Last modified by Artur on 2025/09/30 13:28

From version 22.3
edited by Helena
on 2025/06/08 16:48
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 21.8
edited by Helena
on 2025/06/08 16:32
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -163,8 +163,9 @@
163 163  
164 164  The registry interfaces are invoked in one of two ways:
165 165  
166 -1. The interface is the name of the root node of the SDMX-ML document
167 -1. The interface is invoked as a child element of the RegistryInterface message where the RegistryInterface is the root node of the SDMX-ML document.
166 +*
167 +*1. The interface is the name of the root node of the SDMX-ML document
168 +*1. The interface is invoked as a child element of the RegistryInterface message where the RegistryInterface is the root node of the SDMX-ML document.
168 168  
169 169  In addition to these interfaces the registry must support a mechanism for submitting and querying for structural metadata. This is detailed in sections 5.2.2 and 5.2.3.
170 170  
... ... @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@
180 180  
181 181  === 5.2.2 Structure Submission Service ===
182 182  
183 -The registry must support a mechanism for submitting structural metadata. This mechanism can be the SDMX REST interface for structural metadata (this is defined in the corresponding GitHub project, dedicated to the SDMX REST API: [[__https:~~/~~/github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest__>>https://https:github.comsdmx-twgsdmx-rest]]). In order for the architecture to be scalable, the finest-grained piece of structural metadata that can be processed by the SDMX-RR is a MaintainableArtefact, with the exception of Item Schemes, where changes at an Item level is also possible (see next section on the SDMX Information Model).
184 +The registry must support a mechanism for submitting structural metadata. This mechanism can be the SDMX REST interface for structural metadata (this is defined in the corresponding GitHub project, dedicated to the SDMX REST API: __[[https:~~/~~/github.com/sdmx>>url:https://github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest]][[->>url:https://github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest]][[twg/sdmx>>url:https://github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest]][[->>url:https://github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest]][[rest>>url:https://github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest]]__[[)>>url:https://github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest]]. In order for the architecture to be scalable, the finest-grained piece of structural metadata that can be processed by the SDMX-RR is a MaintainableArtefact, with the exception of Item Schemes, where changes at an Item level is also possible (see next section on the SDMX Information Model).
184 184  
185 185  === 5.2.3 Structure Query Service ===
186 186  
... ... @@ -270,7 +270,7 @@
270 270  1. If the action is set to “delete” (or a maintainable Artefact is DELETEd) then the Registry MUST verify that the object can be deleted. In order to qualify for deletion, the object must:
271 271  
272 272  a) Be a draft version.
273 -b) Not be explicitly^^[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^1^^>>path:#sdfootnote1sym||name="sdfootnote1anc"]](%%)^^ referenced from any other object in the Registry.
274 +b) Not be explicitly^^[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^1^^>>path:#sdfootnote1sym||name="sdfootnote1anc"]](%%)^^ referenced from any other object in the Registry.
274 274  
275 275  4) The semantic versioning rules in the SDMX documentation MUST be obeyed.
276 276  )))
... ... @@ -383,11 +383,14 @@
383 383  
384 384  The following organizations maintain an Agency Scheme.
385 385  
386 -* SDMX – contains Agencies AA, BB
387 -* AA – contains Agencies CC, DD
388 -* BB – contains Agencies CC, DD
389 -* DD – Contains Agency EE
387 +• SDMX – contains Agencies AA, BB
390 390  
389 +• AA – contains Agencies CC, DD
390 +
391 +• BB – contains Agencies CC, DD
392 +
393 +• DD – Contains Agency EE
394 +
391 391  Each agency is identified by its full hierarchy excluding SDMX.
392 392  
393 393  e.g., the id of EE as an agencyID is AA.DD.EE
... ... @@ -400,13 +400,13 @@
400 400  
401 401  Following the same principles, the Metadata Provider is the maintenance organisation for a special subset of Maintainable Artefacts, i.e., the Metadatasets; the latter are the containers of reference metadata combined with a target that those metadata refer to.
402 402  
403 -=== 6.2.2 Universal Resource Name (URN) ===
407 +===== {{id name="_Toc90807"/}}6.2.2 Universal Resource Name (URN) =====
404 404  
405 -==== 6.2.2.1 Introduction ====
409 +**6.2.2.1 Introduction**
406 406  
407 407  To provide interoperability between SDMX Registry/Repositories in a distributed network environment, it is important to have a scheme for uniquely identifying (and thus accessing) all first-class (Identifiable) SDMX-IM objects. Most of these unique identifiers are composite (containing maintenance agency, or parent object identifiers), and there is a need to be able to construct a unique reference as a single string. This is achieved by having a globally unique identifier called a universal resource name (URN) which is generated from the actual identification components in the SDMX-RR APIs. In other words, the URN for any Identifiable Artefact is constructed from its component identifiers (agency, id, version etc.).
408 408  
409 -==== 6.2.2.2 URN Structure //__Case Rules for URN__// ====
413 +**6.2.2.2 URN Structure //__Case Rules for URN__//**// //
410 410  
411 411  For the URN, all parts of the string are case sensitive. The generic structure of the URN is as follows:
412 412  
... ... @@ -418,7 +418,7 @@
418 418  
419 419  The Maintenance agency identifier is separated from the maintainable artefact identifier by a colon ‘:’. All other identifiers in the SDMX URN syntax are separated by a period ‘.’. The version information is encapsulated in parentheses ‘()’ and adheres to the SDMX versioning rules, as explained in SDMX Standards Section 6 “Technical Notes”, paragraph “4.3 Versioning.
420 420  
421 -==== 6.2.2.3 Explanation of the generic structure ====
425 +**6.2.2.3 Explanation of the generic structure**
422 422  
423 423  In the explanation below the actual object that is the target of the URN is called the **actual object**.
424 424  
... ... @@ -497,103 +497,103 @@
497 497  
498 498  The SDMX-RR MUST be able to resolve the unique identifier of an SDMX artefact and to produce an SDMX-ML rendering of that artefact if it is located in the Registry.
499 499  
500 -=== 6.2.3 Table of SDMX-IM Packages and Classes ===
504 +===== {{id name="_Toc90808"/}}6.2.3 Table of SDMX-IM Packages and Classes =====
501 501  
502 502  The table below lists all of the packages in the SDMX-IM together with the concrete classes that are in these packages and whose objects have a URN.
503 503  
504 -(% style="width:750.835px" %)
505 -|(% style="width:222px" %)**Package**|(% style="width:526px" %)**URN class name (model class name where this is different)**
506 -|(% style="width:222px" %)base|(% style="width:526px" %)Agency
507 -|(% style="width:222px" %) |(% style="width:526px" %)AgencyScheme
508 -|(% style="width:222px" %) |(% style="width:526px" %)DataConsumer
509 -|(% style="width:222px" %) |(% style="width:526px" %)DataConsumerScheme
510 -|(% style="width:222px" %) |(% style="width:526px" %)DataProvider
511 -|(% style="width:222px" %) |(% style="width:526px" %)DataProviderScheme
512 -|(% style="width:222px" %) |(% style="width:526px" %)MetadataProvider
513 -|(% style="width:222px" %) |(% style="width:526px" %)MetadataProviderScheme
514 -|(% style="width:222px" %) |(% style="width:526px" %)OrganisationUnit
515 -|(% style="width:222px" %) |(% style="width:526px" %)OrganisationUnitScheme
516 -|(% style="width:222px" %) |(% style="width:526px" %)
517 -|(% style="width:222px" %)datastructure|(% style="width:526px" %)AttributeDescriptor
518 -|(% style="width:222px" %) |(% style="width:526px" %)DataAttribute
519 -|(% style="width:222px" %) |(% style="width:526px" %)Dataflow
520 -|(% style="width:222px" %) |(% style="width:526px" %)DataStructure (DataStructureDefinition)
521 -|(% style="width:222px" %) |(% style="width:526px" %)Dimension
522 -|(% style="width:222px" %) |(% style="width:526px" %)DimensionDescriptor
523 -|(% style="width:222px" %) |(% style="width:526px" %)GroupDimensionDescriptor
524 -|(% style="width:222px" %) |(% style="width:526px" %)Measure
525 -|(% style="width:222px" %) |(% style="width:526px" %)MeasureDescriptor
526 -|(% style="width:222px" %) |(% style="width:526px" %)TimeDimension
527 -|(% style="width:222px" %) |(% style="width:526px" %)
528 -|(% style="width:222px" %)metadatastructure|(% style="width:526px" %)MetadataAttribute
529 -|(% style="width:222px" %) |(% style="width:526px" %)MetadataAttributeDescriptor
530 -|(% style="width:222px" %) |(% style="width:526px" %)(((
508 +|**Package**|**URN class name (model class name where this is different)**
509 +|base|Agency
510 +| |AgencyScheme
511 +| |DataConsumer
512 +| |DataConsumerScheme
