Changes for page 12 Validation and Transformation Language (VTL)
Last modified by Artur on 2025/09/10 11:19
Summary
-
Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -19,7 +19,6 @@ 19 19 This section does not explain the VTL language or any of the content published in the VTL guides. Rather, this is a description of how the VTL can be used in the SDMX context and applied to SDMX artefacts. 20 20 21 21 == 12.2 References to SDMX artefacts from VTL statements == 22 - 23 23 === 12.2.1 Introduction === 24 24 25 25 The VTL can manipulate SDMX artefacts (or objects) by referencing them through predefined conventional names (aliases). ... ... @@ -49,8 +49,10 @@ 49 49 50 50 The generic structure of the URN is the following: 51 51 52 -SDMXprefix.SDMX-IM-package-name.class-name=agency-id:maintainedobject-id (maintainedobject-version).*container-object-id.object-id51 +SDMXprefix.SDMX-IM-package-name.class-name=agency-id:maintainedobject-id 53 53 53 +(maintainedobject-version).*container-object-id.object-id 54 + 54 54 The **SDMXprefix** is "urn:sdmx:org", always the same for all SDMX artefacts. 55 55 56 56 The SDMX-IM-package-name** **is the concatenation of the string** **"sdmx.infomodel." with the package-name, which the artefact belongs to. For example, for referencing a Dataflow the SDMX-IM-package-name is "sdmx.infomodel.datastructure", because the class Dataflow belongs to the package "datastructure". ... ... @@ -71,19 +71,24 @@ 71 71 72 72 The maintainedobject-version is the version, according to the SDMX versioning rules, of the maintained object which the artefact belongs to (for example, possible versions might be 1.0, 2.3, 1.0.0, 2.1.0 or 3.1.2). 73 73 74 -The container-object-id does not apply to the classes that can be referenced in VTL Transformations, therefore is not present in their URN .75 +The container-object-id does not apply to the classes that can be referenced in VTL Transformations, therefore is not present in their URN 75 75 76 76 The object-id is the name of the non-maintainable artefact (when the artefact is maintainable its name is already specified as the maintainedobject-id, see above), in particular it has to be specified: 77 77 78 -* if the artefact is a Dimension, TimeDimension, Measure or DataAttribute (the object-id is the name of one of the artefacts above, which are data structure components) 79 +* if the artefact is a Dimension, TimeDimension, Measure or 80 + 81 +DataAttribute (the object-id is the name of one of the artefacts above, which are data structure components) 82 + 79 79 * if the artefact is a Concept (the object-id is the name of the Concept) 80 80 81 81 For example, by using the URN, the VTL Transformation that sums two SDMX Dataflows DF1 and DF2 and assigns the result to a third persistent Dataflow DFR, assuming that DF1, DF2 and DFR are the maintainedobject-id of the three Dataflows, that their version is 1.0.0 and their Agency is AG, would be written as{{footnote}}Since these references to SDMX objects include non-permitted characters as per the VTL ID notation, they need to be included between single quotes, according to the VTL rules for irregular names.{{/footnote}}: 82 82 83 ->(% style="font-size:16px" %) 'urn:sdmx:org.sdmx.infomodel.datastructure.Dataflow=AG:DFR(1.0.0)' <- 84 ->(% style="font-size:16px" %) 'urn:sdmx:org.sdmx.infomodel.datastructure.Dataflow=AG:DF1(1.0.0)' + 85 ->(% style="font-size:16px" %) 'urn:sdmx:org.sdmx.infomodel.datastructure.Dataflow=AG:DF2(1.0.0)' 87 +'urn:sdmx:org.sdmx.infomodel.datastructure.Dataflow=AG:DFR(1.0.0)' <- 86 86 89 +'urn:sdmx:org.sdmx.infomodel.datastructure.Dataflow=AG:DF1(1.0.0)' + 90 + 91 +'urn:sdmx:org.sdmx.infomodel.datastructure.Dataflow=AG:DF2(1.0.0)' 92 + 87 87 === 12.2.3 Abbreviation of the URN === 88 88 89 89 The complete formulation of the URN described above is exhaustive but verbose, even for very simple statements. In order to reduce the verbosity through a simplified identifier and make the work of transformation definers easier, proper abbreviations of the URN are possible. Using this approach, the referenced artefacts remain intelligible in the VTL code by a human reader. ... ... @@ -174,7 +174,6 @@ 174 174 In the body of the Rulesets, the Codes and in general all the Values can be written without any other specification, because the artefact, which the Values are referred (Codelist, Concept) to can be deduced from the Ruleset signature. 175 175 176 176 == 12.3 Mapping between SDMX and VTL artefacts == 177 - 178 178 === 12.3.1. When the mapping occurs === 179 179 180 180 The mapping methods between the VTL and SDMX object classes allow transforming a SDMX definition in a VTL one and vice-versa for the artefacts to be manipulated. It should be remembered that VTL programs (i.e. Transformation Schemes) are represented in SDMX through the TransformationScheme maintainable class which is composed of Transformations (nameable artefacts). Each Transformation assigns the outcome of the evaluation of a VTL expression to a result: the input operands of the expression and the result can be SDMX artefacts. Every time a SDMX object is referenced in a VTL Transformation as an input operand, there is the need to generate a VTL definition of the object, so that the VTL operations can take place. This can be made starting from the SDMX definition and applying a SDMX-VTL mapping method in the direction from SDMX to VTL. The possible mapping methods from SDMX to VTL are described in the following paragraphs and are conceived to allow the automatic deduction of the VTL definition of the object from the knowledge of the SDMX definition. ... ... @@ -534,7 +534,6 @@ 534 534 It remains up to the SDMX-VTL definer also the assurance of the consistency between a VTL Ruleset defined on Variables and the SDMX Components on which the Ruleset is applied. In fact, a VTL Ruleset is expressed by means of the values of the Variables (i.e. SDMX Concepts), i.e. assuming definite representations for them (e.g. ISOalpha-3 for country). If the Ruleset is applied to SDMX Components that have the same name of the Concept they refer to but different representations (e.g. ISO-alpha-2 for country), the Ruleset cannot work properly. 