Last modified by Artur on 2025/09/13 19:50
Summary
-
Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -9,108 +9,4 @@ 9 9 |(% style="width:154px" %)DRAFT 1.0|(% style="width:249px" %)December 2024|(% style="width:586px" %)Draft release updated for SDMX 3.1 for public consultation 10 10 |(% style="width:154px" %)1.0|(% style="width:249px" %)May 2025|(% style="width:586px" %)Public release for SDMX 3.1 11 11 12 -= 1. Overview = 13 - 14 -SDMX 3.1 is a minor revision to the SDMX 3.0 Standard which introduces a limited set of changes, which cover the following: 15 - 16 -Information Model 17 - 18 -* Support for Dataflows to reference a subset of Dimensions from a Data Structure Definition 19 -* Simplification to Data Constraints 20 -* Addition of Availability Constraints 21 - 22 -1. Documentation 23 - 24 -Registering Reference Metadata removed from documentation, to align with XML Registration object which is unable to reference a Metadata Provision, and REST API which is unable to query for registered reference metadata sources. 25 - 26 -Breaking Changes 27 - 28 -* Remove version property on Categorisation 29 -* Removal of Advanced Release Calendar 30 - 31 -Content of the Document 32 - 33 -The remainder of this document contains a summary of the changes. More detailed information can be found in the SDMX 3.1 Technical Specifications, in particular: 34 - 35 -Section 2 – Information Model 36 - 37 -Section 5 – Registry Specification 38 - 39 -Section 6 – Technical Notes 40 - 41 -SDMX TWG GitHub for the REST API and the XML and JSON formats 42 - 43 -= 2. Summary of Breaking Changes in 3.1 = 44 - 45 -Version 3.1 introduces breaking changes, in the model in the following areas: 46 - 47 -== 2.1 Removal of Advanced Release Calendar == 48 - 49 -The Data Constraint was simplified to become a cohesive structural artefact focussed solely on the restriction of values that can be reported. As part of this remodelling the Advanced Release Calendar was removed as it does not play a restrictive role. 50 - 51 -//Guidance for Implementors// 52 - 53 -Reference Metadata reported against a Dataflow and / or Provision Agreement can be used as an alternative to the Advanced Release Calendar. 54 - 55 -1. //2.2 Removal of Version on Categorisation// 56 - 57 -The Categorisation structural artefact has no use case for undergoing version changes, the version was therefore removed. 58 - 59 - 60 -//Guidance for Implementors// 61 - 62 -If multiple versions of a Categorisation exist where the source or target differs, these Categorisations should be given a unique ID. 63 - 64 -1. 65 -11. Information Model 66 - 67 -The changes to the information model support two distinct use cases: 68 - 69 -1. Horizontally complex Data Structure Definitions (DSDs) 70 -1. Additional cohesion to the Data Constraints model 71 - 72 -These changes are described in below. 73 - 74 -1. //3.1 Horizontally Complex Data Structure Definitions// 75 - 76 -An explanation of this use case, with additional details can be found under Section 6 - Technical Notes, under heading ‘10.3 Dimension Constraint’. 77 - 78 -The following changes to the model have been made to satisfy this use case. 79 - 80 -1. 81 -11. 82 -111. 83 -1111. Data Structure Definition 84 - 85 -The Data Structure Definition has a new ‘evolving structure’ property, this is a Boolean property, when set to ‘true’ it indicates to the users of the DSD that new Dimensions may be added without the DSD undergoing a change to its major version number. 86 - 87 -1. 88 -11. 89 -111. 90 -1111. Dataflow 91 - 92 -The Dataflow has a new Dimension Constraint property, which is used to reference a subset of Dimensions which it uses from the referenced DSD. 93 - 94 -The Dimension Constraint fixes the Dimensions of the Dataflow enabling the referenced DSD to have new Dimensions added without the need to change the major version number. 95 - 96 -The Dimension Constraint property is only required if the DSD sets the evolving structure property to true. 97 - 98 -1. //3.2 Constraint Cohesion// 99 - 100 -The Constraint model in SDMX 3.1 has been made more cohesive by separating the Data Constraint into two distinct structures; the Data Constraint which describes reporting restrictions, and the Availability Constraint, which describes data content from a data source. In SDMX 3.0 these distinctions were made using the ‘type’ property on a Data Constraint. 101 - 102 -1. 103 -11. 104 -111. 105 -1111. Data Constraint 106 - 107 -The Data Constraint has had the ‘type’ property removed; the Data Constraint in SDMX 3.1 is always used to describe restrictions on content for data reporting purposes. 108 - 109 -The attachment of the Data Constraint in SDMX 3.0 included Data Sources, in SDMX 3.1 these attachments have been removed as these are not relevant for restricting reported data. 110 - 111 -1. 112 -11. 113 -111. 114 -1111. Availability Constraint 115 - 116 -The Availability Constraint is a new Structure introduced to describe data that exists, it is generated in the response to the Availability REST API. It is not a maintained structure, and as such has no maintenance agency, identity or version 12 +