513 +| |DataProvider
514 +| |DataProviderScheme
515 +| |MetadataProvider
516 +| |MetadataProviderScheme
517 +| |OrganisationUnit
518 +| |OrganisationUnitScheme
519 +| |
520 +|datastructure|AttributeDescriptor
521 +| |DataAttribute
522 +| |Dataflow
523 +| |DataStructure (DataStructureDefinition)
524 +| |Dimension
525 +| |DimensionDescriptor
526 +| |GroupDimensionDescriptor
527 +| |Measure
528 +| |MeasureDescriptor
529 +| |TimeDimension
530 +| |
531 +|metadatastructure|MetadataAttribute
532 +| |MetadataAttributeDescriptor
533 +| |(((
531 531  MetadataStructure
532 532  
533 533  (MetadataStructureDefinition)
534 534  )))
535 535  
539 +:
540 +
536 536  (((
537 -(% style="width:751.835px" %)
538 -|(% style="width:221px" %)**Package**|(% style="width:528px" %)**URN class name (model class name where this is different)**
539 -|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)Metadataflow
540 -|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)MetadataSet
541 -|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)
542 -|(% style="width:221px" %)process|(% style="width:528px" %)Process
543 -|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)ProcessStep
544 -|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)Transition
545 -|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)
546 -|(% style="width:221px" %)registry|(% style="width:528px" %)DataConstraint
547 -|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)MetadataConstraint
548 -|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)MetadataProvisionAgreement
549 -|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)ProvisionAgreement
550 -|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)Subscription
551 -|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)
552 -|(% style="width:221px" %)structuremapping|(% style="width:528px" %)CategorySchemeMap
553 -|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)ConceptSchemeMap
554 -|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)OrganisationSchemeMap
555 -|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)ReportingTaxonomyMap
556 -|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)RepresentationMap
557 -|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)StructureMap
558 -|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)
559 -|(% style="width:221px" %)codelist|(% style="width:528px" %)Code
560 -|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)Codelist
561 -|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)HierarchicalCode
562 -|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)Hierarchy
563 -|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)HierarchyAssociation
564 -|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)Level
565 -|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)ValueList
566 -|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)
567 -|(% style="width:221px" %)categoryscheme|(% style="width:528px" %)Categorisation
568 -|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)Category
569 -|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)CategoryScheme
570 -|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)ReportingCategory
571 -|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)ReportingTaxonomy
572 -|(% style="width:221px" %)**Package**|(% style="width:528px" %)**URN class name (model class name where this is different)**
573 -|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)
574 -|(% style="width:221px" %)conceptscheme|(% style="width:528px" %)Concept
575 -|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)ConceptScheme
576 -|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)
577 -|(% style="width:221px" %)transformation|(% style="width:528px" %)CustomType
578 -|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)CustomTypeScheme
579 -|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)NamePersonalisation
580 -|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)NamePersonalisationScheme
581 -|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)Ruleset
582 -|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)RulesetScheme
583 -|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)Transformation
584 -|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)TransformationScheme
585 -|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)UserDefinedOperator
586 -|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)UserDefinedOperatorScheme
587 -|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)VtlCodelistMapping
588 -|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)VtlConceptMapping
589 -|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)VtlDataflowMapping
590 -|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)VtlMappingScheme
591 -|(% style="width:221px" %) |(% style="width:528px" %)
542 +|**Package**|**URN class name (model class name where this is different)**
543 +| |Metadataflow
544 +| |MetadataSet
545 +| |
546 +|process|Process
547 +| |ProcessStep
548 +| |Transition
549 +| |
550 +|registry|DataConstraint
551 +| |MetadataConstraint
552 +| |MetadataProvisionAgreement
553 +| |ProvisionAgreement
554 +| |Subscription
555 +| |
556 +|structuremapping|CategorySchemeMap
557 +| |ConceptSchemeMap
558 +| |OrganisationSchemeMap
559 +| |ReportingTaxonomyMap
560 +| |RepresentationMap
561 +| |StructureMap
562 +| |
563 +|codelist|Code
564 +| |Codelist
565 +| |HierarchicalCode
566 +| |Hierarchy
567 +| |HierarchyAssociation
568 +| |Level
569 +| |ValueList
570 +| |
571 +|categoryscheme|Categorisation
572 +| |Category
573 +| |CategoryScheme
574 +| |ReportingCategory
575 +| |ReportingTaxonomy
576 +|**Package**|**URN class name (model class name where this is different)**
577 +| |
578 +|conceptscheme|Concept
579 +| |ConceptScheme
580 +| |
581 +|transformation|CustomType
582 +| |CustomTypeScheme
583 +| |NamePersonalisation
584 +| |NamePersonalisationScheme
585 +| |Ruleset
586 +| |RulesetScheme
587 +| |Transformation
588 +| |TransformationScheme
589 +| |UserDefinedOperator
590 +| |UserDefinedOperatorScheme
591 +| |VtlCodelistMapping
592 +| |VtlConceptMapping
593 +| |VtlDataflowMapping
594 +| |VtlMappingScheme
595 +| |
592 592  )))
593 593  
594 594  **Table 2: SDMX-IM Packages and Contained Classes**
595 595  
596 -=== 6.2.4 URN Identification components of SDMX objects ===
600 +===== {{id name="_Toc90809"/}}6.2.4 URN Identification components of SDMX objects =====
597 597  
598 598  The table below describes the identification components for all SDMX object types that have identification. Note the actual attributes are all ‘id’ but have been prefixed by their class name or multiple class names to show navigation, e.g., ‘conceptSchemeAgencyId’ is really the ‘Id’ attribute of the Agency class that is associated to the ConceptScheme.
599 599  
... ... @@ -601,56 +601,67 @@
601 601  
602 602  urn:sdmx.org.sdmx.infomodel.{package}.{classname}=
603 603  
604 -(% style="width:1272.83px" %)
605 -|(% style="width:290px" %)**Classname**|(% style="width:649px" %)**Ending URN pattern**|(% style="width:332px" %)**Example**
606 -|(% style="width:290px" %)Agency^^[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^2^^>>path:#sdfootnote2sym||name="sdfootnote2anc"]](%%)^^|(% style="width:649px" %)agencySchemeAgencyId:**AGENCIES**(**1.0**).agencyId|(% style="width:332px" %)ECB:**AGENCIES**(**1.0**).AA
607 -|(% style="width:290px" %)//AgencyScheme//|(% style="width:649px" %)agencySchemeAgencyId:**AGENCIES**(**1.0**)|(% style="width:332px" %)ECB:**AGENCIES**(**1.0**)
608 -|(% style="width:290px" %)//Categorisation//|(% style="width:649px" %)categorisationAgencyId:categorisationId(version)|(% style="width:332px" %)IMF:cat001(1.0.0)
609 -|(% style="width:290px" %)Category|(% style="width:649px" %)categorySchemeAgencyId:categorySchemeId(versi on).categoryId.categoryId.categoryId etc.|(% style="width:332px" %)IMF:SDDS(1.0.0):level_1_category.level_2_category …
610 -|(% style="width:290px" %)//CategoryScheme//|(% style="width:649px" %)categorySchemeAgencyId:categorySchemeId(versi on)|(% style="width:332px" %)IMF:SDDS(1.0.0)
608 +|**Classname**|**Ending URN pattern**|**Example**
609 +|Agency^^[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^2^^>>path:#sdfootnote2sym||name="sdfootnote2anc"]](%%)^^|agencySchemeAgencyId:**AGENCIES**(**1.0**).agencyId|ECB:**AGENCIES**(**1.0**).AA
610 +|//AgencyScheme//|agencySchemeAgencyId:**AGENCIES**(**1.0**)|ECB:**AGENCIES**(**1.0**)
611 +|//Categorisation//|categorisationAgencyId:categorisationId(version)|IMF:cat001(1.0.0)
612 +|Category|categorySchemeAgencyId:categorySchemeId(versi on).categoryId.categoryId.categoryId etc.|IMF:SDDS(1.0.0):level_1_category.level_2_category …
613 +|//CategoryScheme//|categorySchemeAgencyId:categorySchemeId(versi on)|IMF:SDDS(1.0.0)
611 611  
612 -|(% style="width:292px" %)**Classname**|(% style="width:647px" %)**Ending URN pattern**|(% style="width:742px" %)**Example**
613 -|(% style="width:292px" %)//CategorySchemeMap//|(% style="width:647px" %)(((
614 -catSchemeMapAgencyId:catSchemeMapId(version)
615 -)))|(% style="width:742px" %)SDMX:EUROSTAT_SUBJECT_DOMAIN(1.0.0)
616 -|(% style="width:292px" %)Code|(% style="width:647px" %)codeListAgencyId:codelistId(version).codeId|(% style="width:742px" %)SDMX:CL_FREQ(1.0.0).Q