535 535 536 536 == 12.4 Mapping between SDMX and VTL Data Types == 537 - 538 538 === 12.4.1 VTL Data types === 539 539 540 540 According to the VTL User Guide the possible operations in VTL depend on the data types of the artefacts. For example, numbers can be multiplied but text strings cannot. In the VTL Transformations, the compliance between the operators and the data types of their operands is statically checked, i.e., violations result in compile-time errors. ... ... @@ -726,20 +726,27 @@ 726 726 |IdentifiableReference|Metadata type – not applicable 727 727 |DataSetReference|Metadata type – not applicable 728 728 729 - **Figure 14 – Mappings from SDMX data types to VTL Basic Scalar Types**733 +додол 730 730 735 +==== Figure 14 – Mappings from SDMX data types to VTL Basic Scalar Types ==== 736 + 731 731 When VTL takes in input SDMX artefacts, it is assumed that a type conversion according to the table above always happens. In case a different VTL basic scalar type is desired, it can be achieved in the VTL program taking in input the default VTL basic scalar type above and applying to it the VTL type conversion features (see the implicit and explicit type conversion and the "cast" operator in the VTL Reference Manual). 732 732 733 -=== 12.4.4 Mapping VTL basic scalar types to SDMX data types === 739 +1. 740 +11. 741 +111. Mapping VTL basic scalar types to SDMX data types 734 734 735 735 The following table describes the default conversion from the VTL basic scalar types to the SDMX data types . 736 736 737 737 |((( 738 738 VTL basic 747 + 739 739 scalar type 740 740 )))|((( 741 741 Default SDMX data type 751 + 742 742 (BasicComponentDataType 753 + 743 743 ) 744 744 )))|Default output format 745 745 |String|String|Like XML (xs:string) ... ... @@ -749,15 +749,17 @@ 749 749 |Time|StandardTimePeriod|<date>/<date> (as defined above) 750 750 |time_period|((( 751 751 ReportingTimePeriod 763 + 752 752 (StandardReportingPeriod) 753 753 )))|((( 754 754 YYYY-Pppp 767 + 755 755 (according to SDMX ) 756 756 ))) 757 757 |Duration|Duration|Like XML (xs:duration) PnYnMnDTnHnMnS 758 758 |Boolean|Boolean|Like XML (xs:boolean) with the values "true" or "false" 759 759 760 - **Figure 14 – Mappings from SDMX data types to VTL Basic Scalar Types**773 +==== Figure 14 – Mappings from SDMX data types to VTL Basic Scalar Types ==== 761 761 762 762 In case a different default conversion is desired, it can be achieved through the CustomTypeScheme and CustomType artefacts (see also the section 763 763 ... ... @@ -815,13 +815,17 @@ 815 815 816 816 The default conversion, either standard or customized, can be used to deduce automatically the representation of the components of the result of a VTL Transformation. In alternative, the representation of the resulting SDMX Dataflow can be given explicitly by providing its DataStructureDefinition. In other words, the representation specified in the DSD, if available, overrides any default conversion{{footnote}}The representation given in the DSD should obviously be compatible with the VTL data type.{{/footnote}}. 817 817 818 -=== 12.4.3 Null Values === 831 +1. 832 +11. 833 +111. Null Values 819 819 820 820 In the conversions from SDMX to VTL it is assumed by default that a missing value in SDMX becomes a NULL in VTL. After the conversion, the NULLs can be manipulated through the proper VTL operators. 821 821 822 822 On the other side, the VTL programs can produce in output NULL values for Measures and Attributes (Null values are not allowed in the Identifiers). In the conversion from VTL to SDMX, it is assumed that a NULL in VTL becomes a missing value in SDMX. In the conversion from VTL to SDMX, the default assumption can be overridden, separately for each VTL basic scalar type, by specifying which the value that represents the NULL in SDMX is. This can be specified in the attribute "nullValue" of the CustomType artefact (see also the section Transformations and Expressions of the SDMX information model). A CustomType belongs to a CustomTypeScheme, which can be referenced by one or more TransformationScheme (i.e. VTL programs). The overriding assumption is applied for all the SDMX Dataflows calculated in the TransformationScheme. 823 823 824 -=== 12.4.5 Format of the literals used in VTL Transformations === 839 +1. 840 +11. 841 +111. Format of the literals used in VTL Transformations 825 825 826 826 The VTL programs can contain literals, i.e. specific values of certain data types written directly in the VTL definitions or expressions. The VTL does not prescribe a specific format for the literals and leave the specific VTL systems and the definers of VTL Transformations free of using their preferred formats. 827 827 ... ... @@ -835,6 +835,7 @@ 835 835 836 836 In case a literal is operand of a VTL Cast operation, the format specified in the Cast overrides all the possible otherwise specified formats. 837 837 855 + 838 838 ---- 839 839 840 840 {{putFootnotes/}}