
448 -
383 +(% class="wikigeneratedid" id="HMany-to-manysourceandtargetcomponents" %)
384 +**Many-to-many source and target components**
449 449  Structure mapping rules may be defined with both multiple source components and multiple target components in contrast to version 2.1 where only one source and target was allowed. That supports many-to-many (n-n) mapping use cases where the output of a mapping rule may be dependent on the combination of a number of input components. For instance:
450 450  
451 451  Set the output component INDICATOR=”DE_A” if the input components are FREQ=”A” and REF_AREA=”DE”.
... ... @@ -455,22 +455,21 @@
455 455  Set the output components FREQ=”A”, REF_AREA=”DE” if the input component INDICATOR=”DE_A”.
456 456  
457 457  **Fixed source and target**
458 -
459 459  The Structure Map may now define input or output components which have a fixed value.
460 460  
461 -==== Time representations mapping ====
462 -
396 +(% class="wikigeneratedid" id="HTimerepresentationsmapping" %)
397 +**Time representations mapping**
463 463  Non SDMX time representations may now be described in a Structure Map, allowing them to be mapped into SDMX time formats.
464 464  
465 -==== Regular expression and substring mappings ====
466 -
400 +(% class="wikigeneratedid" id="HRegularexpressionandsubstringmappings" %)
401 +**Regular expression and substring mappings**
467 467  All item maps allow the use of regular expressions and substrings to match source values, specifically: Concept Scheme Map, Reporting Taxonomy Map, Category Scheme Map and Organisation Scheme Map.
468 468  
469 -==== Item maps validity period ====
470 -
404 +(% class="wikigeneratedid" id="HItemmapsvalidityperiod" %)
405 +**Item maps validity period**
471 471  Item maps may further define the period for which the mapping is valid, meaning the mapping rule will only be applied if the row of information being mapped is within the period.
472 472  
473 -=== //3.8 Constraints// ===
408 +== 3.8 Constraints ==
474 474  
475 475  Constraints in version 3.0 are modelled using two separate artefacts which replace the version 2.1 content constraint:
476 476  
... ... @@ -485,17 +485,17 @@
485 485  
486 486  Attachment constraints have been deprecated due to a lack of use cases.
487 487  
488 -=== //3.9 Code List Extension// ===
423 +== 3.9 Code List Extension ==
489 489  
490 490  In addition to the two new specialised geospatial forms, the option has been added to define a code list as an extension of, or by inheriting codes from, other lists. An optional prefix can be added to inherited codes to disambiguate duplicates.
491 491  
492 492  This feature allows new code lists to be easily derived from existing lists without the need to make and manually maintain copies. When querying for extended code list structures using the REST API, the option has been added to retrieve either the definition or the materialised list. Traditional literal lists of codes continue to be supported.
493 493  
494 -=== //3.10 Discriminated Union of Code Lists// ===
429 +== 3.10 Discriminated Union of Code Lists ==
495 495  
496 496  Combining code list extension with wildcarded constraints solves the discriminated union of code lists problem where a classification or breakdown has multiple “variants” which are all valid but mutually exclusive. A common example is economic activity where several alternative classification schemes are in use including ISIC revisions 1 to 4 and NACE as used in the European Community.
497 497  
498 -=== //3.11 Code Hierarchies// ===
433 +== 3.11 Code Hierarchies ==
499 499  
500 500  Code hierarchies allow the definition of complex hierarchies of codes from potentially multiple lists for data discovery purposes. Hierarchical Codelist has been deprecated and replaced by two new artefacts: Hierarchy – the actual hierarchy of codes, and Hierarchy Association links hierarchies directly to any other identifiable object, a capability missing 312 from the version 2.1 model. Further, the linkage can be within a particular context, for instance linking a hierarchy to a dimension within the context of a specific Dataflow (dimension REF_AREA in the context of the ECB:EXR Dataflow).
501 501  
... ... @@ -543,7 +543,7 @@
543 543  
544 544  = 5 REST Web Services API =
545 545  
546 -== //5.1 Simplified list of resources// ==
481 +== 5.1 Simplified list of resources ==
547 547  
548 548  The version 3.0 REST API has just five main resources:
549 549  
... ... @@ -557,7 +557,7 @@
557 557  
558 558  This and changes in the URLs and query parameters on the data, availability and metadata resources means that, with the exception of schema queries, the version 3.0 API is not backwardly compatible.
559 559  
560 -== //5.2 Improved data queries// ==
495 +== 5.2 Improved data queries ==
561 561  
562 562  Data queries have been changed to provide more granular selections from contexts wider than just a Dataflow.
563 563  
... ... @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@
596 596  
597 597  /data/dataflow/ESTAT/ICP/1.0.0/M…A.ANR,M…A.INX,M…B.CTG
598 598  
599 -== //5.3 Improved reference metadata queries// ==
534 +== 5.3 Improved reference metadata queries ==
600 600  
601 601  Reference metadata queries have been improved with a number of new options to retrieve metadata reports.
602 602  
... ... @@ -612,7 +612,7 @@
612 612  
613 613  /metadata/structure/datastructure/BIS/BIS_CBS/1.0
614 614  
615 -== //5.4 Structural metadata maintenance// ==
550 +== 5.4 Structural metadata maintenance ==
616 616  
617 617  Support has been added for maintenance of structural metadata.
618 618  
... ... @@ -620,7 +620,7 @@
620 620  
621 621  = 6 XML, JSON, CSV and EDI Transmission formats =
622 622  
623 -== //6.1 SDMX-ML// ==
558 +== 6.1 SDMX-ML ==
624 624  
625 625  The SDMX-ML XML messages have been modified and updated for version 3.0. While they broadly follow the same principles, there have been significant changes which break backward compatibility.
626 626  
... ... @@ -706,7 +706,7 @@
706 706  
707 707  The option to reference structures using Agency, ID and Version has been removed. From SDMX version 3.0 URN is used for all referencing purposes with the exception of local references such as where groups reference dimensions within a DSD.
708 708  
709 -== //6.2 SDMX-JSON// ==
644 +== 6.2 SDMX-JSON ==
710 710  
711 711  Like SDMX-ML, the SDMX-JSON messages have been significantly modified and updated for version 3.0. They are not backwardly compatible with version 2.1.
712 712  
... ... @@ -726,7 +726,7 @@
726 726  
727 727  As for SDMX-ML, the option to reference structures using Agency, ID and Version has been removed with URN used for all non-local referencing purposes.
728 728  
729 -== //6.3 SDMX-CSV// ==
664 +== 6.3 SDMX-CSV ==
730 730  
731 731  CSV in SDMX is used transmission of data and reference metadata only.
732 732  
... ... @@ -744,7 +744,7 @@
744 744  
745 745  The SDMX-CSV metadata message is new for version 3.0 and, like the SDMX-ML and SDMX-JSON equivalents, is used for the transmission reference metadata sets.
746 746  
747 -=== //6.4 EDI deprecation// ===
682 +=== 6.4 EDI deprecation ===
748 748  
749 749  The EDI format for transmission of both structures and data has been deprecated. Version 3.0 is therefore not backwardly compatible with legacy EDI messages.
750 750  
SUZ.Methodology.Code.MethodologyClass[0]