617 -|(% style="width:292px" %)//Codelist//|(% style="width:647px" %)codeListAgencyId:codeListId(version)|(% style="width:742px" %)SDMX:CL_FREQ(1.0.0)
618 -|(% style="width:292px" %)ComponentMap|(% style="width:647px" %)structureMapAgencyId:structureMap(version).com ponentMapId|(% style="width:742px" %)SDMX:BOP_STRUCTURES(1.0.0).REF_AREA_TO_COUNT RY
619 -|(% style="width:292px" %)Concept|(% style="width:647px" %)conceptSchemeAgencyId:conceptSchemeId(versio n).conceptId|(% style="width:742px" %)SDMX:CROSS_DOMAIN_CONCEPTS(1.0.0).FREQ
620 -|(% style="width:292px" %)//ConceptScheme//|(% style="width:647px" %)conceptSchemeAgencyId:conceptSchemeId(versio n)|(% style="width:742px" %)SDMX:CROSS_DOMAIN_CONCEPTS(1.0.0)
621 -|(% style="width:292px" %)//ConceptSchemeMap//|(% style="width:647px" %)(((
622 -conceptSchemeMapAgencyId:conceptSchemeMap Id(version)
623 -)))|(% style="width:742px" %)SDMX:CONCEPT_MAP(1.0.0)
624 -|(% style="width:292px" %)CustomType|(% style="width:647px" %)customTypeSchemeAgencyId customTypeSchemeId(version) customTypeId|(% style="width:742px" %)ECB: CUSTOM_TYPE_SCHEME(1.0.0).CUSTOM_TYPE_1
625 -|(% style="width:292px" %)//CustomTypeScheme//|(% style="width:647px" %)customTypeSchemeAgencyId customTypeSchemeId(version)|(% style="width:742px" %)ECB:CUSTOM_TYPE_SCHEME(1.0.0)
626 -|(% style="width:292px" %)DataAttrribute|(% style="width:647px" %)dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId:dataStructureDef initionId(version).dataAttributeId|(% style="width:742px" %)TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0).OBS_STATUS
627 -|(% style="width:292px" %)//DataConstraint//|(% style="width:647px" %)dataConstraintAgencyId:dataConstraintId(version)|(% style="width:742px" %)TFFS:CREDITOR_DATA_CONTENT(1.0.0)
615 +|**Classname**|**Ending URN pattern**|**Example**
616 +|//CategorySchemeMap//|(((
617 +catSchemeMapAgencyId:catSchemeMapId(version
628 628  
629 -|(% style="width:294px" %)**Classname**|(% style="width:645px" %)**Ending URN pattern**|(% style="width:742px" %)**Example**
630 -|(% style="width:294px" %)DataConsumer|(% style="width:645px" %)dataConsumerSchemeAgencyId:**DATA_CONSUME RS**(**1.0**).dataConsumerId|(% style="width:742px" %)SDMX:**DATA_CONSUMERS**(**1.0**).CONSUMER_1
631 -|(% style="width:294px" %)//DataConsumerScheme//|(% style="width:645px" %)(((
632 -dataConsumerSchemeAgencyId:**DATA_CONSUME RS**(**1.0**)
633 -)))|(% style="width:742px" %)SDMX:**DATA_CONSUMERS**(**1.0**)
634 -|(% style="width:294px" %)//Dataflow//|(% style="width:645px" %)dataflowAgencyId:dataflowId(version)|(% style="width:742px" %)TFFS:CRED_EXT_DEBT(1.0.0)
635 -|(% style="width:294px" %)DataProvider|(% style="width:645px" %)(((
636 -dataProviderSchemeAgencyId:**DATA_PROVIDERS**(**1.0**).dataProviderId
637 -)))|(% style="width:742px" %)SDMX:**DATA_PROVIDERS**(**1.0**).PROVIDER_1
638 -|(% style="width:294px" %)//DataProviderScheme//|(% style="width:645px" %)(((
639 -dataProviderSchemeAgencyId:**DATA_PROVIDERS**(**1.0**)
640 -)))|(% style="width:742px" %)SDMX:**DATA_PROVIDERS**(**1.0**)
641 -|(% style="width:294px" %)//DataStructure//|(% style="width:645px" %)dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId:dataStructureDef initionId(version)|(% style="width:742px" %)TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0)
642 -|(% style="width:294px" %)Dimension|(% style="width:645px" %)dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId:dataStructureDef initionId(version).dimensionId|(% style="width:742px" %)TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0).FREQ
643 -|(% style="width:294px" %)(((
619 +)
620 +)))|SDMX:EUROSTAT_SUBJECT_DOMAIN(1.0.0)
621 +|Code|codeListAgencyId:codelistId(version).codeId|SDMX:CL_FREQ(1.0.0).Q
622 +|//Codelist//|codeListAgencyId:codeListId(version)|SDMX:CL_FREQ(1.0.0)
623 +|ComponentMap|structureMapAgencyId:structureMap(version).com ponentMapId|SDMX:BOP_STRUCTURES(1.0.0).REF_AREA_TO_COUNT RY
624 +|Concept|conceptSchemeAgencyId:conceptSchemeId(versio n).conceptId|SDMX:CROSS_DOMAIN_CONCEPTS(1.0.0).FREQ
625 +|//ConceptScheme//|conceptSchemeAgencyId:conceptSchemeId(versio n)|SDMX:CROSS_DOMAIN_CONCEPTS(1.0.0)
626 +|//ConceptSchemeMap//|(((
627 +conceptSchemeMapAgencyId:conceptSchemeMap
628 +
629 +Id(version)
630 +)))|SDMX:CONCEPT_MAP(1.0.0)
631 +|CustomType|customTypeSchemeAgencyId customTypeSchemeId(version) customTypeId|ECB: CUSTOM_TYPE_SCHEME(1.0.0).CUSTOM_TYPE_1
632 +|//CustomTypeScheme//|customTypeSchemeAgencyId customTypeSchemeId(version)|ECB:CUSTOM_TYPE_SCHEME(1.0.0)
633 +|DataAttrribute|dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId:dataStructureDef initionId(version).dataAttributeId|TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0).OBS_STATUS
634 +|//DataConstraint//|dataConstraintAgencyId:dataConstraintId(version)|TFFS:CREDITOR_DATA_CONTENT(1.0.0)
635 +
636 +|**Classname**|**Ending URN pattern**|**Example**
637 +|DataConsumer|dataConsumerSchemeAgencyId:**DATA_CONSUME RS**(**1.0**).dataConsumerId|SDMX:**DATA_CONSUMERS**(**1.0**).CONSUMER_1
638 +|//DataConsumerScheme//|(((
639 +dataConsumerSchemeAgencyId:**DATA_CONSUME**
640 +
641 +**RS**(**1.0**)
642 +)))|SDMX:**DATA_CONSUMERS**(**1.0**)
643 +|//Dataflow//|dataflowAgencyId:dataflowId(version)|TFFS:CRED_EXT_DEBT(1.0.0)
644 +|DataProvider|(((
645 +dataProviderSchemeAgencyId:**DATA_PROVIDERS**(
646 +
647 +**1.0**).dataProviderId
648 +)))|SDMX:**DATA_PROVIDERS**(**1.0**).PROVIDER_1
649 +|//DataProviderScheme//|(((
650 +dataProviderSchemeAgencyId:**DATA_PROVIDERS**(
651 +
652 +**1.0**)
653 +)))|SDMX:**DATA_PROVIDERS**(**1.0**)
654 +|//DataStructure//|dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId:dataStructureDef initionId(version)|TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0)
655 +|Dimension|dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId:dataStructureDef initionId(version).dimensionId|TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0).FREQ
656 +|(((
644 644  DimensionDescriptor
645 645  
646 646  MeasureDescriptor
647 647  
648 648  AttributeDescriptor
649 -)))|(% style="width:645px" %)(((
662 +)))|(((
650 650  dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId:dataStructureDef initionId(version).componentListId
651 651  
652 -where the componentListId is the name of the class (there is only one occurrence of each in the Data Structure Definition)
653 -)))|(% style="width:742px" %)(((
665 +where the componentListId is the name of the class (there is only one occurrence of each in the
666 +
667 +Data Structure Definition)
668 +)))|(((
654 654  TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0).DimensionDescriptor
655 655  
656 656  TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0).MeasureDescriptor
... ... @@ -657,81 +657,83 @@
657 657  
658 658  TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0).AttributeDescriptor
659 659  )))
660 -|(% style="width:294px" %)GroupDimensionDescriptor|(% style="width:645px" %)dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId:dataStructureDef initionId(version).groupDimensionDescriptorId|(% style="width:742px" %)TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0).SIBLING
661 -|(% style="width:294px" %)HierarchicalCode|(% style="width:645px" %)hierarchyAgencyId:hierarchyId(version).hierarchica lCode.hierarchicalCode|(% style="width:742px" %)UNESCO:H-C-GOV(1.0.0).GOV_CODE1.GOV_CODE1_1
675 +|GroupDimensionDescriptor|dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId:dataStructureDef initionId(version).groupDimensionDescriptorId|TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0).SIBLING
676 +|HierarchicalCode|hierarchyAgencyId:hierarchyId(version).hierarchica lCode.hierarchicalCode|UNESCO:H-C-GOV(1.0.0).GOV_CODE1.GOV_CODE1_1
662 662  
663 -|**Classname**|(% style="width:644px" %)**Ending URN pattern**|(% style="width:743px" %)**Example**
664 -|//Hierarchy//|(% style="width:644px" %)hierarchyAgencyId:hierarchyId(version)|(% style="width:743px" %)UNESCO:H-C-GOV(1.0.0)
665 -|//HierarchyAssociation//|(% style="width:644px" %)hierarchyAssociationAgencyId:hierarchyAssociatio nId(version)|(% style="width:743px" %)UNESCO:CL_EXP_SOURCE(1.0.0)
666 -|Level|(% style="width:644px" %)hierarchyAgencyId:hierarchyId(version).level|(% style="width:743px" %)UNESCO:H-C-GOV(1.0.0).LVL1
667 -|Measure|(% style="width:644px" %)dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId:dataStructureDef initionId(version).measureId|(% style="width:743px" %)TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0).OBS_VALUE
668 -|MetadataAttribute|(% style="width:644px" %)(((
678 +|**Classname**|**Ending URN pattern**|**Example**
679 +|//Hierarchy//|hierarchyAgencyId:hierarchyId(version)|UNESCO:H-C-GOV(1.0.0)
680 +|//HierarchyAssociation//|hierarchyAssociationAgencyId:hierarchyAssociatio nId(version)|UNESCO:CL_EXP_SOURCE(1.0.0)
681 +|Level|hierarchyAgencyId:hierarchyId(version).level|UNESCO:H-C-GOV(1.0.0).LVL1
682 +|Measure|dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId:dataStructureDef initionId(version).measureId|TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0).OBS_VALUE
683 +|MetadataAttribute|(((
669 669  msdAgencyId:msdId(version).metadataAttributeId.
