Last modified by Artur on 2025/09/30 13:28
Summary
-
Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ 89 89 90 90 In that context, the term “Metadata” refers to reference metadata. 91 91 92 -== ={{id name="_Toc90785"/}}3.3 Registration ===92 +== 3.3 Registration == 93 93 94 94 Publishing the data and reference metadata involves the following steps for a Data/Metadata Provider: 95 95 ... ... @@ -100,13 +100,13 @@ 100 100 101 101 **Figure 2: Schematic of Registered Data and Metadata Sources in the SDMX-IM** 102 102 103 -== ={{id name="_Toc90786"/}}3.4 Notification ===103 +== 3.4 Notification == 104 104 105 105 Notifying interested parties of newly published or re-published data, reference metadata or changes in structural metadata involves: 106 106 107 107 • registry support of a subscription-based notification service which sends an email or notifies an HTTP address announcing all published data that meets the criteria contained in the subscription request. 108 108 109 -== ={{id name="_Toc90787"/}}3.5 Discovery ===109 +== 3.5 Discovery == 110 110 111 111 Discovering published data and reference metadata involves interaction with the registry to fulfil the following logical steps that would be carried out by a user interacting with a service that itself interacts with the registry and an SDMX-enabled data or reference metadata resource: 112 112 ... ... @@ -118,9 +118,9 @@ 118 118 119 119 **Figure 3: Schematic of Data and Metadata Discovery and Query in the SDMX-IM** 120 120 121 -= {{id name="_Toc90788"/}}4 SDMX Registry/Repository Architecture =121 += 4 SDMX Registry/Repository Architecture = 122 122 123 -== ={{id name="_Toc90789"/}}4.1 Architectural Schematic ===123 +== 4.1 Architectural Schematic == 124 124 125 125 The architecture of the SDMX registry/repository is derived from the objectives stated above. It is a layered architecture that is founded by a structural metadata repository which supports a provisioning metadata repository which supports the registry services. These are all supported by the SDMX-ML schemas. Applications can be built on top of these services which support the reporting, storage, retrieval, and dissemination aspects of the statistical lifecycle as well as the maintenance of the structural metadata required to drive these applications. 126 126 ... ... @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ 128 128 129 129 **Figure 4: Schematic of the Registry Content and Services** 130 130 131 -== ={{id name="_Toc90790"/}}4.2 Structural Metadata Repository ===131 +== 4.2 Structural Metadata Repository == 132 132 133 133 The basic layer is that of a structural metadata service which supports the lifecycle of SDMX structural metadata artefacts such as Maintenance Agencies, Data Structure Definitions, Metadata Structure Definitions, Provision Agreements, Processes etc. This layer is supported by the Structure Submission and Query Service. 134 134 ... ... @@ -139,15 +139,15 @@ 139 139 140 140 As of the initial version of SDMX 3.0 no messages are defined to support these artefacts; hence, users may need to use SDMX 2.1 Registry Interface messages, instead. 141 141 142 -== ={{id name="_Toc90791"/}}4.3 Provisioning Metadata Repository ===142 +== 4.3 Provisioning Metadata Repository == 143 143 144 144 The function of this repository is to support the definition of the structural metadata that describes the various types of data-store which model SDMX-conformant databases or files, and to link to these data sources. These links can be specified for a data/metadata provider, for a specific data or metadata flow. In the SDMX model this is called the Provision or Metadata Provision Agreement. 145 145 146 146 This layer is supported by the Data and Metadata Registration Service. 147 147 148 -= {{id name="_Toc90792"/}}5 Registry Interfaces and Services =148 += 5 Registry Interfaces and Services = 149 149 150 -== ={{id name="_Toc90793"/}}5.1 Registry Interfaces ===150 +== 5.1 Registry Interfaces == 151 151 152 152 The Registry Interfaces are: 153 153 ... ... @@ -163,9 +163,8 @@ 163 163 164 164 The registry interfaces are invoked in one of two ways: 165 165 166 -* 167 -*1. The interface is the name of the root node of the SDMX-ML document 168 -*1. The interface is invoked as a child element of the RegistryInterface message where the RegistryInterface is the root node of the SDMX-ML document. 166 +1. The interface is the name of the root node of the SDMX-ML document 167 +1. The interface is invoked as a child element of the RegistryInterface message where the RegistryInterface is the root node of the SDMX-ML document. 169 169 170 170 In addition to these interfaces the registry must support a mechanism for submitting and querying for structural metadata. This is detailed in sections 5.2.2 and 5.2.3. 171 171 ... ... @@ -173,25 +173,25 @@ 173 173 174 174 It should be noted that all interactions are assumed to be synchronous, with the exception of Notify Registry Event. This document is sent by the SDMX-RR to all subscribers whenever an even occurs to which any users have subscribed. Thus, it does not conform to the requestresponse pattern, because it is inherently asynchronous. 175 175 176 -== ={{id name="_Toc90794"/}}5.2 Registry Services ===175 +== 5.2 Registry Services == 177 177 178 -=== =={{id name="_Toc90795"/}}5.2.1 Introduction =====177 +=== 5.2.1 Introduction === 179 179 180 180 The services described in this section do not imply that each is implemented as a discrete web service. 181 181 182 -=== =={{id name="_Toc90796"/}}5.2.2 Structure Submission Service =====181 +=== 5.2.2 Structure Submission Service === 183 183 184 -The registry must support a mechanism for submitting structural metadata. This mechanism can be the SDMX REST interface for structural metadata (this is defined in the corresponding GitHub project, dedicated to the SDMX REST API: __[[https:~~/~~/github.com/sdmx>>url:https://github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest]][[->>url:https://github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest]][[twg/sdmx>>url:https://github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest]][[->>url:https://github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest]][[rest>>url:https://github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest]]__[[)>>url:https://github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest]].In order for the architecture to be scalable, the finest-grained piece of structural metadata that can be processed by the SDMX-RR is a MaintainableArtefact, with the exception of Item Schemes, where changes at an Item level is also possible (see next section on the SDMX Information Model).183 +The registry must support a mechanism for submitting structural metadata. This mechanism can be the SDMX REST interface for structural metadata (this is defined in the corresponding GitHub project, dedicated to the SDMX REST API: [[__https:~~/~~/github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest__>>https://https:github.comsdmx-twgsdmx-rest]]). In order for the architecture to be scalable, the finest-grained piece of structural metadata that can be processed by the SDMX-RR is a MaintainableArtefact, with the exception of Item Schemes, where changes at an Item level is also possible (see next section on the SDMX Information Model). 185 185 186 -=== =={{id name="_Toc90797"/}}5.2.3 Structure Query Service =====185 +=== 5.2.3 Structure Query Service === 187 187 188 -The registry must support a mechanism for querying for structural metadata. This mechanism can be the SDMX REST interface for structural metadata (this is defined in the corresponding GitHub project, dedicated to the SDMX REST API: __[[https:~~/~~/github.com/sdmx>>url:https://github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest]][[->>url:https://github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest]][[twg/sdmx>>url:https://github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest]][[->>url:https://github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest]][[rest>>url:https://github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest]]__[[)>>url:https://github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest]].The registry response to this query mechanism is the SDMX Structure message, which has as its root node:187 +The registry must support a mechanism for querying for structural metadata. This mechanism can be the SDMX REST interface for structural metadata (this is defined in the corresponding GitHub project, dedicated to the SDMX REST API: [[__https:~~/~~/github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest__>>https://https:github.comsdmx-twgsdmx-rest]]). The registry response to this query mechanism is the SDMX Structure message, which has as its root node: 189 189 190 - •Structure189 +* Structure 191 191 192 -The SDMX structural artefacts that may be queried are defined in the SDMX structure web service specification which is compatible with this release of the standard __[[https:~~/~~/github.com/sdmx >>url:https://github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest/blob/master/doc/structures.md]][[->>url:https://github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest/blob/master/doc/structures.md]][[twg/sdmx>>url:https://github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest/blob/master/doc/structures.md]][[->>url:https://github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest/blob/master/doc/structures.md]][[rest/blob/master/doc/structures.md>>url:https://github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest/blob/master/doc/structures.md]]__[[url:https://github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest/blob/master/doc/structures.md]]191 +The SDMX structural artefacts that may be queried are defined in the SDMX structure web service specification which is compatible with this release of the standard __[[https:~~/~~/github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest/blob/master/doc/structures.md>>https://github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest/blob/master/doc/structures.md]] __[[https:~~/~~/github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest/blob/master/doc/structures.md>>https://github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest/blob/master/doc/structures.md]] 193 193 194 -=== =={{id name="_Toc90798"/}}5.2.4 Data and Reference Metadata Registration Service =====193 +=== 5.2.4 Data and Reference Metadata Registration Service === 195 195 196 196 This service must implement the following Registry Interfaces: 197 197 ... ... @@ -214,23 +214,24 @@ 214 214 215 215 The Registration has an action attribute which takes one of the following values: 216 216 217 -|**Action Attribute Value**|**Behaviour** 218 -|Append|Add this registration to the registry 219 -|Replace|Replace the existing Registration with this Registration identified by the id in the Registration of the Submit Registration Request 220 -|Delete|Delete the existing Registration identified by the id in the Registration of the Submit Registration Request 216 +(% style="width:893.835px" %) 217 +|(% style="width:241px" %)**Action Attribute Value**|(% style="width:650px" %)**Behaviour** 218 +|(% style="width:241px" %)Append|(% style="width:650px" %)Add this registration to the registry 219 +|(% style="width:241px" %)Replace|(% style="width:650px" %)Replace the existing Registration with this Registration identified by the id in the Registration of the Submit Registration Request 220 +|(% style="width:241px" %)Delete|(% style="width:650px" %)Delete the existing Registration identified by the id in the Registration of the Submit Registration Request 221 221 222 222 The Registration has three Boolean attributes which may be present to determine how an SDMX compliant dataset or metadataset indexing application must index the datasets or metadatasets upon registration. The indexing application behaviour is as follows: 223 223 224 -|**Boolean Attribute**|**Behaviour if Value is “true”** 225 -|indexTimeSeries|A compliant indexing application must index all the time series keys 226 -|indexDataSet|((( 224 +(% style="width:896.835px" %) 225 +|**Boolean Attribute**|(% style="width:712px" %)**Behaviour if Value is “true”** 226 +|indexTimeSeries|(% style="width:712px" %)A compliant indexing application must index all the time series keys 227 +|indexDataSet|(% style="width:712px" %)((( 227 227 A compliant indexing application must index the range of actual (present) values for each dimension of the Dataset. 