Last modified by Helena on 2025/09/10 11:19

From version 8.3
edited by Helena
on 2025/05/14 13:40
Change comment: Update document after refactoring.
To version 10.2
edited by Helena
on 2025/05/14 14:41
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -230,7 +230,7 @@
230 230  
231 231  * GeospatialInformation – a string type where the value is an expression defining a set of geographical features using a purpose-designed syntax
232 232  
233 -== //3.3 Areas Unchanged from Version 2.1// ==
233 +== 3.3 Areas Unchanged from Version 2.1 ==
234 234  
235 235  The following areas of the information model are unchanged from version 2.1:
236 236  
... ... @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@
243 243  * Reporting taxonomy
244 244  * Process
245 245  
246 -== //3.4 Reference Metadata// ==
246 +== 3.4 Reference Metadata ==
247 247  
248 248  Reference metadata has been substantially re-designed for version 3.0 to simplify the model and better support practical use cases.
249 249  
... ... @@ -272,83 +272,45 @@
272 272  * SOURCE_AGENCY – a multi-value data attribute
273 273  
274 274  <Obs xsi:type="dsd:ObsType" OBS_VALUE="112" OBS_STAUS=”A” TIME_PERIOD="2010-09">
275 -
276 276  <!—- complex multi-value and multi-lingual data attributes ~-~->
277 -
278 278  <Comp id="TITLE" xsi:type="ns1:TITLE_ATTRIBUTE">
279 -
280 280  <Value>
281 -
282 282  <common:Text xml:lang="en">Some English Text</common:Text>
283 -
284 284  <common:Text xml:lang="fr">Quelques textes en anglais</common:Text>
285 -
286 286  </Value>
287 -
288 288  </Comp>
289 289  
290 290  <Comp id="SOURCE_AGENCY" xsi:type="ns1:SOURCE_AGENCY_ATTRIBUTE">
291 -
292 292  <Value>4F0</Value>
293 -
294 294  <Value>4D0</Value>
295 -
296 296  <Value>CZ2</Value>
297 -
298 298  </Comp>
299 -
300 300  <!—- metadata attributes are reported like in metadata messages ~-~->
301 -
302 302  <Metadata>
303 -
304 304  <Attribute id="COLLECTION">
305 -
306 306  <Attribute id="METHOD">
307 -
308 308  <Text lang="en">AAA</Text>
309 -
310 310  </Attribute>
311 -
312 312  </Attribute>
313 -
314 314  <Attribute id="CONTACT">
315 -
316 316  <Value>CONTACT 1</Value>
317 -
318 318  <Attribute id="NAME">
319 -
320 320  <Value>Contact 1 Name 1</Value>
321 -
322 322  </Attribute>
323 -
324 324  <Attribute id="NAME">
325 -
326 326  <Value>Contact 1 Name 2</Value>
327 -
328 328  </Attribute>
329 -
330 330  </Attribute>
331 -
332 332  <Attribute id="CONTACT">
333 -
334 334  <Value>CONTACT 2</Value>
335 -
336 336  <Attribute id="NAME">
337 -
338 338  <Value>Contact 2 Name 1</Value>
339 -
340 340  </Attribute>
341 -
342 342  <Attribute id="NAME">
343 -
344 344  <Value>Contact 2 Name 2</Value>
345 -
346 346  </Attribute>
347 -
348 348  </Attribute>
349 -
350 350  </Metadata>
351 -
352 352  </Obs>
353 353  
354 354  === New - Metadata Provision Agreement ===
... ... @@ -363,7 +363,7 @@
363 363  
364 364  A Metadataset now has mandatory identification information, (owner id, id, version) enabling metadata providers to uniquely identify their reports for create, update or delete maintenance operations.
365 365  
366 -== //3.5 Microdata Exchange// ==
328 +== 3.5 Microdata Exchange ==
367 367  
368 368  Several changes have been made the Data Structure Definition to support microdata use cases in addition to aggregated time series.
369 369  
... ... @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@
421 421  
422 422  That allows ValueItems (the equivalent to Code) to contain symbols like ‘¥’ and ‘€’, but 208 also means they are not identifiable.
423 423  
424 -== //3.6 Geospatial Data Exchange// ==
386 +== 3.6 Geospatial Data Exchange ==
425 425  
426 426  The version 3.0 model has been extended to provide explicit support for geospatial data.
427 427  
... ... @@ -436,7 +436,7 @@
436 436  * GeographicCodelist – each item includes an element to represent a specific Geo Feature Set which is described using the same expression syntax as for GeospatialInformation type.
437 437  * GeoGridCodelist – A code list defining a geographical grid composed of cells representing regular squared portions of the Earth. Each item references a cell within the grid.
438 438  
439 -=== //3.7 Structure Mapping// ===
401 +=== 3.7 Structure Mapping ===
440 440  
441 441  The Structure Set in version 2.1 is a container for many mapping structures including Data Structure Map, Codelist Map and Concept Map. For version 3.0 the Structure Set artefact has been deprecated and replaced with a number of new maintainables giving better flexibility and reusability, specifically: Structure Map, Concept Scheme Map, Representation Map, Reporting Taxonomy Map, Category Scheme Map and Organisation Scheme Map.
442 442  
... ... @@ -468,7 +468,7 @@
468 468  
469 469  Item maps may further define the period for which the mapping is valid, meaning the mapping rule will only be applied if the row of information being mapped is within the period.
470 470  
471 -=== //3.8 Constraints// ===
433 +=== 3.8 Constraints ===
472 472  
473 473  Constraints in version 3.0 are modelled using two separate artefacts which replace the version 2.1 content constraint:
474 474  
... ... @@ -483,17 +483,17 @@
483 483  
484 484  Attachment constraints have been deprecated due to a lack of use cases.
485 485  
486 -=== //3.9 Code List Extension// ===
448 +=== 3.9 Code List Extension ===
487 487  
488 488  In addition to the two new specialised geospatial forms, the option has been added to define a code list as an extension of, or by inheriting codes from, other lists. An optional prefix can be added to inherited codes to disambiguate duplicates.
489 489  
490 490  This feature allows new code lists to be easily derived from existing lists without the need to make and manually maintain copies. When querying for extended code list structures using the REST API, the option has been added to retrieve either the definition or the materialised list. Traditional literal lists of codes continue to be supported.
491 491  
492 -=== //3.10 Discriminated Union of Code Lists// ===
454 +=== 3.10 Discriminated Union of Code Lists ===
493 493  
494 494  Combining code list extension with wildcarded constraints solves the discriminated union of code lists problem where a classification or breakdown has multiple “variants” which are all valid but mutually exclusive. A common example is economic activity where several alternative classification schemes are in use including ISIC revisions 1 to 4 and NACE as used in the European Community.
495 495  
496 -=== //3.11 Code Hierarchies// ===
458 +=== 3.11 Code Hierarchies ===
497 497  
498 498  Code hierarchies allow the definition of complex hierarchies of codes from potentially multiple lists for data discovery purposes. Hierarchical Codelist has been deprecated and replaced by two new artefacts: Hierarchy – the actual hierarchy of codes, and Hierarchy Association links hierarchies directly to any other identifiable object, a capability missing 312 from the version 2.1 model. Further, the linkage can be within a particular context, for instance linking a hierarchy to a dimension within the context of a specific Dataflow (dimension REF_AREA in the context of the ECB:EXR Dataflow).
499 499  
SUZ.Methodology.Code.MethodologyClass[0]