670 670  
671 671  metadataAttributeId
672 -)))|(% style="width:743px" %)IMF:SDDS_MSD(1.0.0).COMPILATION.METHOD
673 -|MetadataAttributeDescriptor|(% style="width:644px" %)msdAgencyId:msdId(version).metadataAttributeDe scriptorId|(% style="width:743px" %)IMF:SDDS_MSD(1.0.0).MetadataAttributeDescriptor
674 -|//MetadataConstraint//|(% style="width:644px" %)metadataConstraintAgencyId:metadataConstraintI d(version)|(% style="width:743px" %)TFFS:CREDITOR_METADATA_CONTENT(1.0.0)
675 -|//Metadataflow//|(% style="width:644px" %)metadataflowAgencyId:metadataflowId(version)|(% style="width:743px" %)IMF:SDDS_MDF(1.0.0)
676 -|MetadataProvider|(% style="width:644px" %)metadataProviderSchemeAgencyId:**METADATA_P ROVIDERS**(**1.0**).metadataProviderId|(% style="width:743px" %)SDMX:**METADATA_PROVIDERS**(**1.0**).MD_PROVIDER_1
677 -|//MetadataProviderScheme//|(% style="width:644px" %)metadataProviderSchemeAgencyId:**METADATA_P ROVIDERS**(**1.0**)|(% style="width:743px" %)SDMX:**METADATA_PROVIDERS**(**1.0**)
678 -|//MetadataProvisionAgreement//|(% style="width:644px" %)metadataProvisionAgreementAgencyId:metadataP rovisionAgreementId(version)|(% style="width:743px" %)IMF:SDDS_MDF_AB(1.0.0)
679 -|//MetadataSet//|(% style="width:644px" %)metadataProviderId:metadataSetId(version)|(% style="width:743px" %)MD_PROVIDER:METADATASET(1.0.0)
680 -|//MetadataStructure//|(% style="width:644px" %)msdAgencyId:msdId(version)|(% style="width:743px" %)IMF:SDDS_MSD(1.0.0)
687 +)))|IMF:SDDS_MSD(1.0.0).COMPILATION.METHOD
688 +|MetadataAttributeDescriptor|msdAgencyId:msdId(version).metadataAttributeDe scriptorId|IMF:SDDS_MSD(1.0.0).MetadataAttributeDescriptor
689 +|//MetadataConstraint//|metadataConstraintAgencyId:metadataConstraintI d(version)|TFFS:CREDITOR_METADATA_CONTENT(1.0.0)
690 +|//Metadataflow//|metadataflowAgencyId:metadataflowId(version)|IMF:SDDS_MDF(1.0.0)
691 +|MetadataProvider|metadataProviderSchemeAgencyId:**METADATA_P ROVIDERS**(**1.0**).metadataProviderId|SDMX:**METADATA_PROVIDERS**(**1.0**).MD_PROVIDER_1
692 +|//MetadataProviderScheme//|metadataProviderSchemeAgencyId:**METADATA_P ROVIDERS**(**1.0**)|SDMX:**METADATA_PROVIDERS**(**1.0**)
693 +|//MetadataProvisionAgreement//|metadataProvisionAgreementAgencyId:metadataP rovisionAgreementId(version)|IMF:SDDS_MDF_AB(1.0.0)
694 +|//MetadataSet//|metadataProviderId:metadataSetId(version)|MD_PROVIDER:METADATASET(1.0.0)
695 +|//MetadataStructure//|msdAgencyId:msdId(version)|IMF:SDDS_MSD(1.0.0)
681 681  
682 -|(% style="width:296px" %)**Classname**|(% style="width:646px" %)**Ending URN pattern**|(% style="width:739px" %)**Example**
683 -|(% style="width:296px" %)NamePersonalisation|(% style="width:646px" %)namePersonalisationSchemeAgencyId namePersonalisationSchemeId(version) namePersonalisationId|(% style="width:739px" %)ECB:PSN_SCHEME(1.0.0).PSN1234
684 -|(% style="width:296px" %)//NamePersonalisationScheme//|(% style="width:646px" %)namePersonalisationSchemeAgencyId namePersonalisationSchemeId(version)|(% style="width:739px" %)ECB:PSN_SCHEME(1.0.0)
685 -|(% style="width:296px" %)//OrganisationSchemeMap//|(% style="width:646px" %)orgSchemeMapAgencyId:orgSchemeMapId(versio n)|(% style="width:739px" %)SDMX:AGENCIES_PROVIDERS(1.0.0)
686 -|(% style="width:296px" %)OrganisationUnit|(% style="width:646px" %)organisationUnitSchemeAgencyId:organisationUni tSchemeId(version).organisationUnitId|(% style="width:739px" %)ECB:ORGANISATIONS(1.0.0).1F
687 -|(% style="width:296px" %)//OrganisationUnitScheme//|(% style="width:646px" %)organisationUnitSchemeAgencyId:organisationUni tSchemeId(version)|(% style="width:739px" %)ECB:ORGANISATIONS(1.0.0)
688 -|(% style="width:296px" %)//Process//|(% style="width:646px" %)processAgencyId:processId{version)|(% style="width:739px" %)BIS:PROCESS1(1.0.0)
689 -|(% style="width:296px" %)ProcessStep|(% style="width:646px" %)(((
697 +|**Classname**|**Ending URN pattern**|**Example**
698 +|NamePersonalisation|namePersonalisationSchemeAgencyId namePersonalisationSchemeId(version) namePersonalisationId|ECB:PSN_SCHEME(1.0.0).PSN1234
699 +|//NamePersonalisationScheme//|namePersonalisationSchemeAgencyId namePersonalisationSchemeId(version)|ECB:PSN_SCHEME(1.0.0)
700 +|//OrganisationSchemeMap//|orgSchemeMapAgencyId:orgSchemeMapId(versio n)|SDMX:AGENCIES_PROVIDERS(1.0.0)
701 +|OrganisationUnit|organisationUnitSchemeAgencyId:organisationUni tSchemeId(version).organisationUnitId|ECB:ORGANISATIONS(1.0.0).1F
702 +|//OrganisationUnitScheme//|organisationUnitSchemeAgencyId:organisationUni tSchemeId(version)|ECB:ORGANISATIONS(1.0.0)
703 +|//Process//|processAgencyId:processId{version)|BIS:PROCESS1(1.0.0)
704 +|ProcessStep|(((
690 690  processAgencyId:processId(version).processStepId.