228 - 229 229 Note that for data this requires much less storage than full key indexing, but this method cannot guarantee that a specific combination of Dimension values (the Key) is actually present in the Dataset 230 230 ))) 231 -|indexReportingPeriod|A compliant indexing application must index the time period range(s) for which data are present in the Dataset. 231 +|indexReportingPeriod|(% style="width:712px" %)A compliant indexing application must index the time period range(s) for which data are present in the Dataset. 232 232 233 -=== =={{id name="_Toc90799"/}}5.2.5 Data Discovery =====233 +=== 5.2.5 Data Discovery === 234 234 235 235 The Data Discovery Service implements the following Registry Interfaces: 236 236 ... ... @@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ 237 237 * QueryRegistrationRequest 238 238 * QueryRegistrationResponse 239 239 240 -=== =={{id name="_Toc90800"/}}5.2.6 Subscription and Notification =====240 +=== 5.2.6 Subscription and Notification === 241 241 242 242 The Subscription and Notification Service implements the following Registry Interfaces: 243 243 ... ... @@ -256,34 +256,32 @@ 256 256 257 257 Notification requires that the structural metadata repository and the provisioning metadata repository monitor any event which is of interest to a user (the object of a subscription request query), and to issue an SDMX notification document to the endpoints specified in the relevant subscriptions. 258 258 259 -=== =={{id name="_Toc90801"/}}5.2.7 Registry Behaviour =====259 +=== 5.2.7 Registry Behaviour === 260 260 261 261 The following table defines the behaviour of the SDMX Registry for the various Registry Interface messages. It should be noted, though, that as of SDMX 3.0, an extended versioning scheme newly including semantic versioning is foreseen for all Maintainable Artefacts. Moreover, while the old versioning scheme is allowed, given there is no more a "final" flag, there is no way guaranteeing the consistency across version of a Maintainable, unless semantic versioning is used. 262 262 263 263 Given the above, the behaviour described in the following table concerns either draft Artefacts using semantic versioning or any Artefacts using the old versioning scheme. Nevertheless, in the case of semantic versioning the registry must respect the versioning rules when performing the actions below. For example, it is not possible to replace a non-draft Artefact that follows semantic versioning, unless a newer version is introduced according to the semantic versioning rules. Furthermore, even when draft Artefacts are submitted, the registry has to verify semantic versioning is respected against the previous non-draft versions. It is worth noting that the rules for semantic versioning and replacing or maintaining semantically versioned Artefacts applies to externally shared Artefacts. This means that any system may internally perform any change within a version of an Artefact, until the latter is shared outside of that system or becomes public. Then (as also explained in the SDMX Standards Section 6 “Technical Notes”) the Artefacts must adhere to the Semantic Versioning rules. 264 264 265 -|**Interface**|**Behaviour** 266 -|All|((( 265 +(% style="width:982.835px" %) 266 +|(% style="width:217px" %)**Interface**|(% style="width:763px" %)**Behaviour** 267 +|(% style="width:217px" %)All|(% style="width:763px" %)((( 267 267 1. If the action is set to “replace” (or a maintainable Artefact is PUT or POSTed) then the entire contents of the existing maintainable object in the Registry MUST be replaced by the object submitted. 268 268 1. Cross referenced structures MUST exist in either the submitted document (in Structures or Structure Location) or in the registry to which the request is submitted. 269 269 1. If the action is set to “delete” (or a maintainable Artefact is DELETEd) then the Registry MUST verify that the object can be deleted. In order to qualify for deletion, the object must: 270 270 271 -1. Be a draft version. 272 +a) Be a draft version. 273 +b) Not be explicitly{{footnote}}With semantic versioning, it is allowed to reference a range of artefacts, e.g., a DSD referencing a Codelist with version 1.2.3+ means all patch versions greater than 1.2.3. This means that deleting 1.2.4draft does not break integrity of the aforementioned DSD.{{/footnote}} referenced from any other object in the Registry. 272 272 273 -b) Not be explicitly^^[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^1^^>>path:#sdfootnote1sym||name="sdfootnote1anc"]](%%)^^ referenced from any other object in the Registry. 274 - 275 275 4) The semantic versioning rules in the SDMX documentation MUST be obeyed. 276 276 ))) 277 -|Structure submission|((( 278 -Structures are submitted at the level of the 279 - 280 -Maintainable Artefact and the behaviour in “All” above is therefore at the level of the Maintainable Artefact. 277 +|(% style="width:217px" %)Structure submission|(% style="width:763px" %)((( 278 +Structures are submitted at the level of the Maintainable Artefact and the behaviour in “All” above is therefore at the level of the Maintainable Artefact. 281 281 ))) 282 -|SubmitRegistrationRequest|If the datasource is a file (simple datasource) then the file MAY be retrieved and indexed according to the Boolean attributes set in the Registration. For a queryable datasource the Registry MAY validate that the source exists and can accept an SDMX data query. 280 +|(% style="width:217px" %)SubmitRegistrationRequest|(% style="width:763px" %)If the datasource is a file (simple datasource) then the file MAY be retrieved and indexed according to the Boolean attributes set in the Registration. For a queryable datasource the Registry MAY validate that the source exists and can accept an SDMX data query. 283 283 284 -= {{id name="_Toc90802"/}}6 Identification of SDMX Objects =282 += 6 Identification of SDMX Objects = 285 285 286 -== ={{id name="_Toc90803"/}}6.1 Identification, Versioning, and Maintenance ===284 +== 6.1 Identification, Versioning, and Maintenance == 287 287 288 288 All major classes of the SDMX Information model inherit from one of: 289 289 ... ... @@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ 292 292 * //**VersionableArtefact**// – this has all of the above features plus a version number, according to the SDMX versioning rules in SDMX Standards Section 6 “Technical Notes”, paragraph “4.3 Versioning”, and a validity period. 293 293 * //**MaintainableArtefact**// – this has all of the above features, plus registry and structure URIs, and an association to the maintenance organisation of the object. 294 294 295 -=== =={{id name="_Toc90804"/}}6.1.1 Identification, Naming, Versioning, and Maintenance Model =====293 +=== 6.1.1 Identification, Naming, Versioning, and Maintenance Model === 296 296 297 297 [[image:SDMX 3.1 Section 5_en_4a9b2cfc.jpg||height="688" width="587"]] 298 298 ... ... @@ -301,60 +301,51 @@ 301 301 The table below shows the identification and related data attributes to be stored in a registry for objects that are one of: 302 302 303 303 * //Annotable// 302 +* //Identifiable// 303 +* //Nameable// 304 +* //Versionable// 305 +* //Maintainable// 304 304 305 -//Identifiable// • //Nameable// 306 - 307 -• //Versionable// 308 - 309 -• //Maintainable// 310 - 311 -| |(% colspan="2" %)**Object Type**|(% colspan="2" %)**Data Attributes**|(% colspan="2" %)**Status**|(% colspan="2" %)**Data type**|(% colspan="2" %)**Notes** 312 -| |(% colspan="2" rowspan="4" %)//Annotable//|(% colspan="2" %)AnnotationTitle|(% colspan="2" %)C|(% colspan="2" %)string|(% colspan="2" %) 313 -| |(% colspan="2" %)AnnotationType|(% colspan="2" %)C|(% colspan="2" %)string|(% colspan="2" %) 314 -| |(% colspan="2" %)AnnotationURN|(% colspan="2" %)C|(% colspan="2" %)string|(% colspan="2" %) 315 -| |(% colspan="2" %)((( 316 -AnnotationText in the form of 317 - 318 -InternationalString 307 +(% style="width:1038.83px" %) 308 +|(% colspan="2" %)**Object Type**|(% colspan="2" %)**Data Attributes**|(% colspan="2" %)**Status**|(% colspan="2" %)**Data type**|(% colspan="2" %)**Notes** 309 +|(% colspan="2" rowspan="4" %)//Annotable//|(% colspan="2" %)AnnotationTitle|(% colspan="2" %)C|(% colspan="2" %)string|(% colspan="2" %) 310 +|(% colspan="2" %)AnnotationType|(% colspan="2" %)C|(% colspan="2" %)string|(% colspan="2" %) 311 +|(% colspan="2" %)AnnotationURN|(% colspan="2" %)C|(% colspan="2" %)string|(% colspan="2" %) 312 +|(% colspan="2" %)((( 313 +AnnotationText in the form of InternationalString 319 319 )))|(% colspan="2" %)C|(% colspan="2" %) |(% colspan="2" %)This can have languagespecific variants 320 -| |(% colspan="2" rowspan="4" %)//Identifiable//|(% colspan="2" %)All content as for //Annotable// plus|(% colspan="2" %) |(% colspan="2" %) |(% colspan="2" %) 321 -| |(% colspan="2" %)id|(% colspan="2" %)M|(% colspan="2" %)string|(% colspan="2" %) 322 -| |(% colspan="2" %)uri|(% colspan="2" %)C|(% colspan="2" %)string|(% colspan="2" %) 323 -| |(% colspan="2" %)urn|(% colspan="2" %)C|(% colspan="2" %)string|(% colspan="2" %)Although the urn is computable and therefore may not be submitted or stored physically, the Registry must return the urn for each object, and must be able to service a query on an object referenced solely by its urn. 324 -| |(% colspan="2" rowspan="3" %)//Nameable//|(% colspan="2" %)((( 325 -All content as for 326 - 327 -//Identifiable// plus 315 +|(% colspan="2" rowspan="4" %)//Identifiable//|(% colspan="2" %)All content as for //Annotable// plus|(% colspan="2" %) |(% colspan="2" %) |(% colspan="2" %) 316 +|(% colspan="2" %)id|(% colspan="2" %)M|(% colspan="2" %)string|(% colspan="2" %) 317 +|(% colspan="2" %)uri|(% colspan="2" %)C|(% colspan="2" %)string|(% colspan="2" %) 318 +|(% colspan="2" %)urn|(% colspan="2" %)C|(% colspan="2" %)string|(% colspan="2" %)Although the urn is computable and therefore may not be submitted or stored physically, the Registry must return the urn for each object, and must be able to service a query on an object referenced solely by its urn. 319 +|(% colspan="2" rowspan="3" %)//Nameable//|(% colspan="2" %)((( 320 +All content as for //Identifiable// plus 328 328 )))|(% colspan="2" %) |(% colspan="2" %) |(% colspan="2" %) 329 -| |(% colspan="2" %)((( 330 -Name in the form of 331 - 332 -InternationalString 322 +|(% colspan="2" %)((( 323 +Name in the form of InternationalString 333 333 )))|(% colspan="2" %)M|(% colspan="2" %)string|(% colspan="2" %)This can have language specific variants. 334 -| |(% colspan="2" %)((( 335 -Description in the form of 336 - 337 -InternationalString 325 +|(% colspan="2" %)((( 326 +Description in the form of InternationalString 338 338 )))|(% colspan="2" %)C|(% colspan="2" %)string|(% colspan="2" %)This can have language specific variants. 