691 691  
692 692  processStepId
693 -)))|(% style="width:739px" %)BIS:PROCESS1(1.0.0).STEP1.STEP1_1
694 -|(% style="width:296px" %)//ProvisionAgreement//|(% style="width:646px" %)provisionAgreementAgencyId:provisionAgreement Id(version)|(% style="width:739px" %)TFFS:CRED_EXT_DEBT_AB(1.0.0)
695 -|(% style="width:296px" %)ReportingCategory|(% style="width:646px" %)(((
708 +)))|BIS:PROCESS1(1.0.0).STEP1.STEP1_1
709 +|//ProvisionAgreement//|provisionAgreementAgencyId:provisionAgreement Id(version)|TFFS:CRED_EXT_DEBT_AB(1.0.0)
710 +|ReportingCategory|(((
696 696  reportingTaxonomyAgencyId:
697 697  
698 698  reportingTaxonomyId(version).reportingCategoryI d.reportingCategoryId
699 -)))|(% style="width:739px" %)IMF:REP_1(1.0.0):LVL1_REP_CAT.LVL2_REP_CAT
700 -|(% style="width:296px" %)//ReportingTaxonomy//|(% style="width:646px" %)reportingTaxonomyAgencyId:reportingTaxonomyI d(version)|(% style="width:739px" %)IMF:REP_1(1.0.0)
701 -|(% style="width:296px" %)//ReportingTaxonomyMap//|(% style="width:646px" %)repTaxonomyAgencyId:repTaxonomyId(version)|(% style="width:739px" %)SDMX:RT_MAP(1.0.0)
714 +)))|IMF:REP_1(1.0.0):LVL1_REP_CAT.LVL2_REP_CAT
715 +|//ReportingTaxonomy//|reportingTaxonomyAgencyId:reportingTaxonomyI d(version)|IMF:REP_1(1.0.0)
716 +|//ReportingTaxonomyMap//|repTaxonomyAgencyId:repTaxonomyId(version)|SDMX:RT_MAP(1.0.0)
702 702  
703 -|(% style="width:297px" %)**Classname**|(% style="width:647px" %)**Ending URN pattern**|(% style="width:737px" %)**Example**
704 -|(% style="width:297px" %)//RepresentationMap//|(% style="width:647px" %)repMapAgencyId:repMapId(version)|(% style="width:737px" %)SDMX:REF_AREA_MAPPING(1.0.0)
705 -|(% style="width:297px" %)Ruleset|(% style="width:647px" %)rulesetSchemeAgencyId rulesetSchemeId(version) rulesetId|(% style="width:737px" %)ECB:RULESET_23(1.0.0).SET111
706 -|(% style="width:297px" %)//RulesetScheme//|(% style="width:647px" %)rulesetSchemeAgencyId rulesetSchemeId(version)|(% style="width:737px" %)ECB:RULESET_23(1.0.0)
707 -|(% style="width:297px" %)//StructureMap//|(% style="width:647px" %)structureMapAgencyId:structureMap(version)|(% style="width:737px" %)SDMX:BOP_STRUCTURES(1.0.0)
708 -|(% style="width:297px" %)Subscription|(% style="width:647px" %)(((
718 +|**Classname**|**Ending URN pattern**|**Example**
719 +|//RepresentationMap//|repMapAgencyId:repMapId(version)|SDMX:REF_AREA_MAPPING(1.0.0)
720 +|Ruleset|rulesetSchemeAgencyId rulesetSchemeId(version) rulesetId|ECB:RULESET_23(1.0.0).SET111
721 +|//RulesetScheme//|rulesetSchemeAgencyId rulesetSchemeId(version)|ECB:RULESET_23(1.0.0)
722 +|//StructureMap//|structureMapAgencyId:structureMap(version)|SDMX:BOP_STRUCTURES(1.0.0)
723 +|Subscription|(((
709 709  The Subscription is not itself an Identifiable Artefact and therefore it does not follow the rules for URN structure.
725 +
710 710  The name of the URN is registryURN There is no pre-determined format.
711 -)))|(% style="width:737px" %)This cannot be generated by a common mechanism as subscriptions, although maintainable in the sense that they can be submitted and deleted, are not mandated to be created by a maintenance agency and have no versioning mechanism. It is therefore the responsibility of the target registry to generate a unique Id for the Subscription, and for the application creating the subscription to store the registry URN that is returned from the registry in the subscription response message.
712 -|(% style="width:297px" %)TimeDimension|(% style="width:647px" %)dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId:dataStructureDef initionId(version).timeDimensionId|(% style="width:737px" %)TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0).TIME_PERIOD
713 -|(% style="width:297px" %)Transformation|(% style="width:647px" %)transformationSchemeAgencyId transformationSchemeId(version) transformationId|(% style="width:737px" %)ECB:TRANSFORMATION_SCHEME(1.0.0).TRANS_1
714 -|(% style="width:297px" %)//TransformationScheme//|(% style="width:647px" %)transformationSchemeAgencyId transformationSchemeId(version)|(% style="width:737px" %)ECB: TRANSFORMATION_SCHEME(1.0.0)
715 -|(% style="width:297px" %)**Classname**|(% style="width:647px" %)**Ending URN pattern**|(% style="width:737px" %)**Example**
716 -|(% style="width:297px" %)Transition|(% style="width:647px" %)(((
727 +)))|This cannot be generated by a common mechanism as subscriptions, although maintainable in the sense that they can be submitted and deleted, are not mandated to be created by a maintenance agency and have no versioning mechanism. It is therefore the responsibility of the target registry to generate a unique Id for the Subscription, and for the application creating the subscription to store the registry URN that is returned from the registry in the subscription response message.
728 +|TimeDimension|dataStructureDefinitionAgencyId:dataStructureDef initionId(version).timeDimensionId|TFFS:EXT_DEBT(1.0.0).TIME_PERIOD
729 +|Transformation|transformationSchemeAgencyId transformationSchemeId(version) transformationId|ECB:TRANSFORMATION_SCHEME(1.0.0).TRANS_1
730 +|//TransformationScheme//|transformationSchemeAgencyId transformationSchemeId(version)|ECB: TRANSFORMATION_SCHEME(1.0.0)
731 +|**Classname**|**Ending URN pattern**|**Example**
732 +|Transition|(((
717 717  processAgencyId:processId(version).processStepId.
734 +
718 718  transitionId
719 -)))|(% style="width:737px" %)BIS:PROCESS1(1.0.0).STEP1.TRANSITION1
720 -|(% style="width:297px" %)UserDefinedOperator|(% style="width:647px" %)userDefinedOperatorSchemeAgencyId userDefinedOperatorSchemeId(version) usserDefinedOperatorId|(% style="width:737px" %)ECB:OS_CALC(1.2.0).OS267
721 -|(% style="width:297px" %)//UserDefinedOperatorScheme//|(% style="width:647px" %)userDefinedOperatorSchemeAgencyId userDefinedOperatorSchemeId(version)|(% style="width:737px" %)ECB:OS_CALC(1.2.0)
722 -|(% style="width:297px" %)//ValueList//|(% style="width:647px" %)valuelistAgencyId:valuelistId(version)|(% style="width:737px" %)SDMX:VLIST(1.0.0)
723 -|(% style="width:297px" %)VtlCodelistMapping|(% style="width:647px" %)vtlMappingSchemeAgencyId vtlMappingSchemeId(version) vtlCodelistMappingId|(% style="width:737px" %)ECB:CLIST_MP(2.0.0).ABZ
724 -|(% style="width:297px" %)VtlConceptMapping|(% style="width:647px" %)vtlMappingSchemeAgencyId vtlMappingSchemeId(version) vtlConceptMappingId|(% style="width:737px" %)ECB:CLIST_MP(1.0.0).XYA
725 -|(% style="width:297px" %)VtlDataflowMapping|(% style="width:647px" %)vtlMappingSchemeAgencyId vtlMappingSchemeId(version) vtlDataflowMappingId|(% style="width:737px" %)ECB:CLIST_MP(1.0.0).MOQ
726 -|(% style="width:297px" %)//VtlMappingScheme//|(% style="width:647px" %)vtlMappingSchemeAgencyId VtlMappingSchemeId(version)|(% style="width:737px" %)ECB:CLIST_MP(2.0.0)
736 +)))|BIS:PROCESS1(1.0.0).STEP1.TRANSITION1
737 +|UserDefinedOperator|userDefinedOperatorSchemeAgencyId userDefinedOperatorSchemeId(version) usserDefinedOperatorId|ECB:OS_CALC(1.2.0).OS267
738 +|//UserDefinedOperatorScheme//|userDefinedOperatorSchemeAgencyId userDefinedOperatorSchemeId(version)|ECB:OS_CALC(1.2.0)
739 +|//ValueList//|valuelistAgencyId:valuelistId(version)|SDMX:VLIST(1.0.0)
740 +|VtlCodelistMapping|vtlMappingSchemeAgencyId vtlMappingSchemeId(version) vtlCodelistMappingId|ECB:CLIST_MP(2.0.0).ABZ
741 +|VtlConceptMapping|vtlMappingSchemeAgencyId vtlMappingSchemeId(version) vtlConceptMappingId|ECB:CLIST_MP(1.0.0).XYA
742 +|VtlDataflowMapping|vtlMappingSchemeAgencyId vtlMappingSchemeId(version) vtlDataflowMappingId|ECB:CLIST_MP(1.0.0).MOQ
743 +|//VtlMappingScheme//|vtlMappingSchemeAgencyId VtlMappingSchemeId(version)|ECB:CLIST_MP(2.0.0)
727 727  
728 728  5**Table 3: Table of identification components for SDMX Identifiable Artefacts**
729 729  
730 -= 7 Implementation Notes =
747 += {{id name="_Toc90810"/}}7 Implementation Notes =
731 731  
732 -== 7.1 Structural Definition Metadata ==
749 +=== {{id name="_Toc90811"/}}7.1 Structural Definition Metadata ===
733 733  
734 -=== 7.1.1 Introduction ===
751 +===== {{id name="_Toc90812"/}}7.1.1 Introduction =====
735 735  
736 736  The SDMX Registry must have the ability to support agencies in their role of defining and disseminating structural metadata artefacts. These artefacts include data structure definitions, code lists, concepts etc. and are fully defined in the SDMX-IM. An authenticated agency may submit valid structural metadata definitions which must be stored in the registry. Note that the term “structural metadata” refers as a general term to all structural components (Data Structure Definitions, Metadata Structure Definitions, Code Lists, Concept Schemes, etc.)
737 737  
... ... @@ -747,40 +747,46 @@
747 747  
748 748  The following table lists the Maintainable Artefacts.
749 749  
750 -(% style="width:825.835px" %)
751 -|(% colspan="2" style="width:455px" %)**Maintainable Artefacts**|(% style="width:367px" %)**Content**
752 -|(% style="width:160px" %)**Abstract Class**|(% style="width:295px" %)**Concrete Class**|(% style="width:367px" %)
753 -|(% style="width:160px" %)Item Scheme|(% style="width:295px" %)Codelist|(% style="width:367px" %)Code
754 -|(% style="width:160px" %) |(% style="width:295px" %)Concept Scheme|(% style="width:367px" %)Concept
755 -|(% style="width:160px" %) |(% style="width:295px" %)Category Scheme|(% style="width:367px" %)Category
756 -|(% style="width:160px" %) |(% style="width:295px" %)Organisation Unit Scheme|(% style="width:367px" %)Organisation Unit
757 -|(% style="width:160px" %) |(% style="width:295px" %)Agency Scheme|(% style="width:367px" %)Agency
758 -|(% style="width:160px" %) |(% style="width:295px" %)Data Provider Scheme|(% style="width:367px" %)Data Provider
759 -|(% style="width:160px" %) |(% style="width:295px" %)Metadata Provider Scheme|(% style="width:367px" %)Metadata Provider
760 -|(% style="width:160px" %) |(% style="width:295px" %)Data Consumer Scheme|(% style="width:367px" %)Data Consumer
761 -|(% style="width:160px" %) |(% style="width:295px" %)Reporting Taxonomy|(% style="width:367px" %)Reporting Category
762 -|(% style="width:160px" %) |(% style="width:295px" %)Transformation Scheme|(% style="width:367px" %)Transformation
763 -|(% style="width:160px" %) |(% style="width:295px" %)Custom Type Scheme|(% style="width:367px" %)Custom Type
764 -|(% style="width:160px" %) |(% style="width:295px" %)Name Personalisation Scheme|(% style="width:367px" %)Name Personalisation
765 -|(% style="width:160px" %) |(% style="width:295px" %)Vtl Mapping Scheme|(% style="width:367px" %)Vtl Codelist Mapping Vtl Concept Mapping
766 -|(% style="width:160px" %) |(% style="width:295px" %)Ruleset Scheme|(% style="width:367px" %)Ruleset
767 -|(% style="width:160px" %) |(% style="width:295px" %)User Defined Operator Scheme|(% style="width:367px" %)User Defined Operator
768 -|(% style="width:160px" %)Enumerated List|(% style="width:295px" %)ValueList|(% style="width:367px" %)Value Item
769 -|(% style="width:160px" %)Structure|(% style="width:295px" %)Data Structure Definition|(% style="width:367px" %)(((
767 +|(% colspan="2" %)**Maintainable Artefacts**|**Content**
768 +|**Abstract Class**|**Concrete Class**|
769 +|Item Scheme|Codelist|Code
770 +| |Concept Scheme|Concept
771 +| |Category Scheme|Category
772 +| |Organisation Unit Scheme|Organisation Unit
773 +| |Agency Scheme|Agency
774 +| |Data Provider Scheme|Data Provider
775 +| |Metadata Provider Scheme|Metadata Provider
776 +| |Data Consumer Scheme|Data Consumer
777 +| |Reporting Taxonomy|Reporting Category
778 +| |Transformation Scheme|Transformation
779 +| |Custom Type Scheme|Custom Type
780 +| |Name Personalisation Scheme|Name Personalisation
781 +| |Vtl Mapping Scheme|Vtl Codelist Mapping Vtl Concept Mapping
782 +| |Ruleset Scheme|Ruleset
783 +| |User Defined Operator Scheme|User Defined Operator
784 +|Enumerated List|ValueList|Value Item
785 +|Structure|Data Structure Definition|(((
770 770  Dimension Descriptor
787 +
771 771  Group Dimension Descriptor
789 +
772 772  Dimension
791 +
773 773  Time Dimension
793 +
774 774  Attribute Descriptor
795 +
775 775  Data Attribute
797 +
776 776  Measure Descriptor
799 +
777 777  Measure
778 778  )))
779 -|(% style="width:160px" %) |(% style="width:295px" %)Metadata Structure Definition|(% style="width:367px" %)Metadata Attribute Descriptor Metadata Attribute
780 -|(% style="width:160px" %)Structure Usage|(% style="width:295px" %)Dataflow|(% style="width:367px" %)
781 -|(% style="width:160px" %) |(% style="width:295px" %)Metadataflow|(% style="width:367px" %)
782 -|(% style="width:160px" %)None|(% style="width:295px" %)Process|(% style="width:367px" %)Process Step
783 -|(% style="width:160px" %)None|(% style="width:295px" %)Structure Map|(% style="width:367px" %)(((
802 +| |Metadata Structure Definition|Metadata Attribute Descriptor Metadata Attribute
803 +|Structure Usage|Dataflow|
804 +| |Metadataflow|
805 +|None|Process|Process Step
806 +|None|Structure Map|(((
784 784  Component Map
785 785  
786 786  Epoch Map
... ... @@ -787,44 +787,44 @@
787 787  
788 788  Date Pattern Map
789 789  )))
790 -|(% style="width:160px" %)None|(% style="width:295px" %)Representation Map|(% style="width:367px" %)Representation Mapping
791 -|(% style="width:160px" %)Item Scheme Map|(% style="width:295px" %)Organisation Scheme Map|(% style="width:367px" %)Item Map
792 -|(% style="width:160px" %) |(% style="width:295px" %)Concept Scheme Map|(% style="width:367px" %)Item Map
793 -|(% style="width:160px" %) |(% style="width:295px" %)Category Scheme Map|(% style="width:367px" %)Item Map
794 -|(% style="width:160px" %) |(% style="width:295px" %)Reporting Taxonomy Map|(% style="width:367px" %)Item Map
795 -|(% style="width:160px" %)None|(% style="width:295px" %)Provision Agreement|(% style="width:367px" %)
796 -|(% style="width:160px" %)None|(% style="width:295px" %)Metadata Provision Agreement|(% style="width:367px" %)
797 -|(% style="width:160px" %)None|(% style="width:295px" %)Hierarchy|(% style="width:367px" %)Hierarchical Code
798 -|(% style="width:160px" %)None|(% style="width:295px" %)Hierarchy Association|(% style="width:367px" %)
799 -|(% style="width:160px" %)None|(% style="width:295px" %)Categorisation|(% style="width:367px" %)
800 -|(% style="width:160px" %)Constraint|(% style="width:295px" %)Data Constraint|(% style="width:367px" %)DataKeySet
801 -|(% style="width:160px" %) |(% style="width:295px" %) |(% style="width:367px" %)CubeRegion
802 -|(% style="width:160px" %)Constraint|(% style="width:295px" %)Metadata Constraint|(% style="width:367px" %)MetadataTargetRegion
813 +|None|Representation Map|Representation Mapping
814 +|Item Scheme Map|Organisation Scheme Map|Item Map
815 +| |Concept Scheme Map|Item Map
816 +| |Category Scheme Map|Item Map
817 +| |Reporting Taxonomy Map|Item Map
818 +|None|Provision Agreement|
819 +|None|Metadata Provision Agreement|
820 +|None|Hierarchy|Hierarchical Code
821 +|None|Hierarchy Association|
822 +|None|Categorisation|
823 +|Constraint|Data Constraint|DataKeySet
824 +| | |CubeRegion
825 +|Constraint|Metadata Constraint|MetadataTargetRegion
803 803  
804 804  **Table 4: Table of Maintainable Artefacts for Structural Definition Metadata**
805 805  
806 -=== 7.1.2 Item Scheme, Structure ===
829 +===== {{id name="_Toc90813"/}}7.1.2 Item Scheme, Structure =====
807 807  
808 808  The artefacts included in the structural definitions are:
809 809  
810 810  * All types of Item Scheme (Codelist, Concept Scheme, Category Scheme, Organisation Scheme, Agency Scheme, Data Provider Scheme, Metadata Provider Scheme, Data Consumer Scheme, Organisation Unit Scheme, Transformation Scheme, Name Personalisation Scheme, Custom Type Scheme, Vtl Mapping Scheme, Ruleset Scheme, User Defined Operator Scheme)
811 -* All types of Enumerated List (ValueList)^^[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^3^^>>path:#sdfootnote3sym||name="sdfootnote3anc"]](%%)^^
834 +* All types of Enumerated List (ValueList)^^[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^3^^>>path:#sdfootnote3sym||name="sdfootnote3anc"]](%%)^^
812 812  * All types of Structure (Data Structure Definition, Metadata Structure Definition)
813 813  * All types of Structure Usage (Dataflow, Metadataflow)
814 814  
815 -=== 7.1.3 Structure Usage ===
838 +===== {{id name="_Toc90814"/}}7.1.3 Structure Usage =====
816 816  
817 -==== 7.1.3.1 Structure Usage: Basic Concepts ====
840 +**7.1.3.1 Structure Usage: Basic Concepts**
818 818  
819 819  The Structure Usage defines, in its concrete classes of Dataflow and Metadataflow, which flows of data and metadata use which specific Structure, and importantly for the support of data and metadata discovery, the Structure Usage can be linked to one or more Category in one or more Category Scheme using the Categorisation mechanism. This gives the ability for an application to discover data and metadata by “drilling down” the Category Schemes.