339 -| |(% colspan="2" rowspan="4" %)//Versionable//|(% colspan="2" %)(((328 +|(% colspan="2" rowspan="4" %)//Versionable//|(% colspan="2" %)((( 340 340 All content as for 341 341 342 342 //Identifiable// plus 343 343 )))|(% colspan="2" %) |(% colspan="2" %) |(% colspan="2" %) 344 -| |(% colspan="2" %)version|(% colspan="2" %)M|(% colspan="2" %)string|(% colspan="2" %)This is the version number according to SDMX versioning rules.345 -| |(% colspan="2" %)validFrom|(% colspan="2" %)C|(% colspan="2" %)Date/time|(% colspan="2" %)346 -| |(% colspan="2" %)validTo|(% colspan="2" %)C|(% colspan="2" %)Date/time|(% colspan="2" %)347 -|(% colspan="2" rowspan="5"%)//Maintainable//|(% colspan="2" %)All content as for //Versionable// plus|(% colspan="2" %) |(% colspan="2" %) |(% colspan="2" %)|348 -|(% colspan="2" %)isExternalReference|(% colspan="2" %)C|(% colspan="2" %)boolean|(% colspan="2" %)Value of “true” indicates that the actual resource is held outside of this registry. The actual reference is given in the registry URI or the structureURL, each of which must return a valid SDMX-ML file. |349 -|(% colspan="2" %)serviceURL|(% colspan="2" %)C|(% colspan="2" %)string|(% colspan="2" %)The url of the service that can be queried for this resource. |350 -|(% colspan="2" %)structureURL|(% colspan="2" %)C|(% colspan="2" %)string|(% colspan="2" %)The url of the resource. |351 -|(% colspan="2" %)(Maintenance) organisationId|(% colspan="2" %)M|(% colspan="2" %)string|(% colspan="2" %)The object must be linked to a maintenance organisation, i.e., Agency or Metadata Provider. |333 +|(% colspan="2" %)version|(% colspan="2" %)M|(% colspan="2" %)string|(% colspan="2" %)This is the version number according to SDMX versioning rules. 334 +|(% colspan="2" %)validFrom|(% colspan="2" %)C|(% colspan="2" %)Date/time|(% colspan="2" %) 335 +|(% colspan="2" %)validTo|(% colspan="2" %)C|(% colspan="2" %)Date/time|(% colspan="2" %) 336 +|(% colspan="2" %)//Maintainable//|(% colspan="2" %)All content as for //Versionable// plus|(% colspan="2" %) |(% colspan="2" %) |(% colspan="2" %) 337 +|(% colspan="2" %) |(% colspan="2" %)isExternalReference|(% colspan="2" %)C|(% colspan="2" %)boolean|(% colspan="2" %)Value of “true” indicates that the actual resource is held outside of this registry. The actual reference is given in the registry URI or the structureURL, each of which must return a valid SDMX-ML file. 338 +|(% colspan="2" %) |(% colspan="2" %)serviceURL|(% colspan="2" %)C|(% colspan="2" %)string|(% colspan="2" %)The url of the service that can be queried for this resource. 339 +|(% colspan="2" %) |(% colspan="2" %)structureURL|(% colspan="2" %)C|(% colspan="2" %)string|(% colspan="2" %)The url of the resource. 340 +|(% colspan="2" %) |(% colspan="2" %)(Maintenance) organisationId|(% colspan="2" %)M|(% colspan="2" %)string|(% colspan="2" %)The object must be linked to a maintenance organisation, i.e., Agency or Metadata Provider. 352 352 353 353 **Table 1: Common Attributes of Object Types** 354 354 355 -== ={{id name="_Toc90805"/}}6.2 Unique identification of SDMX objects ===344 +== 6.2 Unique identification of SDMX objects == 356 356 357 -=== =={{id name="_Toc90806"/}}6.2.1 Agencies and Metadata Providers =====346 +=== 6.2.1 Agencies and Metadata Providers === 358 358 359 359 The Maintenance Agency in SDMX is maintained in an Agency Scheme which itself is a sub class of Organisation Scheme – this is shown in the class diagram below. 360 360 ... ... @@ -372,11 +372,9 @@ 372 372 * Agencies registered in the top-level scheme can themselves maintain a single Agency Scheme. Agencies in these second-tier schemes can themselves maintain a single Agency Scheme and so on. 373 373 * The AgencyScheme has a fixed version, i.e., ‘1.0’, hence it is an exception from the Semantic Versioning that other Artefacts follow. 374 374 * There can be only one AgencyScheme maintained by any one Agency. It has a fixed id of AGENCIES. 364 +* The /hierarchy of Organisation is not inherited by Maintenance Agency – thus each Agency Scheme is a flat list of Maintenance Agencies. 365 +* The format of the agency identifier is agencyID.agencyID etc. The top-level agency in this identification mechanism is the agency registered in the SDMX agency scheme. In other words, SDMX is not a part of the hierarchical ID structure for agencies. However, SDMX is, itself, a maintenance agency and is contained in the top-level Agency Scheme. 375 375 376 -• The /hierarchy of Organisation is not inherited by Maintenance Agency – thus each Agency Scheme is a flat list of Maintenance Agencies. 377 - 378 -• The format of the agency identifier is agencyID.agencyID etc. The top-level agency in this identification mechanism is the agency registered in the SDMX agency scheme. In other words, SDMX is not a part of the hierarchical ID structure for agencies. However, SDMX is, itself, a maintenance agency and is contained in the top-level Agency Scheme. 379 - 380 380 This supports a hierarchical structure of agencyID. 381 381 382 382 An example is shown below. ... ... @@ -387,14 +387,11 @@ 387 387 388 388 The following organizations maintain an Agency Scheme. 389 389 390 -• SDMX – contains Agencies AA, BB 377 +* SDMX – contains Agencies AA, BB 378 +* AA – contains Agencies CC, DD 379 +* BB – contains Agencies CC, DD 380 +* DD – Contains Agency EE 391 391 392 -• AA – contains Agencies CC, DD 393 - 394 -• BB – contains Agencies CC, DD 395 - 396 -• DD – Contains Agency EE 397 - 398 398 Each agency is identified by its full hierarchy excluding SDMX. 399 399 400 400 e.g., the id of EE as an agencyID is AA.DD.EE ... ... @@ -407,13 +407,13 @@ 407 407 408 408 Following the same principles, the Metadata Provider is the maintenance organisation for a special subset of Maintainable Artefacts, i.e., the Metadatasets; the latter are the containers of reference metadata combined with a target that those metadata refer to. 409 409 410 -=== =={{id name="_Toc90807"/}}6.2.2 Universal Resource Name (URN) =====394 +=== 6.2.2 Universal Resource Name (URN) === 411 411 412 - **6.2.2.1 Introduction**396 +==== 6.2.2.1 Introduction ==== 413 413 414 414 To provide interoperability between SDMX Registry/Repositories in a distributed network environment, it is important to have a scheme for uniquely identifying (and thus accessing) all first-class (Identifiable) SDMX-IM objects. Most of these unique identifiers are composite (containing maintenance agency, or parent object identifiers), and there is a need to be able to construct a unique reference as a single string. This is achieved by having a globally unique identifier called a universal resource name (URN) which is generated from the actual identification components in the SDMX-RR APIs. In other words, the URN for any Identifiable Artefact is constructed from its component identifiers (agency, id, version etc.). 415 415 416 - **6.2.2.2 URN Structure //__Case Rules for URN__//**// //400 +==== 6.2.2.2 URN Structure //__Case Rules for URN__// ==== 417 417 418 418 For the URN, all parts of the string are case sensitive. The generic structure of the URN is as follows: 419 419 ... ... @@ -425,7 +425,7 @@ 425 425 426 426 The Maintenance agency identifier is separated from the maintainable artefact identifier by a colon ‘:’. All other identifiers in the SDMX URN syntax are separated by a period ‘.’. The version information is encapsulated in parentheses ‘()’ and adheres to the SDMX versioning rules, as explained in SDMX Standards Section 6 “Technical Notes”, paragraph “4.3 Versioning. 427 427 428 - **6.2.2.3 Explanation of the generic structure**412 +==== 6.2.2.3 Explanation of the generic structure ==== 429 429 430 430 In the explanation below the actual object that is the target of the URN is called the **actual object**. 431 431 ... ... @@ -504,103 +504,103 @@ 504 504 505 505 The SDMX-RR MUST be able to resolve the unique identifier of an SDMX artefact and to produce an SDMX-ML rendering of that artefact if it is located in the Registry. 506 506 507 -=== =={{id name="_Toc90808"/}}6.2.3 Table of SDMX-IM Packages and Classes =====491 +=== 6.2.3 Table of SDMX-IM Packages and Classes === 508 508 509 509 The table below lists all of the packages in the SDMX-IM together with the concrete classes that are in these packages and whose objects have a URN. 510 510 511 -|**Package**|**URN class name (model class name where this is different)** 512 -|base|Agency 513 -| |AgencyScheme 514 -| |DataConsumer 515 -| |DataConsumerScheme 516 -| |DataProvider 517 -| |DataProviderScheme 518 -| |MetadataProvider 519 -| |MetadataProviderScheme 520 -| |OrganisationUnit 521 -| |OrganisationUnitScheme 522 -| | 523 -|datastructure|AttributeDescriptor 524 -| |DataAttribute 525 -| |Dataflow 526 -| |DataStructure (DataStructureDefinition) 527 -| |Dimension 528 -| |DimensionDescriptor 529 -| |GroupDimensionDescriptor 530 -| |Measure 531 -| |MeasureDescriptor 532 -| |TimeDimension 533 -| | 534 -|metadatastructure|MetadataAttribute 535 -| |MetadataAttributeDescriptor 536 -| |((( 495 +(% style="width:750.835px" %) 496 +|(% style="width:222px" %)**Package**|(% style="width:526px" %)**URN class name (model class name where this is different)** 497 +|(% style="width:222px" %)base|(% style="width:526px" %)Agency 498 +|(% style="width:222px" %) |(% style="width:526px" %)AgencyScheme 499 +|(% style="width:222px" %) |(% style="width:526px" %)DataConsumer 500 +|(% style="width:222px" %) |(% style="width:526px" %)DataConsumerScheme 501 +|(% style="width:222px" %) |(% style="width:526px" %)DataProvider 502 +|(% style="width:222px" %) |(% style="width:526px" %)DataProviderScheme 503 +|(% style="width:222px" %) |(% style="width:526px" %)MetadataProvider 504 +|(% style="width:222px" %) |(% style="width:526px" %)MetadataProviderScheme 505 +|(% style="width:222px" %) |(% style="width:526px" %)OrganisationUnit 506 +|(% style="width:222px" %) |(% style="width:526px" %)OrganisationUnitScheme 507 +|(% style="width:222px" %) |(% style="width:526px" %) 508 +|(% style="width:222px" %)datastructure|(% style="width:526px" %)AttributeDescriptor 509 +|(% style="width:222px" %) |(% style="width:526px" %)DataAttribute 510 +|(% style="width:222px" %) |(% style="width:526px" %)Dataflow 511 +|(% style="width:222px" %) |(% style="width:526px" %)DataStructure (DataStructureDefinition) 512 +|(% style="width:222px" %) |(% style="width:526px" %)Dimension 513 +|(% style="width:222px" %) |(% style="width:526px" %)DimensionDescriptor 514 +|(% style="width:222px" %) |(% style="width:526px" %)GroupDimensionDescriptor 515 +|(% style="width:222px" %) |(% style="width:526px" %)Measure 516 +|(% style="width:222px" %) |(% style="width:526px" %)MeasureDescriptor 517 +|(% style="width:222px" %) |(% style="width:526px" %)TimeDimension 518 +|(% style="width:222px" %) |(% style="width:526px" %) 519 +|(% style="width:222px" %)metadatastructure|(% style="width:526px" %)MetadataAttribute 520 +|(% style="width:222px" %) |(% style="width:526px" %)MetadataAttributeDescriptor 521 +|(% style="width:222px" %) |(% style="width:526px" %)((( 537 537 MetadataStructure 538 538 539 539 (MetadataStructureDefinition) 540 540 ))) 541 541 542 -: 543 - 544 544 ((( 545 -|**Package**|**URN class name (model class name where this is different)** 546 -| |Metadataflow 547 -| |MetadataSet 548 -| | 549 -|process|Process 550 -| |ProcessStep 551 -| |Transition 552 -| | 553 -|registry|DataConstraint 554 -| |MetadataConstraint 555 -| |MetadataProvisionAgreement 556 -| |ProvisionAgreement 557 -| |Subscription 558 -| | 559 -|structuremapping|CategorySchemeMap 560 -| |ConceptSchemeMap 561 -| |OrganisationSchemeMap 562 -| |ReportingTaxonomyMap 563 -| |RepresentationMap 564 -| |StructureMap 565 -| | 566 -|codelist|Code 567 -| |Codelist 568 -| |HierarchicalCode 569 -| |Hierarchy 570 -| |HierarchyAssociation 571 -| |Level 572 -| |ValueList 573 -| | 574 -|categoryscheme|Categorisation 575 -| |Category 576 -| |CategoryScheme 577 -| |ReportingCategory 578 -| |ReportingTaxonomy 579 -|**Package**|**URN class name (model class name where this is different)** 580 -| | 581 -|conceptscheme|Concept 582 -| |ConceptScheme 583 -| | 584 -|transformation|CustomType 585 -| |CustomTypeScheme 586 -| |NamePersonalisation 587 -| |NamePersonalisationScheme 588 -| |Ruleset 589 -| |RulesetScheme 590 -| |Transformation 591 -| |TransformationScheme 592 -| |UserDefinedOperator 593 -| |UserDefinedOperatorScheme 594 -| |VtlCodelistMapping 595 -| |VtlConceptMapping 596 -| |VtlDataflowMapping 597 -| |VtlMappingScheme 598 -| | 528 +(% style="width:751.835px" %) 529 +|(% style="width:221px" %)**Package**|(% style="width:528px" %)**URN class name (model class name where this is different)** 530 +|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)Metadataflow 531 +|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)MetadataSet 532 +|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %) 533 +|(% style="width:221px" %)process|(% style="width:528px" %)Process 534 +|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)ProcessStep 535 +|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)Transition 536 +|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %) 537 +|(% style="width:221px" %)registry|(% style="width:528px" %)DataConstraint 538 +|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)MetadataConstraint 539 +|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)MetadataProvisionAgreement 540 +|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)ProvisionAgreement 541 +|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)Subscription 542 +|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %) 543 +|(% style="width:221px" %)structuremapping|(% style="width:528px" %)CategorySchemeMap 544 +|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)ConceptSchemeMap 545 +|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)OrganisationSchemeMap 546 +|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)ReportingTaxonomyMap 547 +|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)RepresentationMap 548 +|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)StructureMap 549 +|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %) 550 +|(% style="width:221px" %)codelist|(% style="width:528px" %)Code 551 +|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)Codelist 552 +|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)HierarchicalCode 553 +|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)Hierarchy 554 +|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)HierarchyAssociation 555 +|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)Level 556 +|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)ValueList 557 +|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %) 558 +|(% style="width:221px" %)categoryscheme|(% style="width:528px" %)Categorisation 559 +|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)Category 560 +|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)CategoryScheme 561 +|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)ReportingCategory 562 +|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)ReportingTaxonomy 563 +|(% style="width:221px" %)**Package**|(% style="width:528px" %)**URN class name (model class name where this is different)** 564 +|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %) 565 +|(% style="width:221px" %)conceptscheme|(% style="width:528px" %)Concept 566 +|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)ConceptScheme 567 +|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %) 568 +|(% style="width:221px" %)transformation|(% style="width:528px" %)CustomType 569 +|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)CustomTypeScheme 570 +|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)NamePersonalisation 571 +|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)NamePersonalisationScheme 572 +|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)Ruleset 573 +|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)RulesetScheme 574 +|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)Transformation 575 +|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)TransformationScheme 576 +|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)UserDefinedOperator 577 +|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)UserDefinedOperatorScheme 578 +|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)VtlCodelistMapping 579 +|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)VtlConceptMapping 580 +|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)VtlDataflowMapping 581 +|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)VtlMappingScheme 582 +|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %) 599 599 ))) 600 600 601 601 **Table 2: SDMX-IM Packages and Contained Classes** 602 602 603 -=== =={{id name="_Toc90809"/}}6.2.4 URN Identification components of SDMX objects =====587 +=== 6.2.4 URN Identification components of SDMX objects === 604 604 605 605 The table below describes the identification components for all SDMX object types that have identification. Note the actual attributes are all ‘id’ but have been prefixed by their class name or multiple class names to show navigation, e.g., ‘conceptSchemeAgencyId’ is really the ‘Id’ attribute of the Agency class that is associated to the ConceptScheme. 606 606 ... ... @@ -608,67 +608,56 @@ 608 608 609 609 urn:sdmx.org.sdmx.infomodel.{package}.{classname}= 610 610 611 -|**Classname**|**Ending URN pattern**|**Example** 612 -|Agency^^[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^2^^>>path:#sdfootnote2sym||name="sdfootnote2anc"]](%%)^^|agencySchemeAgencyId:**AGENCIES**(**1.0**).agencyId|ECB:**AGENCIES**(**1.0**).AA 613 -|//AgencyScheme//|agencySchemeAgencyId:**AGENCIES**(**1.0**)|ECB:**AGENCIES**(**1.0**) 614 -|//Categorisation//|categorisationAgencyId:categorisationId(version)|IMF:cat001(1.0.0) 615 -|Category|categorySchemeAgencyId:categorySchemeId(versi on).categoryId.categoryId.categoryId etc.|IMF:SDDS(1.0.0):level_1_category.level_2_category … 616 -|//CategoryScheme//|categorySchemeAgencyId:categorySchemeId(versi on)|IMF:SDDS(1.0.0) 595 +(% style="width:1272.83px" %) 596 +|(% style="width:289px" %)**Classname**|(% style="width:600px" %)**Ending URN pattern**|(% style="width:383px" %)**Example** 597 +|(% style="width:289px" %)Agency{{footnote}}The object must be linked to a maintenance organisation, i.e., Agency or Metadata Provider.{{/footnote}}|(% style="width:600px" %)agencySchemeAgencyId:**AGENCIES**(**1.0**).agencyId|(% style="width:383px" %)ECB:**AGENCIES**(**1.0**).AA 598 +|(% style="width:289px" %)//AgencyScheme//|(% style="width:600px" %)agencySchemeAgencyId:**AGENCIES**(**1.0**)|(% style="width:383px" %)ECB:**AGENCIES**(**1.0**) 599 +|(% style="width:289px" %)//Categorisation//|(% style="width:600px" %)categorisationAgencyId:categorisationId(version)|(% style="width:383px" %)IMF:cat001(1.0.0) 600 +|(% style="width:289px" %)Category|(% style="width:600px" %)categorySchemeAgencyId:categorySchemeId(versi on).categoryId.categoryId.categoryId etc.|(% style="width:383px" %)IMF:SDDS(1.0.0):level_1_category.level_2_category … 601 +|(% style="width:289px" %)//CategoryScheme//|(% style="width:600px" %)categorySchemeAgencyId:categorySchemeId(versi on)|(% style="width:383px" %)IMF:SDDS(1.0.0) 617 617 618 -|**Classname**|**Ending URN pattern**|**Example** 619 -|//CategorySchemeMap//|((( 620 -catSchemeMapAgencyId:catSchemeMapId(version 603 +|(% style="width:292px" %)**Classname**|(% style="width:595px" %)**Ending URN pattern**|(% style="width:794px" %)**Example** 604 +|(% style="width:292px" %)//CategorySchemeMap//|(% style="width:595px" %)((( 605 +catSchemeMapAgencyId:catSchemeMapId(version) 606 +)))|(% style="width:794px" %)SDMX:EUROSTAT_SUBJECT_DOMAIN(1.0.0) 607 +|(% style="width:292px" %)Code|(% style="width:595px" %)codeListAgencyId:codelistId(version).codeId|(% style="width:794px" %)SDMX:CL_FREQ(1.0.0).Q 608 +|(% style="width:292px" %)//Codelist//|(% style="width:595px" %)codeListAgencyId:codeListId(version)|(% style="width:794px" %)SDMX:CL_FREQ(1.0.0) 609 +|(% style="width:292px" %)ComponentMap|(% style="width:595px" %)structureMapAgencyId:structureMap(version).com ponentMapId|(% style="width:794px" %)SDMX:BOP_STRUCTURES(1.0.0).REF_AREA_TO_COUNT RY 610 +|(% style="width:292px" %)Concept|(% style="width:595px" %)conceptSchemeAgencyId:conceptSchemeId(versio n).conceptId|(% style="width:794px" %)SDMX:CROSS_DOMAIN_CONCEPTS(1.0.0).FREQ 611 +|(% style="width:292px" %)//ConceptScheme//|(% style="width:595px" %)conceptSchemeAgencyId:conceptSchemeId(versio n)|(% style="width:794px" %)SDMX:CROSS_DOMAIN_CONCEPTS(1.0.0) 612 +|(% style="width:292px" %)//ConceptSchemeMap//|(% style="width:595px" %)((( 613 +conceptSchemeMapAgencyId:conceptSchemeMap Id(version) 614 +)))|(% style="width:794px" %)SDMX:CONCEPT_MAP(1.0.0) 615 +|(% style="width:292px" %)CustomType|(% style="width:595px" %)customTypeSchemeAgencyId customTypeSchemeId(version) customTypeId|(% style="width:794px" %)ECB: CUSTOM_TYPE_SCHEME(1.0.0).CUSTOM_TYPE_1 616 +|(% style="width:292px" %)//CustomTypeScheme//|(% style="width:595px" %)customTypeSchemeAgencyId customTypeSchemeId(version)|(% style="width:794px" %)ECB:CUSTOM_TYPE_SCHEME(1.0.0) 617 +|(% style="width:292px" %)DataAttrribute|(% style="width:595px" %)dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId:dataStructureDef initionId(version).dataAttributeId|(% style="width:794px" %)TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0).OBS_STATUS 618 +|(% style="width:292px" %)//DataConstraint//|(% style="width:595px" %)dataConstraintAgencyId:dataConstraintId(version)|(% style="width:794px" %)TFFS:CREDITOR_DATA_CONTENT(1.0.0) 621 621 622 -) 623 -)))|SDMX:EUROSTAT_SUBJECT_DOMAIN(1.0.0) 624 -|Code|codeListAgencyId:codelistId(version).codeId|SDMX:CL_FREQ(1.0.0).Q 625 -|//Codelist//|codeListAgencyId:codeListId(version)|SDMX:CL_FREQ(1.0.0) 626 -|ComponentMap|structureMapAgencyId:structureMap(version).com ponentMapId|SDMX:BOP_STRUCTURES(1.0.0).REF_AREA_TO_COUNT RY 627 -|Concept|conceptSchemeAgencyId:conceptSchemeId(versio n).conceptId|SDMX:CROSS_DOMAIN_CONCEPTS(1.0.0).FREQ 628 -|//ConceptScheme//|conceptSchemeAgencyId:conceptSchemeId(versio n)|SDMX:CROSS_DOMAIN_CONCEPTS(1.0.0) 629 -|//ConceptSchemeMap//|((( 630 -conceptSchemeMapAgencyId:conceptSchemeMap 631 - 632 -Id(version) 633 -)))|SDMX:CONCEPT_MAP(1.0.0) 634 -|CustomType|customTypeSchemeAgencyId customTypeSchemeId(version) customTypeId|ECB: CUSTOM_TYPE_SCHEME(1.0.0).CUSTOM_TYPE_1 635 -|//CustomTypeScheme//|customTypeSchemeAgencyId customTypeSchemeId(version)|ECB:CUSTOM_TYPE_SCHEME(1.0.0) 636 -|DataAttrribute|dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId:dataStructureDef initionId(version).dataAttributeId|TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0).OBS_STATUS 637 -|//DataConstraint//|dataConstraintAgencyId:dataConstraintId(version)|TFFS:CREDITOR_DATA_CONTENT(1.0.0) 638 - 639 -|**Classname**|**Ending URN pattern**|**Example** 640 -|DataConsumer|dataConsumerSchemeAgencyId:**DATA_CONSUME RS**(**1.0**).dataConsumerId|SDMX:**DATA_CONSUMERS**(**1.0**).CONSUMER_1 641 -|//DataConsumerScheme//|((( 642 -dataConsumerSchemeAgencyId:**DATA_CONSUME** 643 - 644 -**RS**(**1.0**) 645 -)))|SDMX:**DATA_CONSUMERS**(**1.0**) 646 -|//Dataflow//|dataflowAgencyId:dataflowId(version)|TFFS:CRED_EXT_DEBT(1.0.0) 647 -|DataProvider|((( 648 -dataProviderSchemeAgencyId:**DATA_PROVIDERS**( 649 - 650 -**1.0**).dataProviderId 651 -)))|SDMX:**DATA_PROVIDERS**(**1.0**).PROVIDER_1 652 -|//DataProviderScheme//|((( 653 -dataProviderSchemeAgencyId:**DATA_PROVIDERS**( 654 - 655 -**1.0**) 656 -)))|SDMX:**DATA_PROVIDERS**(**1.0**) 657 -|//DataStructure//|dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId:dataStructureDef initionId(version)|TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0) 658 -|Dimension|dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId:dataStructureDef initionId(version).dimensionId|TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0).FREQ 659 -|((( 620 +|(% style="width:294px" %)**Classname**|(% style="width:645px" %)**Ending URN pattern**|(% style="width:742px" %)**Example** 621 +|(% style="width:294px" %)DataConsumer|(% style="width:645px" %)dataConsumerSchemeAgencyId:**DATA_CONSUME RS**(**1.0**).dataConsumerId|(% style="width:742px" %)SDMX:**DATA_CONSUMERS**(**1.0**).CONSUMER_1 622 +|(% style="width:294px" %)//DataConsumerScheme//|(% style="width:645px" %)((( 623 +dataConsumerSchemeAgencyId:**DATA_CONSUME RS**(**1.0**) 624 +)))|(% style="width:742px" %)SDMX:**DATA_CONSUMERS**(**1.0**) 625 +|(% style="width:294px" %)//Dataflow//|(% style="width:645px" %)dataflowAgencyId:dataflowId(version)|(% style="width:742px" %)TFFS:CRED_EXT_DEBT(1.0.0) 626 +|(% style="width:294px" %)DataProvider|(% style="width:645px" %)((( 627 +dataProviderSchemeAgencyId:**DATA_PROVIDERS**(**1.0**).dataProviderId 628 +)))|(% style="width:742px" %)SDMX:**DATA_PROVIDERS**(**1.0**).PROVIDER_1 629 +|(% style="width:294px" %)//DataProviderScheme//|(% style="width:645px" %)((( 630 +dataProviderSchemeAgencyId:**DATA_PROVIDERS**(**1.0**) 631 +)))|(% style="width:742px" %)SDMX:**DATA_PROVIDERS**(**1.0**) 632 +|(% style="width:294px" %)//DataStructure//|(% style="width:645px" %)dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId:dataStructureDef initionId(version)|(% style="width:742px" %)TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0) 633 +|(% style="width:294px" %)Dimension|(% style="width:645px" %)dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId:dataStructureDef initionId(version).dimensionId|(% style="width:742px" %)TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0).FREQ 634 +|(% style="width:294px" %)((( 660 660 DimensionDescriptor 661 661 662 662 MeasureDescriptor 663 663 664 664 AttributeDescriptor 665 -)))|((( 640 +)))|(% style="width:645px" %)((( 666 666 dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId:dataStructureDef initionId(version).componentListId 667 667 668 -where the componentListId is the name of the class (there is only one occurrence of each in the 669 - 670 -Data Structure Definition) 671 -)))|((( 643 +where the componentListId is the name of the class (there is only one occurrence of each in the Data Structure Definition) 644 +)))|(% style="width:742px" %)((( 672 672 TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0).DimensionDescriptor 673 673 674 674 TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0).MeasureDescriptor ... ... @@ -675,83 +675,81 @@ 675 675 676 676 TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0).AttributeDescriptor 677 677 ))) 678 -|GroupDimensionDescriptor|dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId:dataStructureDef initionId(version).groupDimensionDescriptorId|TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0).SIBLING 679 -|HierarchicalCode|hierarchyAgencyId:hierarchyId(version).hierarchica lCode.hierarchicalCode|UNESCO:H-C-GOV(1.0.0).GOV_CODE1.GOV_CODE1_1 651 +|(% style="width:294px" %)GroupDimensionDescriptor|(% style="width:645px" %)dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId:dataStructureDef initionId(version).groupDimensionDescriptorId|(% style="width:742px" %)TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0).SIBLING 652 +|(% style="width:294px" %)HierarchicalCode|(% style="width:645px" %)hierarchyAgencyId:hierarchyId(version).hierarchica lCode.hierarchicalCode|(% style="width:742px" %)UNESCO:H-C-GOV(1.0.0).GOV_CODE1.GOV_CODE1_1 680 680 681 -|**Classname**|**Ending URN pattern**|**Example** 682 -|//Hierarchy//|hierarchyAgencyId:hierarchyId(version)|UNESCO:H-C-GOV(1.0.0) 683 -|//HierarchyAssociation//|hierarchyAssociationAgencyId:hierarchyAssociatio nId(version)|UNESCO:CL_EXP_SOURCE(1.0.0) 684 -|Level|hierarchyAgencyId:hierarchyId(version).level|UNESCO:H-C-GOV(1.0.0).LVL1 685 -|Measure|dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId:dataStructureDef initionId(version).measureId|TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0).OBS_VALUE 686 -|MetadataAttribute|((( 654 +|**Classname**|(% style="width:644px" %)**Ending URN pattern**|(% style="width:743px" %)**Example** 655 +|//Hierarchy//|(% style="width:644px" %)hierarchyAgencyId:hierarchyId(version)|(% style="width:743px" %)UNESCO:H-C-GOV(1.0.0) 656 +|//HierarchyAssociation//|(% style="width:644px" %)hierarchyAssociationAgencyId:hierarchyAssociatio nId(version)|(% style="width:743px" %)UNESCO:CL_EXP_SOURCE(1.0.0) 657 +|Level|(% style="width:644px" %)hierarchyAgencyId:hierarchyId(version).level|(% style="width:743px" %)UNESCO:H-C-GOV(1.0.0).LVL1 658 +|Measure|(% style="width:644px" %)dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId:dataStructureDef initionId(version).measureId|(% style="width:743px" %)TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0).OBS_VALUE 659 +|MetadataAttribute|(% style="width:644px" %)((( 687 687 msdAgencyId:msdId(version).metadataAttributeId. 688 688 689 689 metadataAttributeId 690 -)))|IMF:SDDS_MSD(1.0.0).COMPILATION.METHOD 691 -|MetadataAttributeDescriptor|msdAgencyId:msdId(version).metadataAttributeDe scriptorId|IMF:SDDS_MSD(1.0.0).MetadataAttributeDescriptor 692 -|//MetadataConstraint//|metadataConstraintAgencyId:metadataConstraintI d(version)|TFFS:CREDITOR_METADATA_CONTENT(1.0.0) 693 -|//Metadataflow//|metadataflowAgencyId:metadataflowId(version)|IMF:SDDS_MDF(1.0.0) 694 -|MetadataProvider|metadataProviderSchemeAgencyId:**METADATA_P ROVIDERS**(**1.0**).metadataProviderId|SDMX:**METADATA_PROVIDERS**(**1.0**).MD_PROVIDER_1 695 -|//MetadataProviderScheme//|metadataProviderSchemeAgencyId:**METADATA_P ROVIDERS**(**1.0**)|SDMX:**METADATA_PROVIDERS**(**1.0**) 696 -|//MetadataProvisionAgreement//|metadataProvisionAgreementAgencyId:metadataP rovisionAgreementId(version)|IMF:SDDS_MDF_AB(1.0.0) 697 -|//MetadataSet//|metadataProviderId:metadataSetId(version)|MD_PROVIDER:METADATASET(1.0.0) 698 -|//MetadataStructure//|msdAgencyId:msdId(version)|IMF:SDDS_MSD(1.0.0) 663 +)))|(% style="width:743px" %)IMF:SDDS_MSD(1.0.0).COMPILATION.METHOD 664 +|MetadataAttributeDescriptor|(% style="width:644px" %)msdAgencyId:msdId(version).metadataAttributeDe scriptorId|(% style="width:743px" %)IMF:SDDS_MSD(1.0.0).MetadataAttributeDescriptor 665 +|//MetadataConstraint//|(% style="width:644px" %)metadataConstraintAgencyId:metadataConstraintI d(version)|(% style="width:743px" %)TFFS:CREDITOR_METADATA_CONTENT(1.0.0) 666 +|//Metadataflow//|(% style="width:644px" %)metadataflowAgencyId:metadataflowId(version)|(% style="width:743px" %)IMF:SDDS_MDF(1.0.0) 667 +|MetadataProvider|(% style="width:644px" %)metadataProviderSchemeAgencyId:**METADATA_P ROVIDERS**(**1.0**).metadataProviderId|(% style="width:743px" %)SDMX:**METADATA_PROVIDERS**(**1.0**).MD_PROVIDER_1 668 +|//MetadataProviderScheme//|(% style="width:644px" %)metadataProviderSchemeAgencyId:**METADATA_P ROVIDERS**(**1.0**)|(% style="width:743px" %)SDMX:**METADATA_PROVIDERS**(**1.0**) 669 +|//MetadataProvisionAgreement//|(% style="width:644px" %)metadataProvisionAgreementAgencyId:metadataP rovisionAgreementId(version)|(% style="width:743px" %)IMF:SDDS_MDF_AB(1.0.0) 670 +|//MetadataSet//|(% style="width:644px" %)metadataProviderId:metadataSetId(version)|(% style="width:743px" %)MD_PROVIDER:METADATASET(1.0.0) 671 +|//MetadataStructure//|(% style="width:644px" %)msdAgencyId:msdId(version)|(% style="width:743px" %)IMF:SDDS_MSD(1.0.0) 699 699 700 -|**Classname**|**Ending URN pattern**|**Example** 701 -|NamePersonalisation|namePersonalisationSchemeAgencyId namePersonalisationSchemeId(version) namePersonalisationId|ECB:PSN_SCHEME(1.0.0).PSN1234 702 -|//NamePersonalisationScheme//|namePersonalisationSchemeAgencyId namePersonalisationSchemeId(version)|ECB:PSN_SCHEME(1.0.0) 703 -|//OrganisationSchemeMap//|orgSchemeMapAgencyId:orgSchemeMapId(versio n)|SDMX:AGENCIES_PROVIDERS(1.0.0) 704 -|OrganisationUnit|organisationUnitSchemeAgencyId:organisationUni tSchemeId(version).organisationUnitId|ECB:ORGANISATIONS(1.0.0).1F 705 -|//OrganisationUnitScheme//|organisationUnitSchemeAgencyId:organisationUni tSchemeId(version)|ECB:ORGANISATIONS(1.0.0) 706 -|//Process//|processAgencyId:processId{version)|BIS:PROCESS1(1.0.0) 707 -|ProcessStep|((( 673 +|(% style="width:296px" %)**Classname**|(% style="width:646px" %)**Ending URN pattern**|(% style="width:739px" %)**Example** 674 +|(% style="width:296px" %)NamePersonalisation|(% style="width:646px" %)namePersonalisationSchemeAgencyId namePersonalisationSchemeId(version) namePersonalisationId|(% style="width:739px" %)ECB:PSN_SCHEME(1.0.0).PSN1234 675 +|(% style="width:296px" %)//NamePersonalisationScheme//|(% style="width:646px" %)namePersonalisationSchemeAgencyId namePersonalisationSchemeId(version)|(% style="width:739px" %)ECB:PSN_SCHEME(1.0.0) 676 +|(% style="width:296px" %)//OrganisationSchemeMap//|(% style="width:646px" %)orgSchemeMapAgencyId:orgSchemeMapId(versio n)|(% style="width:739px" %)SDMX:AGENCIES_PROVIDERS(1.0.0) 677 +|(% style="width:296px" %)OrganisationUnit|(% style="width:646px" %)organisationUnitSchemeAgencyId:organisationUni tSchemeId(version).organisationUnitId|(% style="width:739px" %)ECB:ORGANISATIONS(1.0.0).1F 678 +|(% style="width:296px" %)//OrganisationUnitScheme//|(% style="width:646px" %)organisationUnitSchemeAgencyId:organisationUni tSchemeId(version)|(% style="width:739px" %)ECB:ORGANISATIONS(1.0.0) 679 +|(% style="width:296px" %)//Process//|(% style="width:646px" %)processAgencyId:processId{version)|(% style="width:739px" %)BIS:PROCESS1(1.0.0) 680 +|(% style="width:296px" %)ProcessStep|(% style="width:646px" %)((( 708 708 processAgencyId:processId(version).processStepId. 709 709 710 710 processStepId 711 -)))|BIS:PROCESS1(1.0.0).STEP1.STEP1_1 712 -|//ProvisionAgreement//|provisionAgreementAgencyId:provisionAgreement Id(version)|TFFS:CRED_EXT_DEBT_AB(1.0.0) 713 -|ReportingCategory|((( 684 +)))|(% style="width:739px" %)BIS:PROCESS1(1.0.0).STEP1.STEP1_1 685 +|(% style="width:296px" %)//ProvisionAgreement//|(% style="width:646px" %)provisionAgreementAgencyId:provisionAgreement Id(version)|(% style="width:739px" %)TFFS:CRED_EXT_DEBT_AB(1.0.0) 686 +|(% style="width:296px" %)ReportingCategory|(% style="width:646px" %)((( 714 714 reportingTaxonomyAgencyId: 715 715 716 716 reportingTaxonomyId(version).reportingCategoryI d.reportingCategoryId 717 -)))|IMF:REP_1(1.0.0):LVL1_REP_CAT.LVL2_REP_CAT 718 -|//ReportingTaxonomy//|reportingTaxonomyAgencyId:reportingTaxonomyI d(version)|IMF:REP_1(1.0.0) 719 -|//ReportingTaxonomyMap//|repTaxonomyAgencyId:repTaxonomyId(version)|SDMX:RT_MAP(1.0.0) 690 +)))|(% style="width:739px" %)IMF:REP_1(1.0.0):LVL1_REP_CAT.LVL2_REP_CAT 691 +|(% style="width:296px" %)//ReportingTaxonomy//|(% style="width:646px" %)reportingTaxonomyAgencyId:reportingTaxonomyI d(version)|(% style="width:739px" %)IMF:REP_1(1.0.0) 692 +|(% style="width:296px" %)//ReportingTaxonomyMap//|(% style="width:646px" %)repTaxonomyAgencyId:repTaxonomyId(version)|(% style="width:739px" %)SDMX:RT_MAP(1.0.0) 720 720 721 -|**Classname**|**Ending URN pattern**|**Example** 722 -|//RepresentationMap//|repMapAgencyId:repMapId(version)|SDMX:REF_AREA_MAPPING(1.0.0) 723 -|Ruleset|rulesetSchemeAgencyId rulesetSchemeId(version) rulesetId|ECB:RULESET_23(1.0.0).SET111 724 -|//RulesetScheme//|rulesetSchemeAgencyId rulesetSchemeId(version)|ECB:RULESET_23(1.0.0) 725 -|//StructureMap//|structureMapAgencyId:structureMap(version)|SDMX:BOP_STRUCTURES(1.0.0) 726 -|Subscription|((( 694 +|(% style="width:297px" %)**Classname**|(% style="width:647px" %)**Ending URN pattern**|(% style="width:737px" %)**Example** 695 +|(% style="width:297px" %)//RepresentationMap//|(% style="width:647px" %)repMapAgencyId:repMapId(version)|(% style="width:737px" %)SDMX:REF_AREA_MAPPING(1.0.0) 696 +|(% style="width:297px" %)Ruleset|(% style="width:647px" %)rulesetSchemeAgencyId rulesetSchemeId(version) rulesetId|(% style="width:737px" %)ECB:RULESET_23(1.0.0).SET111 697 +|(% style="width:297px" %)//RulesetScheme//|(% style="width:647px" %)rulesetSchemeAgencyId rulesetSchemeId(version)|(% style="width:737px" %)ECB:RULESET_23(1.0.0) 698 +|(% style="width:297px" %)//StructureMap//|(% style="width:647px" %)structureMapAgencyId:structureMap(version)|(% style="width:737px" %)SDMX:BOP_STRUCTURES(1.0.0) 699 +|(% style="width:297px" %)Subscription|(% style="width:647px" %)((( 727 727 The Subscription is not itself an Identifiable Artefact and therefore it does not follow the rules for URN structure. 728 - 729 729 The name of the URN is registryURN There is no pre-determined format. 730 -)))|This cannot be generated by a common mechanism as subscriptions, although maintainable in the sense that they can be submitted and deleted, are not mandated to be created by a maintenance agency and have no versioning mechanism. It is therefore the responsibility of the target registry to generate a unique Id for the Subscription, and for the application creating the subscription to store the registry URN that is returned from the registry in the subscription response message. 731 -|TimeDimension|dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId:dataStructureDef initionId(version).timeDimensionId|TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0).TIME_PERIOD 732 -|Transformation|transformationSchemeAgencyId transformationSchemeId(version) transformationId|ECB:TRANSFORMATION_SCHEME(1.0.0).TRANS_1 733 -|//TransformationScheme//|transformationSchemeAgencyId transformationSchemeId(version)|ECB: TRANSFORMATION_SCHEME(1.0.0) 734 -|**Classname**|**Ending URN pattern**|**Example** 735 -|Transition|((( 702 +)))|(% style="width:737px" %)This cannot be generated by a common mechanism as subscriptions, although maintainable in the sense that they can be submitted and deleted, are not mandated to be created by a maintenance agency and have no versioning mechanism. It is therefore the responsibility of the target registry to generate a unique Id for the Subscription, and for the application creating the subscription to store the registry URN that is returned from the registry in the subscription response message. 703 +|(% style="width:297px" %)TimeDimension|(% style="width:647px" %)dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId:dataStructureDef initionId(version).timeDimensionId|(% style="width:737px" %)TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0).TIME_PERIOD 704 +|(% style="width:297px" %)Transformation|(% style="width:647px" %)transformationSchemeAgencyId transformationSchemeId(version) transformationId|(% style="width:737px" %)ECB:TRANSFORMATION_SCHEME(1.0.0).TRANS_1 705 +|(% style="width:297px" %)//TransformationScheme//|(% style="width:647px" %)transformationSchemeAgencyId transformationSchemeId(version)|(% style="width:737px" %)ECB: TRANSFORMATION_SCHEME(1.0.0) 706 +|(% style="width:297px" %)**Classname**|(% style="width:647px" %)**Ending URN pattern**|(% style="width:737px" %)**Example** 707 +|(% style="width:297px" %)Transition|(% style="width:647px" %)((( 736 736 processAgencyId:processId(version).processStepId. 737 - 738 738 transitionId 739 -)))|BIS:PROCESS1(1.0.0).STEP1.TRANSITION1 740 -|UserDefinedOperator|userDefinedOperatorSchemeAgencyId userDefinedOperatorSchemeId(version) usserDefinedOperatorId|ECB:OS_CALC(1.2.0).OS267 741 -|//UserDefinedOperatorScheme//|userDefinedOperatorSchemeAgencyId userDefinedOperatorSchemeId(version)|ECB:OS_CALC(1.2.0) 742 -|//ValueList//|valuelistAgencyId:valuelistId(version)|SDMX:VLIST(1.0.0) 743 -|VtlCodelistMapping|vtlMappingSchemeAgencyId vtlMappingSchemeId(version) vtlCodelistMappingId|ECB:CLIST_MP(2.0.0).ABZ 744 -|VtlConceptMapping|vtlMappingSchemeAgencyId vtlMappingSchemeId(version) vtlConceptMappingId|ECB:CLIST_MP(1.0.0).XYA 745 -|VtlDataflowMapping|vtlMappingSchemeAgencyId vtlMappingSchemeId(version) vtlDataflowMappingId|ECB:CLIST_MP(1.0.0).MOQ 746 -|//VtlMappingScheme//|vtlMappingSchemeAgencyId VtlMappingSchemeId(version)|ECB:CLIST_MP(2.0.0) 710 +)))|(% style="width:737px" %)BIS:PROCESS1(1.0.0).STEP1.TRANSITION1 711 +|(% style="width:297px" %)UserDefinedOperator|(% style="width:647px" %)userDefinedOperatorSchemeAgencyId userDefinedOperatorSchemeId(version) usserDefinedOperatorId|(% style="width:737px" %)ECB:OS_CALC(1.2.0).OS267 712 +|(% style="width:297px" %)//UserDefinedOperatorScheme//|(% style="width:647px" %)userDefinedOperatorSchemeAgencyId userDefinedOperatorSchemeId(version)|(% style="width:737px" %)ECB:OS_CALC(1.2.0) 713 +|(% style="width:297px" %)//ValueList//|(% style="width:647px" %)valuelistAgencyId:valuelistId(version)|(% style="width:737px" %)SDMX:VLIST(1.0.0) 714 +|(% style="width:297px" %)VtlCodelistMapping|(% style="width:647px" %)vtlMappingSchemeAgencyId vtlMappingSchemeId(version) vtlCodelistMappingId|(% style="width:737px" %)ECB:CLIST_MP(2.0.0).ABZ 715 +|(% style="width:297px" %)VtlConceptMapping|(% style="width:647px" %)vtlMappingSchemeAgencyId vtlMappingSchemeId(version) vtlConceptMappingId|(% style="width:737px" %)ECB:CLIST_MP(1.0.0).XYA 716 +|(% style="width:297px" %)VtlDataflowMapping|(% style="width:647px" %)vtlMappingSchemeAgencyId vtlMappingSchemeId(version) vtlDataflowMappingId|(% style="width:737px" %)ECB:CLIST_MP(1.0.0).MOQ 717 +|(% style="width:297px" %)//VtlMappingScheme//|(% style="width:647px" %)vtlMappingSchemeAgencyId VtlMappingSchemeId(version)|(% style="width:737px" %)ECB:CLIST_MP(2.0.0) 747 747 748 - 5**Table 3: Table of identification components for SDMX Identifiable Artefacts**719 +**Table 3: Table of identification components for SDMX Identifiable Artefacts** 749 749 750 -= {{id name="_Toc90810"/}}7 Implementation Notes =721 += 7 Implementation Notes = 751 751 752 -== ={{id name="_Toc90811"/}}7.1 Structural Definition Metadata ===723 +== 7.1 Structural Definition Metadata == 753 753 754 -=== =={{id name="_Toc90812"/}}7.1.1 Introduction =====725 +=== 7.1.1 Introduction === 755 755 756 756 The SDMX Registry must have the ability to support agencies in their role of defining and disseminating structural metadata artefacts. These artefacts include data structure definitions, code lists, concepts etc. and are fully defined in the SDMX-IM. An authenticated agency may submit valid structural metadata definitions which must be stored in the registry. Note that the term “structural metadata” refers as a general term to all structural components (Data Structure Definitions, Metadata Structure Definitions, Code Lists, Concept Schemes, etc.) 757 757 ... ... @@ -767,46 +767,40 @@ 767 767 768 768 The following table lists the Maintainable Artefacts. 769 769 770 -|(% colspan="2" %)**Maintainable Artefacts**|**Content** 771 -|**Abstract Class**|**Concrete Class**| 772 -|Item Scheme|Codelist|Code 773 -| |Concept Scheme|Concept 774 -| |Category Scheme|Category 775 -| |Organisation Unit Scheme|Organisation Unit 776 -| |Agency Scheme|Agency 777 -| |Data Provider Scheme|Data Provider 778 -| |Metadata Provider Scheme|Metadata Provider 779 -| |Data Consumer Scheme|Data Consumer 780 -| |Reporting Taxonomy|Reporting Category 781 -| |Transformation Scheme|Transformation 782 -| |Custom Type Scheme|Custom Type 783 -| |Name Personalisation Scheme|Name Personalisation 784 -| |Vtl Mapping Scheme|Vtl Codelist Mapping Vtl Concept Mapping 785 -| |Ruleset Scheme|Ruleset 786 -| |User Defined Operator Scheme|User Defined Operator 787 -|Enumerated List|ValueList|Value Item 788 -|Structure|Data Structure Definition|((( 741 +(% style="width:825.835px" %) 742 +|(% colspan="2" style="width:455px" %)**Maintainable Artefacts**|(% style="width:367px" %)**Content** 743 +|(% style="width:160px" %)**Abstract Class**|(% style="width:295px" %)**Concrete Class**|(% style="width:367px" %) 744 +|(% style="width:160px" %)Item Scheme|(% style="width:295px" %)Codelist|(% style="width:367px" %)Code 745 +|(% style="width:160px" %) |(% style="width:295px" %)Concept Scheme|(% style="width:367px" %)Concept 746 +|(% style="width:160px" %) |(% style="width:295px" %)Category Scheme|(% style="width:367px" %)Category 747 +|(% style="width:160px" %) |(% style="width:295px" %)Organisation Unit Scheme|(% style="width:367px" %)Organisation Unit 748 +|(% style="width:160px" %) |(% style="width:295px" %)Agency Scheme|(% style="width:367px" %)Agency 749 +|(% style="width:160px" %) |(% style="width:295px" %)Data Provider Scheme|(% style="width:367px" %)Data Provider 750 +|(% style="width:160px" %) |(% style="width:295px" %)Metadata Provider Scheme|(% style="width:367px" %)Metadata Provider 751 +|(% style="width:160px" %) |(% style="width:295px" %)Data Consumer Scheme|(% style="width:367px" %)Data Consumer 752 +|(% style="width:160px" %) |(% style="width:295px" %)Reporting Taxonomy|(% style="width:367px" %)Reporting Category 753 +|(% style="width:160px" %) |(% style="width:295px" %)Transformation Scheme|(% style="width:367px" %)Transformation 754 +|(% style="width:160px" %) |(% style="width:295px" %)Custom Type Scheme|(% style="width:367px" %)Custom Type 755 +|(% style="width:160px" %) |(% style="width:295px" %)Name Personalisation Scheme|(% style="width:367px" %)Name Personalisation 756 +|(% style="width:160px" %) |(% style="width:295px" %)Vtl Mapping Scheme|(% style="width:367px" %)Vtl Codelist Mapping Vtl Concept Mapping 757 +|(% style="width:160px" %) |(% style="width:295px" %)Ruleset Scheme|(% style="width:367px" %)Ruleset 758 +|(% style="width:160px" %) |(% style="width:295px" %)User Defined Operator Scheme|(% style="width:367px" %)User Defined Operator 759 +|(% style="width:160px" %)Enumerated List|(% style="width:295px" %)ValueList|(% style="width:367px" %)Value Item 760 +|(% style="width:160px" %)Structure|(% style="width:295px" %)Data Structure Definition|(% style="width:367px" %)((( 789 789 Dimension Descriptor 790 - 791 791 Group Dimension Descriptor 792 - 793 793 Dimension 794 - 795 795 Time Dimension 796 - 797 797 Attribute Descriptor 798 - 799 799 Data Attribute 800 - 801 801 Measure Descriptor 802 - 803 803 Measure 804 804 ))) 805 -| |Metadata Structure Definition|Metadata Attribute Descriptor Metadata Attribute 806 -|Structure Usage|Dataflow| 807 -| |Metadataflow| 808 -|None|Process|Process Step 809 -|None|Structure Map|((( 770 +|(% style="width:160px" %) |(% style="width:295px" %)Metadata Structure Definition|(% style="width:367px" %)Metadata Attribute Descriptor Metadata Attribute 771 +|(% style="width:160px" %)Structure Usage|(% style="width:295px" %)Dataflow|(% style="width:367px" %) 772 +|(% style="width:160px" %) |(% style="width:295px" %)Metadataflow|(% style="width:367px" %) 773 +|(% style="width:160px" %)None|(% style="width:295px" %)Process|(% style="width:367px" %)Process Step 774 +|(% style="width:160px" %)None|(% style="width:295px" %)Structure Map|(% style="width:367px" %)((( 810 810 Component Map 811 811 812 812 Epoch Map ... ... @@ -813,44 +813,44 @@ 813 813 814 814 Date Pattern Map 815 815 ))) 816 -|None|Representation Map|Representation