820 820  
821 -==== 7.1.3.2 Structure Usage Schematic ====
844 +**7.1.3.2 Structure Usage Schematic**
822 822  
823 823  [[image:SDMX 3.1 Section 5_en_9b750e13.jpg||height="246" width="438"]]
824 824  
825 825  **Figure 9: Schematic of Linking the Data and Metadata Flows to Categories and Structure Definitions**
826 826  
827 -==== 7.1.3.3 Structure Usage Model ====
850 +**7.1.3.3 Structure Usage Model**
828 828  
829 829  [[image:SDMX 3.1 Section 5_en_1c94cbe.jpg||height="548" width="578"]]
830 830  
... ... @@ -832,19 +832,19 @@
832 832  
833 833  In addition to the maintenance of the Dataflow and the Metadataflow, the following links must be maintained in the registry:
834 834  
835 -1.
858 +1.
836 836  1*. Dataflow to Data Structure Definition
837 837  1*. Metadataflow to Metadata Structure Definition
838 838  
839 839  The following links may be created by means of a Categorisation
840 840  
841 -1.
864 +1.
842 842  1*. Categorisation to Dataflow and Category
843 843  1*. Categorisation to Metadataflow and Category
844 844  
845 -== 7.2 Data and Metadata Provisioning ==
868 +=== {{id name="_Toc90815"/}}7.2 Data and Metadata Provisioning ===
846 846  
847 -=== 7.2.1 Provisioning Agreement: Basic concepts ===
870 +===== {{id name="_Toc90816"/}}7.2.1 Provisioning Agreement: Basic concepts =====
848 848  
849 849  Data/Metadata provisioning defines a framework in which the provision of different types of statistical data and metadata by various data/metadata providers can be specified and controlled. This framework is the basis on which the existence of data can be made known to the SDMX-enabled community and hence the basis on which data can subsequently be discovered. Such a framework can be used to regulate the data content to facilitate the building of intelligent applications. It can also be used to facilitate the processing implied by service level agreements, or other provisioning agreements in those scenarios that are based on legal directives. Additionally, quality and timeliness metadata can be supported by this framework which makes it practical to implement information supply chain monitoring.
850 850  
... ... @@ -852,7 +852,7 @@
852 852  
853 853  Although the Provision Agreement directly supports the data-sharing “pull” model, it is also useful in “push” exchanges (bilateral and gateway scenarios), or in a dissemination environment. It should be noted, too, that in any exchange scenario, the registry functions as a repository of structural metadata.
854 854  
855 -=== 7.2.2 Provisioning Agreement Model – pull use case ===
878 +===== {{id name="_Toc90817"/}}7.2.2 Provisioning Agreement Model – pull use case =====
856 856  
857 857  An organisation which publishes statistical data or reference metadata and wishes to make it available to an SDMX enabled community is called a Data Provider. In terms of the SDMX Information Model, the Data Provider is maintained in a Data Provider Scheme.
858 858  
... ... @@ -874,9 +874,9 @@
874 874  
875 875  A Provision Agreement is structural metadata. Each Provision Agreement must reference a Data Provider or Metadata Provider and a Dataflow or Metadataflow Definition. The Data/Metadata Provider and the Dataflow/Metadataflow must exist already in order to set up a Metadata Provision or Provision Agreement.
876 876  
877 -== 7.3 Data and Metadata Constraints ==
900 +=== {{id name="_Toc90818"/}}7.3 Data and Metadata Constraints ===
878 878  
879 -=== 7.3.1 Data and Metadata Constraints: Basic Concepts ===
902 +===== {{id name="_Toc90819"/}}7.3.1 Data and Metadata Constraints: Basic Concepts =====
880 880  
881 881  Constraints are, effectively, lists of the valid or actual content of data and metadata. Constraints can be used to specify a subset of the theoretical content of data set or metadata set which can be derived from the specification of the DSD or MSD. A Constraint can comprise a list of keys or a list of content (usually code values) of a specific component such as a dimension or attribute.
882 882  
... ... @@ -890,13 +890,13 @@
890 890  
891 891  In addition, DataAvailabilityConstraints can be extremely useful in a data visualisation system, such as dissemination of statistics on a website. In such a system a Cube Region can be used to specify the Dimension codes that actually exist in a data source (these can be used to build relevant selection tables).
892 892  
893 -=== 7.3.2 Data and Metadata Constraints: Schematic ===
916 +===== {{id name="_Toc90820"/}}7.3.2 Data and Metadata Constraints: Schematic =====
894 894  
895 895  [[image:SDMX 3.1 Section 5_en_28d0cadc.jpg||height="326" width="580"]]
896 896  
897 897  **Figure 14: Schematic of the Constraint and the Artefacts that can be constrained**
898 898  
899 -=== 7.3.3 Data and Metadata Constraints: Model ===
922 +===== {{id name="_Toc90821"/}}7.3.3 Data and Metadata Constraints: Model =====
900 900  
901 901  [[image:SDMX 3.1 Section 5_en_a3184f6a.jpg||height="298" width="579"]]
902 902  
... ... @@ -912,9 +912,9 @@
912 912  
913 913  The content of the Constraint can be found in the SDMX Information Model document.
914 914  
915 -== 7.4 Data Registration ==
938 +=== {{id name="_Toc90822"/}}7.4 Data Registration ===
916 916  
917 -=== 7.4.1 Basic Concepts ===
940 +===== {{id name="_Toc90823"/}}7.4.1 Basic Concepts =====
918 918  
919 919  A Data Provider has published a new dataset conforming to an existing Dataflow (and hence Data Structure Definition). This is implemented as either a web-accessible SDMXML file, or in a database which has a web-services interface capable of responding to an SDMX RESTful query with an SDMX-ML data stream.
920 920  
... ... @@ -924,15 +924,15 @@
924 924  
925 925  SDMX-RR supports dataset registration via the Registration Request, which can be created by the Data Provider (giving the Data Provider maximum control). The registry responds to the registration request with a registration response which indicates if the registration was successful. In the event of an error, the error messages are returned as a registry exception within the response.
926 926  
927 -=== 7.4.2 The Registration Request ===
950 +===== {{id name="_Toc90824"/}}7.4.2 The Registration Request =====
928 928  
929 -==== 7.4.2.1 Registration Request Schematic ====
952 +**7.4.2.1 Registration Request Schematic**
930 930  
931 931  [[image:SDMX 3.1 Section 5_en_293a2ea6.jpg||height="337" width="554"]]
932 932  
933 933  **Figure 16: Schematic of the Objects Concerned with Registration**
934 934  
935 -==== 7.4.2.2 Registration Request Model ====
958 +**7.4.2.2 Registration Request Model**
936 936  
937 937  The following UML diagram shows the composition of the registration request. Each request is made up of one or more Registrations, one per dataset to be registered. The Registration can optionally have information, which has been extracted from the Registration:
938 938  
... ... @@ -944,11 +944,13 @@
944 944  
945 945  The Registration has an action attribute which takes one of the following values:
946 946  
970 +:
971 +
947 947  (((
948 -|(% style="width:224px" %)**Action Attribute Value**|(% style="width:1457px" %)**Behaviour**
949 -|(% style="width:224px" %)Append|(% style="width:1457px" %)Add this Registration to the registry
950 -|(% style="width:224px" %)Replace|(% style="width:1457px" %)Replace the existing Registration with identified by the id in the Registration of the SubmitRegistrationRequest
951 -|(% style="width:224px" %)Delete|(% style="width:1457px" %)Delete the existing Registration identified by the id in the Registration of the SubmitRegistrationRequest
973 +|**Action Attribute Value**|**Behaviour**
974 +|Append|Add this Registration to the registry
975 +|Replace|Replace the existing Registration with identified by the id in the Registration of the SubmitRegistrationRequest
976 +|Delete|Delete the existing Registration identified by the id in the Registration of the SubmitRegistrationRequest
952 952  )))
953 953  
954 954  [[image:SDMX 3.1 Section 5_en_90b3c64a.jpg||height="434" width="579"]]
... ... @@ -967,24 +967,30 @@
967 967  
968 968  https:~/~/github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest/blob/master/doc/availability.md
969 969  
995 +:
996 +
970 970  (((
971 -(% style="width:918.835px" %)
972 -|**Indexing Required**|(% style="width:745px" %)**Registration Process Activity**
973 -|indexTimeSeries|(% style="width:745px" %)Extract all the series keys and create a KeySet(s) Constraint.
974 -|indexDataSet|(% style="width:745px" %)Extract all the codes and other content of the Key value of the Series Key in a Data Set and create one or more Cube Regions containing Member Selections of Dimension Components of the Constraints model in the SDMX-IM, and the associated Selection Value.
975 -|indexReportingPeriod|(% style="width:745px" %)(((
998 +|**Indexing Required**|**Registration Process Activity**
999 +|indexTimeSeries|Extract all the series keys and create a KeySet(s) Constraint.
1000 +|indexDataSet|Extract all the codes and other content of the Key value of the Series Key in a Data Set and create one or more Cube Regions containing Member Selections of Dimension Components of the Constraints model in the SDMX-IM, and the associated Selection Value.
1001 +|indexReportingPeriod|(((
976 976  This applies only to a registered __dataset__.
1003 +
977 977  Extract the Reporting Begin and Reporting End from the Header of the Message containing the data set, and create a Reference Period constraint.