Mapping 817 -|Item Scheme Map|Organisation Scheme Map|Item Map 818 -| |Concept Scheme Map|Item Map 819 -| |Category Scheme Map|Item Map 820 -| |Reporting Taxonomy Map|Item Map 821 -|None|Provision Agreement| 822 -|None|Metadata Provision Agreement| 823 -|None|Hierarchy|Hierarchical Code 824 -|None|Hierarchy Association| 825 -|None|Categorisation| 826 -|Constraint|Data Constraint|DataKeySet 827 -| | |CubeRegion 828 -|Constraint|Metadata Constraint|MetadataTargetRegion 781 +|(% style="width:160px" %)None|(% style="width:295px" %)Representation Map|(% style="width:367px" %)Representation Mapping 782 +|(% style="width:160px" %)Item Scheme Map|(% style="width:295px" %)Organisation Scheme Map|(% style="width:367px" %)Item Map 783 +|(% style="width:160px" %) |(% style="width:295px" %)Concept Scheme Map|(% style="width:367px" %)Item Map 784 +|(% style="width:160px" %) |(% style="width:295px" %)Category Scheme Map|(% style="width:367px" %)Item Map 785 +|(% style="width:160px" %) |(% style="width:295px" %)Reporting Taxonomy Map|(% style="width:367px" %)Item Map 786 +|(% style="width:160px" %)None|(% style="width:295px" %)Provision Agreement|(% style="width:367px" %) 787 +|(% style="width:160px" %)None|(% style="width:295px" %)Metadata Provision Agreement|(% style="width:367px" %) 788 +|(% style="width:160px" %)None|(% style="width:295px" %)Hierarchy|(% style="width:367px" %)Hierarchical Code 789 +|(% style="width:160px" %)None|(% style="width:295px" %)Hierarchy Association|(% style="width:367px" %) 790 +|(% style="width:160px" %)None|(% style="width:295px" %)Categorisation|(% style="width:367px" %) 791 +|(% style="width:160px" %)Constraint|(% style="width:295px" %)Data Constraint|(% style="width:367px" %)DataKeySet 792 +|(% style="width:160px" %) |(% style="width:295px" %) |(% style="width:367px" %)CubeRegion 793 +|(% style="width:160px" %)Constraint|(% style="width:295px" %)Metadata Constraint|(% style="width:367px" %)MetadataTargetRegion 829 829 830 830 **Table 4: Table of Maintainable Artefacts for Structural Definition Metadata** 831 831 832 -=== =={{id name="_Toc90813"/}}7.1.2 Item Scheme, Structure =====797 +=== 7.1.2 Item Scheme, Structure === 833 833 834 834 The artefacts included in the structural definitions are: 835 835 836 836 * All types of Item Scheme (Codelist, Concept Scheme, Category Scheme, Organisation Scheme, Agency Scheme, Data Provider Scheme, Metadata Provider Scheme, Data Consumer Scheme, Organisation Unit Scheme, Transformation Scheme, Name Personalisation Scheme, Custom Type Scheme, Vtl Mapping Scheme, Ruleset Scheme, User Defined Operator Scheme) 837 -* All types of Enumerated List (ValueList) ^^[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink"%)^^3^^>>path:#sdfootnote3sym||name="sdfootnote3anc"]](%%)^^802 +* All types of Enumerated List (ValueList){{footnote}}Note that Codelist is also an EnumeratedList.{{/footnote}} 838 838 * All types of Structure (Data Structure Definition, Metadata Structure Definition) 839 839 * All types of Structure Usage (Dataflow, Metadataflow) 840 840 841 -=== =={{id name="_Toc90814"/}}7.1.3 Structure Usage =====806 +=== 7.1.3 Structure Usage === 842 842 843 - **7.1.3.1 Structure Usage: Basic Concepts**808 +==== 7.1.3.1 Structure Usage: Basic Concepts ==== 844 844 845 845 The Structure Usage defines, in its concrete classes of Dataflow and Metadataflow, which flows of data and metadata use which specific Structure, and importantly for the support of data and metadata discovery, the Structure Usage can be linked to one or more Category in one or more Category Scheme using the Categorisation mechanism. This gives the ability for an application to discover data and metadata by “drilling down” the Category Schemes. 846 846 847 - **7.1.3.2 Structure Usage Schematic**812 +==== 7.1.3.2 Structure Usage Schematic ==== 848 848 849 849 [[image:SDMX 3.1 Section 5_en_9b750e13.jpg||height="246" width="438"]] 850 850 851 851 **Figure 9: Schematic of Linking the Data and Metadata Flows to Categories and Structure Definitions** 852 852 853 - **7.1.3.3 Structure Usage Model**818 +==== 7.1.3.3 Structure Usage Model ==== 854 854 855 855 [[image:SDMX 3.1 Section 5_en_1c94cbe.jpg||height="548" width="578"]] 856 856 ... ... @@ -858,19 +858,17 @@ 858 858 859 859 In addition to the maintenance of the Dataflow and the Metadataflow, the following links must be maintained in the registry: 860 860 861 -1. 862 -1*. Dataflow to Data Structure Definition 863 -1*. Metadataflow to Metadata Structure Definition 826 +* Dataflow to Data Structure Definition 827 +* Metadataflow to Metadata Structure Definition 864 864 865 865 The following links may be created by means of a Categorisation 866 866 867 -1. 868 -1*. Categorisation to Dataflow and Category 869 -1*. Categorisation to Metadataflow and Category 831 +* Categorisation to Dataflow and Category 832 +* Categorisation to Metadataflow and Category 870 870 871 -== ={{id name="_Toc90815"/}}7.2 Data and Metadata Provisioning ===834 +== 7.2 Data and Metadata Provisioning == 872 872 873 -=== =={{id name="_Toc90816"/}}7.2.1 Provisioning Agreement: Basic concepts =====836 +=== 7.2.1 Provisioning Agreement: Basic concepts === 874 874 875 875 Data/Metadata provisioning defines a framework in which the provision of different types of statistical data and metadata by various data/metadata providers can be specified and controlled. This framework is the basis on which the existence of data can be made known to the SDMX-enabled community and hence the basis on which data can subsequently be discovered. Such a framework can be used to regulate the data content to facilitate the building of intelligent applications. It can also be used to facilitate the processing implied by service level agreements, or other provisioning agreements in those scenarios that are based on legal directives. Additionally, quality and timeliness metadata can be supported by this framework which makes it practical to implement information supply chain monitoring. 876 876 ... ... @@ -878,7 +878,7 @@ 878 878 879 879 Although the Provision Agreement directly supports the data-sharing “pull” model, it is also useful in “push” exchanges (bilateral and gateway scenarios), or in a dissemination environment. It should be noted, too, that in any exchange scenario, the registry functions as a repository of structural metadata. 880 880 881 -=== =={{id name="_Toc90817"/}}7.2.2 Provisioning Agreement Model – pull use case =====844 +=== 7.2.2 Provisioning Agreement Model – pull use case === 882 882 883 883 An organisation which publishes statistical data or reference metadata and wishes to make it available to an SDMX enabled community is called a Data Provider. In terms of the SDMX Information Model, the Data Provider is maintained in a Data Provider Scheme. 884 884 ... ... @@ -900,9 +900,9 @@ 900 900 901 901 A Provision Agreement is structural metadata. Each Provision Agreement must reference a Data Provider or Metadata Provider and a Dataflow or Metadataflow Definition. The Data/Metadata Provider and the Dataflow/Metadataflow must exist already in order to set up a Metadata Provision or Provision Agreement. 902 902 903 -== ={{id name="_Toc90818"/}}7.3 Data and Metadata Constraints ===866 +== 7.3 Data and Metadata Constraints == 904 904 905 -=== =={{id name="_Toc90819"/}}7.3.1 Data and Metadata Constraints: Basic Concepts =====868 +=== 7.3.1 Data and Metadata Constraints: Basic Concepts === 906 906 907 907 Constraints are, effectively, lists of the valid or actual content of data and metadata. Constraints can be used to specify a subset of the theoretical content of data set or metadata set which can be derived from the specification of the DSD or MSD. A Constraint can comprise a list of keys or a list of content (usually code values) of a specific component such as a dimension or attribute. 908 908 ... ... @@ -916,13 +916,13 @@ 916 916 917 917 In addition, DataAvailabilityConstraints can be extremely useful in a data visualisation system, such as dissemination of statistics on a website. In such a system a Cube Region can be used to specify the Dimension codes that actually exist in a data source (these can be used to build relevant selection tables). 918 918 919 -=== =={{id name="_Toc90820"/}}7.3.2 Data and Metadata Constraints: Schematic =====882 +=== 7.3.2 Data and Metadata Constraints: Schematic === 920 920 921 921 [[image:SDMX 3.1 Section 5_en_28d0cadc.jpg||height="326" width="580"]] 922 922 923 923 **Figure 14: Schematic of the Constraint and the Artefacts that can be constrained** 924 924 925 -=== =={{id name="_Toc90821"/}}7.3.3 Data and Metadata Constraints: Model =====888 +=== 7.3.3 Data and Metadata Constraints: Model === 926 926 927 927 [[image:SDMX 3.1 Section 5_en_a3184f6a.jpg||height="298" width="579"]] 928 928 ... ... @@ -938,9 +938,9 @@ 938 938 939 939 The content of the Constraint can be found in the SDMX Information Model document. 940 940 941 -== ={{id name="_Toc90822"/}}7.4 Data Registration ===904 +== 7.4 Data Registration == 942 942 943 -=== =={{id name="_Toc90823"/}}7.4.1 Basic Concepts =====906 +=== 7.4.1 Basic Concepts === 944 944 945 945 A Data Provider has published a new dataset conforming to an existing Dataflow (and hence Data Structure Definition). This is implemented as either a web-accessible SDMXML file, or in a database which has a web-services interface capable of responding to an SDMX RESTful query with an SDMX-ML data stream. 946 946 ... ... @@ -950,15 +950,15 @@ 950 950 951 951 SDMX-RR supports dataset registration via the Registration Request, which can be created by the Data Provider (giving the Data Provider maximum control). The registry responds to the registration request with a registration response which indicates if the registration was successful. In the event of an error, the error messages are returned as a registry exception within the response. 952 952 953 -=== =={{id name="_Toc90824"/}}7.4.2 The Registration Request =====916 +=== 7.4.2 The Registration Request === 954 954 955 - **7.4.2.1 Registration Request Schematic**918 +==== 7.4.2.1 Registration Request Schematic ==== 956 956 957 957 [[image:SDMX 3.1 Section 5_en_293a2ea6.jpg||height="337" width="554"]] 958 958 959 959 **Figure 16: Schematic of the Objects Concerned with Registration** 960 960 961 - **7.4.2.2 Registration Request Model**924 +==== 7.4.2.2 Registration Request Model ==== 962 962 963 963 The following UML diagram shows the composition of the registration request. Each request is made up of one or more Registrations, one per dataset to be registered. The Registration can optionally have information, which has been extracted from the Registration: 964 964 ... ... @@ -970,13 +970,11 @@ 970 970 971 971 The Registration has an action attribute which takes one of the following values: 972 972 973 -: 974 - 975 975 ((( 976 -|**Action Attribute Value**|**Behaviour** 977 -|Append|Add this Registration to the registry 978 -|Replace|Replace the existing Registration with identified by the id in the Registration of the SubmitRegistrationRequest 979 -|Delete|Delete the existing Registration identified by the id in the Registration of the SubmitRegistrationRequest 937 +|(% style="width:224px" %)**Action Attribute Value**|(% style="width:1457px" %)**Behaviour** 938 +|(% style="width:224px" %)Append|(% style="width:1457px" %)Add this Registration to the registry 939 +|(% style="width:224px" %)Replace|(% style="width:1457px" %)Replace the existing Registration with identified by the id in the Registration of the SubmitRegistrationRequest 940 +|(% style="width:224px" %)Delete|(% style="width:1457px" %)Delete the existing Registration identified by the id in the Registration of the SubmitRegistrationRequest 980 980 ))) 981 981 982 982 [[image:SDMX 3.1 Section 5_en_90b3c64a.jpg||height="434" width="579"]] ... ... @@ -995,30 +995,24 @@ 995 995 996 996 https:~/~/github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest/blob/master/doc/availability.md 997 997 998 -: 999 - 1000 1000 ((( 1001 -|**Indexing Required**|**Registration Process Activity** 1002 -|indexTimeSeries|Extract all the series keys and create a KeySet(s) Constraint. 