978 978  )))
979 -|indexAttributes|(% style="width:745px" %)(((
1006 +|indexAttributes|(((
980 980  **Data Set**
1008 +
981 981  Extract the content of the Attribute Values in a Data Set and create one or more Cube Regions containing Member Selections of Data Attribute Components of the Constraints model in the SDMXIM, and the associated Selection Value
982 982  
983 983  **Metadata Set**
984 -Indicate the presence of a Reported Attribute by creating one or more Cube Regions containing Member Selections of Metadata Attribute Components of the Constraints model in the
1012 +
1013 +Indicate the presence of a Reported Attribute by creating one or more Cube Regions containing Member Selections of Metadata Attribute
1014 +
1015 +Components of the Constraints model in the
985 985  )))
986 -|**Indexing Required**|(% style="width:745px" %)**Registration Process Activity**
987 -| |(% style="width:745px" %)SDMX-IM. Note that the content is not stored in the Selection Value.
1017 +|**Indexing Required**|**Registration Process Activity**
1018 +| |SDMX-IM. Note that the content is not stored in the Selection Value.
988 988  )))
989 989  
990 990  Constraints that specify the contents of a //QueryDatasource// are submitted to the Registry via the structure submission service (i.e., the RESTful API).
... ... @@ -991,7 +991,7 @@
991 991  
992 992  The Registration must reference the ProvisionAgreement to which it relates.
993 993  
994 -=== 7.4.3 Registration Response ===
1025 +===== {{id name="_Toc90825"/}}7.4.3 Registration Response =====
995 995  
996 996  After a registration request has been submitted to the registry, a response is returned to the submitter indicating success or failure. Given that a registration request can hold many Registrations, then there must be a registration status for each Registration. The SubmitRegistration class has a status field, which is either set to “Success”, “Warning” or “Failure”.
997 997  
... ... @@ -1003,7 +1003,7 @@
1003 1003  
1004 1004  **Figure 18: Logical class diagram showing the registration response**
1005 1005  
1006 -== 7.5 Subscription and Notification Service ==
1037 +=== {{id name="_Toc90826"/}}7.5 Subscription and Notification Service ===
1007 1007  
1008 1008  The contents of the SDMX Registry/Repository will change regularly: new code lists and key families will be published and new datasets and metadata-sets will be registered. To obviate the need for users to repeatedly query the registry to see when new information is available, a mechanism is provided to allow users to be notified when these events happen.
1009 1009  
... ... @@ -1011,13 +1011,13 @@
1011 1011  
1012 1012  When a registry/repository artefact is modified, any subscriptions which are observing the object are activated, and either an email or HTTP POST is instigated to report details of the changes to the user specified in the subscription. This is called a “notification”.
1013 1013  
1014 -=== 7.5.1 Subscription Logical Class Diagram ===
1045 +===== {{id name="_Toc90827"/}}7.5.1 Subscription Logical Class Diagram =====
1015 1015  
1016 1016  [[image:SDMX 3.1 Section 5_en_1433df5d.jpg||height="680" width="587"]]
1017 1017  
1018 1018  **Figure 19: Logical Class Diagram of the Subscription**
1019 1019  
1020 -=== 7.5.2 Subscription Information ===
1051 +===== {{id name="_Toc90828"/}}7.5.2 Subscription Information =====
1021 1021  
1022 1022  Regardless of the type of registry/repository events being observed, a subscription always contains:
1023 1023  
... ... @@ -1026,16 +1026,18 @@
1026 1026  1. A validity period which defines both when the subscription becomes active and expires. The subscriber may be sent a notification on expiration of the subscription.
1027 1027  1. A selector which specifies which type of events are of interest. The set of event types is:
1028 1028  
1060 +:
1061 +::
1062 +
1029 1029  (((
1030 -(% style="width:1061.83px" %)
1031 -|**Event Type**|(% style="width:660px" %)**Comment**
1032 -|STRUCTURAL_REPOSITORY_EVENTS|(% style="width:660px" %)Life-cycle changes to Maintainable Artefacts in the structural metadata repository.
1033 -|DATA_REGISTRATION_EVENTS|(% style="width:660px" %)Whenever a published dataset is registered. This can be either a SDMXML data file or an SDMX conformant database.
1034 -|METADATA_REGISTRATION_EVENTS|(% style="width:660px" %)Whenever a published metadataset is registered. This can be either a SDMXML reference metadata file or an SDMX conformant database.
1035 -|ALL_EVENTS|(% style="width:660px" %)All events of the specified EventType
1064 +|**Event Type**|**Comment**
1065 +|STRUCTURAL_REPOSITORY_EVENTS|Life-cycle changes to Maintainable Artefacts in the structural metadata repository.
1066 +|DATA_REGISTRATION_EVENTS|Whenever a published dataset is registered. This can be either a SDMXML data file or an SDMX conformant database.
1067 +|METADATA_REGISTRATION_EVENTS|Whenever a published metadataset is registered. This can be either a SDMXML reference metadata file or an SDMX conformant database.
1068 +|ALL_EVENTS|All events of the specified EventType
1036 1036  )))
1037 1037  
1038 -=== 7.5.3 Wildcard Facility ===
1071 +===== {{id name="_Toc90829"/}}7.5.3 Wildcard Facility =====
1039 1039  
1040 1040  Subscription notification supports wildcarded identifier components URNs, which are identifiers which have some or all of their component parts replaced by the wildcard character `*`. Identifier components comprise:
1041 1041  
... ... @@ -1091,29 +1091,30 @@
1091 1091  
1092 1092  The complete SDMX versioning syntax can be found in the SDMX Standards Section 6 “Technical Notes”, paragraph “4.3 Versioning”.
1093 1093  
1094 -=== 7.5.4 Structural Repository Events ===
1127 +===== {{id name="_Toc90830"/}}7.5.4 Structural Repository Events =====
1095 1095  
1096 1096  Whenever a maintainable artefact (data structure definition, concept scheme, codelist, metadata structure definition, category scheme, etc.) is added to, deleted from, or modified in the structural metadata repository, a structural metadata event is triggered. Subscriptions may be set up to monitor all such events, or focus on specific artefacts such as a Data Structure Definition.
1097 1097  
1098 -=== 7.5.5 Registration Events ===
1131 +===== {{id name="_Toc90831"/}}7.5.5 Registration Events =====
1099 1099  
1100 1100  Whenever a dataset or metadata-set is registered a registration event is created. A subscription may be observing all data or metadata registrations, or it may focus on specific registrations as shown in the table below:
1101 1101  
1135 +:
1136 +
1102 1102  (((
1103 -(% style="width:1082.83px" %)
1104 -|(% style="width:230px" %)**Selector**|(% style="width:850px" %)**Comment**
1105 -|(% style="width:230px" %)DataProvider|(% style="width:850px" %)Any datasets registered by the specified dataprovider will activate the notification.
1106 -|(% style="width:230px" %)ProvisionAgreement|(% style="width:850px" %)Any datasets for the agreement will activate the notification.
1107 -|(% style="width:230px" %)Dataflow|(% style="width:850px" %)Any datasets for the specified dataflow will activate the notification.
1108 -|(% style="width:230px" %)DataStructureDefinition|(% style="width:850px" %)Any datasets for those dataflows that are based on the specified Data Structure Definition will activate the notification
1109 -|(% style="width:230px" %)Category|(% style="width:850px" %)Any datasets registered for those dataflows, provision agreements that are categorised by the category.
1138 +|**Selector**|**Comment**
1139 +|DataProvider|Any datasets registered by the specified dataprovider will activate the notification.
1140 +|ProvisionAgreement|Any datasets for the agreement will activate the notification.
1141 +|Dataflow|Any datasets for the specified dataflow will activate the notification.
1142 +|DataStructureDefinition|Any datasets for those dataflows that are based on the specified Data Structure Definition will activate the notification
1143 +|Category|Any datasets registered for those dataflows, provision agreements that are categorised by the category.
1110 1110  )))
1111 1111  
1112 1112  The event will also capture the semantic of the registration: deletion or replacement of an existing registration or a new registration.
1113 1113  
1114 -== 7.6 Notification ==
1148 +== {{id name="_Toc90832"/}}7.6 Notification ==
1115 1115  
1116 -=== 7.6.1 Logical Class Diagram ===
1150 +==== {{id name="_Toc90833"/}}7.6.1 Logical Class Diagram ====
1117 1117  
1118 1118  [[image:SDMX 3.1 Section 5_en_8bc1b889.jpg||height="379" width="579"]]
1119 1119  
... ... @@ -1130,11 +1130,11 @@
1130 1130  
1131 1131  Additionally, supplementary information may be contained in the notification as detailed below.
1132 1132  
1133 -=== 7.6.2 Structural Event Component ===
1167 +==== {{id name="_Toc90834"/}}7.6.2 Structural Event Component ====
1134 1134  
1135 1135  The notification will contain the MaintainableArtefact that triggered the event in a form similar to the SDMX-ML structural message (using elements from that namespace).
1136 1136  
1137 -=== 7.6.3 Registration Event Component ===
1171 +==== {{id name="_Toc90835"/}}7.6.3 Registration Event Component ====
1138 1138  
1139 1139  The notification will contain the Registration.
1140 1140