1003 -|indexDataSet|Extract all the codes and other content of the Key value of the Series Key in a Data Set and create one or more Cube Regions containing Member Selections of Dimension Components of the Constraints model in the SDMX-IM, and the associated Selection Value. 1004 -|indexReportingPeriod|((( 960 +(% style="width:918.835px" %) 961 +|**Indexing Required**|(% style="width:745px" %)**Registration Process Activity** 962 +|indexTimeSeries|(% style="width:745px" %)Extract all the series keys and create a KeySet(s) Constraint. 963 +|indexDataSet|(% style="width:745px" %)Extract all the codes and other content of the Key value of the Series Key in a Data Set and create one or more Cube Regions containing Member Selections of Dimension Components of the Constraints model in the SDMX-IM, and the associated Selection Value. 964 +|indexReportingPeriod|(% style="width:745px" %)((( 1005 1005 This applies only to a registered __dataset__. 1006 - 1007 1007 Extract the Reporting Begin and Reporting End from the Header of the Message containing the data set, and create a Reference Period constraint. 1008 1008 ))) 1009 -|indexAttributes|((( 968 +|indexAttributes|(% style="width:745px" %)((( 1010 1010 **Data Set** 1011 - 1012 1012 Extract the content of the Attribute Values in a Data Set and create one or more Cube Regions containing Member Selections of Data Attribute Components of the Constraints model in the SDMXIM, and the associated Selection Value 1013 1013 1014 1014 **Metadata Set** 1015 - 1016 -Indicate the presence of a Reported Attribute by creating one or more Cube Regions containing Member Selections of Metadata Attribute 1017 - 1018 -Components of the Constraints model in the 973 +Indicate the presence of a Reported Attribute by creating one or more Cube Regions containing Member Selections of Metadata Attribute Components of the Constraints model in the 1019 1019 ))) 1020 -|**Indexing Required**|**Registration Process Activity** 1021 -| |SDMX-IM. Note that the content is not stored in the Selection Value. 975 +|**Indexing Required**|(% style="width:745px" %)**Registration Process Activity** 976 +| |(% style="width:745px" %)SDMX-IM. Note that the content is not stored in the Selection Value. 1022 1022 ))) 1023 1023 1024 1024 Constraints that specify the contents of a //QueryDatasource// are submitted to the Registry via the structure submission service (i.e., the RESTful API). ... ... @@ -1025,7 +1025,7 @@ 1025 1025 1026 1026 The Registration must reference the ProvisionAgreement to which it relates. 1027 1027 1028 -=== =={{id name="_Toc90825"/}}7.4.3 Registration Response =====983 +=== 7.4.3 Registration Response === 1029 1029 1030 1030 After a registration request has been submitted to the registry, a response is returned to the submitter indicating success or failure. Given that a registration request can hold many Registrations, then there must be a registration status for each Registration. The SubmitRegistration class has a status field, which is either set to “Success”, “Warning” or “Failure”. 1031 1031 ... ... @@ -1037,7 +1037,7 @@ 1037 1037 1038 1038 **Figure 18: Logical class diagram showing the registration response** 1039 1039 1040 -== ={{id name="_Toc90826"/}}7.5 Subscription and Notification Service ===995 +== 7.5 Subscription and Notification Service == 1041 1041 1042 1042 The contents of the SDMX Registry/Repository will change regularly: new code lists and key families will be published and new datasets and metadata-sets will be registered. To obviate the need for users to repeatedly query the registry to see when new information is available, a mechanism is provided to allow users to be notified when these events happen. 1043 1043 ... ... @@ -1045,13 +1045,13 @@ 1045 1045 1046 1046 When a registry/repository artefact is modified, any subscriptions which are observing the object are activated, and either an email or HTTP POST is instigated to report details of the changes to the user specified in the subscription. This is called a “notification”. 1047 1047 1048 -=== =={{id name="_Toc90827"/}}7.5.1 Subscription Logical Class Diagram =====1003 +=== 7.5.1 Subscription Logical Class Diagram === 1049 1049 1050 1050 [[image:SDMX 3.1 Section 5_en_1433df5d.jpg||height="680" width="587"]] 1051 1051 1052 1052 **Figure 19: Logical Class Diagram of the Subscription** 1053 1053 1054 -=== =={{id name="_Toc90828"/}}7.5.2 Subscription Information =====1009 +=== 7.5.2 Subscription Information === 1055 1055 1056 1056 Regardless of the type of registry/repository events being observed, a subscription always contains: 1057 1057 ... ... @@ -1060,18 +1060,16 @@ 1060 1060 1. A validity period which defines both when the subscription becomes active and expires. The subscriber may be sent a notification on expiration of the subscription. 1061 1061 1. A selector which specifies which type of events are of interest. The set of event types is: 1062 1062 1063 -: 1064 -:: 1065 - 1066 1066 ((( 1067 -|**Event Type**|**Comment** 1068 -|STRUCTURAL_REPOSITORY_EVENTS|Life-cycle changes to Maintainable Artefacts in the structural metadata repository. 1069 -|DATA_REGISTRATION_EVENTS|Whenever a published dataset is registered. This can be either a SDMXML data file or an SDMX conformant database. 1070 -|METADATA_REGISTRATION_EVENTS|Whenever a published metadataset is registered. This can be either a SDMXML reference metadata file or an SDMX conformant database. 1071 -|ALL_EVENTS|All events of the specified EventType 1019 +(% style="width:1061.83px" %) 1020 +|**Event Type**|(% style="width:660px" %)**Comment** 1021 +|STRUCTURAL_REPOSITORY_EVENTS|(% style="width:660px" %)Life-cycle changes to Maintainable Artefacts in the structural metadata repository. 1022 +|DATA_REGISTRATION_EVENTS|(% style="width:660px" %)Whenever a published dataset is registered. This can be either a SDMXML data file or an SDMX conformant database. 1023 +|METADATA_REGISTRATION_EVENTS|(% style="width:660px" %)Whenever a published metadataset is registered. This can be either a SDMXML reference metadata file or an SDMX conformant database. 1024 +|ALL_EVENTS|(% style="width:660px" %)All events of the specified EventType 1072 1072 ))) 1073 1073 1074 -=== =={{id name="_Toc90829"/}}7.5.3 Wildcard Facility =====1027 +=== 7.5.3 Wildcard Facility === 1075 1075 1076 1076 Subscription notification supports wildcarded identifier components URNs, which are identifiers which have some or all of their component parts replaced by the wildcard character `*`. Identifier components comprise: 1077 1077 ... ... @@ -1127,30 +1127,29 @@ 1127 1127 1128 1128 The complete SDMX versioning syntax can be found in the SDMX Standards Section 6 “Technical Notes”, paragraph “4.3 Versioning”. 1129 1129 1130 -=== =={{id name="_Toc90830"/}}7.5.4 Structural Repository Events =====1083 +=== 7.5.4 Structural Repository Events === 1131 1131 1132 1132 Whenever a maintainable artefact (data structure definition, concept scheme, codelist, metadata structure definition, category scheme, etc.) is added to, deleted from, or modified in the structural metadata repository, a structural metadata event is triggered. Subscriptions may be set up to monitor all such events, or focus on specific artefacts such as a Data Structure Definition. 1133 1133 1134 -=== =={{id name="_Toc90831"/}}7.5.5 Registration Events =====1087 +=== 7.5.5 Registration Events === 1135 1135 1136 1136 Whenever a dataset or metadata-set is registered a registration event is created. A subscription may be observing all data or metadata registrations, or it may focus on specific registrations as shown in the table below: 1137 1137 1138 -: 1139 - 1140 1140 ((( 1141 -|**Selector**|**Comment** 1142 -|DataProvider|Any datasets registered by the specified dataprovider will activate the notification. 1143 -|ProvisionAgreement|Any datasets for the agreement will activate the notification. 1144 -|Dataflow|Any datasets for the specified dataflow will activate the notification. 1145 -|DataStructureDefinition|Any datasets for those dataflows that are based on the specified Data Structure Definition will activate the notification 1146 -|Category|Any datasets registered for those dataflows, provision agreements that are categorised by the category. 1092 +(% style="width:1082.83px" %) 1093 +|(% style="width:230px" %)**Selector**|(% style="width:850px" %)**Comment** 1094 +|(% style="width:230px" %)DataProvider|(% style="width:850px" %)Any datasets registered by the specified dataprovider will activate the notification. 1095 +|(% style="width:230px" %)ProvisionAgreement|(% style="width:850px" %)Any datasets for the agreement will activate the notification. 1096 +|(% style="width:230px" %)Dataflow|(% style="width:850px" %)Any datasets for the specified dataflow will activate the notification. 1097 +|(% style="width:230px" %)DataStructureDefinition|(% style="width:850px" %)Any datasets for those dataflows that are based on the specified Data Structure Definition will activate the notification 1098 +|(% style="width:230px" %)Category|(% style="width:850px" %)Any datasets registered for those dataflows, provision agreements that are categorised by the category. 1147 1147 ))) 1148 1148 1149 1149 The event will also capture the semantic of the registration: deletion or replacement of an existing registration or a new registration. 1150 1150 1151 -== {{id name="_Toc90832"/}}7.6 Notification ==1103 +== 7.6 Notification == 1152 1152 1153 -=== ={{id name="_Toc90833"/}}7.6.1 Logical Class Diagram ====1105 +=== 7.6.1 Logical Class Diagram === 1154 1154 1155 1155 [[image:SDMX 3.1 Section 5_en_8bc1b889.jpg||height="379" width="579"]] 1156 1156 ... ... @@ -1167,18 +1167,14 @@ 1167 1167 1168 1168 Additionally, supplementary information may be contained in the notification as detailed below. 1169 1169 1170 -=== ={{id name="_Toc90834"/}}7.6.2 Structural Event Component ====1122 +=== 7.6.2 Structural Event Component === 1171 1171 1172 1172 The notification will contain the MaintainableArtefact that triggered the event in a form similar to the SDMX-ML structural message (using elements from that namespace). 1173 1173 1174 -=== ={{id name="_Toc90835"/}}7.6.3 Registration Event Component ====1126 +=== 7.6.3 Registration Event Component === 1175 1175 1176 1176 The notification will contain the Registration. 1177 1177 1178 - [[1>>path:#sdfootnote1anc||name="sdfootnote1sym"]] With semantic versioning, it is allowed to reference a range of artefacts, e.g., a DSD referencing a Codelist with version 1.2.3+ means all patch versions greater than 1.2.3. This means that deleting 1.2.4draft does not break integrity of the aforementioned DSD.1130 +---- 1179 1179 1180 -[[2>>path:#sdfootnote2anc||name="sdfootnote2sym"]] The identification of an Agency in the URN structure for the maintainable object is by means of the agencyId. The AgencyScheme is not identified as SDMX has a mechanism for identifying an Agency uniquely by its Id. Note that this Id may be hierarchical. For example, a sub-agency of IMF is referred like this: 1181 - 1182 -IMF.SubAgency1 1183 - 1184 -[[3>>path:#sdfootnote3anc||name="sdfootnote3sym"]] Note that Codelist is also an EnumeratedList. 1132 +{{putFootnotes/}}